Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0376358 (prostate cancer)
 59,338 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is considered as a precursor of prostate cancer and is frequently associated with it. Diagnosis of PIN on a prostate needle biopsy without associated carcinoma is a difficult problem since high-grade PIN does not necessarily mean that prostate cancer is always present and low-grade PIN is associated with cancer as well. Definition of parameters predictive of the later finding of prostate cancer on repeat biopsy in patients with PIN is of evident interest and we have reviewed our experience and recent data from the literature on this topic. High grade is a strong predictor of later cancer found on repeat biopsy (50-100%) and in these patients, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound are predictors of later cancer found on repeat biopsy. High-grade PIN is, however, frequently associated with later cancer whatever PSA, even when < or = ng/ml. Low-grade PIN seems to behave like BPH since the incidence of later cancer is extremely low when PSA is < 4 ng/ml and is high when PSA > 10 ng/ml. Patients with high-grade PIN should systematically be rebiopsied after 3-6 months to exclude cancer because they are likely to have undiagnosed cancer. Patients with low-grade PIN and low PSA seem to have a low risk of later cancer found on repeat biopsy. Patients with low-grade PIN and high serum PSA should have repeat biopsies because the incidence of subsequent cancer is high and comparable to high-grade PIN. Further investigations are needed to optimize the management of patients with low-grade PIN and intermediate PSA level.
 ...
PMID:Clinical prognostic criteria for later diagnosis of prostate carcinoma in patients with initial isolated prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. 887 7

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the most likely precursor of human prostate cancer. The prevalence and immunophenotype of PIN in dogs with spontaneous prostate cancer has not been previously described. To investigate the association between PIN and prostate cancer, we evaluated the prostates of dogs with spontaneous prostate carcinoma. The prevalence of PIN was determined in formalin-fixed prostates from 29 dogs with spontaneous prostate cancer. Using immunoperoxidase techniques, we compared basal cell layer integrity (high molecular weight keratin 34 beta-E12), proliferative index (MIB-1), and microvessel density (Factor VIII-related antigen) in 14 prostates which contained benign epithelium, PIN, and carcinoma. PIN was present in 19 of 29 (66%) prostates from dogs with spontaneous prostate cancer. The basal cell layer was intact in benign epithelium, disrupted in 72% of acini with PIN, and absent in carcinoma. The mean proliferative index was 17%, 25%, and 40% for benign epithelium, PIN, and carcinoma, respectively, and these differences were significant. The mean microvessel density in foci of PIN and carcinoma (32 and 39 vessels per mm2, respectively) was greater than in benign epithelium (23 vessels per mm2). High-grade PIN is common in the prostates of dogs with spontaneous carcinoma. The basal cell layer is partially disrupted in PIN, whereas it is absent in prostate cancer. The proliferative index and microvessel density of PIN are intermediate between benign epithelium and cancer. These results are similar to those reported for human PIN and prostate cancer, and indicate that PIN is part of a morphologic continuum in the progression of prostate cancer. To our knowledge, this is the first description of high-grade PIN spontaneously occurring in animals. The canine prostate may serve as a useful model for examining factors that modulate PIN and prostate cancer progression.
 ...
PMID:Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in dogs with spontaneous prostate cancer. 905 Nov 47

PSA-based screening substantially increases the prostate cancer detection rate and the percentage of organ-confined tumors. It appears that there is some benefit from screening for prostate cancer because of the increased amount of potentially curable disease discovered and the fact that 96% of the pathologically staged tumors detected have histologic features associated with aggressive cancer. Additional evidence that nearly all tumors detected on the basis of initial PSA screening are apt to be clinically significant may be derived from the information that PSA-based screening decreases the incidence of incidental A1 grade III and A2 tumors but does not increase the detection of clinically insignificant A1 grade I and II tumors. At this time, PSA represents the most effective and valuable tool to detect early prostate cancer; therefore, PSA should be used to improve early diagnosis of prostate cancer. Some advances have been made with the introduction of age-specific reference ranges and the ability to measure free to total PSA ratios. The data presented support the clinical usefulness of age-specific reference ranges for serum PSA. Calculation of the free to total PSA ratio is valuable in deciding which screening volunteers require further evaluation, increases the specificity of PSA screening, and as demonstrated may be useful in deciding which patients with isolated PIN should undergo repeat biopsies. Based on these facts, PSA truly can be described as the most important and useful marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Based on these encouraging results and the obligingness of the social insurances, we will be able to continue PSA screening for early detection of prostate cancer for all concerned Tyrolean men in the future.
 ...
PMID:Prostate-specific antigen as a screening test. The Austrian experience. 912 29

In a total of 59 prostate cancer (PCa) patients, 9 patients with PIN. 29 subjects with BPH and 26 healthy men serum TPS and PSA values were measured together with NK cell activity, number and proportion of CD16+ cells, and reactivity of lymphocytes to mitogens (Con A. PHA and PWM). NK activity data indicate highly significant differences between both of patients with local tumor and those with disseminated disease (P < 0.01) and b) responders and nonresponding patients to hormonal therapy (P < 0.01). The number and proportion of CD16+ cells is lowest in BPH patients in comparison with controls and PCa patients. Since benign enlargement is attributed mainly to stromal cell proliferation in the absence of cell death in this compartment, gene expressions which control these events may participate in the surprisingly low CD16+ cell proportion. The reactivity of lymphocytes to mitogens (PHA. Con A and PWM) showed lower numerical values in all categories of PCa and BPH patients when compared with healthy men. The reactivity of T and B lymphocytes reported herein as immunological responses to mitogens (PHA. Con A and PWM) was performed 4-6 months after the beginning of therapy. Our data fit in well with those previously reported. Numerically lowest respective reactivity parameters to all mitogens were assessed in PIN subjects. Reported results show the specific significance of the changes in NK cell activity in regard with both metastatic extention of PCa and tumor response to therapy. These alterations match in their reliability changes with tumor marker values related to prostate cancer activity (TPS) and tumor differentiation (PSA). Lymphocyte reactivity to mitogens (Con A. PHA. PWM) may help in a subclinical discrimination between BPH and PIN patients that is still an important goal of clinical urology.
 ...
PMID:Analysis of NK cell activity, lymphocyte reactivity to mitogens and serotest PSA and TPS values in patients with primary and disseminated prostate cancer, PIN and BPH. 917 16

Two histopathologic lesions are considered putative precursors of prostate cancer, but the supportive evidence for one (prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, or PIN) is much greater than the other (atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, or AAH). High grade PIN is the most likely precursor of carcinoma, arising in the peripheral zone, but probably does not account for well-differentiated cancer arising in the transition zone. The biological significance of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate (AAH) is inconclusive at the time. The histological and cytological features of AAH are intermediate between BPH and low grade carcinoma, suggesting that AAH may be a precursor of well differentiated transition; zone carcinoma. In the recent time new findings on morphogenetic aspects of normal and abnormal prostatic growth i.e. stem cell models are discussed and topics about grading and proliferative activities, frequency and histological changes associated with aging as well as clinical relevance of PIN and AAH. This paper reviews the results and discussion at the second international consultation meeting on PIN in Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Nov. 3-4 th. 1995, following the first international consultation meeting of AAH and PIN and origin of the prostatic carcinoma in Ancona, Sept. 11-12 th 1994.
 ...
PMID:Relationship between atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and prostatic adenocarcinoma. 927 Feb 65

Comparison of different screening methods including digital rectal examination (DRE) and estimation of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) had been done for detection of cancer prostate at initial stages in 186 patients presenting with prostatism. The detection rate of raised serum PSA (> 4 ng/dl) was found significantly higher than that of abnormal DRE because it could detect cases of prostate cancer at very early stages. On the other hand using abnormal DRE alone as criteria for biopsy, large number of these cases, specially at early stages, would have remained undetected (36.9%) thereby giving false low incidence. Serum PSA was found raised in pre neoplastic conditions (73.9%) like PIN and AAH also, majority of which were missed on DRE (65.2%). Raised serum PSA was found in many benign conditions (36.7%, false positive) also, hence prostatic biopsy is advised to confirm malignancy.
 ...
PMID:Screening of prostate cancer in males with prostatism. 944 53

From March 1994 to September 1996 485 patients of median age 67 years (range 49-82) underwent transrectal prostate needle biopsy at the Urological Clinic JLF UK in Martin. PIN was detected in 31 (6.4%) patients. Median age of patients with PIN was 67 years (range 58-75). There were 21 (68%) patients with low-grade PIN and 10 (32%) patients with high-grade PIN. In this group concomitant invasive cancer of the prostate was detected in 6 (19.4%) patients with PIN, of whom 5 (16.0%) had high-grade PIN and 1 (3.4%) nad low-grade PIN. Median concentration of PSA in patients with PIN was 9.1 ng/ml (range 1.3-85 ng/ml), significantly higher (p < 0.001) than PSA concentration in patients with BPH. We did not find significant differences between PSA concentrations in patients with PIN and in those with prostate cancer (p = 0.77). In conclusion we recommend clinical management of patients newly diagnosed with PIN.
 ...
PMID:[Occurrence of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in needle biopsy of the prostate and its clinical significance]. 947 72

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is considered the most likely precursor of clinically significant prostate cancer. Biopsy remains the only definitive method for detecting these premalignant lesions. In this article we review the diagnostic criteria of HGPIN and discuss histological features that allow their distinction from other benign and malignant lesions. PIN is recognised at low power magnification as a thickened, basophilic and hyperchromatic epithelium in pre-existing acinar duct structures. This important histological feature is due to nuclear crowding and stratification. Distinction between HGPIN and low grade PIN (LGPIN), a lesion with little clinical significance, is made mainly on the presence or absence of prominent nucleoli. HGPIN lesions always retain an intact or fragmented basal cell layer. The different growth patterns of HGPIN (tufting, micropapillary, cribriform and flat) have no clinical significance but should be considered in the differential diagnosis together with normal structures, and both benign and malignant lesions. HGPIN has a high predictive value as a marker for prostate cancer but should not influence therapeutic decisions. Its identification in biopsy specimens warrants close surveillance with repeated biopsy.
 ...
PMID:[Diagnostic criteria and differential diagnosis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia]. 954 40

Transrectal fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of the prostate under digital control is a cheap and rapid method for diagnostic evaluation of palpable and non-palpable nodules, yielding high sensitivity (ca. 95%) and a low complication rate (< 1%). Its specificity amounts to > 97%. The scarcity of urologists trained in the FNAB method and of pathologists experienced in cytology of the prostate limit the clinical application so far. Besides various forms of prostatitis, five different types of cancer can cytologically be differentiated. While PIN I cannot be cytologically identified, PIN II/III lesions may lead to false-positive diagnoses. Cytologic grading of adenocarcinomas of the prostate is of statistically proven prognostic validity and strictly correlated with its histologic counterpart. Preoperative, radiologically controlled FNAB of pelvic and paraortal lymph nodes has sensitivity of ca.86% and specificity of 100%. It thus helps to avoid unnecessary prostatectomies if nodal tumor spread has preoperatively been proven. Diagnostic DNA cytometry is able to identify those prostatic cancer patients who do not reveal significantly increased risk of tumor progression or decreased survival probability, even without therapy (constantly and representatively diploid and tetraploid patterns). Patients with DNA tetraplid histograms may show deteriation of prognosis under hormonal therapy. DNA-aneuploid prostatic cancers should not be subjected to a "wait and see" strategy; they do not respond to hormonal therapy.
 ...
PMID:[Cytopathology of the prostate]. 954 42

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is considered a premalignant lesion of the prostate. It is often encountered in prostate needle biopsy in cases where no cancer is identified. In order to evaluate its importance 25 patients with PIN in a former prostate needle biopsy underwent a second ultrasound guided needle biopsy. The first biopsy was performed in all patients as a result of positive DRE. In 13 patients (52%), prostate cancer was identified in the second specimen. All presented with high or intermediate grade PIN in the first biopsy. PSA values were compared with PIN grade and cancer presentation in the second biopsy, although no statistically significant difference was proven. In conclusion, when PIN is discovered in prostate needle biopsy in patients with positive DRE, a second biopsy has to be performed in order to exclude the possibility of a prostate carcinoma.
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of needle biopsy in the diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma in men with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. 960 81


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>