Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0376358 (prostate cancer)
 59,338 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The development of GnRH agonists has had a major impact on the practice of gynecology and reproductive endocrinology. The clinical usefulness of GnRH agonists will increase as modes of administration are improved and indications become better defined. GnRH agonists and, potentially, antagonists will provide a prompt, effective, and reversible method of suppressing ovarian function. GnRH agonists may soon become a treatment of choice for many of the noncontraceptive uses of oral contraceptives. Current indications for GnRH agonist administration are best divided into two groups: short-term (less than 6 months) and long-term (greater than 6 months) suppression. Short-term administration of GnRH agonist include most of the current usage of GnRH agonists. Short-term administration avoids most of the side effects of GnRH agonist and offers the most potential for development of GnRH antagonists. Short-term therapy has been shown to be particularly effective in the preoperative treatment of fibroids, suppression of ovarian function before ovulation induction, for short-term suppression of endometriosis, and for diagnostic purposes to determine whether a medical illness is related to ovarian function. Chronic administration of GnRH agonist has produced varying degrees of success. The treatment of precocious puberty is probably the perfect indication for GnRH agonist suppression. The disease is completely reversed with a remarkable absence of side effects. Long-term administration for metastatic breast or prostatic cancer has been shown to be as efficacious as other forms of gonadal suppression and the potential benefits of suppression outweigh the potential side effects of long-term suppression. The risk-benefit ratio must be carefully analyzed for the other indications for long-term suppression. Long-term suppression could be used for medical illnesses exacerbated by the menstrual cycle, painful symptoms related to endometriosis, contraception, and suppression of hyperandrogynism. Although initial studies show the agonist to be quite effective in treating all of these disorders, long-term suppression also may result in potential serious side effects related to hypoestrogenism including hot flashes and osteoporosis. Long-term administration of GnRH agonist may become feasible by lowering the dose and degree of suppression or by combining GnRH agonist with estrogen or progestin replacement, or both.
 ...
PMID:GnRH agonists. 267

Eighty-seven previously untreated patients with clinical stage D2 (bone metastases) prostate cancer have received the combination therapy with a pure antiandrogen and an LHRH agonist (or orchiectomy) as first treatment in a multicentre study for up to 34 months (average = 16.2 months). A positive objective response assessed according to the criteria of the US NPCP has been observed in all cases. Pain disappeared in all patients within 1 month and performance become normal in all (including 2 bedridden patients) within 4 months. Progression of the disease after a period of remission has been observed in only 8 patients. Only one patient has died from prostate cancer while 3 have died from other causes. The probability of continuing response and survival at 2 years for the patients who receive the combination treatment (Kaplan-Meier's method) is 81 and 91%, respectively. By contrast, in the randomized group who had orchiectomy alone, 4 of 7 have died from prostate cancer (P less than 0.05 as compared to combination therapy). In addition to a marked improvement in the remission rate and survival, combination therapy maintains a good quality of life, hot flashes and a decrease or loss of libido being the only side-effects.
 ...
PMID:Combination therapy with flutamide and castration (LHRH agonist or orchiectomy) in advanced prostate cancer: a marked improvement in response and survival. 293 79

In a randomized, prospective trial, 199 previously untreated patients with Stage D2 prostatic cancer were treated with 3 mg/day diethylstilbestrol (DES) or 1 mg/day leuprolide acetate, a luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analog. Both DES and leuprolide suppressed testosterone to the desired castrate levels. Objective measures of disease, such as acid phosphatase levels, and subjective measures, such as bone pain, performance status, and mobility, showed similar decreases in both groups. No progression of disease was seen in 86 per cent of the leuprolide-treated group, compared with 85 per cent of the DES-treated group. The time to disease progression, development of adverse reaction requiring discontinuation of treatment, or death was identical for the two groups. Hot flashes were more common with leuprolide than with DES. Gynecomastia and breast tenderness, nausea and vomiting, and peripheral edema occurred more often in the DES group. Of those taking DES, 13 per cent discontinued treatment because of side effects, compared with 3 per cent of those taking leuprolide.
 ...
PMID:Leuprolide versus diethylstilbestrol for previously untreated stage D2 prostate cancer. Results of a prospectively randomized trial. 307 35

A comparative study was done in 59 recently diagnosed Stage D2 prostatic cancer patients treated with either long-term GnRH-A (Buserelin) (N = 42) or with orchiectomy (N = 17) and followed up for three years. The suppressed limits of plasma testosterone and estradiol levels after eight-week follow-up as well as the objective clinical response and disease outcome were found to be similar with either treatment. Hot flushes and loss of libido were noticed in both groups throughout the follow-up period; however, there were no other side effects. Analysis of Stage D2 patients based on their time of death enables us to identify nonhormonal variables which, in the form of an aggressiveness score, correlated well with both clinical response and disease outcome. These data confirm that (1) Buserelin is an effective and safe alternative to orchiectomy in advanced prostatic cancer, and (2) in clinical studies a multifactor aggressiveness score is useful for analyzing clinical efficacy data. Prospective application of that score may enable predictability of patient response and influence patient management.
 ...
PMID:Objective response and disease outcome in 59 patients with stage D2 prostatic cancer treated with either Buserelin or orchiectomy. Disease aggressivity and its association with response and outcome. 308 58

The safety and efficacy of buserelin, a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist, was tested in 33 evaluable patients with Stages C or D adenocarcinoma of the prostate. With a minimum follow-up duration of 10 months, there was one complete response and 22 partial responses (69%) by National Prostatic Cancer Project criteria, with a median duration greater than 18 months. Six patients (18%) had stable disease, median duration greater than 25 months, and only 12 patients have progressed. Performance status improved in 67%, patient-scored pain improved in 75%, and quality of life improved in 58%. Symptoms occurring during treatment consisted of hot flashes, loss of libido, and impotence. Buserelin produces a high frequency of durable objective and subjective responses in patients with advanced prostatic carcinoma.
 ...
PMID:Buserelin treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma. Long-term follow-up of antitumor responses and improved quality of life. 310 4

The effectiveness of buserelin, a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist, was tested in 28 patients with Stages C or D adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Of 24 evaluable patients, there were 13 partial responses (54%) by National Prostatic Cancer Project criteria, median duration greater than 6 months. Nine patients had stable disease (38%), median duration greater than 5 months, and only two patients progressed. Performance status improved in 38%, patient-scored pain improved in 46%, and quality of life improved in 57%. Symptoms occurring during treatment consisted of hot flashes, loss of libido, and impotence. A flare of symptoms was observed in only one patient, despite a transient 25% increase in testosterone in 36% of patients. Buserelin is an effective treatment for inducing frequent and meaningful remissions in advanced prostatic cancer.
 ...
PMID:Buserelin as primary therapy in advanced prostatic carcinoma. 393 64

Orchiectomy or chronic administration of the gonadotropin releasing hormone agonistic analogue D, Ser (TBU)6, des Gly-NH2(10) ethylamide (HOE 766) were employed as therapeutic maneuvers in 25 patients with advanced prostatic carcinoma. HOE 766 administration effectively suppressed plasma testosterone to castrate levels that persisted for as long as treatment continued. Surgical and medical castration resulted in a significant decrease in prostatic size; this became evident earlier for surgically than medically treated patients (P less than .05), but no difference existed after the third month of treatment. Symptoms and signs of prostatism improved in practically all the patients. Among patients with stage D2 disease, there was an improvement in five as far as bone radiological assessment was concerned. Alkaline phosphatase levels did not show appreciable changes in patients showing objective stable disease or partial response according to National Prostatic Cancer Project criteria. Radioimmunoassayable prostatic acid phosphatase levels became normal in two of two stage C, five of five stage D1, and eight of seventeen patients with stage D2 disease, a rise in prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), in alkaline phosphatase, and deterioration in bone radiology were associated with clinical evidence of relapse; this occurred despite persistently low levels of plasma testosterone. Serum thyroxine, cortisol, and prolactin levels remained unchanged following orchiectomy or chronic administration of HOE 766. Practically all patients complained of hot flashes and experienced a decrease in libido and potency, but none developed gynecomastia or thromboembolic episodes. The data indicate that HOE 766 can be used safely as an alternative to castration or estrogens for the treatment of patients with androgen-dependent prostatic cancer.
 ...
PMID:Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonistic analogues in the treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma. 641 29

We have used the paradoxical antigonadal effects of LHRH agonists as a chemical castration in advanced prostatic cancer. We report early results of a phase II study on the clinical efficacy of the LHRH agonist D-Ser (TBU)6, des-Gly-NH2(10) LHRH administered to patients with stage D prostatic carcinoma. Following dose-range finding studies using either intranasal (IN) (200 micrograms twice/day or 500 micrograms twice/day) or subcutaneous (SC) administration (50 micrograms once/day, we developed a sequential combination of SC (500 micrograms three times/day for seven days) and IN regimen that was administered for 3 to 16 months to a group of 23 patients with stage D prostatic carcinoma. Initiation of therapy was associated with a clinical flare in one patient during the first week of treatment. Mean serum testosterone levels were already decreasing at one week and remained inhibited to levels inferior to 1 ng/ml after the first four weeks of treatment. Overall assessment shows that within the first six months of treatment, 26% patients were improved, 39% were stabilized, and 35% were nonresponders. Fourteen patients were followed during the next six months: 29% continued to respond, 29% escaped, 21% remained stable, and 21% were nonresponders. Histologic studies from castrated patients showed changes in spermatogenesis correlating to the degree and duration of suppression of testicular steroidogenesis without signs of toxicity. Preliminary observations on the combination of the pure antiandrogen RU 23908 with Buserelin (n = 5) or castration (n = 3) suggest that the addition of an antiandrogen does not seem to improve the patients nonresponding to other hormonal suppressive therapy (Buserelin) administered before (n = 3) or concomitantly with the antiandrogen (n = 2). Three relapsing castrate patients responded to the antiandrogen, but the response was temporary in two (eight to nine months of therapy). No side effects other than hot flashes and decreased potency are related to LHRH agonist alone or to the low-dose antiandrogen. Multicenter trials will be necessary to delineate the place of LHRH agonist alone or LHRH agonist combined with an antiandrogen in the treatment of prostatic cancer.
 ...
PMID:Preliminary results on the clinical efficacy and safety of androgen inhibition by an LHRH agonist alone or combined with an antiandrogen in the treatment of prostatic carcinoma. 641 32

Twenty-nine subjects with metastatic carcinoma of the prostate received daily subcutaneous injections of leuprolide, a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analog. After transient gonadotropin and androgen stimulation, leuprolide induced long-term suppression of serum testosterone and gonadotropins production. In 25 subjects there was objective disease stabilization or tumor regression. Eleven subjects subsequently relapsed (median = 10 mo) after initiation of treatment. Except for vasomotor hot flashes, leuprolide appears to be well tolerated by patients with advanced prostatic cancer.
 ...
PMID:Endocrine and clinical effects of leuprolide in prostatic cancer. 643 99

This investigation on 12 well-defined patients with untreated, advanced prostatic adenocarcinoma establishes the gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue [D-Ser(But)6](1-9)-nonapeptide-ethylamide (Hoe 766) as an effective, safe and non-toxic form of medical castration. Hoe 766 was given either as subcutaneous injections of 2 x 200 micrograms/day over 14 days and pernasal application (3 x 400 micrograms/day) thereafter, or as subcutaneous injections of 3 x 1,000 micrograms/day over 6 days and pernasal application thereafter in the dosage mentioned above. Both dose regimens were equally effective: pituitary overstimulation between days 3 and 6 with a rise of serum HL and testosterone; pituitary and testicular desensitization with LH and testosterone decline between days 6 and 14; medical castration with average serum testosterone levels maintained around 0.5 ng/ml for up to 12 weeks. Except for transient hot flashes in 4 patients, no clinical or laboratory side effects were observed. It is concluded from this study that the gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue. Hoe 766, is a valuable alternative to conventional contrasexual measures for prostate cancer palliation. To improve the patient's compliance, however, the smallest single pernasal dosage effective for maintenance of down-regulation and steroidogenic arrest has still to be determined.
 ...
PMID:Endocrine studies with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue to achieve withdrawal of testosterone in prostate carcinoma patients. 681 18


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>