Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0409974 (lupus)
 22,386 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Tests for the presence of heparin-dependent antibodies (heparin-Ig) have evolved in parallel with improved understanding of the pathophysiology of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The first group of tests relied upon platelet aggregation or activation. Among tests in this group, the serotonin release assay has been reported to demonstrate the best performance characteristics. However, this test has not been widely adopted outside a few specialized laboratories owing to its complexity and need for radioactive materials. As a result, the less sensitive and specific platelet aggregation test is more commonly used for the diagnosis of heparin-Ig. The literature suggests that test sensitivity can be improved by the use of the patient's own platelets, platelets from selected donors known to be reactive in the assay, or washed platelets. Test specificity has been enhanced by the use of two point assays that include neutralization of the reaction by a high dose of heparin. A second group of assays have focused on detection of heparin-dependent binding of immunoglobulins to the platelet membrane. Most of these tests are hampered by the fact that platelets in patients with suspected HIT and in conditions that are in the differential diagnosis of HIT frequently express high levels of platelet-associated immunoglobulin. The most recent tests for heparin-Ig are based on the recognition that patient antibodies are directed against the heparin-PF4 complex. This has led to the development of the PF4/ heparin EIA assay. Because whole platelets are not used in this assay, problems related to under-reactivity or nonspecific reactivity are avoided. In addition, the ability of the test to predict clinical complications may be improved because the test can distinguish IgM from IgG heparin-Ig. Currently the laboratory diagnosis of heparin-Ig remains inexact. The sensitivity and specificity of laboratory assays cannot be firmly established. Much like the diagnosis of the phospholipid syndrome-where use of both the cardiolipin EIA and the lupus anticoagulant test offer overlapping advantages-the combination of the heparin-PF4 EIA plus either a test of platelet activation or a heparin-dependent antibody binding assay may prove to be a more sensitive and specific approach to the diagnosis of heparin-Ig. Despite the progress that has been made in the area of laboratory diagnosis of heparin-Ig, further improvement is needed. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is not rare and may be associated with devastating morbidity as well as mortality. Low-molecular-weight heparins usually cross-react with heparin-Ig. Therapy with Org 10172 appears to be the most promising alternative for patients with HIT. Because the clinical diagnosis is uncertain in sick hospitalized patients, further improvements in laboratory assays for heparin-Ig allowing earlier and more accurate diagnosis of patients at risk for HIT will be welcome.
 ...
PMID:Assays for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. 908 78

Heparin, which is used at high doses in hemodialysis patients, may induce antibodies favoring thromboembolic complications. We prospectively investigated the prevalence of heparin-induced platelet-reactive antibodies in a cohort of 38 pediatric hemodialysis patients, by means of heparin/platelet factor 4 (H/PF4) ELISA and heparin-induced platelet activation assay (HIPA). We also assessed other acquired and congenital hypercoagulable states. Heparin-induced antibodies were detected in 13 and 21% of patients with HIPA and ELISA, respectively. Anti-H/PF4 antibodies were negatively correlated with the number of hemodialysis sessions. These antibodies disappeared after a median time of 6 months despite continuing heparin treatment. The prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies was 21% (anticardiolipin 10.5%, anti-beta2GPI 13%, and lupus anticoagulant 5%). Blood levels of homocysteine, factor VIII, and fibrinogen were significantly higher and factor II levels were significantly lower in hemodialysis patients than in controls, whereas factor VII, factor IX, and natural coagulation inhibitor levels were similar in patients and controls. Overall, 26 of 38 patients had at least one biomarker of hypercoagulability, but only 1 patient, without anti-H/PF4 antibodies, presented with thrombosis. In conclusion, heparin induces the transient production of anti-H/PF4 antibodies in children undergoing hemodialysis, but other abnormalities probably contribute to hypercoagulability. These findings may help to improve the diagnosis and management of thrombotic events in hemodialysis patients.
 ...
PMID:A prospective study of the prevalence of heparin-induced antibodies and other associated thromboembolic risk factors in pediatric patients undergoing hemodialysis. 1662 23

Seventy-two patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), with or without antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), were studied for detection of heparin-PF4-induced antibodies (HPIA) using a commercial kit (Asserachrom HPIA) PF4-dependant enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) test. None of the patients had a medical history of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Eleven percent of patients were positive for HPIA. Plasma from 40 of the 72 patients (seven positive and 33 negative), was also tested with the other available HPIA ELISA (GTI) kit. Five patients were positive with both ELISA kits, two were highly positive only with Asserachrom HPIA and four only with GTI. None of the positive patients had severe thrombocytopenia. Two patients have never received heparin treatment. No relationship was found between HPIA presence and patients' age, sex, aPL levels or presence of lupus anticoagulant. No significant difference in HPIA presence was observed in patients with primary APS, secondary APS or aPL without APS. We found a poor correlation between the two commercial ELISA showing that, on the same blood sample, a patient could be highly positive with one technique and negative with the other. The PF4-dependant enzyme-linked immunoassay, which is often the first test used for the diagnosis of HIT, should be interpreted cautiously in patients with aPL since there is a danger of overdiagnosis and overtreatment.
Lupus 2007
PMID:High prevalence of antibodies to platelet factor 4 heparin in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies in absence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. 1740 62