UMLS:C0376358 - FACTA Search

Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts: Target Concepts:

Query: UMLS:C0376358 (prostate cancer)
59,338 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Vitamin E (tocopherol) enhances the growth inhibitory effects of adriamycin (ADR) on a variety of cancer cells in vitro. The role of vitamin E (d-alpha-tocopheryl) acid succinate in adjuvant chemotherapy with ADR was assessed in DU-145 human prostatic carcinoma cells in culture. Adriamycin produced a dose-dependent growth inhibition of DU-145 cells. The ID50 of DU-145 cells on the criteria: of clonal assay was 13 ng./ml. and of cell count assay was 14 ng./ml. Vitamin E succinate also inhibited the growth of DU-145 human prostatic carcinoma cells in a dose-dependent manner. 4.4 micrograms./ml. and 5.4 micrograms./ml. vitamin E succinate in the culture medium produced inhibition of growth to 50 per cent of control (ID50) in the clonal and the cell count assays respectively. When adriamycin and vitamin E succinate were used in combination, both additive and synergistic effects were observed, depending on the concentration of vitamin E succinate used. Doses of vitamin E succinate greater than its ID50 had a synergistic effect while doses smaller than its ID50 had an additive effect. In either case, the presence of vitamin E succinate caused an enhancement of tumor cell cytotoxicity of adriamycin while decreasing its ID50. Equivalent concentrations of sodium succinate and ethanol used to dissolve vitamin E succinate did not have any effect on DU-145 cells. Thus, it is concluded that the effect of vitamin E succinate is due to vitamin E and not due to succinate or ethanol. These results suggest that vitamin E may have a role in the treatment of human prostatic cancer as an adjuvant agent to adriamycin.
...
PMID:Vitamin E enhances the chemotherapeutic effects of adriamycin on human prostatic carcinoma cells in vitro. 373 28

Vitamin E, best known as a potent antioxidant, has been shown to have other functions that are not mediated by this activity. Recent reports have suggested that vitamin E may inhibit smooth muscle cell and also cancer cell growth. We have studied the effect of dl-alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E) on a series of well-established cancer cell lines that included two erythroleukemia cell lines and a hormone-responsive breast and prostate cancer cell line. Cell proliferation was examined in these cell lines, which were maintained at optimal growth conditions. A dose-dependent inhibition of cell growth was found in all cell lines examined, with the MCF-7 breast and CRL-1740 prostate cancer cell lines showing potent suppression of growth at 0.1 mM vitamin E, whereas the erythroleukemia cell lines, HEL and OCIM-1, responded only at > 0.25 mM vitamin E with inhibition of proliferation. Studies of [3H]thymidine incorporation showed that vitamin E supplementation reduced DNA synthesis in all cell lines. Analysis of high-molecular-weight DNA revealed extensive fragmentation, indicating apoptosis of all cell lines supplemented with vitamin E. Our studies thus give evidence of a general inhibition of cell proliferation by dl-alpha-tocopherol, with breast and prostate cancer cells distinctly more sensitive than erythroleukemia cells.
...
PMID:dl-alpha-tocopherol induces apoptosis in erythroleukemia, prostate, and breast cancer cells. 920 Jan 47

Vitamin E is one of the most researched compounds in medicine. Vitamin E is actually a general name for potentially eight different compounds, so supplements can contain several forms and vitamin E in the diet also differs from the form found over the counter. There has been a strong interest in this supplement in the prostate cancer arena primarily because of a Finnish study that demonstrated a lower morbidity and mortality from this disease in men taking 50 mg of synthetic (alpha-tocopherol) vitamin E daily. In addition, observations from laboratory and clinical studies dealing with heart disease have found that gamma-tocopherol may also play a significant role in prevention; therefore, we decided to test the ability of this compound (versus synthetic vitamin E) to control the growth of a human prostate cancer cell line. Gamma-tocopherol was found to be superior to alpha-tocopherol in terms of cell inhibition in vitro. Both forms of vitamin E (and others) should be thoroughly evaluated in the future to provide the most effective chemoprevention information to the patient.
...
PMID:Vitamin E, alpha- and gamma-tocopherol, and prostate cancer. 1033 21

A review is presented of studies on the effects of vitamin E on heart disease, studies encompassing basic science, animal studies, epidemiological and observational studies, and four intervention trials. The in vitro, cellular, and animal studies, which are impressive both in quantity and quality, leave no doubt that vitamin E, the most important fat-soluble antioxidant, protects animals against a variety of types of oxidative stress. The hypothesis that links vitamin E to the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) postulates that the oxidation of unsaturated lipids in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle initiates a complex sequence of events that leads to the development of atherosclerotic plaque. This hypothesis is supported by numerous studies in vitro, in animals, and in humans. There is some evidence that the ex vivo oxidizability of a subject's LDL is predictive of future heart events. This background in basic science and observational studies, coupled with the safety of vitamin E, led to the initiation of clinical intervention trials. The three trials that have been reported in detail are, on balance, supportive of the proposal that supplemental vitamin E can reduce the risk for heart disease, and the fourth trial, which has just been reported, showed small, but not statistically significant, benefits. Subgroup analyses of cohorts from the older three trials, as well as evidence from smaller trials, indicate that vitamin E provides protection against a number of medical conditions, including some that are indicative of atherosclerosis (such as intermittent claudication). Vitamin E supplementation also produces an improvement in the immune system and protection against diseases other than cardiovascular disease (such as prostate cancer). Vitamin E at the supplemental levels being used in the current trials, 100 to 800 IU/d, is safe, and there is little likelihood that increased risk will be found for those taking supplements. About one half of American cardiologists take supplemental vitamin E, about the same number as take aspirin. In fact, one study suggests that aspirin plus vitamin E is more effective than aspirin alone. There are a substantial number of trials involving vitamin E that are in progress. However, it is possible, or even likely, that each condition for which vitamin E provides benefit will have a unique dose-effect curve. Furthermore, different antioxidants appear to act synergistically, so supplementation with vitamin E might be more effective if combined with other micronutrients. It will be extremely difficult to do trials that adequately probe the dose-effect curve for vitamin E for each condition that it might affect, or to do studies of all the possible combinations of other micronutrients that might act with vitamin E to improve its effectiveness. Therefore, the scientific community must recognize that there never will be a time when the science is "complete." At some point, the weight of the scientific evidence must be judged adequate; although some may regard it as early to that judgement now, clearly we are very close. In view of the very low risk of reasonable supplementation with vitamin E, and the difficulty in obtaining more than about 30 IU/day from a balanced diet, some supplementation appears prudent now.
...
PMID:Vitamin E and heart disease: basic science to clinical intervention trials. 1065

Epidemiologic data suggest that the environment is responsible for most prostate cancers (PCA). One major mechanism by which the environment can influence carcinogenesis is oxidative damage. This refers to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that then damage important biomolecules, including DNA, protein, and lipids. Experimental observations suggest that oxidative damage is associated with PCA. These include: a) the association of PCA and dietary fat consumption (a major substrate for oxidative stress), b) oxidative biomarker data (suggesting increased oxidative stress among patients with PCA), c) ubiquitous defects in the glutathione-s-transferase pi pathway (a major endogenous antioxidant mechanism), and d) evidence that androgens (an important promoter of PCA growth) work in part via generation of ROS. Perhaps the best indirect evidence for oxidative stress comes from randomized double-blind prevention trials of antioxidants. Vitamin E and selenium have both been shown to reduce prostate cancer incidence. Although PCA prevention was not the primary endpoint of these studies, the statistical likelihood that both would prove beneficial by chance alone is 1 in 400. These data suggest that antioxidants may be beneficial in preventing PCA. Further research including randomized trials is warranted.
...
PMID:Antioxidant dietary supplements: Rationale and current status as chemopreventive agents for prostate cancer. 1129 3

Prostate cancer, even with its substantial public health impact of 180,400 new cases and 31,900 deaths estimated for 2000, still has a very low annual incidence (0.27% for men 34.4 years and older), which makes designing and conducting efficient prostate cancer prevention trials a challenge. Definitive prevention trials with cancer endpoints, such as the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT), Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT), and Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT), require long trial duration (up to 12 years) and large sample size (up to 32,400 subjects) to accomplish their objectives. This article discusses design concepts for potential prostate cancer prevention trials that require fewer years, subjects, and resources to complete. Design elements, such as high-risk populations, randomization, surrogate endpoints, including quality-of-life endpoints, masking/blinding, and various clinical/statistical designs (including 1-way layout, all-versus-none, factorial, and adaptive designs), are discussed, along with the ultimate goal of gaining US Food and Drug Administration approval for prostate-cancer preventive agents that can improve public health by reducing prostate cancer incidence and mortality.
...
PMID:Design considerations for efficient prostate cancer chemoprevention trials. 1129 29

A chemoprevention (CP) strategy has evolved for conducting efficient clinical trials for prostate cancer (PCa) prevention. It integrates five key components, including agents, biomarkers, cohorts, designs, and endpoints. The rationale for the CP strategy relates to the natural history of prostate cancer. There is a wide array of natural and synthetic agents that hold promise for inhibiting, reversing, or modulating the transition from normal to precancer and from precancer to cancer. These agent classes include antiandrogens, antiestrogens, phytoestrogens, antioxidants, anti-inflammatory (proapoptotic) agents, antiproliferation/antidifferentiation agents, signal transduction modulators of receptor tyrosine kinase and ras farnesylation, antiangiogenesis agents, insulinlike growth factor (IGF)-1, peroxisome proliferator-activator receptor modulators (-gamma and -delta), and gene-based interventions. Biomarkers and endpoints are guided by the level of evidence required (eg, phase 1, 2, 3). Two candidate surrogate endpoints (SE) based on histology are high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and computer-assisted image analysis of dysplastic lesions. Phase 1 trials use standard endpoints of safety, pharmacokinetics and limited pharmacodynamics. Phase 2 trials use endpoints of modulation of biomarkers and correlation with histology. Phase 3 trials use endpoints of clinical benefit, such as cancer incidence reduction and quality of life. Validation of a biomarker as a SE involves correlation of the biomarker with clinical benefit. Cohorts (target populations) for phase 2/3 trials include the general population of men over age 50 with a normal prostate-specific antigen (PSA), subjects with a strong family history of PCa, subjects with elevated PSA/negative biopsy, and subjects with HGPIN/negative biopsy. These at-risk populations reflect key individual risk factors (age, race, serum PSA [free/total]; serum IGF-1/IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3; 1, 25(OH)(2) D3; family history of PCa; carriers of PCa susceptibility genes [ELAC2, CYP3A4, SRD5A2, etc.]; and histology such as atypia and HGPIN) that could be combined into a multivariate risk model for PCa. The probability of cancer risk (recurrence) is a key factor that impacts on the clinical trial design (power, sample size, and primary endpoint). Multivariate predictive mathematical models for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy by decreasing sample size and time to clinical outcomes maximize trial efficiency and identify the patients most likely to benefit from secondary prevention. The two large primary prevention trials, Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial/Seleninium and Vitamin E Chemoprevention Trial (PCPT/ SELECT), in low- and average-risk subjects have sample sizes of 18,000 to 32,000, with a treatment duration of 7 years to detect a 25% reduction in biopsy-proven PCa. Subjects with HGPIN have the highest known cancer risk (approximately 50% at 3 years), and thus require a small sample size (n = 450) to detect a 33% reduction in cancer incidence. A schema involving three sequential trials for agent registration is described. In summary, a CP strategy that incorporates well-defined agents, clinical and validated SE, and high-risk cohorts defined by genetic and acquired risk factors in a series of well-designed randomized controlled trials provides an efficient pathway for evaluating and approving new agents for PCa prevention.
...
PMID:Prostate cancer chemoprevention: Strategies for designing efficient clinical trials. 1129 33

Selenium and vitamin E are probably 2 of the most popular dietary supplements considered for use in the reduction of prostate cancer risk. This enthusiasm is reflected in the initiation of the Selenium and Vitamin E Chemoprevention Trial (SELECT). Is there sufficient evidence to support the use of these supplements in a large-scale prospective trial for patients who want to reduce the risk of prostate cancer? Results from numerous laboratory and observational studies support the use of these supplements, and data from recent prospective trials also add partial support. However, a closer analysis of the data reveals some interesting and unique associations. Selenium supplements provided a benefit only for those individuals who had lower levels of baseline plasma selenium. Other subjects, with normal or higher levels, did not benefit and may have an increased risk for prostate cancer. The concept that supplements reduce prostate cancer risk only in those at a higher risk and/or those with lower plasma levels of these compounds is supported by trials examining beta-carotene supplements. Smokers may be the only individuals who benefit, as has also been shown with vitamin E supplementation. In 4 recent prospective studies, vitamin E was found to reduce the risk of prostate cancer in past/recent and current smokers and those with low levels of this vitamin. Vitamin E supplements in higher doses (> or =100 IU) were also associated with a higher risk of aggressive or fatal prostate cancer in nonsmokers from a past prospective study. The dose of vitamin E in the SELECT trial (400 IU/day) is 8 times higher than what has been suggested to be effective (50 IU/day) by the largest randomized prospective trial in which the incidence rate of prostate cancer was used as an endpoint. Recent research also suggests that dietary vitamin E may be associated with a lower risk of prostate cancer than the vitamin E supplement. Additionally, recent results from all past cardiovascular prospective, randomized trials suggest that vitamin E shows little benefit for cardiovascular disease risk, especially at the dose being used in the SELECT trial. Other intriguing positive findings from past prospective studies of supplements suggest that aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have a role in reducing the risk of prostate cancer or other types of cancer (eg, colon cancer). It may be time to conduct a large costly trial to reconsider the use of selenium and vitamin E supplements for the reduction of prostate cancer risk. Some evidence for the use of these supplements exists, but serious embellishment of study findings may be leading to an inappropriate use of these supplements in a clinical setting.
...
PMID:Selenium and vitamin E supplements for prostate cancer: evidence or embellishment? 1193 32

Prostate cancer is the commonest non-skin malignancy in the United States and has a substantial mortality rate despite the use of PSA-based screening. Furthermore, therapy for prostate cancer by surgery, radiotherapy or hormonal manipulation carries a significant risk of treatment-related morbidity. Recent analysis of secondary endpoints of several large-scale randomized prospective clinical trials for other malignancies has suggested that selenium or vitamin E may result in a decreased incidence and mortality from prostate cancer. In vitro and preclinical studies of these antioxidants support this hypothesis. This review outlines the rationale and design of SELECT, the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial, designed to test the hypothesis that selenium or vitamin E alone or in combination can reduce the clinical incidence of prostate cancer in a population-based cohort of men at risk. SELECT is a phase III, randomized, double-blinded, prospective, 2x2 factorial clinical trial which will randomize 32,400 healthy men with normal DRE and serum PSA to one of four study arms: selenium alone, vitamin E alone, selenium+vitamin E, or placebo. Study agents will be taken orally for a minimum of 7 and maximum of 12 y with assessments of general health, incident prostate cancer and toxicity performed at 12 month intervals. Under the assumptions described, the detectable risk reduction is 25% for an effective single agent relative to placebo, with an additional 25% reduction for the combination relative to an effective single agent. The estimated power for the comparison of a single agent vs placebo is 96% and the power for the comparison of an effective single agent vs combination is 89%. Secondary endpoints will include prostate cancer-free survival, all-cause mortality, and the incidence and mortality of other cancers and diseases potentially impacted by the chronic use of selenium and vitamin E. Other trial objectives will include periodic quality of life assessments, assessment of serum micronutrient levels and prostate cancer risk, and studies of the evaluation of biological and genetic markers with the risk of prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2000) 3, 145-151
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2000 Nov
PMID:SELECT: the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial: rationale and design. 1249 90

Increased intake of vitamin E has been suggested to be protective against prostate cancer in men, but the effects of vitamin E on prostate growth and function remain poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of vitamin E deficiency on pubertal growth and maturation of the prostate in the rat. Animals were placed on a vitamin E deficient diet at 28 days of age and were followed for 15 and 26 weeks. Vitamin E deficient rats had a circulating vitamin E level of less than 1% of control animals and experienced a decrease in body and testis weight. The deficiency did not alter the weights of the ventral and dorsal lobes of the prostate. However, there was an increase in weight, DNA, and protein contents of the lateral lobe in control and vitamin E deficient rats from 15 to 26 weeks of treatment, but these increases were significantly lower in vitamin E deficient 26-week treated rats. The volume of secretion per milligram tissue was greater in the ventral than lateral or dorsal lobes. The volume of secretion and activity of the secretory 26 kDa protease in the ventral prostate was lower in vitamin E deficient rats at 15 weeks, but not at 26 weeks of treatment. In contrast, the relative protein content of lateral lobe secretion increased in both control and vitamin E deficient rats from 15 to 26 weeks of treatment. The lateral, but not ventral or dorsal, lobes of both control and vitamin E deficient rats were affected by chronic prostatitis as evidenced by infiltration of inflammatory cells. The lateral lobes also showed markedly elevated activities of the matrix metalloproteinases gelatinase A (MMP-2) and gelatinase B (MMP-9). These data indicate that vitamin E deficiency does not alter the growth of the prostatic lobes, nor the onset and extent of lateral lobe specific prostatitis, but it may delay some differentiated functions such as secretion of specific proteins in the ventral lobe. Thus, the effects of vitamin E in the prostate of the rat appear to be selective.
...
PMID:Effect of vitamin E deficiency on the growth and secretory function of the rat prostatic complex. 1278 14

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >>