Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0348321 (Haemophilus)
 15,372 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The antibiotic susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae was investigated in five different geographical areas of Sweden in 1990 and compared with results from similar investigations performed in 1983 and 1986. Tests on 100 isolates per species and laboratory were performed by the disk diffusion method, and 10% of the strains plus all resistant ones were sent to the central laboratory for determination of MICs of ampicillin, phenoxymethylpenicillin, cefaclor, loracarbef, erythromycin, tetracycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Beta-lactamase production was found in 7% of H. influenzae and 71% of M. catarrhalis, and reduced susceptibility to penicillin in 3% of S. pneumoniae. Low frequencies (1-3%) of tetracycline resistance were found in H. influenzae and in the 2 streptococcal species, in which also less than 1% of the strains were resistant to erythromycin. Resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole occurred in 7% (range 3-14%) of H. influenzae and in 3% of S. pneumoniae. Cefaclor was active against all streptococci except against S. pneumoniae with reduced susceptibility to penicillin. It was active against beta-lactamase negative strains of M. catarrhalis but had, according to the SIR-system, intermediate activity against H. influenzae. Loracarbef was twice as active as cefaclor against H. influenzae but equally active against the 3 other species tested.
 ...
PMID:Antibiotic susceptibility of upper respiratory tract pathogens in Sweden: a seven year follow-up study including loracarbef. Swedish Respiratory Tract Study Group. 141 15

Loracarbef (LY163892), a carbacephem, is the first of a new class of beta-lactam compounds. A 14-day, double-blind, randomized, parallel treatment study compared loracarbef (400 mg b.i.d.; n = 169) and amoxicillin (500 mg t.i.d.; n = 167) in the treatment of lobar pneumonia and bronchopneumonia. Forty-four patients in the loracarbef group and 40 patients in the amoxicillin group were evaluable for efficacy analysis. Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae were isolated from pure or mixed cultures in 45.5% of the evaluable patients, with S. pneumoniae being isolated most frequently. Favourable clinical responses (cure or improvement) in the loracarbef-treated group (42/44; 95.5%) were similar to those in the amoxicillin-treated group (38/40; 95%). A favourable bacteriological response was observed for 36/44 (81.8%) loracarbef-treated patients compared with 28/40 (70%) amoxicillin-treated patients (p = 0.2). Adverse events were similar in both groups. Withdrawal of treatment was required in three patients in each group due to gastrointestinal events or rash/allergic exanthema. These data support the conclusion that loracarbef and amoxicillin have comparable efficacy and safety in the treatment of bronchopneumonia and lobar pneumonia caused by susceptible pathogens. However, loracarbef can be administered twice daily, offering the advantage of improved patient compliance. It is also active against beta-lactamase producing organisms.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of loracarbef (LY163892) versus amoxicillin in the treatment of bronchopneumonia and lobar pneumonia. 146 27

The efficacy and safety of loracarbef, a new beta-lactam antibiotic, was compared with that of amoxicillin-clavulanate potassium in the treatment of bacterial acute otitis media with effusion. A double-blind format was utilized to administer 10-day, randomized, parallel treatment regimens to patients who were between 6 months and 12 years of age. The most prevalent causative pathogens found in the two treatment groups were Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis. The percentages of favorable posttherapy clinical responses in evaluable patients were similar for both drugs: 87.3% (124/142) of the loracarbef group, compared with 91.5% (130/142) of the amoxicillin-clavulanate group, showed favorable responses within 72 hours after treatment. Ten to sixteen days after treatment, 68.1% of the loracarbef group, compared with 76.1% of the amoxicillin-clavulanate group, showed favorable responses. More patients in the amoxicillin-clavulanate group reported treatment-emergent events: 46.1% compared with 35.8% in the loracarbef group (p = 0.023). Diarrhea was the most frequently reported event, occurring in 13.3% of the loracarbef group and in 26.3% of the amoxicillin-clavulanate group (p less than 0.001). Vomiting was reported by 5.8% of the loracarbef group and 10.3% of the amoxicillin-clavulanate group (p = 0.072). Loracarbef is comparable in efficacy to amoxicillin-clavulanate in the treatment of bacterial acute otitis media with effusion and has a more desirable safety profile.
 ...
PMID:Loracarbef (LY163892) versus amoxicillin-clavulanate in the treatment of bacterial acute otitis media with effusion. 159 61

Acute bronchitis, an illness frequently encountered by primary-care physicians, is an inflammation of the tracheobronchial tree that results from a respiratory tract infection. It is characterized by persistent cough and sputum production and is occasionally accompanied by fever and/or chest pain. Acute bronchitis may have a viral or bacterial origin and is often treated with antibiotics. Four clinical trials were conducted to compare high and low doses of loracarbef, a new oral beta-lactam antibiotic, with three agents commonly used to treat acute bronchitis: amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefaclor, and amoxicillin. Results of these studies indicated that loracarbef, 400 and 200 mg twice daily, had clinical and bacteriologic efficacy against the common respiratory pathogens Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis that was comparable with that of the comparative agents. Loracarbef was as well tolerated as cefaclor and amoxicillin; moreover, it produced a significantly lower incidence of diarrhea than did amoxicillin/clavulanate. Loracarbef may be considered a safe and effective alternative agent for the treatment of patients with acute bronchitis.
 ...
PMID:Acute bronchitis: results of U.S. and European trials of antibiotic therapy. 162 45

Loracarbef is a new oral antimicrobial of the carbacephem class with in vitro activity against the common pathogens associated with skin infections, otitis media, sinusitis, bronchopulmonary infections, and urinary tract infections. A review of the literature shows the following ranges for 90% minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC90) values (microgram/mL) against the organisms that commonly cause these illnesses: Streptococcus pneumoniae, 0.25-2.0; Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis (beta-lactamase positive), 0.5-8.0; M. catarrhalis (beta-lactamase negative), 0.12-0.25; Haemophilus influenzae (beta-lactamase positive), 0.5-16.0; H. influenzae (beta-lactamase negative), 0.25-8.0; Escherichia coli, 2.0-25; Klebsiella pneumoniae, 0.25-8.0; Proteus mirabilis, 1.0-8.0; Streptococcus pyogenes, less than or equal to 0.06-1.0; Staphylococcus aureus (beta-lactamase positive), 8.0; S. aureus (beta-lactamase negative), 1.0-2.0. The in vitro activity of loracarbef against these common outpatient pathogens is similar to that of other oral antimicrobials such as cefaclor, cefuroxime axetil, cefixime, amoxicillin/clavulanate, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. The results of in vitro susceptibility tests with any antimicrobial, including loracarbef, are somewhat dependent on the specific test method that is employed in the laboratory. This is particularly true with H. influenzae. Furthermore, the results of loracarbef susceptibility tests are of uncertain value in predicting therapeutic outcome.
 ...
PMID:In vitro activity of loracarbef and effects of susceptibility test methods. 162 48

The new oral cephalosporins cefpodoxime, cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet and ceftibuten demonstrate enhanced activity against Enterobacteriaceae susceptible to the established compounds as well (e.g. cefuroxime, cefaclor, cefadroxil). In addition, cefpodoxime, cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet and ceftibuten include in their spectrum species hitherto resistant to oral cephalosporins (Proteus vulgaris, Providencia spp., Yersinia enterocolitica). Besides, the majority of these compounds demonstrate relevant activity (MIC50 equal to or below 2 mg/l) against Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter freundii, Serratia spp. and Morganella morganii. Ceftibuten is the most potent oral cephalosporin against most of the Enterobacteriaceae. Non-fermentative bacilli (Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas spp.) remain completely resistant to oral cephalosporins (except some Acinetobacter species against cefdinir and Pseudomonas cepacia against ceftibuten). Antistaphylococcal activity for oral cephalosporins is highest for cefdinir followed by BAY 3522, cefprozil, cefuroxime and cefpodoxime. Loracarbef, cefaclor and cefadroxil are about equally active, while the other compounds are only weakly active (cefixime) or inactive (cefetamet, ceftibuten). Enterococci are insensitive to new generation oral cephalosporins as they have been to established compounds. The most active oral cephalosporins against hemolytic streptococci are cefdinir and cefprozil. Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus milleri and Streptococcus mitior are most susceptible to cefpodoxime, cefdinir, cefuroxime and BAY 3522. Penicillin resistant pneumococci have to be regarded as resistant to all oral cephalosporins. Fastidious pathogens like Haemophilus spp., Moraxella catarrhalis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae are more susceptible to cefpodoxime, cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet and ceftibuten than to the other oral cephalosporins. The activity of oral cephalosporins is only weak against Listeria spp., Helicobacter pylori and anaerobic pathogens (except BAY 3522). Bordetella pertussis remains resistant to all absorbable cephalosporins. Progress in antibacterial activity of oral cephalosporins was mainly achieved by cefpodoxime, cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet and ceftibuten against Enterobacteriaceae and the fastidious pathogens and against staphylococci and the nonenterococcal streptococci by cefdinir, BAY 3522, cefprozil and cefpodoxime.
 ...
PMID:Antibacterial activity of cefpodoxime in comparison with cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet, ceftibuten, loracarbef, cefprozil, BAY 3522, cefuroxime, cefaclor and cefadroxil. 180 Mar 77

We compared the in-vitro activities of cefprozil, a novel oral cephalosporin, and of loracarbef, a new oral carbacephem, with other agents against middle ear fluid isolates obtained from children with acute otitis media. These included Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Branhamella catarrhalis. Cefprozil activity (MIC50 and MIC90) against S. pneumoniae was 0.25 and 0.50 mg/l; against H. influenzae 8 and 16 mg/l; against B. catarrhalis 2 and 2 mg/l. Loracarbef activity (MIC50 and MIC90) against S. pneumoniae was 1 and 2 mg/l; against H. influenzae 8 and 16 mg/l; against B. catarrhalis 1 and 8 mg/l. Cefprozil was four-fold more active against S. pneumoniae than loracarbef but similar to amoxycillin, amoxycillin/clavulanate, cefaclor, cefixime, cefuroxime and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX). Against H. influenzae, cefprozil was similar to loracarbef and other agents through less active than TMP/SMX and cefixime. Against B. catarrhalis, cefprozil was four-fold more active than loracarbef, cefaclor and cefixime but similar to the comparative antibiotics. Cefprozil and loracarbef activities were unaffected at pH 6 and 8 or in the presence of human serum, but there was a major diminution of activity for both agents at pH 5 and at inoculum sizes greater than or equal to 10(7) cfu/ml. Cefoprozil and loracarbef have consistent activity against middle ear pathogens and further pharmacokinetic and clinical studies appear warranted.
 ...
PMID:In-vitro activity of cefprozil (BMY 28100) and loracarbef (LY 163892) against pathogens obtained from middle ear fluid. 190 88

The in vitro activity of a new orally administered carbacephem analog of cefaclor, loracarbef (LY163892), was compared with those of cefaclor and several other oral antimicrobial agents against recent clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis. Loracarbef was found to be slightly more active than cefaclor against H. influenzae and had activity essentially equivalent to that of cefaclor for M. catarrhalis. Resistance to loracarbef was uncommon and was noted only with rare beta-lactamase-producing strains of H. influenzae. On the basis of these observations, loracarbef may be of utility in the management of localized, non-life-threatening infections caused by H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis.
 ...
PMID:In vitro activity of loracarbef (LY163892), a new oral carbacephem antimicrobial agent, against respiratory isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis. 192 18

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether pre-exposure of bacteria to a subinhibitory concentration (sub-MIC) of loracarbef (LY 163892) or daptomycin (LY 146032) could modify bacterial susceptibility to serum bactericidal activity and to phagocytosis and killing by murine peritoneal macrophages and by human polymorphonuclear leucocytes. Escherichia coli, Haemophilus influenzae type b and Staphylococcus aureus grown in the presence of one quarter the MIC of loracarbef, and S. aureus exposed to one quarter the MIC of daptomycin were phagocytosed and killed in numbers significantly higher than non-exposed bacteria. Pre-exposure to loracarbef resulted in increased susceptibility of E. coli and H. influenzae type b to the bactericidal activity of antiserum, but exposure to loracarbef or daptomycin did not modify serum sensitivity of S. aureus. Loracarbef treatment and antiserum enhanced phagocytosis and killing of E. coli and H. influenzae type b to a greater extent than either antibiotic treatment or antiserum alone. These data indicate that loracarbef and daptomycin at sub-MIC enhance the susceptibility of bacterial pathogens to cellular and host defence mechanisms.
 ...
PMID:Influence of subinhibitory concentrations of loracarbef (LY 163892) and daptomycin (LY 146032) on bacterial phagocytosis, killing and serum sensitivity. 217 52

Loracarbef is an orally administered member of a new synthetic class of beta-lactam antibiotics, the carbacephems, which is characterised by enhanced chemical stability. At low concentrations (< 2 mg/L) in vitro, it inhibits Streptococcus pneumoniae, S. pyogenes, beta-haemolytic streptococci groups B, C and G. Proteus mirabilis and Moraxella catarrhalis, including beta-lactamase-producing strains. At therapeutic plasma concentrations it is also active in vitro against most strains of Staphylococcus aureus, S. saprophyticus, Escherichia coli and beta-lactamase-positive and -negative strains of Haemophilus influenzae. Like other beta-lactams, loracarbef is inactive against methicillin-resistant strains of S. aureus. When administered at dosages of 200 to 400 mg twice daily, the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of loracarbef is comparable with that of amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in patients with upper or lower respiratory tract infections, and comparable with that of cefaclor in treating infections of the lower respiratory tract, skin and skin structures and urinary tract. Loracarbef and phenoxymethylpenicillin (penicillin V) were equally effective in treating streptococcal pharyngitis and tonsillitis. Loracarbef is generally well tolerated by all age groups and causes less diarrhoea than amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. It is administered twice daily. It offers a suitable alternative to other orally administered antibiotics for the treatment of mild to moderate infections caused by susceptible organisms.
 ...
PMID:Loracarbef. A review of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy. 768 66


1 2 Next >>