Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0348321 (Haemophilus)
 15,372 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The in vitro activity of fleroxacin, a new trifluorinated quinolone was evaluated against 432 bacterial isolates. Fleroxacin was 1- to 2-fold less active than ciprofloxacin and at least as active as ofloxacin and lomefloxacin against most members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. The MICs of fleroxacin for 90% of strains tested (MIC90) were < or = 0.25 micrograms/ml against all isolates of Enterobacteriaceae except Citrobacter freundii (MIC90, 4 micrograms/ml) and Serratia marcescens (MIC90, 2 micrograms/ml). Fleroxacin was as active as ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and lomefloxacin against Pseudomonas spp, (MIC90 for all quinolones tested were > 8 micrograms/ml). Acinetobacter and Haemophilus influenzae were very susceptible to fleroxacin; however fleroxacin was 1-fold less active than lomefloxacin against Acinetobacter and at least 1-fold less active than ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin against H. influenzae. Methicillin-susceptible and -resistant strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis and methicillin-susceptible strains of S. aureus were very susceptible to fleroxacin, with an MIC90 < or = 1 microgram/ml (range 0.5-1 microgram/ml). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus and Staphylococcus spp. other than aureus and epidermidis were not susceptible to fleroxacin (MIC90 > 8 micrograms/ml). In addition, fleroxacin as well as ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and lomefloxacin were inactive against Enterococcus spp. (MIC90 > 8 micrograms/ml). Streptococcus pneumoniae and S. pyogenes were resistant to both fleroxacin and lomefloxacin but were very susceptible to ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin. These results suggest that fleroxacin represents a valid therapeutic option in the treatment of infections caused by most Enterobacteriaceae and some species of staphylococcus.
 ...
PMID:The comparative activity of fleroxacin, three other quinolones and eight unrelated antimicrobial agents. 133 7

We evaluated fleroxacin, a newer fluoroquinolone, against isolates from sputum from patients with cystic fibrosis. These isolates included rough and mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas cepacia, Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, and Escherichia coli. Selected isolates were tested by the broth microdilution method to examine the influence of various pHs, inoculum sizes, and biological fluids (serum or sputum from patients with cystic fibrosis). Fleroxacin MICs for 50 and 90% of isolates of P. aeruginosa were 2.0 and 4 micrograms/ml, those for P. cepacia were 2 and 16 micrograms/ml, those for S. aureus were 0.5 and 1 microgram/ml, those for H. influenzae were 0.06 and 0.06 micrograms/ml, and those for E. coli were 0.01 and 0.03 micrograms/ml, respectively. Fleroxacin activity against mucoid P. aeruginosa was similar to the activities of enoxacin and ofloxacin but eightfold lower than that of ciprofloxacin. It was twofold more active than norfloxacin and enoxacin but was twofold less active than ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and nafcillin against S. aureus. Fleroxacin inhibitory activity against P. cepacia was two- to fourfold lower than that of ciprofloxacin but eightfold greater than those of the other quinolones tested. Alterations in pH, diluent, and inoculum size did not significantly affect fleroxacin activity. These results, combined with available pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution data, support the need for clinical evaluation of fleroxacin in pulmonary infections in patients with cystic fibrosis.
 ...
PMID:Comparative in vitro activity of a new quinolone, fleroxacin, against respiratory pathogens from patients with cystic fibrosis. 212 70

The in-vitro and in-vivo antibacterial activities of fleroxacin were compared with those of other new quinolones including NY-198. Fleroxacin showed potent activity against most members of the Enterobacteriaceae, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Haemophilus influenzae, and good activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and staphylococci. Against these bacteria, the activity of fleroxacin was roughly comparable to that of norfloxacin, enoxacin, NY-198, and ofloxacin, but slightly less than that of ciprofloxacin. Fleroxacin strongly inhibited DNA supercoiling activity of DNA gyrase purified from Escherichia coli which may explain its high antibacterial activity. The protective effects of a single oral dose of fleroxacin in mice were greater than those of norfloxacin and comparable to or greater than that of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and NY-198 against systemic infections with Staphylococcus aureus, Esch. coli and Ps. aeruginosa, and Serratia marcescens.
 ...
PMID:In-vitro and in-vivo antibacterial activity of fleroxacin, a new fluorinated quinolone. 284 4

The in vitro activity of Fleroxacin (Ro23-6240; AM 833), a new fluorinated 4-quinolone, was compared to that of ciprofloxacin, enoxacin and A-56620, against 747 isolates from cancer patients. Fleroxacin inhibited more than 90% of Enterobacteriacea isolates at a concentration of less than or equal to 0.25 micrograms/ml. It was also extremely active against Aeromonas hydrophila and Haemophilus influenzae isolates with MIC90 values of 0.12 and 0.06 micrograms/ml, respectively. The MIC90 for Acinetobacter spp. was 1.0 micrograms/ml, for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Pseudomonas fluorescens 4.0 micrograms/ml, and for other Pseudomonas spp., 8.0 micrograms/ml. Staphylococcus aureus isolates including methicillin-resistant strains were inhibited by less than or equal to 1.0 microgram/ml. The MIC90 for three different species of coagulase-negative Staphylococci was 1.0 microgram/ml. Streptococcal species required 8-16 micrograms/ml for inhibition. Fleroxacin was also active against group JK-diphtheroids and Bacillus cereus. The overall activity of fleroxacin was similar to that of enoxacin and less than that of A-56620 and ciprofloxacin.
 ...
PMID:In vitro activity of fleroxacin (Ro23-6240), a new fluorinated 4-quinolone against isolates from cancer patients. 314 68

Fleroxacin, a newer fluoroquinolone, has been investigated extensively in worldwide clinical trials by laboratories using a variety of in vitro susceptibility testing methods. These methods differ in their technical details, leading to applied interpretive criteria that can also differ from nation to nation and from method to method. This retrospective three-phase investigation was designed to assess the disk diffusion and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) result variations produced by European laboratories participating in fleroxacin clinical trials as compared with the results of a reference laboratory performing National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) tests. In "phase I," 105 clinical trial strains (1988-1989) from six European investigators were processed by the reference laboratory. In comparison of participant and reference laboratory zone diameters, absolute qualitative agreement was 88.7% for the approved NCCLS interpretive criteria and 94.8% for the criteria used in the fleroxacin urinary tract infection clinical trials. Only three false-susceptible results (3.1%) were reported by the investigators. In the remaining phases of this study (unknown challenge strains and contemporary clinical isolates), the investigator laboratory zone diameters and MICs were within limits of acceptable test variation, that is, +/- 4 mm by disk diffusion and +/- 1 log2 dilution step by the MIC method. For laboratories using the German (DIN) and French (SFM) methods, however, a trend toward larger zones was observed. The greatest variation between participant and NCCLS results was produced when fastidious isolates such as Haemophilus influenzae (significantly smaller zone diameters) were tested. In general, the European fleroxacin clinical trial laboratory results (organism identification and susceptibility tests) could be considered comparable to data produced with NCCLS reference methods, indicating that clinical trial results from wider sources could be used for drug registry by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or by other national agencies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:Interlaboratory variations of fluoroquinolone susceptibility testing. An international study to validate the quality of microbiology results reported during the fleroxacin clinical trials. 811 32

In a multicenter study the efficacy and safety of oral fleroxacin at 400 mg once a day and amoxicillin at 500 mg three times daily for 7 days were compared for the treatment of patients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis due to drug-susceptible bacteria. A total of 194 patients were enrolled, 102 in the fleroxacin group and 92 in the amoxicillin group. Of those enrolled, 22 in the fleroxacin group and 30 (29 for clinical efficacy) in the amoxicillin group were included in the efficacy analysis. All were included in the safety analysis. Clinical success was noted in 21 (95%) of 22 fleroxacin-treated patients and 22 (76%) of 29 amoxicillin-treated patients. Bacteriologic cure was obtained in 21 (95%) of 22 of the fleroxacin group and 18 (60%) of 30 of the amoxicillin group. One Haemophilus parainfluenzae strain persisted with fleroxacin. Persisting organisms with amoxicillin included Haemophilus influenzae (four), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (three), Escherichia coli (two), Streptococcus pneumoniae (one), Neisseria species (one), and Proteus mirabilis (one). Adverse events were reported by 41% of 102 patients receiving fleroxacin and 15% of 92 patients receiving amoxicillin. Insomnia, dizziness, and nausea occurred more frequently with fleroxacin. Fleroxacin may be indicated for the treatment of acute bacterial infection in chronic bronchitis known to be due to Haemophilus species and Moraxella catarrhalis. The 92% incidence of resistance among the S. pneumoniae isolates recovered from all enrolled patients suggests that fleroxacin may not be useful for such infections.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy of fleroxacin versus amoxicillin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. 845 69

The in vitro activity of fleroxacin was determined by broth microdilution against 2,079 recent bacterial isolates and compared to the activities of ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, lomefloxacin, cefaclor, cefuroxime, cefixime, ceftriaxone, amoxicillin/clavulanate, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), and, as appropriate, erythromycin and oxacillin. Most Enterobacteriaceae were inhibited by the quinolones at a concentration of < or = 1 microgram/ml; MIC90s of fleroxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and lomefloxacin were 0.25, 0.5, 1 and 1 micrograms/ml, respectively. Fleroxacin was 2-fold more active than ciprofloxacin against Providencia stuartii and Serratia marcescens. Aside from the quinolones, ceftriaxone and TMP-SMX were the most active antibiotics against the Enterobacteriaceae, with MIC90s of 8 and 16 micrograms/ml, respectively. Ciprofloxacin was more active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa than the other quinolones, while fleroxacin was more active against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: 17.7, 11.2, 20.0, and 22.4% of P. aeruginosa were resistant to fleroxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and lomefloxacin, respectively. Moraxella catarrhalis and Haemophilus influenzae were uniformally susceptible to all antibiotics tested, as were the majority of oxacillin-susceptible staphylococci. The MIC90s of the quinolones and of the beta-lactam antibiotics for oxacillin-resistant staphylococci were 8- to 256-fold higher than for oxacillin-susceptible staphylococci. The beta-lactam antibiotics, TMP-SMX, and erythromycin were more active than the quinolones against streptococci; all antibiotics were poorly active against enterococci. Fleroxacin is active against a broad range of gram-negative bacilli and against oxacillin-susceptible staphylococci and should prove useful for such infections. However, its use cannot be recommended for infections due to oxacillin-resistant staphylococci, streptococci, or enterococci.
 ...
PMID:A multicenter comparative study of the in vitro activity of fleroxacin and other antimicrobial agents. 852 40