Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0376358 (prostate cancer)
 59,338 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The clinical features of a new prostate tumor marker, prostate-specific antigen (prostate antigen, PA), has been reviewed. Although PA cannot be used in early detection of prostate cancer, simultaneous determination of PA and PAP yields an additive clinical value in immuno-diagnosis of prostate cancer. At the present stage of development, PA is most useful as a prognostic marker for monitoring disease recurrence and treatment response. Also, PA is an effective immunohistologic marker for differential diagnosis of metastatic carcinomas with unknown primary, especially in the identification of metastatic prostate tumor in distant metastases and in the differentiation of primary prostate carcinoma from poorly differentiated transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Unequivocal evidence is not yet available on the role of circulating PA-binding globulin as an auto-antibody or an anti-tumor antibody as a result of patient's immune response. This observation is of clinical value for investigation of prostate cancer biology. The intriguing protease activity as detected in PA may provide new avenues for prostate cancer research.
 ...
PMID:What's new in tumor markers for prostate cancer? 242 64

Serum-acid phosphatase as measured by nine different methods, serum prostate-specific antigen, cancer antigen CA-50, and creatine kinase BB isoenzyme have been evaluated and compared with respect to efficiency in differentiating between prostate cancer and benign hyperplasia. The patient material consisted of 92 prostate cancer patients (59 untreated, and 33 previously treated), 106 patients with benign hyperplasia and 66 patients with non-prostatic urological diseases. The cancer group was classified according to the TNM-system, and also graded according to histopathological findings. The following main conclusions were drawn. Acid phosphatase activity, when measured with continuous monitoring procedure (substrate: alpha-naphthyl phosphate), showed on the average slightly, but statistically not significant higher diagnostic efficiency than when measured with conventional two-point discontinuous monitoring method (substrate: p-nitrophenyl phosphate). There was no or only marginal differences in diagnostic efficiency between activity measurements of the total acid phosphatase and the tartrate-labile fraction, and also between activity measurements and immunological measurements (PAP-RIA and PAP-IEA). Prostate-specific antigen was found to have statistically significant higher diagnostic efficiency than acid phosphatase, the former being positive in 17 of 25 patients with prostate cancer without distant metastases, and in six of 11 patients classified as T0-2 M0. Cancer antigen CA-50 and creatine kinase BB isoenzyme appeared to be of little diagnostic value. From a cost-effective point of view, total or tartrate-labile prostatic acid phosphatase activity, as measured by continuous monitoring technique with alpha-naphthyl phosphate as substrate, is suggested suitable as a first-choice parameter both for diagnostic and monitoring purposes with respect to prostate disease. Prostate-specific antigen may give additional information, and should be considered analysed on special request.
 ...
PMID:Diagnostic efficiency of biological markers in blood serum on prostate cancer: a comparison of four different markers and 12 different methods. 242 93

We have compared the concentrations in serum of gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-SM) and prostate specific antigen (PSA), two antigens of prostatic origin that are synthesized independently of prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP, EC 3.1.3.2), to assess their potential in monitoring prostatic cancer. At presentation, 27/30 (90%) patients with metastases had a PSA concentration greater than 10 ng/mL, and 29/30 (97%) a gamma-SM concentration greater than 10 ng/mL; 21/61 (34%) with disease but without metastases had an abnormal content of PSA, and 23/61 (38%) an abnormal gamma-SM. Concentrations of PSA and gamma-SM were significantly correlated (r = 0.68, p less than 0.001). In 20 patients without metastases followed longitudinally, the median concentrations of gamma-SM, PSA, and PAP in the 13 patients who developed bony metastases or showed signs of local spreading of the tumor were 58 ng/mL, 34 ng/mL, and 2.1 U/L, respectively. The corresponding median values in the seven patients who remained clinically stable were 2.5 and 3.9 ng/mL, and 2.3 U/L. We conclude that either PSA or gamma-SM can warn of disease progression when PAP activities are still within normal limits.
 ...
PMID:Measurements of serum gamma-seminoprotein and prostate specific antigen evaluated for monitoring carcinoma of the prostate. 243 Jul 32

We did a comparative analysis of the physiological and analytical properties of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), acid phosphatase (ACP; EC 3.1.32) activity, and acid phosphatase antigen (PAP) in serum. The PSA assay is sensitive to 0.2 microgram/L and demonstrates good linearity (y = 1.01x + 0.74). The CV was 3.9% at 40 micrograms/L, 8.0% at 3.1 micrograms/L. PSA and PAP are less stable at 4 degrees C than at -20 degrees C. Serum PAP and ACP concentrations showed large intra-individual fluctuations (average CVs of 22% and 24%, respectively), which were not observed with PSA measurements (average CV 6.2%). We saw significant correlation with the magnitude of physiological change when analytes were compared for serially collected split samples [y(PSA) = 0.14x(PAP) + 0.00, r = 0.767], which indicates that a common factor is influencing this variation. The excellent analytical performance, tissue specificity, and small degree of intra-individual variance are characteristics that favor the measurement of PSA in serum for monitoring patients with prostatic cancer.
 ...
PMID:Analytical and physiological characteristics of prostate-specific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase in serum compared. 244 7

Prostate-specific antigen (PA) has been evaluated clinically as a tumor marker of prostate cancer with the use of enzyme immunoassay (EIA). For serodetection of prostate cancer, PA was assayed in a total of 1,109 sera. From mean +/- 3 S.D. of normal controls, upper cut-off values in males were decided as 2.5 and 1.2 ng/ml in Americans and Japanese, respectively. Serum PA values in prostate cancer patients were positive in 78% of Americans and 62% of Japanese. However, in benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) cases, a high false positive rate of 41% was observed in Americans. Simultaneous assays of serum PA and PAP showed high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of prostate cancer. This antigen could be used, as well as PAP, for monitoring prostate cancer patients. Furthermore, serum PA levels prior to treatment may express to some degree the malignant potential of the cancer. These results suggest that PA may be useful as a tumor marker of prostate cancer.
 ...
PMID:Prostate-specific antigen in prostate cancer. 244 97

PSA and PAP are effective immunohistologic markers for prostatic cancer metastases. PSA seems to be more sensitive than PAP for diagnosing metastatic prostatic cancer. Simultaneous determination of PSA and PAP yields an additive clinical value in diagnosing and follow-up of prostatic cancer. The prognostic reliability for disease progression (recurrence and treatment response) seems to be PSA greater than PAP greater than AcidP greater than Alkal. P.
 ...
PMID:Acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase and prostate-specific antigen--usefulness in the diagnosis of metastatic disease and follow-up. 245 8

Comparison of basic fetoprotein (BFP) with 10 other tumor markers was made with sera from 549 patients with benign diseases and 870 patients with cancers, using BFP-EIA kit and commercial kits for others. BFP-positive rates higher than CEA or CA19-9 were found in various cancers except CEA in cancer of the colon, pancreas and lung, or CA19-9 in cancer of pancreas and bile duct. Furthermore, BFP showed higher positive rates in comparison with AFP in cancer of liver and testis, SLX(sialyl SSEA-1) or SCC in lung cancer and CA125 in uterine cancer. The correlation coefficient of BFP with other tumor markers except for SCC in lung cancer were low (below 0.262) in cancer and benign diseases. The combined assay of BFP with some other makers such as CEA in cancer of the digestive organ, lung, markers ovary and uterus, CA19-9 in cancer of the bile duct and lung, CA125 in ovarian cancer, AFP in cancer of the liver and testis, and PAP in prostatic cancer, showed an elevation of diagnostic efficiency compared with single assay. These results indicate that BFP is superior to other tumor markers for serological diagnosis of various cancer and also available for the combined assays.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical evaluation on an enzyme immunoassay kit for basic fetoprotein (BFP). (2) Comparison and combination of BFP with other tumor markers]. 245 40

Serum PAP, PSA, and testosterone values were measured in 101 men with prostatic nodule. In 71 patients prostatic cancer was detected and in 62 of those patients monitoring studies of the same parameters were assessed on 153 sera by applying a radioimmunodetective procedure. The PSA test, when compared to PAP values, offers significantly greater sensitivity towards small tumor burdens in early stages of the disease, and enables, in some cases, the prediction of tumor recurrence before clinical symptoms have been manifested. The results of this study indicate that the addition of the PSA assessment to the standard protocol of prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment, either alone or together with PAP in a double-marker assay, is promising for more accurate staging and monitoring of patients with prostatic tumors.
 ...
PMID:Cross-comparison of PSA and PAP values in a wide spectrum of prostate cancer conditions. 246 18

The present study was designed to investigate the efficacy of various combinations of chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of prostatic cancer in a group refractory to antiandrogenic therapy (Group 1) and in a previous untreated group (Group 2). Therapeutic combinations of Estracyt (E) + Peplomycin (P) + Doxorubicin (Do) and P + Do + 5 FU (F) in Group 1 and E + P, Honvan (Ds) + P and E in Group 2 were carried out. The main objectives of this study were estimations of the efficacy of E and P in relation to the refractory cases of Group 1 and the efficacy of the combination E + P, in Group 2. This is the first such prospective, randomized, controlled study to be carried out in Japan in relation to prostatic cancer. The results obtained in the present study indicated that chemotherapeutic regimens including E provide some enhanced efficacy, but that the efficacy with regard to refractory cases is poor (23.1-27.3%), as has been reported of studies conducted in the USA and Europe. With regard to previously untreated cases, the E + P regimen achieved a relatively higher response rate than the other treatments (72.7 vs 44.5 or 50.0%). In the comparison of survival times and survival curves, there were no statistically significant differences among the various treatment subgroups. A comparison of survival curves revealed the interesting finding that the PAP-related response showed a clear correlation to the survival curves of Group 2 patients.
 ...
PMID:A prospective, randomized controlled study on the treatment of stage C and stage D prostatic cancer with estracyt in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents. 246 51

Between June, 1986 and December, 1987, the serum gamma-Sm and PAP was measured in 29 men with untreated prostatic cancer, 45 with treated prostatic cancer (32 were well-controlled and 13 poorly controlled), 82 with benign prostatic hypertrophy and 10 with other urological diseases. All of the patients with prostatic cancer had histologically proven disease. Enzyme immunoassay for gamma-Sm and radioimmunoassay for PAP were used. The cut-off value for gamma-Sm was 4 ng/ml and that for PAP was 3 ng/ml. The mean values of gamma-Sm and PAP were statistically high in the untreated group and also in poorly-controlled group. In the untreated group, the rate of positivity for gamma-Sm and for PAP were 69% respectively and 83% of the patients had elevated values for either or both of these markers. In clinical stage A and B, gamma-Sm and PAP values were within the normal limit, however the concentrations of mean gamma-Sm and PAP correlated well with the stage of disease. In the poorly-controlled group, positive gamma-Sm values were detected in 75% and PAP in 67%, whereas almost all of the patients had normal values for these markers in the well-controlled group. In prostatic hypertrophy, elevated gamma-Sm values were detected in 15% and elevated PAP values in 6%. After the onset of treatment, elevated values were normalized in 66.7% of the patients for gamma-Sm and in 68.4% for PAP. In the untreated group, gamma-Sm tended to show a more prompt response. In the ill-controlled group, gamma-Sm and PAP returned to normal in 50% of the patients. gamma-Sm and PAP values were well correlated with the course of the prostatic cancer and the clinical usefulness became more obvious with a combination of these markers.
 ...
PMID:[Role of gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-SM) and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) as tumor markers of prostatic cancer]. 246 42


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>