Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0376358 (prostate cancer)
 59,338 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Comparison of basic fetoprotein (BFP) with 10 other tumor markers was made with sera from 549 patients with benign diseases and 870 patients with cancers, using BFP-EIA kit and commercial kits for others. BFP-positive rates higher than CEA or CA19-9 were found in various cancers except CEA in cancer of the colon, pancreas and lung, or CA19-9 in cancer of pancreas and bile duct. Furthermore, BFP showed higher positive rates in comparison with AFP in cancer of liver and testis, SLX(sialyl SSEA-1) or SCC in lung cancer and CA125 in uterine cancer. The correlation coefficient of BFP with other tumor markers except for SCC in lung cancer were low (below 0.262) in cancer and benign diseases. The combined assay of BFP with some other makers such as CEA in cancer of the digestive organ, lung, markers ovary and uterus, CA19-9 in cancer of the bile duct and lung, CA125 in ovarian cancer, AFP in cancer of the liver and testis, and PAP in prostatic cancer, showed an elevation of diagnostic efficiency compared with single assay. These results indicate that BFP is superior to other tumor markers for serological diagnosis of various cancer and also available for the combined assays.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical evaluation on an enzyme immunoassay kit for basic fetoprotein (BFP). (2) Comparison and combination of BFP with other tumor markers]. 245 40

Tumour markers are often circulating tumour-associated indicators of tumour development. As such they are not suitable for tumour screening and localization, but valuable as adjuncts for medical follow-up care of tumour patients, where their serum level alterations may anticipate the clinical detection of tumour behaviour by a lead time of 1 to 6 months before other methods. The following tumour may be controlled by established markers: endocrine tumours by NSE, calcitonin, parathormone, 5-HIAA, catecholamines/metabolites etc.; head-neck tumours: SCC, CEA; thyroid carcinoma: TG, calcitonin; lung cancer: CEA, NSE, SCC; liver cancer: AFP (PLC), CA 19-9 (cholangiocell.), CEA (secondary): biliary tract and pancreatic cancer: CA 19-9; colorectal carcinoma: CEA, CA 19-9; squamous cell carcinoma (ENT, oesophagus, anal): SCC; breast cancer: CEA and CA 15-3; ovarian cancer: CA 125 (epithelial), CA 19-9 (mucinous); germ cell tumours (ovary including trophoblastic tumours/testes): AFP and HCG; prostatic cancer: PAP and PSA; bladder cancer: TPA.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical relevance of tumor markers]. 267 6

Prognostic factors in genitourinary cancers, renal cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, prostatic cancer, and testicular tumor, were discussed from several aspects on the basis of the analysis of own cases and reviews of literatures. The anatomical distribution of disease, particularly beyond the kidney, and degree of tumor differentiation were mostly related to prognosis in renal cell carcinoma. In bladder cancer, macroscopic growth pattern, histopathological intramural mode of spread, lymphatic and venous invasion, played an important role in prognosis, as do tumor grade and stage including metastasis. Hormone dependency and tumor markers were reconfirmed to be important and complementary as prognostic indicators as well as stage and grade in prostatic cancer. In testicular tumors, the most important factors for survival were extent of disease and tumor size, and histological cell type and determination of tumor markers, AFP and HCG, were also important and complementary as prognostic indicators.
 ...
PMID:[Prognostic factors in genitourinary cancer]. 340 56

The level of serum TPA was determined by radio-immunoassay in 19 healthy subjects and 90 patients with urogenital cancer. The normal level of serum TPA was 86 +/- 24 U/l, and the level of more than 134 U/l was determined positive. The positive rate of TPA was 38.9% in 90 patients, while that of CEA was 25.6%. In 19 patients with bladder tumor and 7 with testicular tumor, the positive rates of TPA were 52.6% and 71.4%, respectively, and the level of serum TPA was high in these positive patients. Considering the low positive rate of CEA, TPA may be a more useful marker than CEA in patients with bladder tumor and testicular tumor. Serial determinations of serum TPA and CEA showed the considerable variation of serum TPA compared with serum CEA and a temporary elevation of serum TPA following radical nephrectomy and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. However, the level of serum TPA fell significantly after the successful treatment in 8 patients (2 with renal cell cancer, 3 with bladder tumor, 1 with prostate cancer, 2 with testicular tumor) and rose sharply with recurrent or metastatic disease in 4 patients (2 with bladder tumor, 2 with testicular tumor). Although there was no correlation between the levels of serum TPA and serum PAP, the level of serum TPA tended to change in parallel with the level of serum AFP or HCG in 3 patients with testicular tumor.
 ...
PMID:[Evaluation of serum tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA) in patients with urogenital cancer]. 672 13

To enroll a large percentage of the cancer high-risk group and to simultaneously screen for various kinds of cancer, a modified combination assay of tumor markers and risk factors in serum was devised. A pilot study using 5 tumor markers, AFP, CEA, CA19-9, CA125, Dupan-2, as well as 3 risk factors of pepsinogen, PGI, PGII, PGI/II, showed 87.0% sensitivity and 58.8% specificity in 54 patients with various cancers and 163 healthy subjects. Eighty percent of stage I or II cases were detected except for one stage I case of right lung cancer and one stage II case of oral cavity cancer. Field work is now under way to detect various cancers among approximately 1000 inhabitants above 50 years of age in a particular town using 11 tumor markers and 3 risk factors. One hundred fifty three of 967 cases (male 372, female 595) showed various abnormal values and some were examined further as higher risk cases to detect particular cancers suspected from the results of the modified combination assay. At present, 5 PAP positive cases were referred to urological clinic for examination and 3 were confirmed histologically as prostatic cancer. This corresponds to approximately a 0.8% of detection rate which is more than 40 times the prostatic cancer mortality. Other kinds of cancer are still under investigation at various specified clinics. If cancer is not detected in these higher risk cases, they will be followed year to year. Further, the most suspicious cases will be examined at a chromosome or DNA level.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Clinical preventive medicine in cancer diagnosis--proposal for a new cancer diagnostic system in an aging society]. 836 Oct 26

Present status of tumor markers in urological malignancies for diagnosis and follow-up was reviewed. Although many researches have been performed, specific tumor markers in kidney, urothelium and penis cancers have not identified. In testicular tumors, AFP and beta-subunit of HCG are widely used. Especially, using biological half time, these substances are very useful in the judgement of presence of residual tumor or tumor recurrence. In prostate cancer, the determination of PSA has been confirmed to be the most useful tumor marker in solid tumor. World standardization of PSA assays and evaluation of PSA subtypes are necessary.
 ...
PMID:[Tumor markers in urological malignancies]. 869 21

To assess the possibility of increasing the detection rates of cytological examination in malignant effusions by the selection of specific tumor markers for a given type of tumor, we measured CEA, CA 19.9, CA 15.3, MCA, PSA, and AFP in malignant effusions from 89 patients with the following primary malignancies: colon, stomach, breast, liver, prostate, lung, and kidney. Cytological examination was positive in only 35 of 89 patients (40%), while the tumor markers were positive in 72 of 89 cases (80%). However, apart from small cell lung and kidney cancers, where the lack of a specific tumor marker resulted in no advantage, in the other types of tumors, the specific marker for each tumor identified correctly malignant effusions in 72 of 74 cases (97%). In fact, CEA was positive in 11 of 11 effusions induced by colorectal cancer; CA 19.9 in 28 of 30 gastric cancer effusions, while MCA and CA 15.3 were positive in breast cancer effusions (16/22 and 20/22). Finally, elevated AFP and PSA indicated hepatocellular and prostate cancer, respectively. In conclusion, in cancer patients with elevated effusion levels of specific tumor markers, the effusions could be considered of a malignant nature even without cytologically demonstrable tumor cells.
 ...
PMID:Tumor markers in the diagnosis of malignant serous effusions. 916 46

Clinical oncologists have always shown great interest in circulating tumor markers. There are several markers that in the clinical routine are a signal of particular tumor types; some of them are strictly tissue-specific such as prostatic specific antigen (PSA) for prostatic cancer, AFP and HCG for germ cell tumors of the testis and ovary, others such as CA 15.3, CA125, CEA or cytokeratins are less specific since their elevations can be found in different varieties of cancers even if they are preferentially associated to a certain tumor type, thus are considered markers for breast, ovarian cancer and colon adenocarcinoma. The most useful clinical applications of these parameters is their determination during the follow-up of the treated patients, in order to detect the tumor recurrence early, and also to evaluate the evolution of the disease by monitoring the treatment responses. During follow-up, increasing levels of tumor markers can be observed even several months before the clinical demonstration of cancer recurrence. The association of tumor marker tests with imaging modalities can lead to several advantages: the first is to confirm the diagnosis of relapses, possibly before the appearence of the related clinical symptoms due to tumor growth; the second is to localize the sites of lesions, while tumor markers provide only a general indication of the existence of metastases; the third is to make possible a correct whole body restaging. In the assessment of cancer response tumor markers are often very reliable and their changes are faster than the morphological ones. Among all the imaging modalities, nuclear medicine plays an important role in detecting recurrences and metastatic localizations as it is able to investigate functional rather than morphological aspects of tumors, and provide different information in comparison to morphologic imaging. In addition, the scintigraphic techniques offer the possibility to evaluate treatment responses, confirming or not the information from biochemical changes. This review aims to show some examples (breast, prostate and ovarian cancer) in which the combination of nuclear medicine imaging modalities and tumor marker tests is proposed for clinical practice. The advantages and some critical aspects are discussed on the basis of the clinical findings and the most important clinical indications are described.
 ...
PMID:Circulating tumor markers and nuclear medicine imaging modalities: breast, prostate and ovarian cancer. 1211 72

Cancer screening is a major healthcare issue. Screening modalities are constantly changing due to improvements in technology. Whole body positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-fluoro-2 deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) and the additional help of the serum levels of tumor markers have been considered as non-invasive methods for cancer screening in asymptomatic subjects. A total of 1283 subjects underwent whole-body FDG PET studies with the additional help of the serum levels of tumor markers in our center for cancer screening. The final diagnoses were confirmed by other imaging modalities or pathological findings in subjects with positive FDG-PET findings, and follow-up for at least 6 months were held in subjects with negative FDG-PET findings. Among a total of 18 (1.4%) subjects with cancers, FDG-PET detected cancers in 15 (1.2%) subjects but with false negative studies in 3 subjects with hepatoma (AFP = 129.6 ng/ml), prostate cancer (PSA = 25.1 ng/ml), and breast cancer (CEA and CA-153 were normal). False-positive FDG-PET studies were found in 24 (1.9%) subjects. However, none had abnormal serum levels of tumor markers. Whole body FDG-PET with the additional help of tumor markers could reduce the false negative and false positive results of FDG-PET only.
 ...
PMID:The value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with the additional help of tumor markers in cancer screening. 1293 56

Cancer often results from the accumulation of multiple genetic alterations. Although most malignancies are sporadic, only a small number of genes have been shown to undergo frequent mutations in sporadic cancers. The long arm of chromosome 16 is frequently deleted in human cancers, but the target gene for this deletion has not been identified. Here we report that ATBF1, which encodes a transcription factor that negatively regulates AFP and MYB but transactivates CDKN1A, is a good candidate for the 16q22 tumor-suppressor gene. We narrowed the region of deletion at 16q22 to 861 kb containing ATBF1. ATBF1 mRNA was abundant in normal prostates but more scarce in approximately half of prostate cancers tested. In 24 of 66 (36%) cancers examined, we identified 22 unique somatic mutations, many of which impair ATBF1 function. Furthermore, ATBF1 inhibited cell proliferation. Hence, loss of ATBF1 is one mechanism that defines the absence of growth control in prostate cancer.
 ...
PMID:Frequent somatic mutations of the transcription factor ATBF1 in human prostate cancer. 1575 May 93


1 2 Next >>