Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0376358 (prostate cancer)
 59,338 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

This is a presentation of some preliminary data from SPCG-I, a multicenter study started in 1984 by the Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer Group. It is a randomized double-blind study comparing estramustine phosphate and diethylstilbestrol in the primary treatment of 195 patients with T1-4, NX, M1, G2-3 prostatic cancer. The code is not yet broken. This presentation describes the impact of the pretreatment parameters performance status, pain, tumor burden, grade and DNA-ploidy of the prostate tumor, on time to progression and overall survival. DNA studies have so far only been completed in 66 of the 195 patients. For the whole group of 195 patients, pain (p less than 0.004) and tumor grade (p less than 0.02) had the most significant impact on time to progression, and performance status (p less than 0.01) and grade (p less than 0.03) on overall survival. In the small group of 66 patients where the DNA pattern of the primary tumor was evaluated, no parameter had any significant correlation to time to progression and overall survival. This study is still continuing.
 ...
PMID:DNA as a prognostic marker in advanced high-grade prostatic cancer. A preliminary report. SPCG-I study. 202 9

Estrogen-related cardiovascular dysfunction was noted in 23 out of 30 patients with prostatic cancer (PC). Coronary subjects with PC suffered from cardiac pain evident on ECG necessitating correction by effective doses of coronary active drugs. PC patients with essential hypertension exhibited frequent headache, progressive edema of the legs, drastic hypertensive reactions. It is held that estrogen therapy for prostatic cancer should be preceded and monitored by therapeutic evaluation responsible for optimal conditions to prevent and early diagnose cardiovascular complications.
 ...
PMID:[Diagnosis and therapeutic correction of changes in the cardiovascular system of patients with prostatic cancer treated with estrogens]. 208 39

The clinical efficacy and safety of 3.75 or 7.5 mg leuprorelin acetate depot given subcutaneously once every 4 weeks was evaluated in a collaborative study of 81 patients with untreated prostatic cancer. Efficacy of treatment was assessed using criteria based on a meeting of the Prostatic Cancer Study Group funded by the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare and using National Prostatic Cancer Project criteria. Japanese criteria enabled evaluation of individual parameters, unlike the National Prostatic Cancer Project system which classified a patient as unevaluable if one evaluation parameter was unavailable. Leuprorelin acetate depot suppressed serum luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone and testosterone concentrations. Objective response rates of the prostate, bone metastases, serum prostatic acid phosphatase and soft tissue metastases, and subjective dysuria and pain responses were comparable to those found with conventional hormone therapy. Leuprorelin acetate depot was well tolerated, with no significant differences in response to the two doses.
 ...
PMID:Leuprorelin acetate depot: results of a multicentre Japanese trial. TAP-144-SR Study Group. 210 89

In a randomized, double-blind trial for metastatic prostate cancer (Stage D2), 603 men received leuprolide, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog that inhibits the release of gonadotropins, coupled with either placebo or flutamide, a nonsteroidal antiandrogen that inhibits the binding of androgens to the cell nucleus. The 303 men receiving androgen blockade with leuprolide and flutamide demonstrated a longer progression-free survival (16.9 vs. 13.9 months, P = 0.039) and an increased median length of survival (35.0 vs. 27.9 months, P = 0.035). In the subgroup of men with minimal disease and good performance status, the advantages of maximal androgen blockade were more pronounced. It is concluded that combined androgen blockade with leuprolide and flutamide was more effective than leuprolide alone for patients with metastatic cancer of the prostate. The therapeutic benefits, although greatest in patients with minimum disease, need to be evaluated in a prospective, randomized fashion in trials specifically designed for men with minimal disease and good performance status. Exploratory analyses using the black race as an explanatory variable were also performed. Black race is associated with shorter survival times and is also associated with other prognostic factors, including recent weight loss, anemia, elevated phosphatase levels, and pain. These findings suggest the need for future studies of the relationship of black race and response to prostate cancer therapy.
 ...
PMID:Leuprolide with and without flutamide in advanced prostate cancer. 211 17

One hundred eighteen patients with stage D (D1 or D2) prostate cancer with a mean age of 69 years were treated with monthly goserelin (Zoladex; ICI 118, 630; ICI Americas Inc, Wilmington, DE, property of Imperial Chemical Industries PLC) injections and the data were analyzed for predictive parameters for best response and time to treatment failure (National Prostatic Cancer Project [NPCP] and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] criteria). For best response in a univariate analysis, the performance status (PS 0-1 v 2-3) (P = .01), hematocrit (P = .04), and pain (P = .04) were significant. For time to treatment failure by univariate analysis, ECOG performance status (0-1 v 2-3) was most predictive (P less than .0001), followed by pain at entry (P = .0002), initial testosterone (T) level (greater than 250 ng/dL) (P = .0005), age less than 69 years (P = .02), alkaline phosphatase (less than 115 IU/L) (P = .03), hemoglobin (less than 14 g/dL) (P = .03), whereas normal acid phosphatase (less than 3 IU/mL) (P = .29) was not predictive. In multivariate analysis for time to treatment failure, only the ECOG performance status was of significance (P = .01). Estimated median time to treatment failure for PS of 0-1 was 88 weeks and for PS of 2-3 was 31 weeks.
 ...
PMID:Predictive initial parameters for response of stage D prostate cancer to treatment with the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist goserelin. 213 2

Forty-seven patients with solid tumors were treated on a phase I study of menogaril administered by mouth once per week. Nausea and vomiting were excessive at weekly doses of 350 and 450 mg/m2/week but were tolerable and controlled reasonably well by antiemetics at lower doses. There appeared to be a relatively shallow dose-vs-granulocytopenia curve above a menogaril dose of 180 mg/m2/week. No patient receiving chronic dexamethasone for cerebral edema developed granulocytopenia, even at menogaril doses of 350-450 mg/m2/week. Two patients developed neutropenic infection. No patient developed thrombocytopenia. Mild arrhythmias were seen in 3 patients. Two patients suffered possible myocardial infarcts that may not have been related to treatment. Asymptomatic blood pressure fluctuations were common and were probably not related to treatment. Diarrhea was dose-related but was generally not severe. Alopecia and stomatitis occurred occasionally. Minor responses were seen in two patients with gliomas, and three of five evaluable prostate cancer patients experienced marked pain relief. The dose recommended for phase II studies is 250-300 mg/m2/week with antiemetic pretreatment. This schedule appears to allow an oral menogaril dose-intensity that is approximately double that attainable with other oral schedules that have been studied.
 ...
PMID:Phase I study of oral menogaril administered on a once weekly schedule. 214 May 64

72 patients with hormone resistant, progressing prostatic cancer completed a self-administered questionnaire to assess subjective morbidity and quality of life before they were entered into a phase III trial of estramustine (34) vs. mitomycin (38). At least one post-treatment assessment was available in 43 patients. This considerable degree of non-compliance is explained by practical problems related to completion and collection of the questionnaires in these rapidly deteriorating patients. Doctors underestimated subjective morbidity (pain, decreased performance status, nausea) in 30-50% of the cases. Decreased functional status, fatigue and pain were identified as the most frequent major morbidities before study entry. In most patients, treatment did not reduce this morbidity. The routine application of self-administered quality of life questionnaires has considerable practical problems but yields clinically worthwhile information about subjective morbidity. Simple but relevant monitoring of subjective morbidity by the patient should be mandatory in cancer trials where palliation is a major endpoint.
 ...
PMID:Quality of life and treatment of hormone resistant metastatic prostatic cancer. The EORTC Genito-Urinary Group. 214 95

A collaborative multicenter trial was conducted by 17 Italian groups to verify whether the so-called total androgen blockade obtained with luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) analogs combined with antiandrogens is more effective than conventional monotherapy in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer. A total of 328 previously untreated patients were evaluated: 163 patients received Zoladex depot alone, 3.6 mg subcutaneously every 28 days, and 165 patients received Zoladex depot plus cyproterone acetate (CPA), 200 mg/day orally. The follow-up period ranged from 41-251 weeks. Treatment was well tolerated, and side-effects in both groups mainly comprised loss of libido and erections, hot flashes and breast swelling and tenderness. There was no significant difference in objective response after 6, 12 and 24 months of treatment between the 2 groups. Median time to disease progression was comparable in both groups: 55 weeks in the Zoladex group and 54 weeks in the Zoladex plus CPA group. The time to disease progression and the survival distribution was comparable in both groups. Although there were no significant differences in the overall subjective response to both treatments, a faster improvement, with respect to pain and performance status was noted in the Zoladex plus CPA group (8 weeks) compared to Zoladex alone (12 weeks). The addition of antiandrogen, by inhibiting the initial elevation of plasma testosterone, may prevent the disease flare-up which occurs in a small number of patients during the first few days of treatment with LHRH analogs alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Zoladex vs. Zoladex plus cyproterone acetate in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer: a multicenter Italian study. 215 Dec 78

We report the results of the first use of a steroidal aromatase inhibitor, 4-hydroxyandrostenedione (4-OHA, CGP 32349), in the palliation of patients with advanced, hormone resistant, prostatic cancer. Twelve of 19 patients (63%), who had relapsed following castration and other therapies, gained significant pain relief following weekly intramuscular injections of 4-OHA. Five patients (31%) experienced a transient 'tumour flare', represented by an increase in bone pain soon after commencing treatment. The mechanism of action of 4-OHA in palliating patients with advanced prostatic cancer is obscure at present, but may represent an important new treatment modality which may lead to greater insight into prostatic biology.
 ...
PMID:Aromatase inhibition in advanced prostatic cancer: preliminary communication. 220 97

Patients with newly diagnosed prostatic cancer should be investigated with regard to the presence or absence of distant metastases by: (1) Clinical history especially of weight loss, recent pain, or analgesics intake. (2) Physical examination, looking especially for hepatic enlargement, peripheral lymph nodes, local bone tenderness. (3) Performance status. (4) Hemoglobin, creatinine, PSA and/or PAP, alkaline phosphatases, liver tests, testosterone. (5) Bone scan with X-ray of doubtful hot spots. (6) Chest X-ray. (7) Ultrasound scans (liver, kidney, lymph nodes) or CT scan may be indicated if abnormal blood parameters or in specific situations. (8) Other investigations are only indicated in special circumstances. Follow-up should include: (1), (2), (3), (4) every 3 months. For patients in clinical trials, depending on the end point, bone scan should be repeated every 6 months or possibly depending on the prognostic group (good: every 12 months; bad: 3 to 6 months). For routine clinical management, it could be repeated only when markers (PAP, PSA, alkaline phosphatase) show significant (25-50%) increase and provided the result will influence treatment. Other investigations should only be repeated or performed if abnormal at the start of if clinical data require them.
 ...
PMID:The staging of M+ disease. 221 62


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>