Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0409974 (
lupus
)
22,386
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The capacity to locate polymorphisms on a virtually complete map of the human genome coupled with the ability to accurately evaluate large numbers (by historical standards) of genetic markers has led to gene identification in complex diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE or
lupus
). While this is a phenotype with enormous clinical variation, the twin studies and the observed familial aggregation, along with the genetic effects now known, suggest a strong genetic component. Unlike type 1 diabetes,
lupus
genetics is not dominated by the powerful effect of a single locus. Instead, there are at least six known genetic association effects in
lupus
of smaller magnitude (odds ratio <2), and at least 17 robust linkages (established and arguably confirmed independently) defining potentially responsible genes that largely remain to be discovered. The more convincing genetic associations include the human leukocyte antigen region (with multiple genes), C1q, PTPN22,
PDCD1
, Fc receptor-like 3, FcgammaRIIA, FcgammaRIIIA, interferon regulatory factor 5, and others. How they contribute to disease risk remains yet to be clarified, beyond the obvious speculation derived from what has previously been learned about these genes. Certainly, they are expected to contribute to
lupus
risk independently and in combination with each other, with genes not yet identified, and with the environment. A substantial number of genes (>10) are expected to be identified to contribute to
lupus
or in its many subsets defined by clinical and laboratory features.
...
PMID:Unraveling the genetics of systemic lupus erythematosus. 1702 21
Programmed cell death 1 (
PDCD1
or PD1) polymorphisms have been inconsistently reported to be associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The aim of this study was to explore whether the
PDCD1
polymorphisms confer a susceptibility to SLE and lupus nephritis (LN). We conducted a meta-analysis on the association of
PDCD1
polymorphisms with SLE in overall and specific ethnic populations. A total of 15 separate comparisons were included in this meta-analysis consisting of nine Europeans, two Latin Americans, two Africans, one Asian and one unknown participant. In subgroup analysis, the PD1.3A allele was significantly associated with SLE in Latin Americans (OR = 3.073, 95% CI = 1.416-6.461, P = 0.003), but not in patients of European and African decent. The PD1.3A allele was a risk factor for LN in European descendants (OR = 2.207, 95% CI = 1.488-3.467, P < 0.001). The PD1.5C allele was a risk factor for SLE in Europeans (OR = 1.297, 95% CI = 1.024-1.643, P = 0.031). In conclusion, this meta-analysis demonstrated an association of the PD1.3A allele with LN in European and SLE in Latin-American populations. Furthermore, the PD1.5C allele was associated with SLE susceptibility in Europeans.
Lupus
2009 Jan
PMID:Association of programmed cell death 1 polymorphisms and systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis. 1907 63
Genetic variation was first shown to be important in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE or
lupus
) in the 1970s with associations in the human leukocyte antigen region. Almost four decades later, and with the help of increasingly powerful genetic approaches, more than 25 genes are now known to contribute to the mechanisms that predispose individuals to
lupus
. Over half of these loci have been discovered in the past 2 years, underscoring the extraordinary success of genome-wide association approaches in SLE. Well-established risk factors include alleles in the major histocompatibility complex region (multiple genes), IRF5, ITGAM, STAT4, BLK, BANK1,
PDCD1
, PTPN22, TNFSF4, TNFAIP3, SPP1, some of the Fcgamma receptors, and deficiencies in several complement components, including C1q, C4 and C2. As reviewed here, many susceptibility genes fall into key pathways that are consistent with previous studies implicating immune complexes, host immune signal transduction and interferon pathways in the pathogenesis of SLE. Other loci have no known function or apparent immunological role and have the potential to reveal novel disease mechanisms. Certainly, as our understanding of the genetic etiology of SLE continues to mature, important new opportunities will emerge for developing more effective diagnostic and clinical management tools for this complex autoimmune disease.
...
PMID:Recent insights into the genetic basis of systemic lupus erythematosus. 1944 Jan 99
Recent progress in genetics has expanded the number of the genes associated with SLE to more than 20 in the past 2 years. One might assign these candidate genetic factors into several pre-existing biological pathways: (i) innate immune response including TLR/interferon signaling pathways (IRF5, STAT4, TNFAIP3, and TREX1); (ii) adaptive immune response (HLA-DR, PTPN22,
PDCD1
, STAT4, LYN, BLK, and BANK1) including B, T cells, and antigen-presenting cells; and (iii) immune complex clearance mechanism (FCGRs, CRP, and ITGAM). In addition, there are also several genes and loci that could not be assigned into previous known pathways (KIAA1542, PXK, XKR6, ATG5, etc), providing possible novel mechanisms in SLE. It has also been evident that there are similarities and differences in SLE susceptibility loci across ethnic groups. Here we categorize the susceptible genes into four groups. The first group is the consistently associated genes with similar risk allele frequency between multiple ethnic populations such as STAT4, TNFAIP3, BANK1, and IRAK1/MECP2. The second group is the genes that are consistently associated but show marked difference in risk allele frequency (BLK, IRF5). The third group is the genes in which different risk variants exist within a gene or genetic loci (allelic heterogeneity) such as HLA-DR, FCGRs, and IRF5. The fourth group is the genes that show consistently discrepancy between populations such as PTPN22 and possibly ITGAM, PXK, and LYN (genetic heterogeneity). The possible explanations for differences of susceptible genetic factors between populations could be different genetic backgrounds, contribution of gene-gene or gene-environment interaction, and the relation between marker and causal variants. Therefore, efforts to identify ethnic-specific genetic factors or disease causing variants should be necessary for individualized therapy for SLE in future.
Lupus
2010 Oct
PMID:What can we learn from genetic studies of systemic lupus erythematosus? Implications of genetic heterogeneity among populations in SLE. 2094 57