Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0376358 (prostate cancer)
 59,338 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Serum concentrations of prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-Sm) and prostatic specific antigen (PSA) were measured in 31 hemodialysis patients without clinical signs of malignant disease. PAP, gamma-Sm and PSA levels in serum were not significantly different between control and hemodialysis groups. A significant reduction in these tumor markers was not found after dialysis treatment. This indicates that the measurement of PAP, gamma-Sm and PSA in serum is useful for the detection of prostatic cancer in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
 ...
PMID:Serum prostatic acid phosphatase, gamma-seminoprotein and prostatic specific antigen in hemodialysis patients. 137 77

Serum levels of gamma-seminoprotein (GSM), prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostate specific acid phosphatase (PAP) were examined, using enzyme immunoassay, in 250 patients with prostatic disease. The results indicated that the highest specificity was obtained with GSM (94%) and the lowest with PSA (60%). In contrast, the highest sensitivity in newly detected carcinomas (n = 41) was obtained with PSA (71%), whereas that of GSM (51%) was comparable to that of PAP (44%). Of 41 patients with newly detected prostatic cancer, 35 (85%) showed a significant increase in at least 1 of the tumour markers. Five of 6 patients whose markers were within normal limits had incidental carcinomas. During follow-up, PSA was raised in 88%, GSM in 66% and PAP in 55% within 12 months prior to clinical progression. Our results suggest that the determination of GSM may be of value in the serological detection and monitoring of prostatic cancer. These findings must be confirmed by further studies with larger numbers of patients and longer follow-up.
 ...
PMID:Gamma-seminoprotein--a new tumour marker in prostatic cancer? Results of a pilot study. 171 99

We measured prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-Sm) and prostatic specific antigen (PSA) levels simultaneously in the serum of 52 patients with untreated prostatic cancer and 44 patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy to assess the clinical usefulness of these tumor markers. PAP and PSA were measured by radioimmunoassay and gamma-Sm by enzyme immunoassay. The positive rates of PAP, gamma-Sm and PSA in patients with prostatic cancer were 50.0, 61.5 and 69.2%, respectively, and those in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy were 11.4, 13.6 and 13.6%, respectively. In patients with early stage prostatic cancer (stage A and B), the positive rates of PAP, gamma-Sm and PSA were 20.8, 41.7 and 54.2%. The efficiency of PSA was the highest among the three markers. The positive rate of the combination assay of PAP and PSA, that of gamma-Sm and PSA and that of PAP, gamma-Sm and PSA were slightly higher than that of the PSA assay alone. However, the efficiency of the PSA assay alone was higher than that of any combination. No significant correlation was found between histopathological grade and the level of each tumor marker. A significant correlation was found between PAP and gamma-Sm (r = 0.68, P less than 0.001), and between PAP and PSA (r = 0.61, P less than 0.001), but there was no correlation between gamma-Sm and PSA. These results suggest that PSA is the most useful marker and the combination assay of multiple markers is not so advantageous, at least for screening of prostatic cancer.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical study of tumor markers in prostatic cancer]. 169 63

Prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-Sm) and prostate specific antigen (PSA) were examined on 120 cases of stage D2 prostate cancer between 1979 and 1989. All patients received endocrine therapy as the first treatment; castration and immediate administration of estrogen or antiandrogen (101), LH-RH analogs (13), estrogen (3) and antiandrogen (3). The actuarial survival rates were calculated by the cause-specific survival method. Pretreatment levels of PAP, gamma-Sm and PSA did not influence prognosis. After start of treatment, the relationship between the changes of the markers and prognosis were examined. At 1 month after the start of the treatment, normalization of PAP or gamma-Sm was not reflected in the following course. On the contrary, at 3 and 6 months, groups with normalization of PAP or gamma-Sm showed better prognosis than those with elevated levels. The same tendency of PSA was obtained at 6 months after start of treatment. In patients with normalized PAP at 3 months, abnormal gamma-Sm showed worse prognosis than normalized gamma-Sm. Therefore, the significance of determination on the two markers was manifested. As histological grade influenced the following course, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with normalized PAP at 3 months showed better prognosis than those with elevated levels. In conclusion, it is worthwhile to measure multiple markers for predicting the prognosis of stage D2 prostate cancer treated with endocrine therapy.
 ...
PMID:[Changes in prostatic acid phosphatase, gamma-seminoprotein and prostate specific antigen after endocrine therapy for stage D2 prostate cancer]. 170 May 88

To evaluate the usefulness of tumor markers in monitoring the patients with prostate cancer, serial measurements of serum prostate-specific antigen (PA), prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-Sm) were performed in 78 stage C or D patients. Positive rates of each marker prior to the treatment were as follows; PA; 75%, PAP; 56% and gamma-Sm; 62% in stage C, and PA; 95%, PAP; 79% and gamma-Sm; 91% in stage D. In most cases showing PR (partial response) and S (stable) in clinical responses, these three markers decreased their serum titers corresponding to clinical course if the markers were elevated at the start of the treatment. But the usefulness of PAP was lessened because of its lower positive rate than those of PA and gamma-Sm. In 33 PD (progressive disease) cases, positive rates of each marker at time of clinical diagnosis as PD were found to be 85% in PA, 55% in PAP and 76% in gamma-Sm. And with the combination assays of these three tumor markers, positive rate was elevated to 88%. Moreover, elevation of serum values of these three markers at 3 months before the progression event were observed in 50% of PA, 39% of PAP and 46% of gamma-Sm. Then the prognostic significance of each marker was examined. In PA and PAP, there were statistical differences in non-relapsing rates between patients whose reduction rates from the pretreatment value on 7th day were more than and less than 50%. But in gamma-Sm, a statistical difference between each group was firstly observed on 14th day. As a result, in monitoring patients with prostate cancer, PA and gamma-Sm are more useful than PAP and, in prediction of patients' prognosis, PA is more useful than gamma-Sm.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical studies on tumor markers for monitoring prostate cancer patients; the evaluation of prostate-specific antigen and comparison with prostatic acid phosphatase and gamma-seminoprotein]. 170 55

A mass screening for prostatic cancer was conducted in Hisayama town, Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan from 1988 to 1989. As the primary screening questionnaire survey about urination and measurement of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) were performed in 789 of the 1025 male residents over 50 years old (77.0%). For the second screening with digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography, 184 subjects (23.3%) were picked up. Prostatic cancer was suspected in 33 (4.2%) of the 134 subjects who actually underwent the second screening examination. Prostatic biopsy and other examinations such as measurement of prostatic acid phosphatase and gamma-seminoprotein, urinalysis and radiographic examination were performed in 26 as the third screening, and prostatic cancer was detected in 5 (0.63%); 3 in stage B and 2 in stage C. Four of the 5 subjects with prostatic cancer had complained no urinary symptoms on questionnaire. Serum PSA was useful for detecting early stage prostatic cancer.
 ...
PMID:[Mass screening for prostatic cancer in Hisayama town, Fukuoka]. 170 89

Twenty-seven cases of reactivated prostatic cancer between 1979 and 1990 were investigated. Reactivation took place in the form of local aggravation in 3 cases, occurrence or aggravation of metastasis to bones in 8 cases, and in both forms in 16 cases. The elevation of tumor markers preceded the clinical findings in 11 cases (41%). In 75% of the cases with occurrence or aggravation of metastasis, the elevation of tumor markers preceded the clinical findings. This showed that tumor markers were useful in most cases for early detection of reactivation. However, in 3 cases with local aggravation, the clinical findings preceded the elevation of tumor marks. Therefore, it is also important to check the clinical findings at the follow-up. At the time of reactivation, positive rates of prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-Sm) and prostatic specific antigen (PA) were 78%, 83% and 80%, respectively. Thus gamma-Sm and PA appeared to be more reliable than PAP for monitoring of prostatic cancer.
 ...
PMID:[Relationship between reactivation and tumor markers in prostatic cancer]. 170 17

Prostate-specific antigen (PA) and gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-Sm) were compared by immunocytochemical, immunodiffusion and immunoblotting methods using rabbit anti-PA antibody and rabbit anti-gamma-Sm antibody. Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) were developed for measurements of PA and gamma-Sm to determine a correlation between serum PA and gamma-Sm levels in patients with prostate cancer. The patterns of localization and distribution of PA and gamma-Sm were identical in prostate tissue sections, including benign and cancerous human prostates. The immunodiffusion study showed that the antigens with which anti-PA antibody and anti-gamma-Sm antibody reacted in seminal plasma and prostate tissue homogenates were identical to each other. In the immunoblotting study, anti-PA antibody and anti-gamma-Sm antibody recognized a single antigen corresponding to a molecular weight of approximately 33,000 both in seminal plasma and prostate tissue homogenates. The EIAs developed in this study were sensitive, specific, and reproducible, and the correlation between serum PA and gamma-Sm values determined by these EIAs was highly significant (r = 0.99, P less than 0.001). These results indicated that PA and gamma-Sm were immunologically identical and that serum PA and gamma-Sm determined by immunoassays using anti-PA antibody and anti-gamma-Sm antibody should be evaluated as identical tumor markers for serodiagnosis of prostate cancer.
 ...
PMID:Immunological comparison between prostate-specific antigen and gamma-seminoprotein. 170 12

Serum levels of prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-Sm) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were determined simultaneously in 57 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and in 50 untreated patients with prostatic cancer (adenocarcinoma, N = 47 and non-adenocarcinoma, N = 3). The correlations between the serum levels of gamma-Sm and PSA in these patients were assessed by linear regression analysis. Some fundamental studies were added for explaining the causes of discrepancy between the serum levels of gamma-Sm and PSA. All of BPH group underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and the sera were obtained for measurements before, immediately after and 18 hours after TURP. The gamma-Sm correlated well with the PSA in the sera obtained before (r = 0.76) and 18 hours after (r = 0.73) TURP. However, there was no correlation (r = 0.26) between them in the sera obtained immediately after TURP. In 47 untreated patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate, no significant correlation (r = 0.19) between serum levels of gamma-Sm and PSA was observed, although there was correlation (r = 0.51) between those of PAP and PSA. When these patients were classified into two groups, M0 (stage A-C; N = 26) and M1 (stage D; N = 21), however, the serum gamma-Sm correlated with the serum PSA in M0 group (r = 0.57), but didn't in M1 group (r = 0.11). Furthermore, the differences in the means of PAP (p less than 0.05) and PSA (p less than 0.001) between M0 group and M1 group were statistically significant, although the serum gamma-Sm failed to distinguish M0 from M1. The anti-PSA antibody of "PSA Kit" reacted against the standard gamma-Sm adopted from "gamma-Sm Kit". Surprisingly, the anti-gamma-Sm antibody of "gamma-Sm Kit" also reacted against the standard PSA adopted from "PSA Kit". The gamma-Sm and PSA apparently cross-reacted each other. The quantitative analyses with serial dilution of the sera were done by using each assay in 3 patients whose serum levels of gamma-Sm were markedly different from those of PSA. The dilution curve for PAP appeared to be rectilineal, and that for PSA also appeared to be approximately rectilineal. However, the gamma-Sm assay failed to be proportional. In conclusion, the correlation between serum levels of gamma-Sm and PSA was absent in certain circumstances, when the true values of them were expected to be much higher than those determined.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Discrepancy between the serum levels of gamma seminoprotein and prostate-specific antigen in patients with prostatic neoplasms. Both true or either untrue]. 171 Nov 33

The clinical significance of serum basic fetoprotein (BFP) in prostatic cancer was investigated together with serum prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-Sm) and prostate specific antigen (PA). Investigated in this study were 40 patients with prostatic cancer, ranging in age from 50 to 85 years (mean age: 69.5 years). According to clinical staging, 3 cases (7.5%) had a stage A disease, 10 cases (25.0%) a stage B disease, 7 cases (17.5%) a stage C disease, and 20 cases (50.0%) a stage D disease. The positive rates for serum BFP, PAP, gamma-Sm, and PSA were 60.0, 45.0, 63.6, and 68.4%, respectively, and these rates increased as the stage advanced. The above results suggest that BFP is the most useful marker of the four for monitoring prostatic cancer. In a combination assay of these four markers, 29 (87.9%) of 33 patients with prostatic cancer could be diagnosed by observing an elevated serum level in one of the markers. This suggests that a combination assay of BFP, PAP, gamma-Sm and PSA in patients with prostatic cancer is useful for diagnosis and monitoring of the disease.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical evaluation of serum basic fetoprotein for prostatic cancer--comparative study with PAP, gamma-Sm and PSA]. 171 73


1 2 3 4 5 Next >>