Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0376358 (prostate cancer)
 59,338 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A new enzymatic method for isolation and determination of urinary polyamines was presented and basically studied in previous report 1 and 2 in comparison with existing techniques. Using the new method, urinary polyamines were isolated and determined in 56 patients with genitourinary cancer. Urinary polyamines were also determined in 63 controls consisting of 20 normal subjects, 25 patients with benign urological disease and 18 patients with BPH. The mean concentrations of Diamine, Spermidine, Spermine in 20 normal subjects were 16.6 +/- 5.8 mumoles/g Cr, 4.7 +/- 2.0 mumoles/g Cr and 0.99 +/- 0.51 mumoles/g Cr respectively. To emphasize the specificity to cancer, the level of positiveness was modified to a higher value than M+3SD. The positive values thus calculated were 40 mumoles/g Cr for Diamine, 15 mumoles/g Cr for Spermidine and 3 mumoles/g Cr for Spermine. The positive ratios of Diamine in patients with early cancer were 43% in renal cell cancer, 20% in pelvic and ureter cancer, 0% in bladder cancer and 20% in prostatic cancer. Those of Spermidine were 29% in renal cell cancer, 0% in pelvic and ureter cancer, 20% in bladder cancer and 40% in prostatic cancer. Those of Spermine were 29% in renal cell cancer, 20% in pelvic and ureter cancer, 20% in bladder cancer and 0% in prostatic cancer. In early diagnoses, Diamine indicated high positive ratios to renal cell cancer and Spermidine to prostatic cancer. Relatively high positive ratios were demonstrated, when any one of the isolated polyamines was found positive: namely, 57% in renal cell cancer, 20% in pelvic and ureter cancer, 30% in bladder cancer and 40% in prostatic cancer.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Detection of urinary polyamine by a new enzymatic differential assay. (III). Studies on urinary polyamines in patients with malignant genitourinary diseases]. 242 8

The prevalence, rate of correct clinical diagnosis and mortality of cancer were analyzed in 4,894 consecutive autopsies at the Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital from 1972 to 1990. average age and standard deviation of patients was 78.1 +/- 9.1 years. Cancer was found in 45.5% of patients of 60 years and over, and in 49.1% in men and 41.9% in women (p < 0.001). Cancer prevalence decreased with advance in age; 50.0% in the sixties, 47.9% in the seventies, 43.2% in the eighties and 39.3% in the nineties and over. Multiple cancer was found in approximately 12% of patients of 70 years and over. The top three cancer incidences were gastric cancer, 15.0%, lung cancer, 10.7% and colon cancer, 5.9% in both genders. In men, prostate cancer was next common, followed in orderly hepatic cancer, esophageal cancer, gall bladder-bile duct cancer, pancreas cancer, renal cancer and urinary bladder cancer. In women, the following order of frequency was gall bladder-bile duct cancer, uterus cancer, pancreas cancer, hepatic cancer, breast cancer, thyroid cancer, esophageal cancer, renal cancer and urinary bladder cancer. The prevalence of gastric cancer, lung cancer, hepatic cancer and esophageal cancer was significantly higher in men, while that of gall bladder-bile duct cancer was higher in women. The age-related tendencies varied among cancers of different organs. Gastric cancer increased up to the sixties in men and up to the seventies in women and leveled off after those ages. Lung cancer revealed peak prevalence in the sixties and seventies and decreased after the age of eighty.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Prevalence, rate of correct clinical diagnosis and mortality of cancer in 4,894 elderly autopsy cases]. 847 26

Older African Americans constitute an expanding part of the elderly population in the United States. Although socioeconomic factors affect longevity and functional status more than race, African-American elders, as a whole, show poorer health status, as well as greater levels of financial strain and care-giver burden. Incidence rates of hypertension, heart disease, stroke, end-stage renal disease, dementia and prostate cancer are higher among African Americans than among the white population. The incidence of depression, however, is lower. Cancer survival rates are also lower, in part because of lower rates of cancer screening in this group. Physicians should carefully choose instruments to assess cognitive and physical status in African-American elders. The Activities of Daily Living scale and the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire are two tools that have been specially tested and shown to be reliable and valid in this population group. The Geriatric Depression Scale is a useful diagnostic tool that is quick to use in a busy office practice. Taking the time during an initial visit to understand the patient's values and perceptions of health and illness builds a sense of comfort and trust that will set a positive tone for the entire doctor-patient relationship and may empower the patient to take positive steps to improve health habits.
 ...
PMID:Special health considerations in African-American elders. 909 85

Urinary and sexual dysfunctions are side effects of radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PC) that contribute to depression. Despite the effectiveness of support groups at reducing depression in cancer patients, men typically do not participate in them. The purpose of this pilot study was to test the effects of a dyadic intervention (one-to-one support) on social support (Modified Inventory of Socially Supportive Behaviors), self-efficacy (Stanford Inventory of Cancer Patient Adjustment), and depression (Geriatric Depression Scale). Subjects were randomized to group. Controls (N=15; Mage=59.7) received usual care. Experimentals were paired with long-term survivors (LTS) who had RP and who had treatment side effects in common. Experimentals (N=15; Mage=57.5) met with a LTS 8 times in 8 weeks to discuss concerns associated with survivorship. No significant differences were detected on social support, but after 4 weeks, significant differences were present on depression between controls and experimentals, however these differences were not seen at 8 weeks. After 8 weeks, there were also significant differences on self-efficacy between controls and experimentals. Weekly anecdotal data supported the feasibility and acceptance of the intervention that was a low cost strategy effective at reducing depression and increasing self-efficacy in men treated by RP. Future research directions and clinical application is presented.
 ...
PMID:The effect of dyadic intervention on self-efficacy, social support, and depression for men with prostate cancer. 1474 45

Satraplatin [BMS 182751, BMY 45594, JM 216] belongs to a series of orally-active platinum compounds with anticancer activity. It was jointly originated by Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson Matthey and the Institute of Cancer Research in the UK; however, Johnson Matthey has since ceased involvement with drug development. Subsequently, the agent has been licensed to and is under development with GPC Biotech, Pharmion and Spectrum Pharmaceuticals. Clinical trials are underway to evaluate satraplatin among patients with different tumour types, including prostate, breast, cervical and lung cancers. The compound is under regulatory review with the US FDA for the treatment of hormone-refractory prostate cancer. NeoTherapeutics (now Spectrum Pharmaceuticals) granted GPC Biotech an exclusive worldwide licence to develop and market satraplatin in October 2002. Under the terms of the agreement, GPC Biotech is fully funding development costs and commercialisation requirements for the drug. The deal also involves GPC Biotech paying a signing fee, milestone and royalty payments. Spectrum is a member of a joint development committee headed by GPC Biotech to govern development of satraplatin. Previously in October 2001, NeoOncoRx (Spectrum Pharmaceuticals) gained the rights to develop and market the compound worldwide. In December 2005, GPC Biotech and Pharmion Corporation entered into a co-development and license agreement for satraplatin. Under the agreement terms, Pharmion has exclusive commercialisation rights for Europe, Turkey, the Middle East, Australia and New Zealand, while GPC Biotech retains rights to North America and all other territories. Pharmion made an upfront payment of $US37.1 million to GPC Biotech, which included reimbursement for past clinical development costs plus funding for ongoing and certain clinical development activities to be jointly conducted by the companies. In addition, both parties will pursue a joint development plan for satraplatin in a variety of tumour types and will share global development costs, for which Pharmion has made an additional commitment of $US22.2 million. GPC Biotech could also receive up to $US270 million in milestone payments and royalties on sales. Both companies will manage regulatory and commercial activities in their respective territories. A registrational phase III study is ongoing among 950 patients with HRPC. This global, multicentre, randomised study, called SPARC (Satraplatin and Prednisone Against Refractory Cancer), is assessing satraplatin plus prednisone versus prednisone alone as second-line therapy in HRPC patients. Top-line results from the trial showed that patients who received satraplatin plus prednisone had a 40% reduction in the risk of progression compared with patients who received prednisone plus placebo. In accordance with the recommendation of the independent Data Monitoring Board for the SPARC trial, patients who have not progressed will continue to be treated and all patients will be followed for overall survival. The company expects to have final overall survival results in the fall of 2007. The company intends to complete the NDA filing with the FDA before the end of 2006. In February 2006, GPC Biotech raised euro36.2 million from a private placement of shares; the funds will be used in the commercialisation of satraplatin in the US. GBC Biotech received a Scientific Advice letter from the EMEA in January 2004, enabling the company to use the SPARC trial for registrational plans in both Europe and the US. Data from the pivotal phase III trial are expected in the second half of 2006. If positive, the findings will form the basis of a MAA filing with the EMEA for satraplatin as a second-line therapy of HRPC. The EMEA has confirmed that it would accept the final analysis for progression-free survival (PFS) from the SPARC trial and the available overall survival data as the basis for the MAA submission expected in the first quarter of 2007. In December 2005, enrolment started for a phase II study of satraplatin plus paclitaxel as a first-line treatment for unresectable advanced NSCLC. This open-label study is enrolling up to 40 patients at sites in the US. In addition, GPC Biotech and Spectrum have initiated a phase I/II trial of satraplatin plus radiation therapy among patients with NSCLC. The study is expected to enrol up to 30 patients in the phase I portion to determine dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated doses. Once these are established, the phase II portion will enrol patients to evaluate efficacy and safety. This trial is expected to be closely followed by phase I/II trials of satraplatin in combination with docetaxel and paclitaxel. GPC Biotech initiated a phase I trial in July 2005 investigating satraplatin plus docetaxel among patients with advanced solid tumours in the US. The study is primarily focused on establishing the toxicity and maximum tolerated doses of combination therapy to determine suitable dosages for phase II trials. Enrolment is ongoing for the open-label, single-centre study with a target of up to 48 patients. A phase I study is evaluating satraplatin in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumours. Previously, Bristol-Myers Squibb initiated phase III development of satraplatin in Europe and the US in 1996. The trials were being conducted in patients with ovarian, non-small cell lung and small-cell lung cancers. However, the company closed all ongoing trials of satraplatin in 1999. Satraplatin is protected by a number of patents issued in the US, EU, Japan, Canada and Australia. The patents have been assigned to Johnson Matthey, a multinational chemical company in the UK, which has exclusively sub-licensed these to GPC Biotech under a co-development and licensing agreement with Spectrum Pharmaceuticals. The patents cover the composition of matter and anticancer uses of various platinum-based compounds, including satraplatin. Two of the US patents will expire in 2008 and 2010, respectively, while patents in most other countries will expire in 2009.
 ...
PMID:Satraplatin: BMS 182751, BMY 45594, JM 216. 1732 11

Most people diagnosed with cancer are aged >65 years, and many diagnosed younger live to become older survivors. Geriatric oncology is becoming recognized as a specialty area within oncology. It focuses specifically on the functional impacts of the interplay of aging and cancer, including the role of comorbidities. Nevertheless, to the authors' knowledge, little attention has been given to cancer from a gerontologic and lifespan perspective, especially quality of life and psychologic impact. Research has shown that the amount and type of psychologic impact of cancer is highly variable and that part of that variation is related to age, in that older persons are often less affected in both negative and positive ways. Gerontologic concepts and empiric findings related to physical, psychologic, and social aging processes may serve as partial explanations for that age-related pattern. Important potential contributors include psychologic factors, such as changes in future time perspective and goals, as well as social ones, such as roles and previous experience. The result is a complex interplay of factors that vary across persons but are covaried with age. Empiric findings regarding 1-year to 8-year prostate cancer survivors illustrate the age differences and the differential impacts of age itself and comorbidity. The use of gerontologic concepts to explain the age-related impact of cancer will benefit both research and clinical practice by providing a means to target interventions more effectively by taking into account the psychologic and social changes that often accompany aging. .
 ...
PMID:A gerontologic perspective on cancer and aging. 1842 4

Although there are clear guidelines that advise at what age to begin screening for various cancers, there is less guidance concerning when it may be appropriate to stop screening. The decision to stop screening must take into account patients' age; overall health and life expectancy; the natural history of the disease; and the risks, expense, and convenience of the screening test, and any subsequent testing and treatment. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the American Academy of Family Physicians suggest that Papanicolaou smears can be discontinued in women at 65 years of age, provided they have had adequate recent normal screenings. Evidence suggests that cessation of breast cancer screening at approximately 75 to 80 years of age is appropriate, although American Geriatric Society guidelines recommend cessation at a more advanced age. Studies support continuing colon cancer screening until approximately 75 years of age in men and 80 years of age in women for patients without significant comorbidities. Prostate cancer screening, if conducted at all, may be discontinued at approximately 75 years of age in otherwise healthy men. Ultimately, the decision to screen or to discontinue screening must be made after careful discussion with each patient, using evidence-based guidelines and individual patient preferences.
 ...
PMID:Cancer screening in the older patient. 1911 49

Radical prostatectomy commonly results in urinary, sexual, and bowel dysfunction that bothers men and may lead to depressive symptomatology (hereafter depression) that occurs at a rate 4 times greater for men with prostate cancer than healthy counterparts. The purpose of this study was to assess depressive symptoms in men shortly after radical prostatectomy and to identify associated risk factors. Seventy-two men were interviewed 6 weeks after surgery. Measured were depression (Geriatric Depression Scale), self-efficacy (Stanford Inventory of Cancer Patient Adjustment), social support (Modified Inventory of Socially Supportive Behaviors), physical and emotional factors (UCLA Prostate Cancer Index), and social function (SF-36 subscale). Results indicate that men with high self-efficacy and less sexual bother were 45% and 55% less likely to have depressive symptoms, respectively. Findings from this study add to the limited amount of information on the complex relationship between prostate cancer treatment and depression in men.
 ...
PMID:Physical and emotional predictors of depression after radical prostatectomy. 1947 80

Urologic cancers are now usually found in elderly patients and the value of curative treatment is frequently asked. Life expectancy must not be underestimated with its consequence of undertreatment. Geriatric assessment is a good tool to make the right decision. For bladder and prostatic carcinomas, external beam radiation therapy is often the treatment of choice, if a curative option has been choose, because its toxicity is low in this population. In fact, many retrospectives studies have demonstrated that toxicity is equivalent in young and old patients. In prostate cancer, a recent randomised trial demonstrated that combination of irradiation and hormonal treatment increased biochemical control and overall survival over hormonal treatment alone. Hypofractionated schedules, more convenient to old patients, have been regularly reported for bladder cancers, but new techniques in radiation therapy seem to allow the use of this type of treatment schedules in prostate carcinomas.
 ...
PMID:[Urological cancers of the elderly subject: the role of radiotherapy]. 2012 10

Prostate cancer is the most prevalent cancer in men and predominantly affects older men (aged >or=70 years). The median age at diagnosis is 68 years; overall, two-thirds of prostate cancer-related deaths occur in men aged >or=75 years. With the exponential ageing of the population and the increasing life-expectancy in developed countries, the burden of prostate cancer is expected to increase dramatically in the future. To date, no specific guidelines on the management of prostate cancer in older men have been published. The International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) conducted a systematic bibliographic search based on screening, diagnostic procedures and treatment options for localized and advanced prostate cancer, to develop a proposal for recommendations that should provide the highest standard of care for older men with prostate cancer. The consensus of the SIOG Prostate Cancer Task Force is that older men with prostate cancer should be managed according to their individual health status, which is mainly driven by the severity of associated comorbid conditions, and not according to chronological age. Existing international recommendations (European Association of Urology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and American Urological Association) are the backbone for localized and advanced prostate cancer treatment, but need to be adapted to patient health status. Based on a rapid and simple evaluation, patients can be classified into four different groups: 1, 'Healthy' patients (controlled comorbidity, fully independent in daily living activities, no malnutrition) should receive the same treatment as younger patients; 2, 'Vulnerable' patients (reversible impairment) should receive standard treatment after medical intervention; 3, 'Frail' patients (irreversible impairment) should receive adapted treatment; 4, Patients who are 'too sick' with 'terminal illness' should receive only symptomatic palliative treatment.
 ...
PMID:Management of prostate cancer in older men: recommendations of a working group of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology. 2208 33


1 2 3 Next >>