Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0376358 (prostate cancer)
 59,338 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Conventional cytogenetics of breast and other solid tumors has been hampered by a number of factors. An analysis of breast tumor tissues was therefore undertaken using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). A total of 34 specimens were analyzed using a chromosome 8-specific alpha-satellite probe. Various approaches were tested and compared. Among 30 informative samples, 11 infiltrating ductal carcinomas, not otherwise specified (NOS), 5 ductal carcinomas in situ, 5 lobular carcinomas, 3 papillary carcinomas, and 6 benign lesions were studied. Of the 11 cases of infiltrating ductal carcinomas (NOS) analyzed, four cases showed 3 signals, one case showed 4 signals, and the rest showed 2 signals. Of the 5 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ samples, 1 showed 3 signals and the other 4 cases showed 2 signals. All cases of lobular carcinomas, papillary carcinomas, and benign lesions showed 2 signals. We inferred from these data that 36% of the infiltrating ductal carcinomas (NOS) were trisomic and 9% were tetrasomic, whereas 20% of the ductal carcinomas in situ were trisomic. All samples from lobular carcinomas, papillary carcinomas, and the benign lesions were disomic. From our preliminary data, it can further be concluded that a subset of breast cancer is characterized by chromosome 8 trisomy. These data are consistent with an ever-increasing database on the association of chromosomal 8 trisomy with other cancers such as leukemia, lymphoma, prostate cancer, ovarian carcinoma, salivary gland tumor, malignant melanoma, desmoid tumors, and recently gestational trophoblastic disease. It is also noted that the ability to analyze formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival material will enable a more comprehensive cytogenetic study of breast cancer than is currently available.
 ...
PMID:Fluorescent in situ hybridization assessment of chromosome 8 copy number in breast cancer. 886 38

In a previous study, we observed a low frequency of HER-2/neu oncogene amplification in prostate cancer using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). In our continued effort to identify prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer, we analyzed 74 cases of prostate cancer to assess the presence of chromosomal trisomies in this cohort of patients. Previous results from this laboratory have implicated a role of chromosomal trisomies in various cancers. FISH using a chromosome 7 and a chromosome 8 centromere probe was utilized to study abnormal chromosome copy numbers together with data from a chromosome 17 control. The frequency of trisomy 7 was found to be 58.1% (43 of 74 informative cases), while the frequency of trisomy 8 was found to be 9.5% (7 of 74 informative cases). The frequency of cells showing chromosome 17 trisomy was 18.5% (15 of 81 cases successfully studied). While chromosome 8 trisomy did not seem to play as significant a role here as in other cancers that we studied, the results of chromosome 7 trisomy are consistent with those reported in the literature. Further exploration of selected trisomies as biomarkers in prostate cancer using a larger study sample size is warranted to establish their clinical utilities.
 ...
PMID:Assessment of chromosomal trisomies in prostate cancer using fluorescent in situ hybridization. 1052 62

We previously conducted a study of 88 cases of prostate cancer in an attempt to identify potential prognostic biomarkers that can distinguish aggressive cases that must be treated immediately. Prostate cancer is a serious disease affecting men worldwide and compromises the quality of life of its patients. Biomarkers studied included chromosome 7 trisomy, chromosome 8 trisomy, and HER-2/neu oncogene amplification. These biomarkers were initially studied because trisomy 8 and oncogene amplification of the HER-2/neu gene have been reported in many other cancers, including those studied in this laboratory. In view of the fact that HER-2/neu amplification was not found to play a prominent role in the group of prostate cancer specimens that we studied, an exploration of other biomarkers was felt to be warranted. Thus, we began a pilot study of c-myc oncogene copy number in prostate cancer using the same protocol for fluorescent in situ hybridization and a direct-labeled SpectrumOrange LSI c-myc probe (Vysis, Inc., Downers Grove, IL) on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. From a total of 36 cases of prostate cancers successfully analyzed, we found 11 (31%) tumors exhibiting 3 or more positive signals for c-myc in 15% or more of the cells. Of these, only 7 tumors (19% of the total cases studied) had >/=3 signals in 20% or more of the cells. No case had >/=3 signals in 25% or more of the cells. Compared to other molecular probes tested, the c-myc signals were more faint and the quality of the preparation was less optimal than other tumor specimens that we previously studied. Based on the information available thus far, we conclude that an increased copy number in c-myc oncogene copy number was not a prominent finding in our cohort of prostate cancer patients.
 ...
PMID:Fluorescent in situ hybridization study of c-myc oncogene copy number in prostate cancer. 1064 Apr 55

Prostate cancer (CaP) is a multifocal heterogenous disease. A major challenge in CaP research is to identify genetic biomarkers that herald aggressive transformation. To investigate the effect of tumor heterogeneity on the analysis of genomic aberration, we compared the results of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis of DNA extracted from tumor bulk against that of DNA amplified by degenerate oligonucleotide primed polymerase chain reaction (DOP-PCR) from homogeneous cell population obtained by laser capture microdissection of discrete tumor foci. Sampling by microdissection, aberrations were observed in three of three foci of carcinoma involved with prostatic capsule, and in two of three prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) foci examined. Carcinoma foci consistently exhibited more extensive aberrations than the PIN samples obtained from the same tumor. Within these samples, the different tumor foci exhibited gain of 8q, whereas PIN showed no consistent aberration. Using bulk extracted DNA, CGH detected aberrations in only 3 of 21 samples investigated, despite the known trisomy 8 status, as revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The results of this study demonstrate that CGH analysis using bulk dissected fresh tissue is insufficiently sensitive to fully detect the chromosomal numerical aberrations in CaP. Given the considerable intratumor genomic heterogeneity, CGH with microdissection and DOP-PCR amplification provides a more complete repertoire of aberrations as well as a better phenotype-genotype correlation in prostate tumors.
 ...
PMID:Resolution of genotypic heterogeneity in prostate tumors using polymerase chain reaction and comparative genomic hybridization on microdissected carcinoma and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia foci. 1237 8