Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0376358 (prostate cancer)
 59,338 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

For therapeutic decisions it is essential to have an evaluation of the tumor volume and the grade of dedifferentiation. Measurement of PSA gives a good additional guide to the tumor volume and to dissemination of the disease. Investigation of the DNA ploidy values can offer further important information on the aggressiveness of the tumor and be helpful for our understanding of the process of tumor propagation. However, DNA studies can still not be regarded as being standard in the clinical work-up of these patients. They are optional but they have a definite place in the research on prostatic cancer. The various methods to study tumor growth by analysis of the S phase fraction are interesting new contributions but still belong to the research laboratories. When we consider prognostic indicators we have to take into account the biologic character of carcinogenesis. Modern research has shown that the development and the progression of cancer is not an instantaneous and solitary reaction. It is a series of events and a net-work reaction between growth-regulating factors, stimulating and inhibiting, a step-wise alteration of the genome. We must recognize that what we are observing is the condition at the present time, and, of course, the observation must be evaluated together with the whole clinical scenario, the man's age, his general condition etc. But still the series of diagnostic procedures presented here will give a rather solid ground for both our therapeutic decisions and for evaluation of the results of treatment.
 ...
PMID:Prognostic indicators in prostatic cancer. 150 80

Evaluation of results obtained in 70 hormone-treated patients with disseminated prostate cancer. Thirty-six of them were treated via orchiectomy and 34 received also flutamide. Initial objective response rates were 47% in the monotherapy group versus 58% for those undergoing complete blockade. Decrease of PSA and PAP was also higher in the group given flutamide. Nonetheless, no significant changes were observed with regard to biological and clinical progression or patients survival.
 ...
PMID:[Complete hormonal blockade vs. monotherapy in the management of metastasizing prostatic cancer]. 150 13

Correlation between findings on bone gammagraphy and PSA levels in 144 patients with untreated prostate cancer are analyzed. With prevalence of metastatic disease in 57.6% cases and considering the predictive cut value of metastasis to be 20 ng/ml, there were positive and negative predictive values of 64.9% and 73.9%, with a diagnostic confidence of 66.6%. We conclude that bone gammagraphy is essential for staging prostate cancer even in patients with PSA below 20 ng/ml.
 ...
PMID:[Can we do without bone gammagraphy in the staging of prostatic cancer?]. 150 19

A free screening consultation for carcinoma of the prostate was proposed to men over the age of 50 years working in different companies in the areas of Paris. This consultation included a digital rectal examination, a blood test for determination of serum acid phosphatase and prostatic specific antigen, and two dimensional trans-rectal ultrasonography of the prostate. 600 patients were seen. 575 were evaluable. Prostate biopsy was recommended in 152 men. Ninety-three prostate biopsies were performed. Eighteen prostatic cancers and 1 urothelial cancer invading the prostate were detected with an overall incidence of prostate cancer of 3.1%. Radical prostatectomies were performed in 10 of the 18 patients with a prostate cancer. Sensitivity of digital rectal examination ultrasonography and PSA were respectively 42.8%, 47.3% and 68.4% with an abnormal serum PSA level defined as being greater than 5 ng/ml. The predictive value of a positive ultrasonography (18.7%) contrasts with the predictive value of a positive digital rectal examination (30.7%) and serum PSA (30%). Digital rectal examination and determination of serum prostatic specific antigen seem to be the most useful tests for mass screening of prostate cancer. Transrectal ultrasonography is very useful for guided prostatic biopsy and for a better topographic evaluation of the tumor.
 ...
PMID:[Detection of cancer of the prostate. A study of 600 cases]. 169 Sep 63

In conclusion, an effective new marker for prostatic tissue has been identified and is commonly known as PSA. A review of the literature indicates that although PSA is not tumor specific, its organ-site and cell-type specificity provide the basis for making PSA the marker of choice for use in patients with prostate cancer. The clinical utility of PSA includes monitoring therapeutic efficacy, screening and early diagnosis in high-risk patients, prognosis, staging, and tumor volume evaluation, prediction of disease progression, detection of recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy, and the differential diagnosis and confirmation of tissue for prostatic origin. PSA is not a "magic bullet" for patients with prostate cancer. Many questions must still be answered. For example, with an increase in sensitivity for screening of high-risk populations, how does the urologist/oncologist determine which patients with latent curable early cancer will develop into clinically significant metastasis? Is PSA a more reliable method for detection of early prostate cancer than rectal examination? What procedure should be followed for an asymptomatic patient who presents a 35 ng/ml level of PSA during a routine physical examination? Clearly, further studies are required to answer these questions as well as to assess the malignant potential of the prostatic tumor cell. For now, the combination of PSA, rectal examination, and transrectal ultrasonography guided needle biopsy would appear to be the method of choice to decrease the yearly fatalities due to cancer of the prostate.
 ...
PMID:Prostate-specific antigen: questions often asked. 169 41

PSA is an important tumor-marker for prostatic cancer disease. We developed a sensitive, simple and inexpensive Sandwich ELISA for PSA with two monoclonal antibodies. The precision and reliability of the assay are reflected in the low inter- and intraassay coefficient of variation. PSA was not detectable in sera from normal females (n = 50). Sera from males with different serum levels of PSA (normal males, patients with prostate hypertrophy, prostate cancer patients, n = 79) and 15 prostate cancer patients treated with Zoladex were measured by our ELISA and by a commercially available RIA. The correlation coefficient between these both test systems was close to 1 (r = 0.97).
 ...
PMID:Development and evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunoassay for the prostate: specific antigen utilizing two monoclonal antibodies. 170 85

In this paper, data obtained through bone gammagraphia, prostatic specific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase in 159 measurements carried out in 76 patients with treated prostate cancer, 41 locoregional and 35 metastatic, is compared. Sensitivity to detect progression was higher for PSA (89% in LR and 92% in M) versus bone GF (22% in LR an 83% in M) and PAP (11% in LR and 79% in M). The results indicate that it is possible to use bone gammagraphia optimizing its efficacy.
 ...
PMID:[Usefulness of bone gammagraphy versus tumor markers (PSA/PAP) in monitoring cancer of the prostate]. 170 58

PSA is a kallikrein-like, serine protease that is produced exclusively by the epithelial cells of all types of prostatic tissue, benign and malignant. Physiologically, it is present in the seminal fluid at high concentration and functions to cleave the high molecular weight protein responsible for the seminal coagulum into smaller polypeptides. This action results in liquefaction of the coagulum. PSA is also present in the serum and can be measured reliably by either a monoclonal immunoradiometric assay or a polyclonal radioimmunoassay. The calculated half-life of serum PSA ranges from 2.2 to 3.2 days and the metabolic clearance rate of this tumor marker follows first-order kinetics. Digital rectal examination, cystoscopic examination and prostate biopsy all can cause spurious elevations of the serum PSA concentration. Conditions such as bacterial prostatitis and acute urinary retention also can falsely elevate the serum PSA level. Because approximately 25% of the patients with BPH only will have an elevated serum PSA concentration and BPH tissue contributes to this PSA value in a variable manner from patient to patient, it is unlikely that PSA by itself will become an effective screening tool for the early diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, if combined with digital rectal examination and/or transrectal ultrasound it may become a vital part of any early detection program. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia also may be associated with moderately elevated serum PSA levels. Although there is a direct correlation between the serum PSA concentration and clinical stage, PSA is not sufficiently reliable to determine the clinical stage on an individual basis. This finding also applies to pathological stage. As a result, the preoperative serum PSA concentration cannot be used to decide whether to recommend radical prostatectomy for potential cure. Low preoperative serum PSA concentrations in patients with previously untreated prostate cancers are predictive of a negative bone scan. Thus, in these select patients a staging bone scintigram may not be necessary. With respect to monitoring patients after definitive therapy, PSA is an exquisitely sensitive tumor marker. Irrespective of the treatment modality (radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy or antiandrogen treatment), PSA reflects accurately the tumor status of the patient and is prognostic of eventual outcome; this tumor marker is capable of predicting tumor recurrence months before its detection by any other method. PSA is also a most useful immunocytochemical marker. Its sensitivity and specificity to identify tissue of prostatic origin approach 100%. When compared to PAP, PSA is a more precise and meaningful marker in all clinical situations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Prostate specific antigen: a critical assessment of the most useful tumor marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. 170 89

The comparison of the diagnostic and prognostic significance of histology, immunohistochemical parameters (PSA, PSP), and silver-stained nucleolar organizer regions (AgNORs) was estimated in paraffin sections taken of 63 prostatic carcinomas prior to therapy. AgNORs were visualized with a one-step silver staining technique with the appropiate staining time determined by preliminary staining-time series. The mean AgNOR number per cell (n) and the mean AgNOR area per silver-stained dot (A) were determined by means of an automatic image analysis system. Thereby prostatic carcinomas exhibited multiple small AgNORs within their nuclei (n = 4.7, A = 0.09 micron 2), whereas benign prostatic epithelium showed few but large silver-stained particles (n = 1.8, A = 0.27 micron 2; p less than 0.001). This relationship was then calculated as a quotient of AgNOR number and area (NQ = n/A) which provided additional information for the diagnosis of malignancy as well as survival. Univariate survival analysis disclosed a set of four variables predicting death from prostatic cancer; cribriform growth pattern, AgNOR quotient, histological grade, and PSA immunoreactivity. Of these parameters, immunoreactivity of PSA failed to prove its prognostic significance in multivariate survival analysis (Cox model). No relation to prognosis was found for the number as well as the area of AgNORs alone. Therefore, image analysis proved to be a prerequisit for the feasibility of this promising technique by providing objective and reproducible results.
 ...
PMID:Silver-stained structures in prostatic carcinoma: evaluation of diagnostic and prognostic relevance by automated image analysis. 170 24

Serum prostatic specific antigen (PSA by Tandem-R immunoassay) was measured in 190 patients after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Serial measurements were made in all patients operated on in the past 3 years; 131 had undetectable levels and 59 had levels in the detectable range. Only 10% of the patients with undetectable PSA following surgery had seminal vesical involvement or positive lymph nodes. None of the patients with undetectable PSA have had clinical recurrence within the 41 months of mean follow-up. In 14 patients who had PSA serially measured since surgery, detectable levels were found within 6 months of operation and 7 of these patients had clinical progression within 2 years; 39 patients had detectable PSA after radical prostatectomy with no clinical evidence of recurrence. Biopsy of the anastomosis was performed in 11 patients with isolated detectable PSA after surgery and local recurrence was established in 4. PSA was detectable later in the follow-up of 45 patients operated on before the PSA assay became available but the date when PSA actually became detectable is not known. A relatively new method of estimating that date and constructing a corresponding Kaplan Meier curve is presented. PSA is an effective marker for monitoring patients after radical prostatectomy as it often detects early persistent disease in patients with detectable measurements 6 months post-operatively or recurrent disease in patients with later rising levels.
 ...
PMID:Prostatic specific antigen related to clinical status 1 to 14 years after radical retropubic prostatectomy. 171 55


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>