Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0348321 (Haemophilus)
 15,372 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The in vitro activity of and pathogen responses to sparfloxacin were compared with those of standard therapies for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia, complicated skin or skin-structure infections, urinary tract infections, acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, and acute maxillary sinusitis in 7 multicenter controlled trials in North America. Sparfloxacin was administered orally as a 400-mg loading dose followed by 200 mg once daily for up to 10 days. The bacteriologic efficacy of sparfloxacin (84% to 95%) was comparable to that of comparator drugs (77% to 100%). Sparfloxacin was generally 2 to 8 times more active (minimum inhibitory concentration for 90% of strains tested [MIC90]: 0.03 to 0.5 microg/mL) than comparators against common pathogens isolated in community-acquired infections, especially Streptococcus pneumoniae, including penicillin-resistant strains; Moraxella catarrhalis; Haemophilus influenzae; Streptococcus pyogenes; and Staphylococcus aureus. Sparfloxacin was also effective against Chlamydia and Mycoplasma species. The emergence of resistance was uncommon during sparfloxacin therapy (0.3% of 1100 cases). Higher area under the plasma concentration-time curve/MIC and maximum plasma concentration/MIC ratios for sparfloxacin were associated with clinical and bacteriologic efficacy, whereas lower ratios were associated with clinical and bacteriologic failure. The clinical efficacy of sparfloxacin (80% to 95%) was comparable to that obtained with the comparator drugs (71% to 92%). In addition, sparfloxacin was well tolerated and had an overall frequency of related adverse events similar to that of the comparators. There was a higher frequency of photosensitivity reactions but a lower level of digestive adverse events with sparfloxacin compared with comparators. Sparfloxacin is a suitable therapeutic alternative for the empiric treatment of respiratory tract infections owing to its favorable pharmacokinetic profile and activity against typical and atypical respiratory tract pathogens, even in geographic areas with a high incidence of penicillin resistance.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of the in vitro activity of and pathogen responses to sparfloxacin with those of other agents in the treatment of respiratory tract, urinary tract, and skin and skin-structure infections. 1039 75

The treatment of respiratory tract infection is the most common reason for antibiotic prescribing. However, therapeutic options are diminishing as antibiotic resistance to penicillins and macrolides in key respiratory pathogens is increasing. As resistance increases, there are parallel rises in the number of treatment failures and the total cost of infection management. New generation broad-spectrum fluoroquinolones, such as grepafloxacin, have recently been recommended as a first-line treatment option in guidelines for lower respiratory tract infection. Grepafloxacin is an oral fluoroquinolone, with a microbiological and clinical profile that is particularly suited to the treatment of community-acquired respiratory infections. In vitro, it is rapidly bactericidal, and compared with earlier quinolones, its broad spectrum activity encompasses all important respiratory pathogens; Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila, including strains which are resistant to penicillin, other beta-lactam antibiotics and macrolides. In addition, grepafloxacin achieves high lung concentrations, and its long half-life (up to 15 h) enables once daily dosing. Overall, grepafloxacin combines the positive properties of the beta-lactam antibiotics against conventional Gram-positive and Gram-negative respiratory pathogens, with the activity of the macrolides against atypical pathogens. In patients with bacteriologically documented infections, clinical studies in community-acquired pneumonia have shown that treatment for 7-10 days once daily (o.d.) with approximately 600 mg is equivalent to that with either twice daily (b.i.d.) clarithromycin 250 mg, or three times daily (t.i.d.) cefaclor 500 mg, and superior to that with t.i.d. amoxycillin 500 mg. In these studies, grepafloxacin proved effective in the treatment of both typical and atypical pneumonia. In acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (ABECB), 7-10 days treatment with o.d. grepafloxacin 400 mg or 600 mg has been shown to be equivalent to that with either t.i.d. amoxycillin 500 mg, or b.i.d. ciprofloxacin 500 mg. In patients with a documented bacterial pathogen, microbiological success with both grepafloxacin dosage regimens was superior to amoxycillin 500 mg t.i.d. In addition, short course treatment of ABECB with 400 mg of grepafloxacin given o.d. for five days has been shown to be as effective, clinically and microbiologically as a ten-day course of the same dose. The safety profile of grepafloxacin has been well-characterised from data from over 12,000 patients treated in Phase II/III and post-marketing studies, and over 400,000 patients treated worldwide in routine clinical practice. The most commonly reported adverse events are gastrointestinal, mainly nausea and unpleasant taste. The potential for photosensitivity and central nervous system effects is low, and there have been no reports of convulsions. No unique or unexpected.
 ...
PMID:Grepafloxacin: an overview of antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety. 1599 94