Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0432222 (SEM)
 47,337 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

An allergen challenge was performed in 10 asymptomatic patients with strictly seasonal allergic rhinitis. For comparison; seven nonallergic subjects were challenged with allergen, and seven allergic patients were challenged with diluent. Cell samples, obtained with use of a brush technique to recover cells from within the epithelium and nasal lavage to collect cells from the epithelial surface, and symptom scores were taken before challenge and at 2-hour intervals during 12 hours. The cell suspensions were cytocentrifuged onto object slides for light microscopy. Histamine was determined in the cell pellets. In brush samples from the allergic patients challenged with allergen, eosinophils, expressed as a percentage of the total granulocytes, increased from 4.3% +/- 2.7% (mean +/- SEM) to 10.3% +/- 3.8% (p < 0.05) 4 hours after challenge. This level was maintained for up to 12 hours. A similar increase was noted in the lavage specimens 2, 6, and 8 hours after the challenge. In the brush samples the proportion of eosinophils containing two or more cytoplasmic vacuoles, taken as a sign of activation, increased from 20% to 72% (p < 0.05) 8 hours after provocation. In brush samples from the allergic patients challenged with allergen, the numbers of metachromatic cells increased to a maximum of eightfold at 10 hours. In the lavage specimens, no metachromatic cells were observed before provocation, but they progressively increased in number 2 to 12 hours after provocation. Cell pellet histamine content decreased temporarily 2 to 4 hours after challenge (p < 0.05) in brush samples from allergen-challenged allergic patients. The local metachromatic cell density before challenge, as reflected in the brush specimens, correlated with nasal congestion, sneezing, and the degree of eosinophilia.
 ...
PMID:Mast cells and eosinophils in the allergic mucosal response to allergen challenge: changes in distribution and signs of activation in relation to symptoms. 128 Nov 77

Growth hormone-releasing hormone, GHRH(1-44), was administered intranasally to 16 healthy young adult male volunteers in a placebo-controlled study using a dose of 1,000 micrograms dissolved in two different solvent vehicles: water alone and water with the surface tension-lowering agent Tween 80 (0.12%). The growth hormone (GH)-releasing effects of intranasal GHRH as well as that of the vehicle were established and compared to the effects of 80 micrograms intravenous GHRH. Plasma GH response was assessed by frequent blood sampling over an 180-min period, using both peak response and area under the curve (AUC). The results show that the GH-release effects of intranasal GHRH are comparable whichever vehicle is used, and are similar, with the dose of 1,000 micrograms, to the response obtained following the administration of 80 micrograms intravenous GHRH. Peak GH responses to GHRH (means +/- SEM) were 25.6 +/- 4.2 ng/ml (1,000 micrograms GHRH with water), 32.9 +/- 9.1 ng/ml (1,000 micrograms with water plus Tween 80) and 36.3 +/- 7.8 ng/ml (80 micrograms i.v. administration) (not significant). There was no significant GH response to placebo. Mean peak GH responses occurred after approximately 30 min in all three active treatments (29.2 +/- 2.7, 33.9 +/- 3.2 and 30.9 +/- 3.9 min, respectively). The AUC values (ng.min.ml-1) were not statistically different: 1,914.4 +/- 386.7 (water), 2,176.2 +/- 599.9 (water plus Tween 80) and 2,419.2 +/- 506.9 (i.v.) (not significant). Intranasal GHRH administration was well tolerated in all subjects. Occasional local reactions consisted of a prickly sensation in the nostrils or sneezing irrespective of the vehicle used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A placebo-controlled trial of intranasal growth hormone-releasing hormone [GHRH(1-44)-NH2] administration in normal young adults. 211 56

Limited data support the use of first-generation antihistamines for treatment of the common cold. The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of clemastine fumarate, a first-generation antihistamine, for treatment of sneezing and rhinorrhea associated with naturally occurring common colds. Four hundred three subjects (202 clemastine fumarate recipients and 201 placebo recipients) who reported new onset (< 24 hours) of cold symptoms that included rhinorrhea or sneezing were studied. At baseline (day 1), the mean symptom-severity scores +/- SEM for the clemastine fumarate and placebo groups were not significantly different. The mean rhinorrhea-severity score +/- SEM was not different on day 2; however, on day 3, the mean rhinorrhea-severity score +/- SEM was 1.02 +/- 0.07 for the clemastine fumarate group and 1.39 +/- 0.07 for the placebo group (P < .001). This treatment effect persisted on day 4. A significant effect on sneezing was noted on days 2-4. Sedation occurred in 14% of the clemastine fumarate-treated subjects and 1.5% of the placebo-treated subjects (P < .0001).
 ...
PMID:Effectiveness of clemastine fumarate for treatment of rhinorrhea and sneezing associated with the common cold. 935 96