Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0348321 (Haemophilus)
 15,372 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The aim of this multicentre, randomized study was to compare the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin (BAY 12-8039), a new 8-methoxy fluoroquinolone, with that of cefuroxime axetil for the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis in adults. Diagnosis was made on a range of clinical signs and symptoms combined with radiology and microbiology. A 400 mg dose of moxifloxacin was administered once daily for 7 days to 242 patients and 250 mg twice daily of cefuroxime axetil was administered to 251 patients for 10 days. The clinical success rate at the end of treatment in the evaluable population was significantly higher (96.7%) in the moxifloxacin group (204/211) than in the cefuroxime axetil group (204/225, 90.7%; 95% confidence intervals 1.5%; 10.6%). At follow-up the success rate in the moxifloxacin group was 90.7% and that for the cefuroxime axetil group was 89.2% (95% confidence intervals -4.3%; 5.4%). The predominant pathogens isolated were Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae, followed by Moraxella catarrhalis and Staphylococcus aureus. The bacteriological eradication rates were higher for moxifloxacin (94.5%, 103/109) than for cefuroxime axetil (83.5%, 96/115; 95% CI 3.6%; 19.7%). Only one S. pneumoniae infection persisted following moxifloxacin therapy in contrast with three in individuals on cefuroxime axetil. There were slightly more adverse events in the moxifloxacin group than in the cefuroxime axetil group, but there were fewer serious adverse events following moxifloxacin treatment (three vs. eight). The drug was discontinued because of adverse events in 14 moxifloxacin patients and in 11 cefuroxime axetil patients. Overall, in all assessments, moxifloxacin was at least as effective clinically and bacteriologically, and as well tolerated, as cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute sinusitis.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of the safety and efficacy of moxifloxacin (BAY 12-8039) and cefuroxime axetil in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis in adults. The Sinusitis Study Group. 1084 31

The activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, safety, drug interactions, and dosage and administration of moxifloxacin are reviewed. Moxifloxacin is an oral 8-methoxyquinolone antimicrobial approved in December 1999 for use in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis, acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, and community-acquired pneumonia. This fluoroquinolone is active against common community-acquired respiratory pathogens (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis), atypical pathogens, and many anaerobes. Moxifloxacin has an absolute bioavailability of 90% after oral administration and a mean elimination half-life of 12 hours. The drug is not a substrate or inhibitor of the hepatic cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme system thereby avoiding many potential drug interactions. Moxifloxacin has limited phototoxic potential. In clinical trials, moxifloxacin had clinical success rates of 88-97% and bacteriologic eradication rates of 90-97%. Reported adverse effects were primarily gastrointestinal (nausea, diarrhea) and were mild to moderate in severity. Moxifloxacin prolongs the QT interval by a mean + S.D. of 6 +/- 26 milliseconds above baseline and should be used with caution in patients with proarrhythmic conditions and avoided in patients receiving antiarrhythmia agents, such as quinidine, procainamide, amiodarone, and sotalol. The standard oral dosage is 400 mg once a day. Dosage adjustment is unnecessary in patients with renal dysfunction or mild to moderate hepatic dysfunction. Moxifloxacin is a safe and effective antimicrobial that will be useful for treating acute sinusitis, acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, and community-acquired pneumonia.
 ...
PMID:Moxifloxacin: clinical efficacy and safety. 1125 73

Although most cases of rhinosinusitis are benign, the disruption of quality of life due to disease symptoms leads patients to seek early medical care. Ongoing debates dispute the definition, bacteriology, and medical management of chronic sinusitis, while the criteria for acute sinusitis are relatively well established. Chronic rhinosinusitis remains poorly categorized, and authors differ in opinions of symptoms, time course, and bacteriology of the infections, as well as proper medical management. Recent studies from the Mayo Clinic even question the idea that chronic sinusitis is a bacterial disease and document the presence of fungal pathogens that are responsible for the inflammatory reaction and mucosal response. In general, medical management is based on physiologic principles of re-establishing natural mucociliary function and restoring proper aeration of the paranasal sinuses after an inflammatory insult. Injudicious use and indiscriminate overprescription of antibiotics has fostered the rapid development of penicillin-resistant organisms over the past two decades. Drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumonia and b-lactamase-producing Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis are becoming the norm, forcing the need to consider alternatives in antibacterial management. Appropriate medical management of this common problem requires a systematic approach and consideration of adjunctive therapy. This article examines the current bacteriology of these common infections and reviews the management of acute and chronic infections.
 ...
PMID:The Microbiology and Management of Acute and Chronic Rhinosinusitis. 1138 50

The aim of the present study was to assess the hypothesis that, when present in nasopharyngeal secretions, Streptococcus pneumoniae. Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis play a pathogenic role early in the course of an upper respiratory tract infection. Adults with a clinical diagnosis of acute sinusitis or common cold were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive azithromycin 500 mg daily or placebo for 3 days. The effect of treatment on symptom evolution in the predefined subset of patients with Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, or Moraxella catarrhalis in their nasopharyngeal secretions was assessed. Of 265 patients enrolled, 132 received placebo and 133 azithromycin. Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, or Moraxella catarrhalis was identified in nasopharyngeal secretions of 77 patients (29%). In this predefined subgroup of patients with Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, or Moraxella catarrhalis, resolution of symptoms by day 7 occurred in 73% of those treated with azithromycin compared with 47% of those who received placebo (P=0.007). The median time before resolution of symptoms was 5 days in the azithromycin group compared to 7 days in the placebo group. Respiratory complications requiring antibiotic treatment occurred in 19% of patients in the placebo group and in 3% of the azithromycin group (P=0.025). In the remaining 188 patients without Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, or Moraxella catarrhalis, resolution of symptoms by day 7 was similar in both groups (69% in the placebo group vs. 64% in the azithromycin group [P=0.75]). Antibiotic treatment is of clinical benefit for patients with acute sinusitis or common cold when Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, or Moraxella catarrhalis is present in nasopharyngeal secretions. This observation provides new insights into the pathogenic role of these bacteria in the early stage of the common cold.
 ...
PMID:Role of nasopharyngeal culture in antibiotic prescription for patients with common cold or acute sinusitis. 1156 99

Among adults, acute sinusitis, tonsillitis/pharyngitis, community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) are the most commonly encountered respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in the community. Empiric antibacterial therapy is the most widely used approach for the treatment of such infections. The appropriate antibacterial requires consideration of a number of patient-, pathogen- and drug-related factors. One additional factor is the global spread of resistance among common respiratory pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis, which limits the utility of existing antibacterials. Telithromycin (HMR 3647), the first of a new family of antibacterials, the ketolides, was designed specifically to provide optimal therapy for community-acquired RTIs. This agent, which has a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity against common respiratory pathogens (including resistant strains and atypical/intracellular organisms), has been clinically and bacteriologically evaluated against gold-standard comparators in a series of phase III clinical trials. The results of these studies demonstrate that telithromycin, at a dosage of 800 mg once daily, is an effective, well-tolerated agent for the treatment of the most commonly encountered community-acquired RTIs. Moreover, telithromycin meets the challenge of increasing antibacterial resistance. High rates of clinical cure and bacteriologic eradication were achieved, even in patients infected with problematic resistant pathogens such as penicillinG- and macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae. In summary, telithromycin represents a promising new antibacterial for the treatment of community-acquired RTIs. With high efficacy and bacterial eradication rates, good tolerability and convenient once-daily administration, telithromycin therapy should result in increased patient compliance and improved outcomes, thereby minimizing the risk of developing antibacterial resistance.
 ...
PMID:Clinical management of respiratory tract infections in the community: experience with telithromycin. 1178 52

The ketolide telithromycin (HMR-3647; Ketek), a derivative of clarithromycin, has been launched by Aventis Pharma (formerly Hoechst Marion Roussel) for the treatment of respiratory tract infections with gram-positive or gram-negative cocci, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, intracellular pathogens, atypical microorganisms, toxoplasma or anaerobic bacteria. By May 2001, filings in the US and EU had been completed and a filing in Japan was expected to take place in the fourth quarter of 2001. In July 2001, telithromycin was granted marketing authorization by the EC for the treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections, including those caused by bacteria resistant to commonly used antibiotics. In October 2001, the product was launched in Germany. In March 2000, telithromycin was submitted to the US FDA and the EMEA, under the EU centralized approval procedure, for approval for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute sinusitis, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and tonsillitis/pharyngitis. The company had expected to launch the product in early 2001. The CPMP issued a positive opinion for all four indications on April 23 2001. In September 2001, the company indicated that it expected the product to be launched in Japan in 2002. The FDA's Anti-infectives Advisory Committee was due to review telithromycin for all the submitted indications on January 29 2001; however, this was postponed. This postponement was thought to be at Aventis' request in order to discuss the potential for a resistant pneumococcal infection labeling which would boost product sales. The revised date for the meeting was April 26 2001, at which the Anti-Infective Drugs Advisory Committee of the FDA recommended approval of telithromycin for the treatment of CAP in patients 18 years of age or older. The committee failed to recommend approval for the use of the drug for the remaining three indications for which it was filed, citing concerns over potential cardiovascular risk and liver toxicity; at this time, the company was in active discussions with the FDA regarding approval of the remaining three indications. An approvable letter for CAP, acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute bacterial sinusitis was received by the company in June 2001; Aventis also received a non-approvable letter for the treatment of tonsillitis/pharyngitis at this time. In April 1999, ABN Amro predicted annual sales of DM 50 million in 2001, rising to DM 100 million in 2002. In February 1999, Lehman Brothers estimated a 70% probability that this ketolide would come to market. The analysts also estimated a launch date of 2001, with peak sales of US $700 million in 2009. Analysts Merrill Lynch predicted in September 200, that the product would be launched by 2001, with sales of euro 50 million in that year, rising to euro 284 million in 2004. Deutsche Bank predicted in August 2001, that sales of the product would reach euro 5 million in 2001, rising to euro 300 million in 2005. Analysts at Merrill Lynch predicted in November 2001, that the product would be resubmitted in the US in mid-2002, and would make sales of US $5 million in 2001, rising to US $250 million in 2004.
 ...
PMID:Telithromycin. Aventis Pharma. 1189 30

Recently FDA-approved fluoroquinolones like gatifloxacin possess enhanced activity against Gram-positive pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae. However, experience with adverse events among previously used fluoroquinolones has led to expanded post-marketing investigations of clinical efficacy and safety. An open-label gatifloxacin trial was initiated in early 2000, using 2795 (>15000 enrolled cases) primary care providers for treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections (CARTI) such as community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (ABECB), acute sinusitis. Microbiology specimens and sputum slides were referred to a reference laboratory, pathogens identified and reference antimicrobial susceptibility tests performed. Results were classified by infection site, geographic census region and patient profile/demographics. The most frequent pathogens were: for CAP (n = 384)-S. pneumoniae (37%) > Hemophilus influenzae (31%) > Moraxella catarrhalis (13%); for ABECB (528)-H. influenzae (37%) > M. catarrhalis (26%) > S. pneumoniae (17%); and for sinusitis (2691)-M. catarrhalis (29%) > H. influenzae (24%) > S. pneumoniae (17%). H. parainfluenzae (ABECB) and S. aureus (sinusitis) were also commonly isolated. CAP S. pneumoniae isolates had significantly less high-level resistance (5% at > or =2 micro g/ml) than those isolates from ABECB or sinusitis (13-15%). United States census zone differences in S. pneumoniae resistance were identified (greatest in West or East South Central, South Atlantic). S. pneumoniae macrolide resistance was high (23-33%) and H. influenzae clarithromycin susceptibility was only 56-62%. beta-lactamase rates in H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis were 21-29% and 88-92%, respectively. Only one S. pneumoniae was not susceptible to gatifloxacin, and this new fluoroquinolone was fourfold more potent than levofloxacin (MIC(50,) 0.25 vs. 1 micro g/ml). This Phase IV surveillance trial (TeqCES) confirmed the clinical importance of S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis in CARTI, and high fluoroquinolone potency/spectrum (>97% susceptible). beta-lactams and macrolides continue to be compromised by increasing resistances in pathogens isolated in these monitored primary care settings.
 ...
PMID:Gatifloxacin phase IV surveillance trial (TeqCES study) utilizing 5000 primary care physician practices: report of pathogens isolated and susceptibility patterns in community-acquired respiratory tract infections. 1237 36

Aerobic bacterial examination for sinusitis was conducted using specimens from maxillary sinuses collected by antral puncture in 540 patients--284 men and 256 women aged 6-89 years--between May 1999 and April 2000. We obtained 528 strains of bacteria. Our results were as follows: 1. We obtained 303 pathogens from 540 patients. In acute sinusitis, the most frequently found was Streptococcus pneumoniae (30.4%), followed by Hemophilus influenzae (27.7%). In chronic cases, the most frequently found was Streptococcus pneumoniae (16.0%), followed by Hemophilus influenzae (15.1%) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (12.6%). 2. We found an increase in bacteria resistant to multiple drugs, with 11.1% of the Staphylococcus aureus isolates methicillin-resistant in acute sinusitis and 40% methicillin-resistant in chronic sinusitis, and that 30.6% of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates were penicillin-resistant. 3. Ciclacillin was effective against 64.7% of all pathogens isolated in this study, cefpodoxime proxetil effective against 6.5%, and cefixime effective against 2.4%. 4. In considering pathogens, we therefore choose antibiotics and make a maxillary aspiration puncture.
 ...
PMID:[Bacterial examination of sinusitis using antral puncture and irrigation]. 1240 Jan 69

Community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, and acute sinusitis are among the most common bacterial infections encountered in clinical practice. Pathogens frequently associated with these infections include Streptococcus pneumoniae, Hemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Unfortunately, resistance to antimicrobials commonly used for the treatment of these infections is increasing, limiting the clinical efficacy of these agents. Fluoroquinolones offer several advantages over other classes of antimicrobials used for the treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections. In general, fluoroquinolones have excellent in vitro activity against common respiratory pathogens, including some drug-resistant strains of S. pneumoniae. Microbial resistance to the newer fluoroquinolones is relatively uncommon, currently occurring in approximately 1% of clinical isolates in North America. Fluoroquinolones currently in clinical development may offer additional benefits over the marketed agents because they maintain good potency against isolates of S. pneumoniae displaying resistance to older quinolones (i.e., ofloxacin or ciprofloxacin) and may have a lower potential to engender resistance. This article reviews the in vitro activity of several newer fluoroquinolones, including agents currently in clinical development, against common respiratory pathogens, including antimicrobial-resistant strains. The mechanisms and prevalence of resistance of beta-lactam antimicrobials, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones also are reviewed.
 ...
PMID:Microbiology of newer fluoroquinolones: focus on respiratory pathogens. 1249 66

In this multicentre, multinational, comparative, double-blind clinical trial, out-patients with both symptoms and radiographic evidence of acute sinusitis were randomly assigned to receive either a seven-day, once daily (o.d.) oral regimen of moxifloxacin (400 mg) or a 10-day o.d. oral regimen of trovafloxacin (200 mg). Among 452 patients considered valid for clinical efficacy, moxifloxacin treatment was found to be statistically equivalent to trovafloxacin (96.9 per cent vs 92.1 per cent -95 per cent CI = 0.6 per cent; 8.9 per cent) at the seven to 10 days post-therapy assessment. At follow-up, the success rate in the moxifloxacin group was 94.9 per cent and that for the trovafloxacin group was 97.6 per cent (95 per cent CI = -4.9 per cent; 1.3 per cent). The predominant causative organisms were Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Staphylococcus aureus followed by Enterobacteriaceae and Moraxella catarrhalis. The bacteriological success rate at the post-therapy evaluation was similar in both treatment groups: 94.4 per cent and 90.1 per cent in the moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin groups respectively (95 per cent CI = -3.0 per cent; 11.9 per cent). Only three of the 103 baseline isolated pathogens still persisted in the moxifloxacin group, whereas there were 10 of the 121 isolates that failed to respond in the trovafloxacin treatment group. At least one drug-related event was reported by 16.9 per cent of the moxifloxacin-treated patients and by 22.3 per cent of those who received trovafloxacin. CNS events such as dizziness and vertigo were reported more than five times more often in patients receiving trovafloxacin than in the moxifloxacin group. Trovafloxacin recipients were also more than twice as likely to discontinue treatment due to adverse events than moxifloxacin-treated patients. Overall, moxifloxacin was at least as effective clinically and bacteriologically as trovafloxacin and better tolerated.
 ...
PMID:Comparison of the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin and trovafloxacin for the treatment of acute, bacterial maxillary sinusitis in adults. 1259 Aug 55


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >>