Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0348321 (Haemophilus)
 15,372 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Cefprozil granule preparation was administered orally to 16 patients (ages ranging 8 months to 9 years and 6 months) with pediatric bacterial infections at daily dose levels between 29.4 and 35.7 mg/kg divided into 3 or 4 doses. The following results were obtained. 1. Sixteen patients including 5 with pharyngitis, 3 with tonsillitis, 3 with lacunar tonsillitis, 2 with pneumonia, 2 with contagious impetigo and 1 with scarlet fever were treated. Clinical effects were excellent in 9 cases and moderate in 7, with an overall efficacy rate of 100%. 2. Organisms suspected as pathogens included 17 strains (10 strains of haemophilus influenzae, 2 of Haemophilus parainfluenzae, 3 of Streptococcus pyogenes and 2 of Staphylococcus aureus). Bacteriologically, eradication of pathogens were observed for 11 strains, but no changes were obtained for 5 (all Haemophilus), and unknown results were obtained for 1, thus the eradication rate was 68.8%. 3. No side effects were observed. Abnormal laboratory test results included 2 cases of increase in platelets, and 2 of increase in eosinophils, but those were not significant. 4. No refusal of the drug occurred due to its taste or odor.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical studies on cefprozil granules]. 128 82

Cefprozil (CFPZ), a newly developed oral cephalosporin in a fine granular form for pediatric use, was administered to children with bacterial infections. MICs were determined for 6 drugs including CFPZ, cephalexin (CEX), cefaclor (CCL), ampicillin (ABPC), methicillin (DMPPC) and cloxacillin (MCIPC) against the following 84 strains isolated from cases to which CFPZ was administered; 55 strains of Gram-positive cocci (GPC) including 2 strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 49 strains of Streptococcus pyogenes, 4 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae, and 29 strains of Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) including 10 strains of Haemophilus influenzae, 18 strains of Escherichia coli, and 1 strain of Proteus mirabilis. MIC determination of these strains was done with an inoculum size of 10(6) CFU/ml. In pharmacokinetic studies, serum concentrations, urinary concentrations and urinary recovery rates were investigated using bioassay and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). CFPZ was orally administered 30 minutes before meals to 9 children with ages ranging from 7 years and 1 month to 12 years and 3 months. Three groups of 3 children were tested with doses of 4.0, 7.5 and 15.0 mg/kg, respectively. In addition to the above, clinical and bacteriological studies were performed in a total of 160 cases consisting of children with ages ranging 5 months to 12 years and 5 months. A mean dose of 8.6 mg/kg in 3-4 divided doses (130 cases of t.i.d. and 30 cases of q.i.d.) was administered for an average of 7 days. The 160 cases included 34 cases of pharyngitis, 5 cases of tonsillitis, 8 cases of acute bronchitis, 8 cases of pneumonia, 52 cases of scarlet fever, 4 cases of acute purulent otitis media, 47 cases of urinary tract infection, 1 case of purulent lymphadenitis and 1 case of posthitis. Adverse reactions and abnormal clinical laboratory test results were also examined in 166 cases, including 6 cases excluded from the evaluation of clinical efficacy. The results obtained are summarized as follows: 1. With regard to GPC, MICs of CFPZ against 2 strains of S. aureus were 0.78 or 1.56 micrograms/ml and CFPZ showed the second highest activity to MCIPC. MICs of CFPZ against 49 strains of S. pyogenes were all less than 0.025 micrograms/ml.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Pharmacokinetic and clinical studies on cefprozil granules in the pediatric field]. 128 89

Cefprozil (CFPZ, BMY-28100) was evaluated for its efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics in children. CFPZ was effective against streptococcal pharyngitis, pneumococcal lower respiratory tract infections, staphylococcal skin infections and Escherichia coli urinary tract infections, but was less effective against lower respiratory tract infections and otitis media due to Haemophilus influenzae. No adverse reactions were encountered in 46 cases treated with CFPZ. With a premeal administration of 7.5 mg/kg, the Cmax was approximately 3.2 micrograms/ml and the T 1/2 beta was 1.4 hours. From the present study, CFPZ appears to be safe and effective against community-acquired childhood infections.
 ...
PMID:[Clinical evaluation of a new oral cephem, cefprozil in children]. 149 33

Cefprozil (CFPZ, BMY-28100), a new oral cephem antibiotic, was studied for its antibacterial activities, absorption and excretion upon administration. Its clinical efficacies were also studied in pediatric patients with infections. A study on antibacterial activities of CFPZ against 11 clinical isolates including 6 species found that its activities against Staphylococcus aureus, alpha-hemolytic Streptococcus, Escherichia coli and Haemophilus influenzae were equal or superior to those of CCL. When CFPZ was given to patients orally at 15 mg/kg, maximum serum concentration was obtained between 1 to 2 hours after administration and urinary excretion rate in the first 6 hours was 33.8 +/- 17.6%. Clinical evaluation was done in a total of 25 patients with various infections. Responses were excellent in 15 cases and good in 10 cases, hence the efficacy rate was 100%. As side effect, soft stool was found in 1 case, and eosinophilia in 2 cases and elevation of GOT and GPT in 1 case were found as abnormal laboratory test results, but none of them was serious. It appears that CFPZ is an effective and safe antibiotic in the field of pediatrics.
 ...
PMID:[Pharmacokinetic, bacteriological and clinical studies on cefprozil in pediatric patients]. 149 38

Cefprozil (CFPZ, BMY-28100) granule preparation was studied for pharmacokinetic, bacteriological and clinical aspects in the pediatric infections. The results obtained are summarized as follows: 1. Serum concentrations and urinary excretion. The pharmacokinetics of CFPZ in pediatrics was investigated by single oral administration of fine granules at doses of 4.0, 7.5 and 15.0 mg/kg. Peak blood levels of CFPZ were 3.06, 4.62 and 9.65 micrograms/ml, respectively, at 1.00-1.30 hours after each dose and AUCs were 7.44, 12.50 and 27.01 micrograms.hr/ml, respectively. These data showed that Cmax and AUC depended on dose levels. T 1/2 (beta) at these dose levels were 1.03, 0.94 and 1.01 hours, respectively. There were no differences related to dose. Urinary recovery rates in the first 6 hours after administration were 51.5-57.1%. The pharmacokinetics of CFPZ before or after meals were also investigated at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg. Peak blood levels were 4.88 micrograms/ml at 1.17 hours after administration in the fasting state, and 4.30 micrograms/ml at 1.54 hours after administration in the non-fasting state. Delay of Tmax and slight decrease of Cmax were observed in the non-fasting state, but T 1/2 and AUC were 0.91 hour and 12.96 micrograms.hr/ml, respectively, in the non-fasting state, and were similar to those in the fasting state, 0.93 hour and 12.82 micrograms.hr/ml, respectively. Urinary recovery rates in the first 6 hours after administration were 63.8% in the fasting state and 50.7% in the non-fasting state. 2. Clinical results. Clinical efficacies of CFPZ granules in various infectious diseases were studied in 804 cases. Twenty nine cases, mostly viral or mycoplasmal infections, were excluded from the statistical analysis. The clinical efficacy rate in 527 cases with causative bacteria isolated was 97.2%; and in 248 cases from whom no significant isolate had been obtained was 96.0%. The clinical efficacy rate in 475 cases with monobacterial infections (proven by culture of isolates) was 97.3%, and that in 52 case with polybacterial infections was 96.2%. Haemophilus influenzae was isolated mostly from acute respiratory infections. In 88 cases from whom H. influenzae was isolated, clinical efficacy rate was 95.5%. In cases from whom H. influenzae was found concomitant by with Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes or Streptococcus pneumoniae, the clinical efficacy rates were also high. The bacteriological eradication rate in cases with 582 strains was 83.3%; the eradication rate for Gram-positive organisms was 95.8%; and for Gram-negative organisms, it was 64.2%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:[Overall clinical evaluation of cefprozil against infections in pediatric fields. Pediatric Study Group for Cefprozil]. 149 40

Cefprozil is a newer oral cephalosporin with a spectrum of activity against organisms that include gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens. A review of published data shows that cefprozil is active (susceptibility, less than or equal to 8 micrograms/mL; moderate susceptibility, 16 micrograms/mL; resistance, greater than or equal to 32 micrograms/mL) against gram-positive species such as streptococci, methicillin-susceptible staphylococci, and Listeria monocytogenes; it may have marginal activity against some enterococci. Among the gram-negative species, cefprozil has activity against Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Citrobacter diversus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. For anaerobic species, cefprozil has activity against clostridial species, including Clostridium difficile, peptostreptococci, and possibly Bacteroides melaninogenicus and Eubacterium. The activity of cefprozil is generally greater than that of cephalexin and generally similar to that of cefaclor. In these reports, cefprozil showed more in vitro activity than cephalexin and cefaclor against penicillin-resistant pneumococci, penicillin-resistant viridans streptococci, beta-lactamase-positive methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, and C. difficile, although the clinical significance of some of these differences has yet to be studied.
 ...
PMID:Review of the in vitro antibacterial activity of cefprozil, a new oral cephalosporin. 161 37

We compared the in-vitro activities of cefprozil, a novel oral cephalosporin, and of loracarbef, a new oral carbacephem, with other agents against middle ear fluid isolates obtained from children with acute otitis media. These included Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Branhamella catarrhalis. Cefprozil activity (MIC50 and MIC90) against S. pneumoniae was 0.25 and 0.50 mg/l; against H. influenzae 8 and 16 mg/l; against B. catarrhalis 2 and 2 mg/l. Loracarbef activity (MIC50 and MIC90) against S. pneumoniae was 1 and 2 mg/l; against H. influenzae 8 and 16 mg/l; against B. catarrhalis 1 and 8 mg/l. Cefprozil was four-fold more active against S. pneumoniae than loracarbef but similar to amoxycillin, amoxycillin/clavulanate, cefaclor, cefixime, cefuroxime and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX). Against H. influenzae, cefprozil was similar to loracarbef and other agents through less active than TMP/SMX and cefixime. Against B. catarrhalis, cefprozil was four-fold more active than loracarbef, cefaclor and cefixime but similar to the comparative antibiotics. Cefprozil and loracarbef activities were unaffected at pH 6 and 8 or in the presence of human serum, but there was a major diminution of activity for both agents at pH 5 and at inoculum sizes greater than or equal to 10(7) cfu/ml. Cefoprozil and loracarbef have consistent activity against middle ear pathogens and further pharmacokinetic and clinical studies appear warranted.
 ...
PMID:In-vitro activity of cefprozil (BMY 28100) and loracarbef (LY 163892) against pathogens obtained from middle ear fluid. 190 88

Cefprozil (BMY-28100) is a semisynthetic cephalosporin with broad-spectrum antibacterial activity and prolonged serum elimination half-life allowing for once-a-day oral administration. In vitro, cefprozil demonstrates excellent activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Cefprozil (500 mg once daily) was compared to cefaclor (250 mg three times daily) in an open, randomized, comparative trial for the treatment of acute group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis. Ninety-four patients were enrolled in this study; 53 patients were evaluable for clinical and bacteriological response assessment. Seventy-eight patients were evaluable for safety assessment. Three patients (all in the cefprozil treatment group) required disenrollment because of side effects, mainly nausea. Clinical and bacteriological responses were comparable for both study drugs. Leukopenia and nausea, the most common side effects observed, were more common in the cefprozil-treated group. Cefprozil appears to be an appropriate alternative to cefaclor for the treatment of acute group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis. However, because of the small number of patients eligible for efficacy assessment, a large type II (beta) error was expected in our study, which may have resulted in a potential failure to detect a difference between both treatment groups. A larger study would be required to determine the proper role of cefprozil in the treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal infections.
 ...
PMID:Comparative efficacy and safety of cefprozil (BMY-28100) and cefaclor in the treatment of acute group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis. 192 53

Cefprozil is an orally active cephalosporin which has demonstrated activity against a wide range of organisms in vitro. It is particularly active against the Gram-positive organisms Streptococcus pyogenes, pneumoniae and agalactiae and against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus are not susceptible to cefprozil. Cefprozil is also moderately active against Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, many Enterobacteriaceae and certain anaerobic organisms, and is relatively stable to hydrolysis by a number of beta-lactamases. In comparative trials, the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of cefprozil 500mg or 20 mg/kg administered once or twice daily has been comparable with multiple daily dosage regimens of erythromycin in patients with tonsillitis or pharyngitis, with cefaclor and amoxicillin/clavulanate in lower respiratory tract infections, with amoxicillin/clavulanate and erythromycin in skin and skin-structure infections and with cefaclor in acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections. The clinical efficacy of cefprozil is similar to that of cefaclor in patients with tonsillitis or pharyngitis but the bacteriological efficacy of cefprozil is significantly greater than that of cefaclor. Cefprozil is clinically more effective than cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections and demonstrated greater efficacy than cefaclor in one of 2 comparative studies when administered twice daily in patients with skin and skin-structure infections. In children with acute otitis media, cefprozil 15 mg/kg twice daily was as effective as cefaclor or amoxicillin/clavulanate 13.3 mg/kg 3 times daily and was as effective as cefixime 8 mg/kg once daily. The most frequently reported adverse effects associated with cefprozil, diarrhoea and nausea, are usually mild to moderate in severity and discontinuation of treatment is rarely necessary. Thus, cefprozil with its convenient administration regimen appears to be a suitable alternative to cefaclor, cefixime, amoxicillin/clavulanate or erythromycin for the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections, skin and skin-structure infections, and otitis media in children. While cefprozil has shown similar efficacy to cefaclor in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections, well-controlled clinical trials comparing its efficacy with that of cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim+sulfamethoxazole) in this indication are required.
 ...
PMID:Cefprozil. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential. 768 76

In vitro studies on the activity of cefprozil have been conducted in Europe and North America. Against gram-negative bacilli, cefprozil and cefaclor are at least two to four times more active than cephalexin. Cefixime is more active against these organisms. Against gram-positive cocci, cefprozil is at least two to four times more active than cefaclor and cephalexin; cefixime has limited gram-positive activity, and is particularly inactive against staphylococci (MIC90 32 mg/l). Cefprozil is highly active against Streptococcus pneumoniae (unlike cefixime). Those strains of this genus that display intermediate resistance to pneumococci are more susceptible to cefprozil than cefaclor. Neisseria species and Moraxella catarrhalis are susceptible to cefprozil (MIC90 0.06 and 1 mg/l). beta-lactamase-producing strains of Haemophilus influenzae appear to be susceptible to cefprozil, as the reported MIC90 is 2-4 mg/l. Enterococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and those strains of the Enterobacteriaceae that commonly possess a chromosomal cephalosporinase (e.g., Providencia, Morganella and Enterobacter) are generally considered to be resistant to cefprozil as well as to other oral cephalosporins. Cefprozil appears to display enhanced stability to the commonly encountered Tem-1 and SHV-1 plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases, as found in Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and the Enterobacteriaceae. Cefprozil is rapidly absorbed, reaching a maximum concentration 0.9 to 1.2 h post-dose. Following oral doses of 250 and 500 mg, the Cmax is 6.2 and 10.0 mg/l respectively. Serum half-lives are generally reported as between 1.2 and 1.4 h, and urine recovery is high, 57-70%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Comparative microbiological activity and pharmacokinetics of cefprozil. 788 57


1 2 Next >>