Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0393754 (HSA)
 2,996 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Based on 2D-connectivity molecular similarity and cluster analyses, a dataset for HSA binding is divided into the training set and the test set. 4D-fingerprint similarity measures were applied to this dataset. Four different predictive schemes (SM, SA, SR, and SC) were applied to the test set based on the similarity measures of each compound to the compounds in the training set. The first algorithmic scheme (SM), which only takes the most similar compound in the training set into consideration, predicts the binding affinity of a test compound. This scheme has relatively poor predictivity based on 4D-fingerprint similarity analyses. The other three algorithmic schemes (SM, SR, and SC), which assign a weighting coefficient to each of the top-ten most similar training set compounds, have reasonable predictivity of a test set. The algorithmic scheme which categorizes the most similar compounds into different weighted clusters predicts the test set best. The 4D-fingerprints provide 36 different individual IPE/IPE type molecular similarity measures. Further investigation shows that the NP/HA, HS/HA, and HA/HA IPE/IPE type measures predict the test set well. Moreover, these three IPE/IPE type similarity measures are very similar to one another for the particular training and test sets investigated. The 4D-fingerprints have relatively high predictivity for this particular dataset.
 ...
PMID:Constructing plasma protein binding model based on a combination of cluster analysis and 4D-fingerprint molecular similarity analyses. 1621 46

A 115 compound dataset for HSA binding is divided into the training set and the test set based on molecular similarity and cluster analyses. Both Kier-Hall valence connectivity indices and 4D-fingerprint similarity measures were applied to this dataset. Four different predictive schemes (SM, SA, SR, SC) were applied to the test set based on the similarity measures of each compound to the compounds in the training set. The first algorithmic scheme (SM) predicts the binding affinity of a test compound using only the most similar training set compound's binding affinity. This scheme has relatively poor predictivity based both on Kier-Hall valence connectivity indices similarity measures and 4D-fingerprints similarity analyses. The other three algorithmic schemes (SM SR, SC), which assign a weighting coefficient to each of the top-ten most similar training set compounds, have reasonable predictivity of a test set. The algorithmic scheme which categorizes the most similar compounds into different weighted clusters predicts the test set best. The 4D-fingerprints provide 36 different individual IPE/IPE type molecular similarity measures. This study supports that some types of similarity measures are highly similar to one another for this dataset. Both the Kier-Hall valence connectivity indices similarity measures and the 4D-fingerprints have nearly same predictivity for this particular dataset.
 ...
PMID:Prediction of plasma protein binding of drugs using Kier-Hall valence connectivity indices and 4D-fingerprint molecular similarity analyses. 1626 92