Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0376358 (prostate cancer)
 59,338 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Many questions still exist about the etiology of prostate cancer. Prostate cancer screening methods continue to evolve. The following four findings are important to remember: (1) PSA is organ specific, not cancer specific, (2) DRE remains the standard method for screening, (3) TRUS continues to evolve but is currently too expensive to use as a screening modality, and (4) a combination of DRE and PSA is the most effective and cost-efficient screening method. Although screening methods are controversial, mass screening for prostate cancer is already occurring in several cities in the United States. An understanding of the value and limitations of the available screening tools is essential.
 ...
PMID:Prostate cancer: screening and early detection update. 769 77

Nurses have the clinical knowledge and organizational ability to carry out a quality prostate cancer screening program. In addition, nurses possess the communication and patient education skills necessary for effective follow-up. With the dramatic increase in prostate screening programs, nurses are likely to be among the leaders in this effort. Motivating patients to follow up when they have an abnormal DRE or serum PSA can increase the early detection of prostate cancer and potentially cure the disease. After all, this is the primary purpose of the screening.
 ...
PMID:Prostate cancer screening: getting your patients to follow-up. 821 Dec 48

Five randomized pilot studies of screening for prostate cancer (PC) have been conducted in the area of Rotterdam from 1991 to 1994. The purpose of these studies was to establish the feasibility of a randomized screening protocol with PC mortality as the major end point in The Netherlands and at a European level. All procedures related to recruitment of participants, to application of the screening tests and to data collection were evaluated. Men (7,200) aged 55-74 years were invited through the Rotterdam Population Registry. The recruitment rate over the 5 pilot studies averaged 38.2% (2,747 men). Recruitment procedures proved to be relevant for establishing higher participation rates (invitation and consent by mail). The screening tests were well accepted and tolerated. The general population-based character of the sample was confirmed by studying symptoms of prostatic disease in participants and in men who refused participation. Data based on one PSA serum determination, rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography are presented; 204/1,403 men (14.5%) had a positive screening result by either test combination and underwent biopsy. Forty-nine cancers were found in 1,403 men (3.5%); 65% of prostate cancers (17/26) identified in men who eventually underwent radical prostatectomy proved to be locally confined. From the pilot studies, we conclude that a large contribution to a European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) can be made by recruiting about 40,000 men in the area of Rotterdam. The preliminary data suggest that after confirmation of the present data during the first years in the European study, DRE and TRUS can be withheld depending on the PSA result in a large proportion of the screening population.
 ...
PMID:European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer--the Rotterdam pilot studies. 856 9

Prostate cancer is a common cancer and a leading cause of cancer death in men. It is potentially detectable at early, possibly curative stages through various combinations of testing, including DRE, PSA, and TRUS of the prostate. Still unproven is the effectiveness of prostate cancer treatment, and because of that lack of proof, the optimal screening strategies are also elusive. It is possible that what is known as prostate cancer today may be, in fact, multiple entities with different natural histories, different treatment needs, and, consequently, different screening strategies. The role of informed consent has been suggested as a means to involve patients in the decision process, especially because the literature presents an environment of intense controversy. It is hoped that the PIVOT trial or similar efforts and further research into the basic mechanisms of the disease will provide clearer answers in the future.
 ...
PMID:Prostate cancer screening. 856 2

In conclusion, prostate cancer is a major menace to Western society. Since prostate cancer is asymptomatic in the early stages and no curative therapy exists for the advanced stages, our only hope for decreasing the mortality rate from prostate cancer is through early detection programs. Young men with life expectancies of 15 years or more should participate in early detection efforts. These men should be evaluated diligently, through the combined use of DRE and the newly described age-specific reference ranges. Radical prostatectomy, when performed on a man with a life expectancy of 30 to 35 years who has organ-confined prostate cancer, is an effective treatment for the No. 1 cancer in men today. With limited health care dollars available in the future for the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer, physicians will be forced to become selective with their diagnostic and therapeutic efforts. It is much less expensive to treat a young man with early-stage, curable prostate cancer than to manage an elderly man terminally ill from advanced prostate cancer. Without question, young men will be the target of our early detection efforts and the ones who will benefit.
 ...
PMID:Early detection of prostate cancer. Decreasing the mortality rate. 869 30

As a significant public health problem, prostate cancer meets nearly all the criteria for screening. While concerns about incomplete natural history, progression rates and need for better prognostic factors are valid, important social and public health issues also need consideration. If future expenditures for terminal cancer care are minimized via reductions in therapy choices or coverage, no economic benefit for prostate cancer screening should exist. Narrowly focused attempts at cost reduction could inappropriately discourage highest risk groups from participating in early detection programs, thereby eliminating the greatest potential benefit of screening. The ACS-NPCDP has demonstrated that early detection of prostate cancer produced distinct stage migration to earlier, more curable disease through optimized use of DRE, TRUS and PSA. PSA is the most objective test and detects tumors of significant biologic potential. Current cost savings are possible with improved public health education about the appropriateness of early detection in the oldest age groups or those with significant pre-existing medical conditions. Prostate cancer control perhaps requires a tailored approach of screening in high risk groups and more appropriate "case finding" in the lower risk general population. The initial combination of PSA and DRE represents an ethical and economical choice for individual patients consulting with informed physicians.
 ...
PMID:The American Cancer Society's National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. 885 93

To determine if patients with bladder cancer have a higher incidence of unsuspected prostate cancer, 40 cases were studied. All except one case had no evidence of prostate cancer on preoperative clinical assessment. Detailed pathological evaluation of cystoprostatectomy specimens with sections at 2- to 3-mm intervals was done. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate was identified in 18 of 40 patients (45%). Multifocal prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) was present in 19 cases (47.5%); 4 (10%) without an associated prostate cancer and 15 (37.5%) in conjunction with adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Twelve cases of unsuspected prostate cancer were stage pT1a, 4 were pT1b, and 2 were pT3. No patients exhibited nodal or distance metastases by the prostate cancer. At a mean follow-up of 15.2 months (range 3-34 months), 37 of the 40 patients are alive. Among prostate cancer patients, no clinical or biochemical evidence of disease recurrence or prostate cancer related mortality has been observed. Our findings support the previously reported high incidence rate of prostate cancer in patients undergoing cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer. This, though, may not be higher than the observed incidence in an age-matched general population. We recommend DRE and PSA as part of the bladder cancer workup in males, and complete removal of the prostate at cystoprostatectomy to prevent the dilemma of residual prostate cancer.
 ...
PMID:Incidental prostatic adenocarcinoma in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer. 893 64

Serum PSA determinations are an important part of the urologic evaluation for prostate cancer. DRE, TRUS, cystoscopy, and ejaculation have minimal effects on serum PSA levels. Prostatic massage, needle biopsy, TURP, and prostatitis can cause significant elevations of serum PSA (Table 1). These factors should be kept in mind for interpretation of PSA values.
 ...
PMID:The effects of prostatic manipulation on prostate-specific antigen levels. 912 26

Serum PSA-based early detection for prostate cancer has been studied fairly extensively for the past several years. It appears that we can state fairly categorically what the relative performances of total serum PSA, DRE, and TRUS are in detecting early-stage prostate cancer; that initial screening is effective in detecting histologically significant and pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer; that annual, serial, repetitive screening, at least over a 4- to 5-year horizon, does not overdetect prostate cancer, and that the results of early detection will improve as our ability to use certain PSA transformations such as PSA density, PSA slope, age-specific PSA adjustment, and knowledge of free versus total serum PSA is better characterized. These advances in our ability to diagnose early-stage prostate cancer likely will be coupled with an increased ability to predict the behavior, curability, and significance of individual tumors. It is hoped that information soon will be available to allow physicians to categorize an individual tumor as insignificant, significant and surgically curable, or significant and incurable by standard approaches. This ability, coupled with the demonstrated ability to detect prostate cancer, will make an even more compelling argument for widespread PSA-based screening. At present, annual DRE and total serum PSA measurements are recommended for men older than 50 and among younger men at high risk for prostate cancer. All suspicious DRE findings should be evaluated with prostatic biopsy. Among younger men, PSA levels over 2.5 ng/mL should be considered worrisome and further evaluated. For men older than 65, serum PSA levels above 4 ng/mL should be considered abnormal and warrant biopsy. Men with persistent serum PSA elevation and a negative biopsy should undergo repeat biopsy at least once, and perhaps more often if PSA slope exceeds 0.75 per year, if density is greater than 0.10, or if f-PSA is less than 20%.
 ...
PMID:Prostate-specific antigen as a screening test for prostate cancer. The United States experience. 912 27

CT Scan, MR Imaging Scan, and Pedal Lymphangiography. Patients with a PSA greater than 25 ng/mL, a Gleason score greater than 6, and a positive DRE should undergo CT scan with FNA of lymph nodes at least 6 mm in size. Otherwise, CT scan, MR imaging scan, and pelvic lymphangiogram are not indicated. This should eliminate use of these staging studies in over 90% of patients with newly diagnosed adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Pelvic Lymph-Node Dissection. Pelvic lymph-node dissection can be safely eliminated in patients who meet the following predictive criteria: 1. PSA not more than 5 ng/mL or 2. Gleason score not more than 5 or 3. A combination of the following: PSA not more than 25 ng/mL, Gleason score not more than 7, and negative DRE. Following these criteria should eliminate the need for pelvic lymphadenectomy in 60% of patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer.
 ...
PMID:Use of prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, and digital rectal examination in staging patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. 912 35


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>