Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0348321 (Haemophilus)
 15,372 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Several rapid method kits (one to four hours) have become available for the identification of Haemophilus and related genera. Two kits (the "Rapid NH" system and the "RIM Haemophilus" system), which include the identification and biotyping of H influenzae, were investigated for the rapid identification and biotyping of 193 isolates of H influenzae and the results compared with those obtained by more standard overnight methods. The kits were convenient to use and gave reliable and rapid speciation of all isolates. Both test systems were unreliable for biotyping: 42 isolates were wrongly biotyped by the RIM kit and 40 isolates wrongly biotyped by the rapid NH kit. It is concluded that the test kits may be useful for the rapid identification of H influenzae but that they are not reliable for the biotyping of this species.
 ...
PMID:Evaluation of two rapid methods for identifying and biotyping Haemophilus influenzae. 201 34

A commercially available system, the RIM-H system (Austin Biological Laboratories, Austin, Tex.), was evaluated for its ability to rapidly and accurately identify various Haemophilus spp. A total of 110 clinical isolates were tested by both the RIM and conventional identification procedures. The RIM agreed with the standard identification for 100% of the Haemophilus influenzae (76 of 76) and 92.0% of the Haemophilus parainfluenzae (23 of 25) isolates tested. The identifications of Haemophilus parahaemolyticus, Haemophilus aphrophilus, and Haemophilus haemolyticus also correlated with those obtained by conventional methods. The RIM was found to be rapid and easy to use and was considered a suitable alternative to conventional identification procedures.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of the RIM-H rapid identification kit with conventional tests for the identification of Haemophilus spp. 220 17

The purpose of the study was to assess vaccination coverage of 2-year-olds and estimate immunization practices in Canada using a postal survey with a panel of 862 households. RIM weighting was used to provide national estimates. 95% CIs were calculated using the binomial method. Completed questionnaires were received for 534 children born between February 1991 and January 1992. Thirty nine percent of children had received all/most of their vaccinations at a public health clinic. Overall 5.6% parents indicated they had their child immunized because it was mandatory and 7.4% because of requirements for school, pre-school, nursery or day care attendance. A total of 78.7% of parents remembered receiving information on benefits of immunizations and 97% on the risks/side-effects. By their second birthday, 83.7% (95% CI 80.3-86.7) of 2-year-olds had received complete immunization against poliomyelitis; 97.2% (95% CI 95.4-98.4), at least one dose of a measles containing vaccine; 86.5% (95% CI 83.3-89.3), at least one dose of Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine; and 81.6% (95% CI 78.1-84.8), at least, four doses of diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine.
 ...
PMID:Vaccination coverage of 2-year-old children and immunization practices--Canada, 1994. 904 62