Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0376358 (
prostate cancer
)
59,338
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
Serum acid phosphatase activity, prostate specific phosphatase and
prostate specific antigen
were measured in 100 patients with
prostatic cancer
. The patients were divided according to the differentiation grade into 3 groups: G1 (well), G2 (moderately) and G3 (poorly differentiated) carcinoma. Bone metastases were identified by scintigraphy. Among the 76 M0 patients the mean levels of all 3 markers were slightly higher in patients with moderately differentiated prostatic carcinoma. Among the 24 M1 patients the primary tumour was either G2 (18 patients) or G3 (6 patients); none had G1 lesions. Significantly higher serum ACP and PAP levels were found in patients with G2 tumours than in those with G3 lesions. It was concluded that the histological differentiation grade of prostatic carcinoma did affect serum levels of prostatic tumour markers; the tendency towards higher levels in the G2 group was noticeable in both non-metastatic and metastatic cases despite the limited number of patients in the latter category. In clinical practice this information may be an important additional tool in staging
prostatic cancer
.
...
PMID:Prostate tumour markers and differentiation grade in prostatic cancer. 170 39
Presently, the standard staging evaluation of
prostate cancer
includes digital rectal examination, measurement of serum tumor markers and a radionuclide bone scan. To evaluate the ability of local clinical stage, tumor grade, serum acid phosphatase, serum prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and serum
prostate specific antigen
(
PSA
) to predict bone scan findings, a retrospective review of 521 randomly chosen patients (mean age 70 years, range 44 to 92 years) with newly diagnosed, untreated
prostate cancer
was performed. Local clinical stage, tumor grade, acid phosphatase, PAP and
PSA
all correlated positively with bone scan findings (p less than 0.0001). Using receiver operating characteristic curves, however,
PSA
had the best over-all correlation with bone scan results. The median serum
PSA
concentration in patients with a positive bone scan was 158.0 ng./ml., whereas men with a negative bone scan had a median serum
PSA
level of 11.3 ng./ml. (p less than 0.0001). Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, local clinical stage, tumor grade, acid phosphatase and PAP were evaluated in combination with
PSA
to assess whether these parameters increased the ability of
PSA
alone to predict bone scan findings. None of these clinical parameters, irrespective of the combination used, contributed appreciably to the predictive power of
PSA
alone. A probability plot with 95% confidence intervals was constructed that allows the practicing urologist to estimate on an individual basis the probability of a positive bone scan for any given serum
PSA
value. The most significant finding of this study, however, was the negative predictive value of a low serum
PSA
concentration for bone scan findings. In 306 men with a serum
PSA
level of 20 ng./ml. or less only 1 (
PSA
18.2 ng./ml.) had a positive bone scan (negative predictive value 99.7%). This finding would suggest that a staging radionuclide bone scan in a previously untreated
prostate cancer
patient with a low serum
PSA
concentration may not be necessary.
...
PMID:Predicting radionuclide bone scan findings in patients with newly diagnosed, untreated prostate cancer: prostate specific antigen is superior to all other clinical parameters. 137 Jun 99
A mass screening for
prostatic cancer
was conducted in Hisayama town, Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan from 1988 to 1989. As the primary screening questionnaire survey about urination and measurement of serum
prostate specific antigen
(
PSA
) were performed in 789 of the 1025 male residents over 50 years old (77.0%). For the second screening with digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography, 184 subjects (23.3%) were picked up.
Prostatic cancer
was suspected in 33 (4.2%) of the 134 subjects who actually underwent the second screening examination. Prostatic biopsy and other examinations such as measurement of prostatic acid phosphatase and gamma-seminoprotein, urinalysis and radiographic examination were performed in 26 as the third screening, and
prostatic cancer
was detected in 5 (0.63%); 3 in stage B and 2 in stage C. Four of the 5 subjects with
prostatic cancer
had complained no urinary symptoms on questionnaire. Serum
PSA
was useful for detecting early stage
prostatic cancer
.
...
PMID:[Mass screening for prostatic cancer in Hisayama town, Fukuoka]. 170 89
The clinical significance of serum
prostate specific antigen
(
PSA
) values in hormonally treated
prostate cancer
patients and the effect of hormonal therapy on the serum
PSA
concentration, independent of the response observed from its antitumor activity, are not well defined. To elucidate further the influence of antiandrogen therapy on serum
PSA
expression, 81 randomly selected patients with stage D2
prostate cancer
were evaluated with respect to serum
PSA
concentration. These patients were divided into 2 groups on the basis of previous hormonal therapy. Group 1 consisted of 43 patients 55 to 89 years old (mean age 71 years) who had received no prior therapy for
prostate cancer
. Group 2 included 38 men 58 to 84 years old (mean age 72 years) who had received only androgen deprivation therapy with either bilateral orchiectomy or diethylstilbestrol. The mean interval between initiation of antiandrogen therapy and evaluation of these patients was 14 months (range 8 to 31 months). At the time of
PSA
determination both groups were similar in all respects, including tumor grade, disease symptoms and bone scan findings. The median serum
PSA
concentration was 96.0 ng./ml. in group 1 and 16.5 ng./ml. in group 2 (p less than 0.001), despite both groups having similar symptoms and widespread metastatic disease on radionuclide bone scan. In group 1 only 1 patient (2%) had a serum
PSA
level less than 4.0 ng./ml., whereas 13 men (34%) in group 2 had a serum
PSA
concentration below 4.0 ng./ml. (p less than 0.001). Of the patients in group 1, 2% and of the men in group 2, 45% had a serum
PSA
concentration less than 10 ng./ml. (p less than 0.001). These findings demonstrate that the serum
PSA
level in
prostate cancer
patients treated hormonally may have a significantly different meaning than the same serum
PSA
value in patients without hormonal therapy. In addition, these observations suggest that
PSA
expression may be under hormonal regulation and that androgen deprivation therapy may have a direct effect on the serum
PSA
concentration, independent of the response obtained from any antitumor activity. However, the exact mechanism of this androgenic influence on
PSA
expression awaits further investigation at the cellular level.
...
PMID:Prostate specific antigen in hormonally treated stage D2 prostate cancer: is it always an accurate indicator of disease status? 170 40
The usefulness of acid phosphatase (PAP) and
prostate specific antigen
(
PSA
) is compared. The author concludes that
PSA
is more sensitive, has better organ specificity, does less diurnal variations and correlates better with tumor which makes
PSA
superior for staging and monitoring of therapy in
prostate cancer
.
...
PMID:Is acid phosphatase (PAP) still justified in the management of prostatic cancer? 170 56
In a study of 2,400 randomly selected men (age 55-70 years) for early detection of
prostate cancer
the authors have compared the diagnostic value of digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and
prostate specific antigen
(
PSA
). Altogether 62 prostate cancers were detected, corresponding to a detection rate of 3.5% but by use of DRE the detection rate was only 2.3%. The study showed that TRUS added significantly to the detection rate. If radical surgery is restricted to stages T1 and T2A, the combined use of DRE and TRUS detected twice as many cases fit for this treatment than DRE alone. The authors advocate randomized studies for evaluation of early radical treatment of
prostate cancer
. Before results of such studies have appeared they recommend methodological studies aimed at development and enhancement of the accuracy of the diagnostic tools.
...
PMID:Digital rectal examination versus transrectal ultrasound in detection of prostate cancer. Preliminary results from a study of a randomly selected population. 170 57
The American Cancer Society National
Prostate Cancer
Detection Project (ACS-NPCDP) is a multidisciplinary, multicenter effort to assess the feasibility of early
prostate cancer
detection by digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), and
prostate specific antigen
(
PSA
) assay. By June 1990, 2425 men not previously suspected of having
prostate cancer
had been examined in ten participating clinical centers according to the project protocol. Three hundred ninety-six men (16.3%) were recommended for biopsy on the basis of TRUS or DRE. An analysis of the results of 330 completed biopsies showed 52 cancers detected by DRE and/or TRUS. Forty-four (84.6%) of the men with cancer had positive TRUS examination results compared with 33 (63.5%) with positive DRE. Five additional cancers were discovered as a result of elevated
PSA
levels. The overall detection rate was 2.4% and this rate varied by age. The detection rate in men 55 to 60 years of age was 1.3% and this rose to 3.3% in men older than 65 years of age. The estimated sensitivity was significantly greater for TRUS compared with DRE (77.2% versus 57.9%; P less than 0.05). The estimated specificity of DRE was greater than that of TRUS (96.3% versus 89.4%; P less than 0.01). The positive predictive value (PPV) for the tests varied as a function of patient and disease characteristics. The overall PPV was 28.0% for DRE and 15.2% for TRUS. The occurrence of elevated
PSA
levels significantly increased the PPV of both TRUS and DRE. The majority of cancers detected were at early stages. These preliminary data suggest the feasibility of using these techniques to promote cancer control, but additional data and follow-up are needed to assess the significance of the results.
...
PMID:The American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project. Findings on the detection of early prostate cancer in 2425 men. 171 May 31
The clinical significance of serum basic fetoprotein (BFP) in
prostatic cancer
was investigated together with serum prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-Sm) and
prostate specific antigen
(PA). Investigated in this study were 40 patients with
prostatic cancer
, ranging in age from 50 to 85 years (mean age: 69.5 years). According to clinical staging, 3 cases (7.5%) had a stage A disease, 10 cases (25.0%) a stage B disease, 7 cases (17.5%) a stage C disease, and 20 cases (50.0%) a stage D disease. The positive rates for serum BFP, PAP, gamma-Sm, and PSA were 60.0, 45.0, 63.6, and 68.4%, respectively, and these rates increased as the stage advanced. The above results suggest that BFP is the most useful marker of the four for monitoring
prostatic cancer
. In a combination assay of these four markers, 29 (87.9%) of 33 patients with
prostatic cancer
could be diagnosed by observing an elevated serum level in one of the markers. This suggests that a combination assay of BFP, PAP, gamma-Sm and PSA in patients with
prostatic cancer
is useful for diagnosis and monitoring of the disease.
...
PMID:[Clinical evaluation of serum basic fetoprotein for prostatic cancer--comparative study with PAP, gamma-Sm and PSA]. 171 73
To determine the value of prostatic markers for
prostate cancer
, serum prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP),
prostate specific antigen
(
PSA
) and gamma-Seminoprotein (gamma-Sm) were measured in 81 patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy and in 12 patients with incidental
prostatic cancer
. gamma-Sm was the most sensitive but the least specific of the three markers. Large prostate glands, especially hyper-glandular type tended to be associated with high gamma-Sm levels in our study. Patients with acute urinary retention, acute prostatitis and necrosis also showed positive markers. Out of 12 patients with incidental cancer, 5 patients had more than 2 elevated markers. Four patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma failed to show increased markers.
...
PMID:[Clinical and pathological study of tumor marker in benign prostatic hypertrophy and incidental prostatic cancer]. 171 9
The records of 143 patients treated at 5 institutions with external beam megavoltage irradiation for localized
prostatic cancer
were reviewed to evaluate post-treatment changes in
prostate specific antigen
(
PSA
) in the context of subsequent events. Complete responders were defined as patients clinically well with normal
PSA
, clinical failures were patients with documented local tumor recurrence or distant metastases and chemical failures were patients clinically well but with a
PSA
level above the upper limits of normal. Correlations with pre-treatment
PSA
values were also made for the 50 of 143 patients for whom pre-treatment
PSA
data were available. Median patient followup was 27 months (range 18 to 91 months). The data were analyzed with parametric and nonparametric univariate and multivariate statistical procedures. Pre-treatment
PSA
levels increased with increasing tumor stage (p = 0.004) but not with increasing summed Gleason pattern scores (p = 0.15). The probability of remaining a complete responder decreased with increasing stage (p = 0.008) but not with increasing Gleason score (p = 0.14). Increasing pre-treatment
PSA
correlated with clinical failure (p = 0.01) and chemical failure (p = 0.006). Of the patients with a pre-treatment
PSA
level of less than 4 times the upper limits of normal 83% remained as complete responders compared to 30% of those with a higher pre-treatment
PSA
(p = 0.0002). The return of
PSA
levels to the normal range within 6 months after treatment was strongly correlated with a favorable outcome when analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. The status at last followup of patients who had a normal
PSA
level at 6 months versus those with an elevated
PSA
level 6 months after treatment is 94% versus 8% for complete responders (p = 0.0001), 0% versus 60% for clinical failures (p = 0.002) and 6% versus 32% for chemical failures (p = 0.14). Similar results occurred when analyzing outcomes in relationship to
PSA
normalization within 12 months after treatment (p = 0.001 for clinical failures, p = 0.02 for chemical failures and p = 0.001 for complete responders). We conclude that the pre-treatment level of
PSA
is an independent prognostic factor for
prostate cancer
patients treated with primary radiation therapy, and that the failure of
PSA
to return to the normal range within 1 year after completion of treatment identifies a group of patients at high risk for tumor recurrence.
...
PMID:Prostate specific antigen in the management of patients with localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with primary radiation therapy. 171 96
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>