Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0376358 (prostate cancer)
 59,338 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Three hundred sixty-two men underwent transrectal ultrasound of the prostate (TRUS), digital rectal examination (DRE), and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determination as part of an early detection program for prostate cancer. Thirty-seven (10%) cancers were detected. DRE had the highest sensitivity and specificity, 89 percent and 84 percent, respectively. TRUS and PSA had comparable sensitivities (84% and 81%) and specificities (82% and 82%). The positive predictive values of DRE, TRUS, and PSA determination were 39 percent, 35 percent, and 33 percent, respectively. We found a cancer detection rate of 16 percent among patients with symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction and 5 percent in patients without these symptoms. The detection rate was 36 percent for physician-referred patients and 3 percent for self-referred patients. This suggests to us that at the present time the best utilization of medical resources to increase prostate cancer detection is to educate men to have annual medical evaluations by primary-care physicians who are encouraged to incorporate risk assessment and screening DRE as part of their routine practice. Any man with either abnormal findings on examination or increased risk should be referred to a urologist for further evaluation.
 ...
PMID:Early detection program for prostate cancer: results and identification of high-risk patient population. 170 32

The authors evaluated 440 men with clinically staged and untreated prostate cancer with a monoclonal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay. The serum PSA value correlated significantly with both the stage and grade of disease (P less than 0.00005). The relationships between PSA and consecutive Stages A, B, C, and D2 (alpha = 0.15) and between progressive Gleason's scores 2 to 4, 5 to 7, and 8 to 10 (alpha = 0.15) were statistically significant. Also statistically significant was the correlation between serum PSA level and intracapsular versus extracapsular disease (P less than 0.00005), although no one value can be used to differentiate reliably between patients in these two categories. The probability of clinically detectable metastasis (Stage D2) is 85% if the serum PSA level is greater than 30; however, 12% of patients without clinical evidence of metastases (Stages A, B, and C) have such a serum PSA value. Despite the statistically significant association between PSA and tumor differentiation and volume as reflected by tumor grade and clinical stage, this marker cannot be used to determine either for an individual patient.
 ...
PMID:Monoclonal prostate-specific antigen in untreated prostate cancer. Relationship to clinical stage and grade. 170 17

Serum levels of prostate-specific antigen have assumed a prominent clinical role in the management of prostate cancer. Little is known about the production of prostate-specific antigen, its mechanism of entry into the serum in normal and pathologic states, and mechanism(s) of removal from the serum. This study examined nephrostomy urine specimens, finding no significant excretion of prostate-specific antigen into the renal pelvic urine. Similarly, no significant lowering of serum prostate-specific antigen levels occurred during routine hemodialysis in men with chronic renal failure, nor were ambulatory, pre-dialysis serum prostate-specific antigen levels in these same men with chronic renal failure elevated. It appears unlikely that the kidney plays a significant role in the clearance of prostate-specific antigen from human serum.
 ...
PMID:Prostate-specific antigen is not excreted by human kidney or eliminated by routine hemodialysis. 170 64

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been shown to be a more sensitive tumor marker than prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) in prostatic adenocarcinoma: PSA was positive in 54 of our 117 patients (46%) and PAP was positive in 24 (21%). In order to compare the usefulness of these markers during and after radiotherapy serum samples from 24 patients treated with external beam irradiation were analyzed. PAP was only slightly positive in 1 patient (4%) after radiotherapy. His PSA level was highly elevated and he died of progressive disease. In the other 23 patients the cancer was in local control. However, the serum PSA level remained positive in 5 of these patients indicating vital cancer cells may still have been present. An alternative possibility is that metaplastic prostatic cells which secrete PSA were left after radiotherapy, as has been shown to be the case in prostatic hyperplasia. Before radiotherapy increased PSA levels were measured in 3 patients. In 2 of them the level declined to normal within 6 months after radiotherapy. The PAP levels were normal. It is concluded that PSA (positive in 25% of patients after radiotherapy) might be more sensitive than PAP (positive in 4%) in monitoring the effect of radiotherapy in prostatic cancer patients.
 ...
PMID:Prostate-specific antigen in the follow-up of prostatic adenocarcinoma treated with external beam radiation. 170 23

To compare the clinical usefulness of the measurement of prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in serum of patients with prostatic carcinoma, we studied 128 patients with prostatic pathology, sixty (46.9%) of whom had prostatic cancer. Receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed and the underlying areas were calculated and compared to study clinical efficiency of the two markers regardless of the cutoff level selected. The area for PSA (0.90 +/- 0.30) was significantly higher (p less than 0.001) than that of PAP (0.71 +/- 0.05) showing that PSA was a better discriminator of the patients with or without prostatic cancer. The maximal clinical efficiency of the two tests at selected cutoff levels (0.8 U/L for PAP and 10 micrograms/L for PSA) was 0.787 and 0.883, respectively, confirming the superiority of PSA. However, the associated determination of the two markers improved the clinical specificity with no false-positive cases.
 ...
PMID:Diagnostic value of prostatic acid phosphatase and prostate-specific antigen in patients with prostatic cancer. 170 11

Prostate-specific antigen (PA) and gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-Sm) were compared by immunocytochemical, immunodiffusion and immunoblotting methods using rabbit anti-PA antibody and rabbit anti-gamma-Sm antibody. Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) were developed for measurements of PA and gamma-Sm to determine a correlation between serum PA and gamma-Sm levels in patients with prostate cancer. The patterns of localization and distribution of PA and gamma-Sm were identical in prostate tissue sections, including benign and cancerous human prostates. The immunodiffusion study showed that the antigens with which anti-PA antibody and anti-gamma-Sm antibody reacted in seminal plasma and prostate tissue homogenates were identical to each other. In the immunoblotting study, anti-PA antibody and anti-gamma-Sm antibody recognized a single antigen corresponding to a molecular weight of approximately 33,000 both in seminal plasma and prostate tissue homogenates. The EIAs developed in this study were sensitive, specific, and reproducible, and the correlation between serum PA and gamma-Sm values determined by these EIAs was highly significant (r = 0.99, P less than 0.001). These results indicated that PA and gamma-Sm were immunologically identical and that serum PA and gamma-Sm determined by immunoassays using anti-PA antibody and anti-gamma-Sm antibody should be evaluated as identical tumor markers for serodiagnosis of prostate cancer.
 ...
PMID:Immunological comparison between prostate-specific antigen and gamma-seminoprotein. 170 12

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and DNA ploidy as measured by flow cytometry were compared with conventional prognostic indicators in 112 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically resectable prostate cancer. The variables examined included age, race, prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), Gleason score of the radical prostatectomy specimen, and pathologic stage. No significant relationships were found between DNA ploidy and age, mean PAP value, and absolute PAP value. Of the 112 patients, 65 (58.0%) had disease limited to the prostate (pathologic Stages A and B); 47 (42.0%) had extraprostatic disease (pathologic Stages C and D1). The stage was related to the Gleason score (P less than 0.0001) where extraprostatic disease was associated with a Gleason score of 6 to 10. Nineteen (17.0%) patients had aneuploid tumors, and 93 (83.0%) had diploid tumors. DNA ploidy significantly correlated with pathologic stage (P = 0.04); aneuploidy was identified more frequently in patients with Stages C and D1 tumors. Aneuploid tumors occurred more frequently than diploid tumors in patients with a Gleason score of 6 to 10 (P = 0.034). Mean PSA values were higher in patients with aneuploid tumors (P = 0.078), extraprostatic neoplasms (P = 0.00001), and cancers with a Gleason score of 6 to 10 (P = 0.0004). Furthermore, PSA values greater than 10.0 ng/ml were associated with extraprostatic disease and a Gleason score of 6 to 10 (P less than 0.05 and P less than 0.001, respectively). Significant racial differences were found with respect to DNA ploidy, mean DNA indices, and mean PSA values. The 18 black patients had more DNA aneuploid tumors (P = 0.043), a higher mean DNA index (P = 0.017), and a higher mean PSA value (P = 0.043) than the 94 white patients. Both PSA and DNA ploidy analysis by flow cytometry appear to be valuable indicators in the evaluation of patients with prostatic carcinoma.
 ...
PMID:DNA ploidy and prostate-specific antigen as prognostic factors in clinically resectable prostate cancer. 171 May 33

Serum levels of prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-Sm) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were determined simultaneously in 57 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and in 50 untreated patients with prostatic cancer (adenocarcinoma, N = 47 and non-adenocarcinoma, N = 3). The correlations between the serum levels of gamma-Sm and PSA in these patients were assessed by linear regression analysis. Some fundamental studies were added for explaining the causes of discrepancy between the serum levels of gamma-Sm and PSA. All of BPH group underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and the sera were obtained for measurements before, immediately after and 18 hours after TURP. The gamma-Sm correlated well with the PSA in the sera obtained before (r = 0.76) and 18 hours after (r = 0.73) TURP. However, there was no correlation (r = 0.26) between them in the sera obtained immediately after TURP. In 47 untreated patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate, no significant correlation (r = 0.19) between serum levels of gamma-Sm and PSA was observed, although there was correlation (r = 0.51) between those of PAP and PSA. When these patients were classified into two groups, M0 (stage A-C; N = 26) and M1 (stage D; N = 21), however, the serum gamma-Sm correlated with the serum PSA in M0 group (r = 0.57), but didn't in M1 group (r = 0.11). Furthermore, the differences in the means of PAP (p less than 0.05) and PSA (p less than 0.001) between M0 group and M1 group were statistically significant, although the serum gamma-Sm failed to distinguish M0 from M1. The anti-PSA antibody of "PSA Kit" reacted against the standard gamma-Sm adopted from "gamma-Sm Kit". Surprisingly, the anti-gamma-Sm antibody of "gamma-Sm Kit" also reacted against the standard PSA adopted from "PSA Kit". The gamma-Sm and PSA apparently cross-reacted each other. The quantitative analyses with serial dilution of the sera were done by using each assay in 3 patients whose serum levels of gamma-Sm were markedly different from those of PSA. The dilution curve for PAP appeared to be rectilineal, and that for PSA also appeared to be approximately rectilineal. However, the gamma-Sm assay failed to be proportional. In conclusion, the correlation between serum levels of gamma-Sm and PSA was absent in certain circumstances, when the true values of them were expected to be much higher than those determined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Discrepancy between the serum levels of gamma seminoprotein and prostate-specific antigen in patients with prostatic neoplasms. Both true or either untrue]. 171 Nov 33

Prostate cancer, the most prevalent cancer affecting men, frequently metastasizes to the axial skeleton where it produces osteoblastic lesions with growth rates often exceeding that of the primary tumor. To evaluate the role of tumor cell-host stromal interaction and stromal specific growth factors (GFs) in prostate cancer growth and progression, we coinoculated athymic mice with human prostate cancer cells (LNCaP) and various nontumorigenic fibroblasts s.c. LNCaP tumor formation was most consistently induced by human bone (MS) fibroblasts (62%), followed by embryonic rat urogenital sinus mesenchymal (rUGM) cells (31%) and Noble rat prostatic fibroblasts (17%), but not by NIH-3T3, normal rat kidney, or human lung CCD16 fibroblasts. Carcinomas formed preferentially in male hosts, demonstrating in vivo androgen sensitivity. The human prostate component of these tumors was confirmed with immunohistochemical staining for prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Northern analysis for PSA expression, and Southern analysis for human repetitive Alu sequences. Elevations in serum PSA paralleled the histomorphological and biochemical findings. LNCaP and fibroblast cell-conditioned media (CM) was used to determine whether autocrine and paracrine mitogenic pathways exist between LNCaP and fibroblast cells in vitro, and various defined GFs were tested to identify possible active factors. Mitogenic assays revealed a 200-300% bidirectional stimulation between LNCaP and bone or prostate fibroblast-derived CM. Lung, normal rat kidney, and 3T3 fibroblast CM were not mitogenic for LNCaP cells. Among the purified GFs tested basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) was the most potent mitogen, stimulating LNCaP growth 180% in a concentration-dependent manner. Transforming growth factor alpha and epidermal growth factor were both minimally mitogenic. Coinoculation of LNCaP cells with a slowly absorbed matrix (Gelfoam) absorbed with bFGF or dialyzed and concentrated rUGM or MS CM was also capable of inducing LNCaP tumor formation in vivo. These observations illustrate that fibroblasts differentially modulate prostate cancer growth through the release of paracrine-mediated GFs, possibly including bFGF, and that tumor-stromal cell interactions play an important role in prostate cancer growth and progression.
 ...
PMID:Acceleration of human prostate cancer growth in vivo by factors produced by prostate and bone fibroblasts. 171 49

To assess the value of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in prostate cancer follow-up, we prospectively studied 107 consecutive patients with: (1) pathologically confirmed prostate cancer; (2) definitive prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy greater than or equal to 3 mo prior to bone scanning; and (3) one bone scan and serum PSA sampling within 3 mo of each other. The mean and range of patient follow-up since definitive therapy was 1.6 and 0.5-8 yr, respectively. Abnormal bone scans were correlated with pertinent radiographs. Of 107 bone scans, 16 demonstrated metastatic bone disease. A PSA value of less than or equal to 8 ng/ml excluded bone metastases with a predictive value of a negative test of 98.5%. Without radiographic correlation, abnormal bone scans rarely represented metastases if the PSA value was less than or equal to 8 ng/ml. In summary, serum PSA concentration determines the need for follow-up bone scanning and assists in scan interpretation in patients status post definitive therapy for prostate cancer.
 ...
PMID:The clinical utility of prostate-specific antigen and bone scintigraphy in prostate cancer follow-up. 171 83


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>