Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0348321 (Haemophilus)
 15,372 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Mupirocin (2 percent) ointment is a unique topical agent recently developed for use in the treatment of superficial skin infections. It has shown excellent in vitro and in vivo activity against gram-positive staphylococci and streptococci, which are the predominant pathogens in most superficial skin infections, and against gram-negative Hemophilus influenzae and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. At present, mupirocin (2 percent) ointment has been approved for use in the treatment of impetigo, but an analysis of several recent clinical trials has also indicated the potential for mupirocin treatment of other primary and secondary skin infections. Furthermore, because mupirocin apparently has fewer adverse effects than systemic antibiotics, is less expensive, easier to administer, and less likely to induce antibiotic resistance, it should be considered as an alternative to oral agents in the antimicrobial therapy of a variety of primary and secondary skin disorders.
 ...
PMID:Mupirocin (2 percent) ointment in the treatment of primary and secondary skin infections. 250 Oct 71

Mupirocin is an investigational topical antibiotic used for treatment and prophylaxis of bacterial skin infections. Mupirocin differs from other antibiotics in its synthesis, structure, and mechanism of action. In vitro, mupirocin possesses antimicrobial activity against staphylococci, streptococci, Hemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Few studies comparing mupirocin to other topical antibiotics are available. Initial studies comparing mupirocin to inactive vehicle in the treatment of impetigo indicate an overall 92 percent pathogen eradication rate with active drug and 58 percent eradication rate with vehicle. Overall response to treatment of secondary skin infections was favorable in 91 percent of patients treated with mupirocin and 77 percent of those treated with vehicle. Although incidence is not greater than placebo, adverse effects have included pruritus, burning, dry skin, and erythema. Additional trials and clinical use should further help determine the role of mupirocin in the treatment of minor, primary, and secondary skin infections.
 ...
PMID:Topical mupirocin in the treatment of bacterial skin infections. 310 97

Mupirocin (pseudomonic acid A), an antibiotic produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens, showed a high level of activity against staphylococci and streptococci and against certain gram-negative bacteria, including Haemophilus influenzae and Neisseria gonorrhoeae, but was much less active against most gram-negative bacilli an anaerobes. Nearly all clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, including multiply resistant strains, were susceptible (mupirocin MIC, less than or equal to 0.5 microgram/ml). There was no cross-resistance between mupirocin and clinically available antibiotics, and the selection of resistant variants in vitro occurred at a low frequency. Mupirocin was highly bound (95% bound) to the protein of human serum, and activity was reduced 10- to 20-fold in the presence of human serum. The activity of mupirocin was not greatly influenced by inoculum size but was significantly enhanced in acid medium. In tests of bactericidal activity, MBCs were 8- to 32-fold higher than MICs and the antibiotic demonstrated a slow bactericidal action in time-kill tests, resulting in 90 to 99% killing after 24 h at 37 degrees C.
 ...
PMID:Antibacterial activity of mupirocin (pseudomonic acid), a new antibiotic for topical use. 392 22

Mupirocin E-test strips have been evaluated for their ease of use and accuracy in determining the susceptibilities of 171 strains of Staphylococcus spp., Streptococcus spp., Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. The susceptibility of each strain was determined on two occasions, using parallel E-test and agar dilution methodologies each time. To ensure similar precisions for statistical analyses, E-test MICs were rounded up to a standard twofold agar dilution scale. Clear, elliptical zones were obtained against Staphylococcus spp. M. catarrhalis also gave clear zones, but the scale intercept was often difficult to interpret because of the irregular shape of the inhibition zone. Poor growth sometimes resulted in less-distinct zones of inhibition against Streptococcus spp. and H. influenzae. Excellent correlation was observed between the the E-test and agar dilution against Staphylococcus spp. and H. influenzae, with > 95% of the E-test values falling within one log2 dilution of the corresponding agar MIC. The correlation was lower for Streptococcus spp. and M. catarrhalis, with 86 and 83%, respectively, of E-test results falling within one log2 dilution of the agar MIC. When E-test MICs did not agree exactly with the corresponding agar MIC against Staphylococcus spp. or Streptococcus spp., there was a tendency for the E-test to give a lower MIC. This bias has little effect upon individual MICs in staphylococci or in the generation of susceptibility interpretation errors ( < 1.5% overall), but it could reduce population geometric mean MICs by factors of 0.78 to 0.83. This effect was more marked for Streptococcus spp., reducing the population mean by a factor of 0.73 and resulting in 0.7% major and 8% very major errors. In contrast, the E-test tended to give higher MICs against M. catarrhalis, resulting in 7.3% major errors and increasing the population geometric mean MIC by a factor of 1.60.
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of mupirocin E-test for determination of isolate susceptibility: comparison with standard agar dilution techniques. 749 11