Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0392326 (discomfort)
 22,423 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Treatment of palmoplantar hyperhidrosis was carried out with a conventional galvanic generator in 40 patients and with a newly developed iontophoresis apparatus, which is suited for home treatment, in 31 patients. The new apparatus is operated by a rechargeable energy source or by batteries and is disconnected from the electrical net during treatment. It conforms to most recent safety regulations as approved by Underwriter's Laboratory. Hyperhidrosis was completely controlled after 10-12 treatments as revealed by quantitative gravimetric measurements of sweat rates and semiquantitative estimation of starch iodine paper imprints. There was no apparent difference in efficacy between the two apparatuses. Not only hyperhidrosis was abolished, but associated symptoms, such as lividity of palms or soles, acral hypothermia and edema of fingers or toes, also subsided. Skin temperature on palms rose from 29.7 +/- 1.8 degrees C before treatment to 32.2 +/- 1.4 degrees C thereafter. Maintenance treatment was continued on an average for 14 months, in 4 patients for more than 3 years. No loss of efficacy was found during that period. Side effects were minimal and depended upon amperage used. Only slight discomfort during treatment and mild short-lasted skin irritation were observed. Long-term side effects did not occur.
 ...
PMID:Long-term efficacy and side effects of tap water iontophoresis of palmoplantar hyperhidrosis--the usefulness of home therapy. 365 60

Seven patients with hyperhidrosis of the palms or soles resistant to topical application of aluminum chloride solution were treated successfully with tap water iontophoresis. After an average of 10 or 11 treatments 80% sweating suppression was found on palms and 74% suppression on soles. As side effects of treatment discomfort and transient skin irritation were observed depending on the amperage used. The effect lasts up to several weeks; however, maintenance treatment on an individual schedule is required.
 ...
PMID:[Tap water iontophoresis in the treatment of hyperhidrosis of the hands and feet]. 671 69

This study was made to determine if those patients apparently dissatisfied with an orbital prosthesis might accept an eye patch more readily. The study included 27 patients who were seen during the past 8 years. A total of 60 orbital and eye patch proshteses were prepared for the patients. Eighteen patients responded to the questionnaire. Twelve of these patients are presently wearing their prostheses, and five of them are not. Reasons given by the patients for not using their prostheses were discomfort, lack of retention, skin irritation due to daily application and removal of the adhesive, change in defect, ill-fitting prostheses, and surgical reconstruction of the site. The study shows that given a choice, 67% of the patients would prefer the orbital prosthesis. Seventy-five percent of the patients who had an eye patch would prefer an orbital prosthesis.
 ...
PMID:Accetability of orbital prostheses. 692 11

Tap water iontophoresis with direct current represents the therapy of choice in palmoplantar hyperhidrosis. Side effects are minor discomfort and skin irritations. Improper use may induce iontophoretic burns at sites of minor skin injuries. The aim of this study was to find ways of minimizing side effects, increasing safety standards and reducing the technical complications of tap water iontophoresis without loss of efficacy. In a blind study, 30 patients with palmar hyperhidrosis were treated with tap water iontophoresis using pulsed direct current of 4.3 kHz or 10.0 kHz. Efficacy and side effects were compared with those of the conventional direct current method as a control. Normal sweat secretion rates of palms were found after an average of ten treatment sessions with the conventional direct current method and after twelve with pulsed direct current of 4.3 or 10 kHz. Treatment with pulsed direct current of 4.3 kHz failed to inhibit palmar hyperhidrosis in two of ten patients. Occasionally, such side effects as discomfort, skin irritation, and mild electric shock occurred when direct current was applied. Using pulsed direct current subjective sensations of discomfort and skin irritation were rare (4.3 kHz) or very rare (10 kHz). Electric shock was completely prevented. Because of the minimal side effects, despite minor loss of efficacy tap water iontophoresis with pulsed direct current can be a valuable alternative treatment for palmar hyperhidrosis.
 ...
PMID:[Pulsed direct current iontophoresis as a possible new treatment for hyperhidrosis]. 755 23

In August 1991, the Ministry of the Environment was informed of the occurrence of illnesses suspected to be related to a modern, multi-story office building. Investigations revealed that 34 of the occupants on two floors of the building had non-specific ailments such as eye, throat or skin irritation which caused acute discomfort but resolved upon leaving the premises. Case-control study identified a number of factors significantly associated with the illness; viz. a personal history of allergy, asthma or sinusitis; a high level of work-related stress; and a lack of thermal comfort. One feature of the affected offices was numerous high partitions which tended to obstruct air movement. Adjustments of central temperature to compensate for complaints of "stuffiness" had resulted in wide fluctuations of temperature and relative humidity. Indoor air quality measurements also revealed high bacterial counts, a condition aggravated by the raised relative humidity and inadequate air movement. The problems gradually resolved following major modifications at the offices and air-handling units. This episode confirmed the need for further studies of building-associated illness in the tropics.
 ...
PMID:Epidemiological investigations into an outbreak of building-associated illness in Singapore. 760 93

Tap-water iontophoresis (TWI) using direct current (DC) is the most effective therapy in palmoplantar hyperhidrosis. Side-effects of this method are discomfort, with burning and tingling, and skin irritation, including erythema and vesicles. Incorrect use may induce iontophoretic burns at sites of minor skin injury. Elaborate safety measures are required to prevent electric shock. The aim of this study was to minimize side-effects and to increase technical and safety standards of TWI, without loss of efficacy. In a controlled blind study, treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis by alternating current (AC) or by AC with DC-offset (AC/DC) was compared with the conventional DC method. Palmar hyperhidrosis was completely controlled after an average of 11 treatments by either AC/DC iontophoresis or the conventional DC method. Virtually no effect was seen when AC without DC-offset was used for TWI. There were no signs of cutaneous irritation, or subjective sensations of discomfort when AC with or without DC-offset was employed. AC/DC iontophoresis should become the treatment of choice for palmoplantar hyperhidrosis. The mechanism of action is unknown. It is hypothesized that an interrupted stimulus-secretion-coupling leads to a functional disturbance of sweat secretion.
 ...
PMID:Iontophoresis with alternating current and direct current offset (AC/DC iontophoresis): a new approach for the treatment of hyperhidrosis. 765 77

The aim of the study was assessment of local and remote effects of radioactive substances on ocular media and development of measures to remove radionuclides from the eye. Radioactive substances getting into the eye in the form of aerosols, dust, or gaseous mixtures are unevenly distributed in it. The highest radioactivity was found on the skin of the eyelids and orbit, particularly so on the eyelashes and eyebrows, the least one on the cornea and in the conjunctival cavity. A follow-up of 8 to 17 years showed that timely removal of radionuclides from ocular surface prevented the development of specific symptoms and trophic changes of ocular media, of radiation cataracts among other things. The suggested method for washing the skin of the eyelids and orbital area from radioactive contaminants did not induce skin irritation, maceration, sense of discomfort, and is recommended for practice.
 ...
PMID:[Clinico-radiometric studies of the eye in radioactive contamination]. 807 71

Water based paints contain organic solvents and many additives, such as biocides, surfactants, pigments, binders, amines, and monomers. The chemical complexity may introduce new potential health hazards to house painters, in particular irritative and allergic disorders. This study was performed to compare how house painters experience work with water based paints or solvent based paints, and to evaluate whether exposure to water based paints increases mucous membrane and dermal symptoms among house painters. 255 male house painters aged 20 to 65 were invited to participate in the study. Controls were two industrial populations, in total 302 men, without exposure to water based paints. Self administered questionnaires were used to assess the painter's experiences of working with different types of paints and the occurrence of symptoms in the exposed and unexposed groups. Hygiene measurements were performed during normal working days when only water based paints and no solvent based paints were used. The painters were exposed to low concentrations of dust, metals, ammonia, formaldehyde, and volatile organic compounds. The work environment was considered better when working with water based paints than with solvent based paints. There were more complaints of frequent urination when working with water based paint. Taste or olfactory disturbances were less common. General as well as work related eye and skin irritation was more common among the exposed workers. For other symptoms no significant differences were found. The study indicates that the introduction of water based paints has improved the work environment for house painters. Water based paints cause less discomfort and airway irritation than the earlier solvent based paints. Adverse general health effects seem low. Some of the painters may have dermal symptoms caused by the components in water based paints.
 ...
PMID:Occupational exposure to water based paint and symptoms from the skin and eyes. 813 Aug 46

Detergent enzymes may cause skin irritation and occasionally hypersensitivity reactions. The potential hazards of these enzymes have led some physicians to advise atopic dermatitis patients against the use of enzyme-enriched detergents. A three-phased randomised, double-blind, cross-over experiment was designed to question this recommendation. Each period was of 1 month's duration. In the first phase patients continued using their normal washing detergent. In phase II patients used trial detergent with or without added enzymes, and during phase III patients were given the opposite trial detergent. A total of 25 patients completed the study. The primary efficacy parameters were inter-period changes in corticosteroid usage and changes in SCORAD. Secondary efficacy parameters were altered subjective symptoms scored during the final 2 weeks of each interval. Analyses of all data revealed no statistical differences in any of the primary or secondary parameters comparing treatment and placebo periods. Our data therefore seem to exclude that atopic dermatitis may exacerbate during 1 month's exposure to enzyme-enriched detergents. Since no significant irritant capacity was detected in atopic dermatitis patients, it is unlikely that consumers with "normal skin" will experience any skin discomfort when enzyme-enriched detergents are used.
 ...
PMID:Skin symptoms in patients with atopic dermatitis using enzyme-containing detergents. A placebo-controlled study. 949 31

One hundred patients with acne vulgaris applied adapalene (Differin) 0.1% gel to one side of their face and tretinoin 0.025% cream to the other once a day for 4 weeks; the side of application was determined by randomization code. Patient tolerance (assessed as the side of the face least irritated by drug application) was recorded weekly and patient preference (assessed as the preparation more easily spread, absorbed more quickly, smelled better, felt best on the skin and least greasy to the feel) at completion of the study. The investigator measured skin irritation weekly, scoring erythema, skin dryness, desquamation and burning/stinging on a 10-point scale. After each week of treatment, 64-68% of patients found adapalene 0.1% gel more tolerable than tretinoin 0.025% cream (P < 0.05). At study completion, 65% of patients preferred adapalene 0.1% gel over tretinoin 0.025% cream (P = 0.003). An overall assessment showed adapalene 0.1% gel was significantly less irritating to the skin in terms of producing erythema, dryness, desquamation and burning/stinging, at Visits 2, 3 and 4 (P < 0.02). Thirty-two patients experienced mild to moderately severe adverse events; three had adverse events considered to be drug related (two with skin discomfort; one with skin dryness). One patient stopped using the study drugs because of dry skin. This study showed that a majority of patients preferred adapalene 0.1% gel over tretinoin 0.025% cream and that it caused significantly less skin irritation.
 ...
PMID:Adapalene 0.1% gel for the treatment of acne vulgaris: its superiority compared to tretinoin 0.025% cream in skin tolerance and patient preference. 999 Apr 16


1 2 3 4 5 Next >>