Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0345904 (
liver cancer
)
15,188
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
To evaluate the effects of continuous low-level ionizing radiation on humans, the follow-up data (1980-85) on Japanese thorotrast-exposed patients were analyzed. The patients were 241 war-wounded military personnel registered with and cared for by the Ministry of Health and Welfare since 1979. During this period, a total of 1144 person-years, 94 patients died. Compared with the expected number of deaths calculated from age- and cause-specific death rates in Japan during the same period, the thorotrast-exposed patients were at three times greater risk of death from all causes (P less than 0.001), had 47 times the risk of
liver cancer
(P less than 0.001), 12 times the risk of leukemia (P less than 0.05), and 20 times the risk of liver cirrhosis (P less than 0.001). Age at time of thorotrast injection, drinking and smoking habits had little effect on these statistics. Analyses of 30 autopsied patients with
liver cancer
showed statistically significantly increases in
hemangiosarcoma
and cholangiocarcinoma. The thorotrast-exposed patients' estimated risk of
liver cancer
by histological type was 21 times that of the general population for hepatocellular carcinoma, 303 times that for cholangiocarcinoma and 3129 times that for
hemangiosarcoma
.
...
PMID:Increased risk of death in thorotrast-exposed patients during the late follow-up period. 282 75
Resection remains the treatment of choice in
liver cancer
. In order to avoid liver transplantation in conventionally unresectable tumors ex-situ ("bench" procedure), in-situ and ante-situm resection technique should be preferred whenever feasible. Despite the deficiency of donor organs, a single center experience with 198 patients reveals that liver transplantation continues its role as a therapeutic option for selected patients. At present "favorable" indications for transplantation are International Union against Cancer (UICC) - stage II hepatocellular carcinoma as well as the subtype fibrolamellar carcinoma, uncommon tumors such as epitheloid hemangioendothelioma, hepatoblastoma, and liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors. Due to unsatisfying results, intrahepatic bile duct-, stage III and IV hepatocellular carcinoma,
hemangiosarcoma
, and liver metastases from nonendocrine primaries should be excluded from liver transplantation alone. For these advanced tumors, especially in cases of extrahepatic involvement, a combination of liver transplantation and multivisceral resection has been proven feasible. However, a significant improvement in patient survival may only be expected only by currently investigated multimodality treatment protocols which will require further randomized studies.
...
PMID:Role of liver transplantation in the treatment of unresectable liver cancer. 855 70
PURPOSE: The indication for liver transplantation in malignant liver tumors has been controversial due to disappointing results and shortage of donor organs. The authors evaluated the experience and results of a single center in order to define present indications and selection criteria in hepatobiliary malignancy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 212 patients who underwent liver transplantation for malignant tumors between 1972 and 1995: Primary hepatobiliary tumors: hepatocellular carcinoma, n = 124 (with underlying cirrhosis, n = 86; fibrolamellar subtype, n = 8); intrahepatic bile duct (cholangiocellular) carcinoma, n = 24; proximal bile duct carcinoma, n = 29; other uncommon entities (n = 15); secondary liver tumors: neuroendocrine, n = 11, and nonendocrine, n = 9. RESULTS: Survival rates in primary
liver cancer
were correlated to International Union Against Cancer (UICC) tumor stage. For hepatocellular and proximal bile duct carcinoma significantly better outcome was found in UICC-tumor stage I and II versus III and IV. No long-term survival was found after transplantation for intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma,
hemangiosarcoma
and nonendocrine liver metastases. Comparison of transplant and resected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma stage I and II with underlying cirrhosis showed better survival after transplantation: 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rate of 83.3% versus 76.9%, 75.8% versus 44.0%, 60.6% versus 44.0%, and median survival 96.5 versus 23.2 months. Although this difference was not significant, no patient died from tumor recurrence in the transplant group versus three in the resection group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Patients with malignant tumors can be selected for transplantation with predictable likelihood for long-term survival. According to the present data, liver transplantation can be considered in unresectable UICC-stage II hepatocellular and proximal bile duct carcinoma, the uncommon entities fibrolamellar carcinoma, epitheliod hemangioendothelioma and hepatoblastoma as well as liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors. UICC-stage II and IV hepatocellular carcinoma as well as intrahepatic bile duct carcinoma,
hemangiosarcoma
and metastases from nonendocrine tumors should be excluded from transplantation alone. For hepatocellular carcinoma, multimodality treatment protocols have had a proven impact on the prevention of early recurrence and prolongation of survival. There is evidence that liver transplantation in still resectable hepatocellular carcinoma with underlying cirrhosis might be more appropriate in order to cure the cancer-bearing disease.
...
PMID:Indications and Role of Liver Transplantation for Malignant Tumors. 1038 47
We describe the radiation risk for primary liver cancers between 1958 and 1987 in a cohort of atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. The analysis is based on a comprehensive pathology review of known or suspected liver neoplasms that generated 518 incident, first primary cases, mostly hepatocellular carcinoma. Excess relative risk from atomic bomb radiation was linear: 0.81 per sievert weighted liver dose (95% CI [0.32, 1.43]; P < 0.001). Males and females had similar relative risk so that, given a threefold higher background incidence in males, the radiation-related excess incidence was substantially higher in males. Excess risk peaked for those with age at exposure in the early 20s; there was essentially no excess risk in those exposed before age 10 or after age 45. Whether this was due to a difference in sensitivity or possible confounding by other factors could not be addressed retrospectively in the full cohort. A paucity of cholangiocarcinoma and
hemangiosarcoma
cases suggested that they are not significantly associated with whole-body radiation exposure, as they are with the internal alpha-particle-emitting radiological contrast medium Thorotrast. Because most of the radiation-related excess cases occurred among males, it is important to ascertain what factors put men at greater risk of radiation-related
liver cancer
.
...
PMID:Effects of radiation on incidence of primary liver cancer among atomic bomb survivors. 1047 13
Chronic exposure to high LET radiation has been shown to cause
liver cancer
in humans based on studies of patients who received Thorotrast, a colloidal suspension of thorium dioxide formerly used as a radiological contrast agent, and on studies of Russian nuclear weapons workers exposed to internally ingested plutonium. Risk estimates for these exposures and specific subtypes of
liver cancer
have not been previously reported. Combining published data with tumor registry data pertinent to the Thorotrast cohorts in Germany, Denmark, Portugal, and Japan and to Russian workers, we generally found significantly elevated risks of three major histologic types of liver tumors: hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CC), and
hemangiosarcoma
(HS) for Thorotrast exposures. In contrast, HS was the only liver tumor significantly associated with the lower alpha-particle doses experienced by the Russian workers. Excess cases per 1,000 persons exposed to Thorotrast were similar for the three
liver cancer
subtypes but lower for plutonium exposure. Odds ratios (OR) of HS and CC for Thorotrast were from 26 to 789 and from 1 to 31 times higher than those for HCC, respectively. ORs of liver cirrhosis for Thorotrast exposure ranged from 2.7 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2-3.4) to 6.7 (5.1-8.7).
...
PMID:The relationship between internally deposited alpha-particle radiation and subsite-specific liver cancer and liver cirrhosis: an analysis of published data. 1267 1