Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0344307 (
analgesia
)
28,200
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
In a group of 59 consecutive ICU trauma patients with blunt chest injury and considerable injury severity (
ISS
= 29) a three-staged therapeutic approach was followed, depending seriousness of chest injury, overall injury severity and age. Stage 1: i.v.
analgesia
and conventional respiratory therapy. Stage 2: continuous epidural
analgesia
(local anesthetics and opiates) and intermittent CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) by face mask. Stage 3: Endotracheal intubation and internal pneumatic stabilization of the chest, preferably spontaneous breathing. Only 44% of the patients needed intubation, and none died. The authors recommend this three-step approach towards blunt chest injury and serial rib fractures.
...
PMID:[Serial rib fractures: a differentiated treatment concept, illustrated by 59 severely injured intensive care patients]. 207 87
We evaluated the type and severity of injuries and the possible influence of a helicopter staffed by a physician on the outcome of 71 consecutive occupants ejected from a four-wheel vehicle ejected occupants who were cared for by the Swiss Air Rescue Helicopter team from January 1994 to February 1999. The investigation and the data collection were planned prospectively. The following data were collected for each patient ejected from a four wheel vehicle: (1) demographic information; (2) type of injury; (3) vital signs on scene, in flight and at hospital; (4) hospital diagnosis; (5) injury severity score; (6) secondary transfer; (7) length of stay in hospital and on intensive care; and (8) outcome at hospital discharge. A control group included consecutive patients cared for by the same rescue team during the same period but who were not ejected out of their vehicle. Forty-four percent of the ejected patients had a GCS < or = 8, 21% were hypotensive and 22% had respiratory problems. Nine patients died at the scene. A total of 53% of the 62 ejected patients who were transported had an
ISS
> or = 16. The median
ISS
was 17. A total of 37% of the patients were intubated at the scene, needle chest decompression was performed in 5% and major
analgesia
was used in 27% of the cases. A total of 38% of the patients needed surgery in the first 4 h, 34% needed intensive care. No patient needed secondary transfer to the Trauma Centre if they were not brought there in the first instance. The outcome was poor in 27 cases (38%): 17 died and 10 needed transfer to specialised institutions. Non-ejected patients suffered mostly from head and neck injuries (50%) of which 9% were severe (head and neck AIS > or = 4, P < 0.05). Thoracic injuries were less frequent (35%) of which 13% were severe (thorax AIS > or = 4, P < 0,05). The median
ISS
was 9 for the non-ejected patients, P < 0.05. In conclusion, ejection from a four-wheel vehicle causes more severe injuries and requires a high number of advanced life support manoeuvres. Based on the mechanism of injury alone, patients ejected from four-wheel vehicles should automatically receive a response from the best available pre-hospital team. In our system, this means the dispatch of a physician staffed helicopter.
...
PMID:Ejection as a key word for the dispatch of a physician staffed helicopter: the Swiss experience. 1138 22
In addition to life-saving interventions, the assessment of pain and subsequent administration of
analgesia
are primary benchmarks for quality emergency medical services care which should be documented and analyzed. Analyze US combat casualty data from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR) with a primary focus on prehospital pain assessment, analgesic administration and documentation. Retrospective cohort study of battlefield prehospital and hospital casualty data were abstracted by DoDTR from available records from 1 September 2007 through 30 June 2011. Data included demographics; injury mechanism; prehospital and initial combat hospital pain assessment documented by standard 0-to-10 numeric rating scale; analgesics administered; and survival outcome. Records were available for 8,913 casualties (median
ISS
of 5 [IQR 2 to 10]; 98.7% survived). Prehospital analgesic administration was documented for 1,313 cases (15%). Prehospital pain assessment was recorded for 581 cases (7%; median pain score 6 [IQR 3 to 8]), hospital pain assessment was recorded for 5,007 cases (56%; median pain score5 [CI95% 3 to 8]), and 409 cases (5%) had both prehospital and hospital pain assessments that could be paired. In this paired group, 49.1% (201/409) had alleviation of pain evidenced by a decrease in pain score (median 4,, IQR 2 to 5); 23.5% (96/409) had worsening of pain evidenced by an increase in pain score (median 3, CI95 2.8 to 3.7, IQR 1 to 5); 27.4% (112/409) had no change; and the overall difference was an average decrease in pain score of 1.1 (median 0, IQR 0 to 3, p < 0.01). Time-series analysis showed modest increases in prehospital and hospital pain assessment documentation and prehospital analgesic documentation. Our study demonstrates that prehospital pain assessment, management, and documentation remain primary targets for performance improvement on the battlefield. Results of paired prehospital to hospital pain scores and time-series analysis demonstrate both feasibility and benefit of prehospital analgesics. Future efforts must also include an expansion of the prehospital battlefield analgesic formulary.
...
PMID:Analysis of Prehospital Documentation of Injury-Related Pain Assessment and Analgesic Administration on the Contemporary Battlefield. 2672 37