Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0376358 (prostate cancer)
 59,338 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter study was undertaken to investigate the effects of Zoladex plus flutamide vs. Zoladex plus placebo in patients with advanced prostatic cancer. Interim analysis has revealed no differences between the 2 groups in objective or subjective responses at 6 months' follow-up or in overall survival and time to disease progression at 15 months' follow-up.
 ...
PMID:Total androgen blockade with Zoladex plus flutamide vs. Zoladex alone in advanced prostatic carcinoma: interim report of a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. 215 Dec 76

Since March 1987, 304 evaluable patients with stage C and D prostate cancer have been entered into a prospective trial comparing Zoladex and Zoladex plus flutamide. To date, there has been no significant difference in over-all and progression-free survival between the 2 treatment groups. However, combined treatment produced a higher response rate (particularly in stage D patients) and a more rapid normalization of abnormal prostatic acid phosphatase levels. In addition, more prompt relief of bone pain was evident in the Zoladex plus flutamide group. However, significantly more side-effects were associated with combined treatment. These findings should be considered with caution because they form an interim analysis, and follow-up time is short. The results do suggest, however, that there is no particular advantage in using a combination of Zoladex plus flutamide compared to adding flutamide on failure of treatment with Zoladex alone.
 ...
PMID:Zoladex with or without flutamide in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer: interim analysis of an ongoing PONCAP study. Italian Prostatic Cancer Project (PONCAP). 215 Dec 77

A collaborative multicenter trial was conducted by 17 Italian groups to verify whether the so-called total androgen blockade obtained with luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) analogs combined with antiandrogens is more effective than conventional monotherapy in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer. A total of 328 previously untreated patients were evaluated: 163 patients received Zoladex depot alone, 3.6 mg subcutaneously every 28 days, and 165 patients received Zoladex depot plus cyproterone acetate (CPA), 200 mg/day orally. The follow-up period ranged from 41-251 weeks. Treatment was well tolerated, and side-effects in both groups mainly comprised loss of libido and erections, hot flashes and breast swelling and tenderness. There was no significant difference in objective response after 6, 12 and 24 months of treatment between the 2 groups. Median time to disease progression was comparable in both groups: 55 weeks in the Zoladex group and 54 weeks in the Zoladex plus CPA group. The time to disease progression and the survival distribution was comparable in both groups. Although there were no significant differences in the overall subjective response to both treatments, a faster improvement, with respect to pain and performance status was noted in the Zoladex plus CPA group (8 weeks) compared to Zoladex alone (12 weeks). The addition of antiandrogen, by inhibiting the initial elevation of plasma testosterone, may prevent the disease flare-up which occurs in a small number of patients during the first few days of treatment with LHRH analogs alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Zoladex vs. Zoladex plus cyproterone acetate in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer: a multicenter Italian study. 215 Dec 78

The levels of prostatic specific antigen (PSA) and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), both measured by radioimmunoassay, and two cancer indices given by the ratio of serum alpha-1 acid glycoprotein to prealbumin (AGP:Palb) and alpha-1 acid glycoprotein to alpha-2 HS globulin (AGP:HS) were evaluated as markers to assess the response of prostatic cancer to treatment with Zoladex, an LH-RH agonist. A rise in PSA and PAP occurred in 8/65 patients (12%) during the initial induction phase. In metastatic disease prior to treatment none of these indices was significantly different between patients who attained a sustained response and those whose response was nil or only transient. Responders and non-responders could, however, be distinguished by the levels of various analytes after treatment. At 6 months the median PSA in those who responded was 2.5 ng/ml compared with 51.5 ng/ml in the non-responders. At 12 months the figures were 3.0 and 155 ng/ml respectively. The corresponding median PAP levels were 1.4 and 19 ng/ml at 6 months and 1.3 and 18 ng/ml at 12 months. The AGP:Palb ratio was also significantly different in these two groups at 6 and 12 months. PSA appears to be the most sensitive indicator of the response to treatment. The likelihood of obtaining a prolonged clinical response can be assessed within 6 months of the start of treatment.
 ...
PMID:Biochemical monitoring of carcinoma of prostate treated with an LH-RH analogue (Zoladex). 243 85

One hundred and thirty-nine patients with advanced prostate cancer were entered into a randomised trial to test the efficacy and tolerance of goserelin 3.6 mg depot (Zoladex) versus stilboestrol 3 mg/day. As well as the usual clinical and radiological assessments of extent of disease, we used an immunoradiometric assay of prostate specific antigen (PSA) (Hybritech Europe) and normal laboratory enzymatic assays of acid phosphatase (AP) and alkaline phosphatase (ALKP) for biochemical assessment. The upper limit of normal for PSA was taken as 10 micrograms/l. The range of PSA was wide and differed significantly from that of AP and to a lesser extent ALKP in metastatic cases. PSA outperformed both AP and ALKP in both the local and advanced groups in terms of sensitivity. There was no correlation, however, between histological grade and level of PSA, AP or ALKP (the latter in cases with bone disease). In patients with metastatic disease diagnosed by bone scan, nine patients had one abnormal site/one "hot spot", and all of these had a PSA greater than twice the normal upper limit. Early death due to prostate cancer was noted in four patients with levels of PSA greater than 2500 micrograms/l. PSA is more sensitive than either enzymatic AP or ALKP in both locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer and is useful in identifying those advanced cases who have single lesions on bone scan. In this series PSA gave an overall sensitivity of 89%, compared with 63% for AP and 64% for ALKP in patients with metastatic disease.
 ...
PMID:The role of prostate specific antigen in the baseline assessment of patients undergoing hormone therapy for advanced prostate cancer. 244 97

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) have been evaluated in patients with prostatic cancer. All patients, who participated in a phase III trial (n = 110), had disseminated disease and received first line endocrine treatment of either orchidectomy or a monthly injection of a depot luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (Zoladex). Serum samples were analyzed for PSA and PAP at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months and patients were clinically assessed at 6 and 12 months. At diagnosis, 72 and 97% of all patients had elevated PAP and PSA concentrations (greater than 4 ng/ml), respectively. Patients with progressive disease had significantly higher PSA and PAP levels at both assessments. A small number of patients in the "complete remission" group had both PSA and PAP levels within the normal range after 3 months of treatment. Similarly, both PSA and PAP levels steadily declined in the group of patients who had partial regression of the disease. The patients with stable disease, however, had a significant rise only in their PSA levels at the 12-month assessment. This data suggest that PSA is more sensitive than PAP in those patients who have a "slow progression" of the disease.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of prostate-specific antigen and prostatic acid phosphatase in the management of prostatic cancer. 246 80

The identification of the decapeptide luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) has led to the development of LHRH agonists, which are a new class of drugs for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. These peptides have a modified amino acid structure that makes them more potent than LHRH. Prolonged administration of LHRH agonists results in down-regulation of the LHRH receptors in the pituitary and decreased secretion of luteinizing hormone. The result is decreased production of testosterone by Leydig cells, which is the basis for the use of LHRH agonists to treat prostate cancer. The effectiveness of LHRH agonists has been demonstrated in the United States in several randomized, controlled clinical trials. Daily administration of leuprolide produced equivalent results compared with diethylstilbestrol (DES). More recently, in two separate, randomized studies, the long-acting LHRH agonist Zoladex (ICI Pharma, Wilmington, Delaware) produced the same objective response rate as DES or bilateral orchiectomy. The equivalent response rates obtained with LHRH agonists indicate that these drugs can now be considered a reasonable treatment option for patients with metastatic prostatic cancer.
 ...
PMID:Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists for treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma. 252 10

Two multicenter, open, randomized phase III clinical trials were conducted in the United Kingdom to compare the effectiveness and safety of the depot formulation of the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist goserelin (Zoladex, ICI Pharma, Wilmington, Delaware), 3.6 mg sc/28 d, with orchiectomy and with diethylstilbestrol (DES), 1 mg tid, in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer. In the Zoladex versus orchiectomy trial, there was no significant difference between the treatment groups with regard to subjective and objective responses (British Prostate Group criteria), endocrine responses, clinical effects and side effects, time to treatment failure and death, or survival after similar median follow-up periods. It was concluded that depot Zoladex had behaved as a truly medical alternative to orchiectomy. In the Zoladex versus DES trial, subjective and objective responses (British Prostate Group and National Prostatic Cancer Project criteria), response duration and survival were similar. However, there was a more rapid response to treatment in the depot Zoladex group. Side effects from Zoladex such as flare symptoms during the initial stages of treatment required no discontinuation of therapy; in contrast, 15 percent of patients receiving DES required cessation of therapy during the first three months because of side effects. It was concluded that depot Zoladex was superior to DES in its attainment of an early objective response and in its absence of side effects, and that Zoladex was comparable with DES in terms of response rates and survival.
 ...
PMID:Phase III studies to compare goserelin (Zoladex) with orchiectomy and with diethylstilbestrol in treatment of prostatic carcinoma. 252 11

Given the current preference of many patients for an active role in decision-making regarding their care, the feasibility of patients making their own treatment choices was investigated, and the reasons for their selections were studied. Subjects comprised previously untreated Stage D prostate cancer patients for whom hormonal therapy was indicated. Thirteen institutions entered 159 patients into the study. After discussing treatment choices with their physicians, the patients took home a two-page letter explaining two options: surgical castration and therapy with Zoladex (goserelin acetate), a depot luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue injected subcutaneously every twenty-eight days. Patients were encouraged to discuss the treatment choices with their families. After selecting a treatment approach, patients completed a "decision questionnaire" and then treatment was initiated. Of the 147 patients who completed baseline questionnaires, 78 percent selected Zoladex and 22 percent selected orchiectomy. The primary reason for selecting Zoladex included avoidance of surgery (36%), success of treatment (18%), convenience of the drug (10%), and physician's advice (10%). Patients chose surgery primarily because of convenience (32%) and success of treatment (29%). Three months later, patients and their wives completed another questionnaire, which assessed their satisfaction with their treatment choices. Ninety-three percent of patients and 91 percent of patients' wives indicated that they would select the same treatment again.
 ...
PMID:Patients' choice of treatment in stage D prostate cancer. 252 12

The relative merits of the steroidal anti-androgen, cyproterone acetate, and the non-steroidal anti-androgens flutamide and nilutamide, are reviewed. It is concluded that pure anti-androgens offer some advantages over cyproterone acetate but that they each have some features which merit improvement. A new compound which was a pure anti-androgen, peripherally selective, well tolerated with a long half-life would have significant advantages. Preclinical studies in rats and dogs show that Casodex (ICI 176,334) is a potent pure anti-androgen which is well tolerated and has a long half-life. Casodex induces marked regression of the prostate yet fails to cause the substantial elevation in serum LH and testosterone seen with flutamide and nilutamide; it is thus peripherally selective. Casodex is as effective as surgical or medical castration with Zoladex in limiting the growth of the transplantable androgen-responsive Dunning rat prostate tumour. Such a profile makes Casodex a strong candidate as the future anti-androgen of choice for the treatment of prostate cancer and benign prostate hypertrophy.
 ...
PMID:"Casodex" (ICI 176,334)--a new, pure, peripherally-selective anti-androgen: preclinical studies. 253 59


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>