Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0423716 (Neuropathic pain)
 1,417 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Neuropathic pain is often a reason for an unfavourable response to morphine or other opioids in treating cancer pain. This type of pain is difficult to manage and may co-exist with nociceptive cancer pain. There is still a potential for opioid responsiveness, although the doses needed will be higher, and adjuvant drug therapies are best employed concurrently with opioid drugs. Adjuvant drugs used are the antidepressants, anticonvulsants, including benzodiazepines, corticosteroids and neurolepts. Less commonly, agents such as baclofen and clonidine, and sympatholytic drugs such as prazosin can be employed for sympathetically maintained neuropathic pain (discussed in Part 3). The type of agent selected will depend on the natural history of the disease process, as well as a description of the pain--the lancinating pains tending to respond better to anticonvulsants. Non invasive neurostimulatory approaches such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) may be useful in management, and a few patients may require an invasive procedure such as dorsal column stimulation.
 ...
PMID:Pain forum. Part 2. Neuropathic pain. 752 Feb 35

Important differences become evident in a comparison of cancer pain between children and adults. Management of pain in children is commonly multidisciplinary, is less dependent on invasive measures and relies more on systemic therapy. Children are not little adults: their immaturity, developing cognition and dependence all influence their experience and interpretation of pain. Much progress has been made in altering practices such as under-prescribing and underdosing that have adversely affected adequate control of pain in children. The challenge for paediatric health care providers in the mid 1990s is not only to be informed of current practices in pain and symptom control in paediatric palliative care, but also to remember to establish those practices in day to day management. Even though pain and its effects in children are now better understood, it is often still not managed optimally. Good management of pain in children depends on accurate assessment. In the past 10 years, assessment of pain in children has advanced considerably. However, assessment of pain in the preverbal child is still inadequate and in need of attention. Sedation, tolerance and involuntary movements may occur as side effects of opioids in children and may cause significant problems in management of the dying child. Psychostimulants can diminish sedation to some extent, but there is little information as yet on the value of these drugs in children. Tolerance to opioids may develop quickly, leading to poor control of pain and distress for the child. Strategies to improve management of tolerance include use of regional anaesthetic techniques such as the epidural/intrathecal route for opioid administration. Involuntary movements induced by opioids are uncommon but have the potential to cause significant distress. The mechanisms underlying these side effects of opioids need to be established. Strategies are needed for the effective treatment and prevention of these side effects. Neuropathic pain can be severe, distressing and difficult to treat. Experience of its treatment in terminally ill children is limited. Effective use of tricyclic antidepressants and systemically administered local anaesthetics is still to be determined. Regional anaesthetic techniques may be of great benefit when neuropathic pain cannot be controlled with systemic therapy. Procedural pain is more common than pain related to disease in the management of paediatric cancer. Further research is needed to identify the best approach to its management. We have found nitrous oxide to be of great benefit in management of procedural pain in children. Non-pharmacological methods of treatment of pain in children, such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation or acupuncture, may also be useful and should receive continuing evaluation. There are significant and current issues in paediatric palliative care besides management of pain. There are difficulties in the provision of home nursing care for children with cancer in the terminal phase of their illness, including lack of community nursing services at night and on weekends and lack of adequate home help for parents. Attitudes of staff involved in the care of the child and family and their commitment to working as a multidisciplinary team strongly influence the quality and success of care given. Pain control and palliative medicine are evaluable by measures of quality assurance or outcome, and adoption of such evaluations should improve standards of care. Euthanasia in children is even more difficult as an ethical dilemma than in adults. Optimum symptom control with current techniques should almost always obviate its consideration. We are opposed to euthanasia. Psychosocial and cultural issues all influence the family's experience of palliative care. Further research is necessary in all of these areas.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
 ...
PMID:Pain and symptom control in paediatric palliative care. 856 95

Cancer pain generally responds in a predictable way to analgesic drugs and drug therapy is the mainstay of treatment. A small proportion of patients, of the order of 20%, have pain that does not respond well to conventional analgesic management. Because opioid analgesics are the most important part of this pharmacological approach, a terminology has developed which centres around whether or not pain will respond to opioid analgesics. The terms opioid-responsive-pain and opioid-non-responsive pain, or opioid-resistant-pain, have been used to differentiate between patients whose pain falls into these two broad groups. This terminology is not satisfactory because it implies an all or none phenomenon, that is that pain either does or does not respond to opioid analgesics. Rarely is there such a clear distinction in practice. This is because the end point when titrating dose against pain with strong opioid analgesics is not simply pain relief or lack of relief: adverse effects may limit dose titration. It is preferable to describe patients with pain which is relatively less sensitive to opioids and/or patients where there is an inbalance between analgesia and unwanted effects as having "opioid-poorly-responsive pain". A pragmatic definition of opioid-poorly-responsive pain is pain that is inadequately relieved by opioid analgesics given in a dose that causes intolerable side effects despite routine measures to control them. Included in this definition is so called paradoxical pain which is not a distinct entity. Neuropathic pain is the most common form of opioid-poorly-responsive pain. The underlying pathophysiology remains unclear but abnormal metabolism of morphine is not the cause of a poor response to this drug. Patients with opioid-poorly-responsive-pain should be considered for treatment with the same opioid by an alternative (spinal) route or with an alternative opioid agonist administered by the same route (whether oral or parenteral), in conjunction with adjuvant analgesics such as tricyclic antidepressants. The most commonly used alternative oral opioids are phenazocine and methadone; transdermal fentanyl is an additional option.
 ...
PMID:Opioid responsiveness. 906 Oct 99

Until now, there have not been any parameters to monitor opioid therapy in cancer patients with pain. In this study, 325 consecutive advanced cancer patients were scheduled for a prospective longitudinal survey. After exclusions, 67 patients were surveyed. All included patients were advanced cancer patients with pain that required opioid therapy for more than 6 weeks before death. Opioid escalation, symptoms associated with opioid therapy, pain mechanism, and pain intensity were recorded. Indices were calculated to categorize the response to opioids. The opioid escalation index (OEI) was used to index the mean increase of the starting opioid dosage, expressed as a percentage or in mg. The length of the period of stable dose (MLD) and the effective analgesic score (EAS), that is, the analgesic consumption/pain relief ratio calculated at fixed intervals, were also used. Patients with a mean visual analogue scale score (VAS) of less than 4 and regular OEI and EAS were considered responsive; patients with a mean VAS less than 4 but with an OEI more than 5 or increases of more than 100% of EAS when compared to that calculated the week before were considered mildly responsive; and patients with a mean VAS more than 4 were considered unresponsive. Advanced age, female gender, and previous chemotherapy were all factors reducing OEI. Head and neck cancer was associated with a higher OEI. Regarding the influence of the opioid-related symptoms, an increased OEI was associated with the presence of confusion. Moreover the presence of confusion was associated with neuropathic pain. Neuropathic pain taken alone, however, did not influence this score. Gender-specific cancer, such as breast cancer, influenced the gender differences reported for MLD (significantly longer than that reported for males and other primary tumor). Good responsiveness was observed in 28 patients, partial responsiveness in 33 patients, unresponsiveness in six patients. Psychological factors were associated with poor pain relief, probably reducing the patient's compliance. The tools used in this study may be useful in monitoring the effects of opioid therapy in cancer pain patients. Simple numbers are easy to compare and make it possible to profile opioid responsiveness and differences among patients.
 ...
PMID:Monitoring of opioid therapy in advanced cancer pain patients. 913 31

Neuropathic pain syndromes are one of the major problems of cancer pain treatment. The present study surveys 593 cancer patients treated by a pain service following the WHO guidelines for relief of cancer pain. Of these, 380 presented with nociceptive, 32 with neuropathic and 181 with mixed (nociceptive and neuropathic) pain. In patients with nociceptive, mixed and neuropathic pain, the average duration of evaluated pain treatment was 51, 53 and 38 days, respectively. Non-opioid or opioid analgesics were given to 99%, 96% and 79%, antidepressants to 8%, 25% and 19%, anticonvulsants to 2%, 22% and 38% and corticosteroids to 26%, 35% and 22% of patients, respectively. Systemic analgesia was supported by palliative antineoplastic treatment (48%, 56% and 38% of patients), nerve blocks (3%, 6% and 6%), psychotherapy (3%, 7% and 3%), physiotherapy (6%, 12% and 13%) and transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (1%, 6% and 6%). Analgesic treatment resulted in a significant pain relief in all groups of patients, as the mean pain intensity (NRS) decreased from 66 (nociceptive), 65 (mixed) and 70 (neuropathic) on admission to 26, 30 and 28 after 3 days and 18, 17 and 21 at the end of survey. The total outcome of pain treatment was not predicted by the designation to nociceptive, mixed or neuropathic pain. In conclusion, neuropathic cancer pain is not intractable and can be relieved in the majority of patients by treatment following the WHO guidelines.
 ...
PMID:Assessment and treatment of neuropathic cancer pain following WHO guidelines. 992 71

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of age and gender on pain characteristics and opioid response in advanced cancer patients followed at home. A perspective study was carried out in a sample of 181 consecutive advanced cancer patients who required opioids in the last 4 weeks before death. Pain intensity and symptoms associated with opioid therapy at weekly intervals for 4 weeks were recorded, as were the previous oncological treatments. Opioid doses increased over time, but remained stable in the last 2 weeks of life, while pain intensity decreased over time despite unchanged use of NSAIDs. A considerable increase in symptom intensity was observed in the last weeks of life, except for nausea and vomiting. Visceral pain was more often reported in women. Male patients more often presented somatic pain mechanisms. Neuropathic pain was associated with higher mean VAS intensity and was equally reported in male and female patients and in the different age groups. Very old patients, who received less chemotherapy, required less opioid doses and reported a lower intensity of some symptoms, while reporting similar pain relief. Dry mouth was more frequent in adults than in very old patients. The identification of specific factors and pain characteristics may be useful in suggesting the likelihood of response in terms of analgesia and opioid-related adverse effects. Age and gender analysis should be included in all cancer pain and symptom control studies, as they may have an influence on cancer pain prognosis.
 ...
PMID:Factors influencing the opioid response in advanced cancer patients with pain followed at home: the effects of age and gender. 1073 59

The effectiveness of intrathecal opioid therapy when applied to different pain mechanisms, in particular neuropathic and nociceptive pain conditions, was studied retrospectively in 43 patients suffering from cancer pain. On the basis of clinical and radiological data, the pain mechanisms were categorized as nociceptive (n = 23) and neuropathic (n = 20). The average duration of treatment of nociceptive pain was 5 months, of neuropathic pain only 2.5 months. The initial median reduction of pain with intrathecal opioid therapy was 77.8% for nociceptive and 61.1% for neuropathic pain. Long-term results with patients suffering nociceptive pain showed a continuing good median pain reduction of 66.7%. Patients suffering from neuropathic pain showed poor long-term results (11.1% median pain reduction). Neuropathic pain in the extremities reacted least to the application of intrathecal opioids. Optimal results were obtained for nociceptive pain in the trunk area of the body.
 ...
PMID:The significance of intrathecal opioid therapy for the treatment of neuropathic cancer pain conditions. 1141 61

Neuropathic pain is a major problem in the treatment of cancer pain. We performed a retrospective analysis of 213 cancer patients with neuropathic pain treated by a pain service following the World Health Organization guidelines for relief of cancer pain. Of these, 79% presented with nerve compression pain, 16% with nerve injury pain, and 5% with sympathetically-maintained pain. Whereas nerve compression and nerve injury pain were caused most frequently by cancer growth, sympathetically-maintained pain was caused most frequently by cancer treatment. There were no significant differences in the use of analgesics, the mean pain intensity, or the efficacy of analgesic treatment among the three groups. Nerve injury pain and sympathetically-maintained pain were treated more frequently with adjuvant analgesics, especially antidepressants and anticonvulsants. The variety of different neuropathic pain syndromes should be separated in future studies of the efficacy of different treatment approaches.
 ...
PMID:Analysis and treatment of different types of neuropathic cancer pain. 1465 64

Neuropathic pain is commonly seen in cancer patients, either as a direct result of the malignancy or as a consequence of the treatment rendered. In recent years, methadone has been utilized in the treatment of neuropathic pain because of its additional mechanism of action as an NMDA-receptor antagonist. In this paper we discuss the etiology of neuropathic pain in cancer patients, unique properties of methadone, and prior studies on methadone in this patient population. While methadone has been established as a cheap and effective agent in treating cancer pain, specific studies are needed comparing methadone to other opioids in the management of cancer-related neuropathic pain.
 ...
PMID:Methadone for cancer-related neuropathic pain: a review of the literature. 1731 58

Oral medication is the simplest way in treatment of chronic pain. For cancer pain oral analgesics are efficacious in more than 90% of the patients. When a causal therapy of pain (e.g. chemotherapy, operation) fails an analgesic ladder with oral analgesics is instituted. This ladder starts with a non-narcotic analgesic in a sufficient dose. The regular dose of acetylsalicylic acid or paracetamol is 4 g daily. When this dose does not work sufficiently, a weak opioid (e.g. dihydrocodeine) is given concomitantly at an individual dose. When the weak opioid fails, strong opioids are given (e.g. morphine). The drugs should be given by mouth whenever possible. The most important point is the regular application according to a time-schedule. This time-schedule is related to the action time of the drug. Patients with severe vomiting or dysphagia can receive a continuous subcutaneous infusion. These measures are based on recommendations of the WHO.The same medications can be employed in patients with chronic non-malignant pain, provided that all other conventional measures in pain treatment fail. However, many states of pain are not opioid-responsive. Pain related to the sympathetic nervous system is more responsive to antidepressants than to opioids or NSAID. Neuropathic pain as in trigeminal neuralgia responds to anticonvulsants. Pain from muscle spasm is better controlled by muscle relaxants than by analgesics. Bone pain is more sensitive to NSAID than to any other drug.In any state of pain the response to the different groups of drugs should be evaluated first. Then a stepwise pharmacological approach should be performed. In most cases pain can be treated effectively by oral drugs.
 ...
PMID:[Not Available]. 1841 67


1 2 3 Next >>