Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0403608 (
ureter
)
9,655
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is a new concept in the treatment of recurrent and primary advanced colorectal tumors. Between October 1994 and December 1997 27 patients (primary tumor: 8, first recurrent tumor: 12, second recurrent tumor: 7) received IORT (32 applications). Chemotherapy and percutaneous radiotherapy had already been given to all patients with advanced and recurrent colorectal tumors. The intraoperative irradiation was performed through
HDR
iridium afterloading. A flexible flab--individually adapted to the "tumor bed"--was used as applicator. The contact dose ranged from 10 to 15 Gy. The mean operation time (rectum resection: 5, rectum amputation: 14, debulking: 8) increased by 30 min on average. Eight patients had postoperative complications: perianal wound infections (3), sacrovesical fistulas (3), leakage of anastomosis (1) and neural
ureter
dysfunction (1). To date--on average 17.1 months (range: 3-33) after operation--13 patients are free of tumor recurrence or show stable disease. Ten patients--all of them had macroscopic residual tumor--have local tumor progression combined with good quality of life. Only 4 patients died (acute kidney failure, stroke, marasmus, systemic progression). The afterloading flab technique represents a technically simple, minimally harmful procedure in the therapy of colorectal tumor. Even when IORT with electrons is not feasible or the patients have already been irradiated, a higher radiation dose is possible. Given the demonstrated rate of local tumor recurrence, the afterloading flab technique seems to be a valuable treatment alternative to extended, high-risk resections. Long-term follow-ups will be necessary.
...
PMID:[In Process Citation] 1006 22
In vivo dosimetry in bladder and rectum as well as determining doses on suggested reference points following the ICRU report 38 contribute to quality assurance in
HDR
-brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma, especially to minimize side effects. In order to gain information regarding the radiation exposure at ICRU reference points in rectum, bladder,
ureter
and regional lymph nodes those were calculated (digitalisation) by means of orthogonal radiographs of 11 applications in patients with cervical carcinoma, who received primary radiotherapy. In addition, the doses at the ICRU rectum reference point was compared to the results of in vivo measurements in the rectum. The in vivo measurements were by factor 1.5 below the doses determined for the ICRU rectum reference point (4.05 +/- 0.68 Gy versus 6.11 +/- 1.63 Gy). Reasons for this were: calibration errors, non-orthogonal radiographs, movement of applicator and probe in the time span between X-ray and application, missing connection of probe and anterior rectal wall. The standard deviation of calculations at ICRU reference points was on average +/- 30%. Possible reasons for the relatively large standard deviation were difficulties in defining the points, identifying them on radiographs and the different locations of the applicators. Although 3 D CT, US or MR based treatment planning using dose volume histogram analysis is more and more established, this simple procedure of marking and digitising the ICRU reference points lengthened treatment planning only by 5 to 10 minutes. The advantages of in vivo dosimetry are easy practicability and the possibility to determine rectum doses during radiation. The advantages of computer-aided planning at ICRU reference points are that calculations are available before radiation and that they can still be taken into account for treatment planning. Both methods should be applied in
HDR
-brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma.
...
PMID:Dosimetric analysis at ICRU reference points in HDR-brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma. 1099 67