Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0376358 (prostate cancer)
 59,338 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Ca 15-3 is an aspecific tumor marker characteristic of cancer proliferation. Elevated serum levels seem to be closely correlated with cancer progression in non-urological tumors. This study assessed the role of Ca 15-3 as an aspecific tumor marker in patients with borderline prostate-specific antigen (PSA) biochemically suspected of prostate cancer (PCa) and with multiple negative prostate biopsies. The study is based on prospective analysis of 103 patients: (a) 33 patients (group A) presented lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to BPH with normal serum PSA values, DRE and TRUS negative for suspected PCa; (b) 31 patients (group B) with histologically diagnosed PCa; (c) 39 patients (group C) with borderline serum PSA values, DRE and TRUS normal, two ultrasound (US)-guided random prostate biopsies negative for PCa. Ca 15-3 was determined in the entire study series by the IRMA method, using as range the values proposed for the investigated non-urological tumors (38 UI/l).Ca 15-3 was within normal range in all group A patients (control), while the values were elevated in 27/31 of group B patients (PCa) and in 11/39 of group C (PCa suspected) patients. A third biopsy was performed in all 39 group C patients with borderline PSA and it was PCa-positive in 13 patients (33.3%, subgroup C3). In this series Ca 15-3 was increased in 9 of 13 patients (subgroup C3alpha), while the remaining four patients (subgroup C3beta) presented values within the normal range. On 26 group C patients who were negative for PCa to third biopsy (subgroup C4), 24 patients had Ca 15-3 levels within normal range (subgroup C4alpha) with histologic findings of BPH in 23 cases and granulomatous chronic prostatitis in one case, while two patients (subgroup C4beta) had elevated Ca 15-3 concentrations associated with lymphoplasmacytic chronic prostatitis. We hypothesize that Ca 15-3, as a specific tumor marker, could be an interesting and inexpensive second step diagnostic tool for PCa in patients with borderline PSA and multiple negative prostate biopsies, as it could indicate whether a repeated biopsy should be performed in a short time, having excluded other concomitant tumors. However, further prospective studies will be necessary to confirm this hypothesis.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2003
PMID:Role of Ca 15-3 in patients with biochemically suspected prostate cancer and multiple negative ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies. 1266 64

PSA continues to be one of the most effective and widely used cancer screening tools available. Its popularity in prostate cancer screening, however, has eroded its usefulness in the staging of this disease. As more men are screened every year on a routine basis with DRE and PSA, the average PSA at diagnosis has drifted down to well below 10 ng/mL in many centers, including ours. This trend is likely to accelerate, as a PSA cut off for prompting biopsy of the prostate of 2.5 ng/mL gains more widespread acceptance. The recent realization that, at these levels, serum PSA is more reflective of the presence of BPH than of the extent of cancer and, therefore, does not provide additional staging information, has renewed the search for new biochemical markers that are capable of predicting prostate cancer stage and prognosis. Because of the heterogeneity of this disease, it is unlikely that a single biochemical marker that is capable of accurately staging all prostate cancer patients will be found. For this reason, nomograms that are capable of integrating various parameters to predict stage and prognosis will remain indispensable. As new biochemical markers that provide independent predictive information about stage or prognosis are identified, they can be incorporated into currently available nomograms. Of the biochemical markers discussed in this article, IL-6sR and TGF-beta1 are the most promising. By incorporating them into a preoperative nomogram designed to predict PSA recurrence, we found that they improved the ability to predict biochemical recurrence by a statistically and clinically significant margin. The ability to stage prostate cancer and predict response to therapy has improved dramatically over the last 3 decades. Nevertheless, there is still a need for new biochemical markers that will improve the ability to predict an individual patient's stage and response to therapy. Incorporating these new markers into nomograms will enhance the ability to provide optimal care for each prostate cancer patient.
 ...
PMID:Biochemical staging of prostate cancer. 1273 3

Family history is one of the strongest epidemiological risk factors for the development of prostate cancer. The impact on the clinical presentation and prognosis, however, is controversial. In the present study, we analyzed 464 familial and 492 sporadic prostate cancer patients following radical prostatectomy. The average age at onset was 62.1 years in the familial group and 64.2 years in the sporadic controls (p<0.001). The screening attitude, DRE findings and the PSA values at diagnosis the pT- and pN-stages, and the tumor grade did not differ between both groups. With a median follow-up of 3.3 years, the 5- and 10-year progression-free survival rates were 76.2% and 56.5% in familial and 70.8% and 55.5% in sporadic patients, respectively (n.s.). A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that family history did not have an influence on disease recurrence. In our population there was no association between a familial predisposition and clinical features or clinical course of the disease. Whether hereditary prostate cancer is distinct from sporadic forms cannot be determined before the underlying genetic alterations are identified.
 ...
PMID:[Familial versus sporadic prostate cancer in the German population. Clinical and pathological characteristics in patients after radical prostatectomy]. 1289 39

Prostate ultrasound has been accepted as the appropriate tool for prostate biopsy guidance to determine the presence of prostate cancer if the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level is not normal. Prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) has been used to determine if an increased PSA level may be because of benign enlargement of the gland or possible presence of cancer. The specific "cutoff" for PSA and PSAD to delineate which patients are at highest risk has been controversial. We attempted to assess which PSA level or PSAD level should be used. A retrospective analysis of 600 consecutive men, referred for prostate ultrasound and possible biopsy because of an abnormal DRE result or increased PSA level was undertaken. All had prostate volume determined by biplanar endorectal ultrasound. One hundred sixty-six men had cancer confirmed by biopsy. This latter group was further analyzed and was divided into PSA <4.0, PSA 4 to 10, or PSA >10.0 ng/ml. Groups were divided according to those with PSAD <0.10, <0.12, and <0.15 ng/ml. Correlation with Gleason grade of the tumor was made. Of the 166 men with cancer, 15 had PSA levels <4 ng/ml (all palpable), and 81 had PSA levels between 4.0 and 10.0 ng/ml (48 were not palpable by digital rectal examination [DRE]). There were 38 (22.8%) of 166 men with cancer who had a PSAD <0.15. Using the Gleason scoring system, 30 of 38 men had mid-grade or high-grade cancers. Twenty-one (12.6%) of 166 men with cancer had a PSAD <0.12. Of these, 17 of 21 men had mid-grade or high-grade cancers. Fifteen (9.0%) of 166 men with cancer had a PSAD <0.10. Of these, 13 of 15 had mid-grade or high-grade cancer. If the PSA level is more than 4.0 ng/ml, even if no palpable lesion is discerned by DRE, suspicion for the presence of cancer should be raised. The use of PSAD threshold of 0.15 is not inclusive enough to identify clinically important cancer, and it should not be used. Our data demonstrate that 7.9% of men with cancer had a PSAD <0.15 and mid-grade or high-grade, i.e., clinically important, cancer. Although more negative biopsy results will be obtained, we recommend the use of a lower PSAD "cutoff" than the literature has suggested. We recommend that those men with PSA levels more than 4 ng/ml and a PSAD higher than 0.10 should undergo a prostate biopsy to detect clinically important cancer.
 ...
PMID:Should prostate-specific antigen or prostate-specific antigen density be used as the determining factor when deciding which prostates should undergo biopsy during prostate ultrasound. 1297 74

All patients who undergo curative therapy for prostate cancer should be followed for a prolonged period of time to determine tumor control and treatment toxicity for quality assurance purposes. Follow-up duties may be reasonably shared between the oncologist and the family doctor or urologist: however, it is probable that some follow-up information specific to the irradiated patient will be lost unless the oncologist maintains regular contact with the patient, especially in the first 5 years of follow-up when late radiation effects are most likely to appear. There is no strong evidence that patients stop being at risk for recurrence at any time after treatment, and because PSA testing is an accurate, simple, and inexpensive method of determining post-RT tumor status, it is recommended that periodic PSA measurements be continued for life. In the absence of a rising PSA, all other tests and visits are unnecessary to determine post-RT tumor control. Because DRE has been shown to be of limited utility in follow-up of irradiated patients, it should be possible to effectively follow patients remotely. This could be done by asking patients to have PSA tests done, forward the results to their physicians, and report treatment toxicity when it occurs. Only abnormal results would trigger an office visit. This strategy is being evaluated in clinical trials. The alternative is to delegate the follow-up to the primary-care physician with guidelines as to when referral back is required. Follow-up frequency, and the most beneficial follow-up investigations vary from scenario to scenario, and are influenced by the likelihood of relapse, time to relapse, and planned intervention. These decisions are influenced in turn by the initial presentation--either with high or low risk factors--and by the patient's general state of health at completion of EBRT. Effective follow-up also requires active patient cooperation that only can be achieved after discussion of the goals of follow-up with the patient and with the patient's full understanding of the process. The follow-up strategy proposed in Fig. 1 is most suitable for a fit patient with low or intermediate risk factors who wishes to consider all salvage options should he relapse, or for the high-risk individual in situations in which the probability of systemic relapse is of major concern. Young patients with very adverse risk factors may benefit from even closer follow-up in the early years after EBRT and the elderly or frail may require only occasional visits to record or treat treatment toxicity and to ensure clinical non-progression.
 ...
PMID:Recurrent prostate cancer following external beam radiotherapy: follow-up strategies and management. 1468 Mar 12

The discovery that PSA exists in serum in both free and complexed forms led to development of immunoassays specific for different PSA forms. This helped in measuring free PSA in the presence of PSA-ACT (PSA-alpha antichymotrypsin), hence it was possible to calculate the percent free PSA or free to total PSA ratio, measurement of which was helpful in reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies significantly, while maintaining a high clinical sensitivity for detection of cancer. The study was performed on 103 consecutive male patients (mean age 68 +/- 10.8 years SD) comprising of 90 patients with benign disease (87%) and 13 prostate carcinoma patients (13%), who had histologically proven prostate cancer. Patients with total PSA between 2-25 ng/ml were included in the study. 30 normal healthy males with age 58 +/- 10 years, served as control. Serum total PSA and free PSA were analyzed using streptavidin biotin EIA method (M/s Roche Diagnostics, Germany). The mean total PSA in normal healthy control subjects was 1.86 +/- 1.07 ng/ml. It was increased significantly in diseased condition. Its mean concentration in carcinoma patients was 12.6 +/- 5.3 ng/ml and in benign patients it was 6.3 +/- 4.6 ng/ml. The free to total PSA ratio in all the three groups was significantly different (p < 0.004) from each other. In carcinoma patients, mean f/t PSA ratio was 0.12 +/- 0.06 as compared to 0.21 +/- 0.11 and 0.28 +/- 0.17 in benign patients and in control respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the test was calculated at different f/t PSA ratio cutoff. At 0.1 cutoff value, sensitivity of the test was 54% and specificity was 83%. The positive predictive value (ppv) was 32% and negative predictive value (npv) was 92%. From cutoff value of 0.12 to 0.16, sensitivity was increased from 54% to 85% but specificity was reduced from 78% to 67%. The ppv did not show much change and npv was increased from 92% to 97%. Increasing the cut off value thereafter showed no change in sensitivity but specificity was further reduced to 40%, therefore in this patient series, f/t PSA ratio cutoff of 0.16 was found to be the appropriate cutoff value. Combination of this ratio cutoff with other parameters like serum total PSA, DRE and TRUS helped in increasing the sensitivity of the test and this also helped in reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies. In 103 men who were biopsied, 13 (12.6%) prostatic carcinoma were identified. Among these 13 cancer patients, 9 patients had abnormal findings in DRE.7 individuals out of these 9, also had free to total PSA ratio lower than 0.16 and would have been biopsied and diagnosed anyway. If we use only f/t PSA ratio less than 0.16, to decide whom to biopsy, we would have biopsied and diagnosed 11/13 cases i.e. sensitivity of 85% but If we decide to biopsy those patients who had abnormal DRE and those who had low f/t PSA ratio, we could identify 13/13 carcinoma i.e. 100% sensitivity. Combining the f/t PSA ratio with total PSA, DRE and TRUS findings could help in reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies. 37 patients who were negative for malignancy having total PSA in the range of 5-20 ng/ml, normal DRE and TRUS findings, have been biopsied but with combination of total PSA in the range of 5-20 ng/ml, normal findings in digital rectal examination and TRUS and f/t PSA ratio more than 0.16 (cutoff), we could have avoided 16 biopsies which were unnecessary that means there was 43% reduction in unnecessary biopsies.
 ...
PMID:Utility of free/total prostate specific antigen (f/t PSA) ratio in diagnosis of prostate carcinoma. 1525 30

Little is known about the motives of German men to attend or refuse preventive checkups for prostate cancer. The aims of this study were to investigate if in men with familial predisposition screening behaviours are influenced by epidemiological or clinical parameters of prostate cancer of their affected relatives. 476 probands with one and 312 probands with at least two affected relatives were advised in writing to have a PSA-test and DRE done at their local urologists. We evaluated if the response rate was correlated to the proband's age, to the number and the age of onset of their affected relatives and also to the clinical course of their disease. Our data implicate that in men with familial predisposition the acceptance of prostate cancer screening is influenced only by individual characteristics and personal attitude and not by factors within the family. To which extent the awareness of disease risk is modified by familial predisposition remains to be evaluated.
 ...
PMID:[Is the prostate cancer screening behaviour of men with familial predisposition predictable?]. 1572 12

Preclinical, epidemiological, and phase III data from randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials suggest that both selenium and vitamin E have potential efficacy in prostate cancer prevention. In vitro evidence suggests that selenium and vitamin E work synergistically to cause cell-cycle arrest, induce caspase-mediated apoptosis, and act as antiandrogens in arresting clonal expansion of nascent tumors. The Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT), sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, is an intergroup Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, population-based clinical trial designed to test the efficacy of selenium and vitamin E alone and in combination in the prevention of prostate cancer. The study has a 2 x 2 factorial design with a target accrual of 32,400. Eligibility criteria include an age of at least 50 years for African Americans and of at least 55 years for Caucasians; a DRE not suspicious for cancer; a serum PSA no greater than 4 ng/mL; and a normal blood pressure. Randomization will be equally distributed among the four study arms, with intervention consisting of a daily oral dose of study supplement (200 mug l-selenomethionine or 400 mg of racemic alpha-tocopheryl) or matched placebo. Study duration is planned for 12 years, with a 5-year uniform accrual period and a minimum of 7 and maximum of 12 years of intervention. The primary endpoint for SELECT is the clinical incidence of prostate cancer as determined by a recommended routine clinical diagnostic work-up, including yearly DRE and serum PSA level. SELECT is the second large-scale study of chemoprevention for prostate cancer. Enrollment began in 2001, with final results anticipated in 2013.
 ...
PMID:Selenium and vitamin E cancer prevention trial. 1575 49

Among patients with negative initial biopsies of the prostate, 51 patients underwent total 59 repeat biopsies at the Department of Urology of Ikeda Municipal Hospital between January 1998 and April 2004. Overall 26 patients (44.1%) were confirmed to have cancer, 22 patients by second repeat biopsy (22/51), four patients by third biopsy (4/7) and none by fourth biopsy (0/1). Clinical parameters (age, PSA, PSA density, PSA velocity) were analyzed for the possibility to predict the pathological outcome. Significant differences between the positive biopsy group and the negative biopsy group were obtained in age, PSA level and prostatic volume. Of the diagnostic evaluations including palpation and imaging studies (DRE, TRUS, MRI), the most powerful predictor for prostate cancer seemed to be the MRI findings, especially in the cases of short-interval repeat biopsy. Biopsies directed at the positive lesion on MRI in addition to systematic prostate biopsies should be useful.
 ...
PMID:[Repeat biopsy of the suspicious prostate cancer: especially the usefulness of MRI]. 1605 Apr 74

There is an increasing debate regarding the frequency of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and the current primary screening modality used to detect prostate cancer. The purpose of this study is to determine whether PSA screening intervals should be based on initial PSA. Our study explores longitudinal changes of PSA levels in black and white males separately. Study participants were 768 white and 450 black males attending an annual prostate cancer screening. We fit a longitudinal repeated measures model separately for blacks and whites and estimated the probability of PSA converting to greater than 4.0 ng/ml at a follow-up year given baseline PSA range among males without an abnormal DRE. Black and white males with a baseline PSA between 0 and 1.0 ng/ml, with a healthy or enlarged prostate, have a less than 1% chance that their PSA will increase above 4.0 ng/ml over the following 5 years. Black and white males with a PSA between 1.0 and 1.9 ng/ml have a less than 1% chance of PSA conversion to greater than 4.0 ng/ml over the next year. Our findings further support that annual screening for prostate cancer may not be necessary, specifically males with a baseline PSA less than 2.0 may not need to undergo annual screening. Our results suggest that race does not affect the longitudinal trend of PSA enough to warrant setting screening intervals based on race.
 ...
PMID:Impact of race and baseline PSA on longitudinal PSA. 1623 14


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>