Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0344307 (analgesia)
28,200 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The ability of acetylcholine muscarinic agonists, injected subcutaneously (s.c.) to elicit yawning and analgesia (tail-flick response) in rats was examined. Yawning was elicited by physostigmine, RS86 and pilocarpine with an inverted 'U'-shaped dose-response relationship; maximal effects occurred at 0.1, 0.5 and 2.0 mg/kg respectively. Neostigmine (0.05-0.2 mg/kg); arecoline (0.5-2.0 mg/kg); bethanecol (0.1-10 mg/kg) and McN-A-343 (5-20 mg/kg) had marginal or no activity. In contrast, dose-related analgesia was obtained following oxotremorine (0.01-0.3 mg/kg) and arecoline (0.5-4.0 mg/kg) and physostigmine (0.1-0.4 mg/kg), RS86 (0.25-2.5 mg/kg) and pilocarpine (0.5-8.0 mg/kg). The effects of acetylcholine antagonists on physostigmine-induced yawning and physostigmine-induced analgesia were also investigated. Following their s.c. injection, trihexyphenidyl, atropine, dicyclomine, secoverine and methylatropine but not pirenzepine, inhibited both yawning and analgesia; there were clear differences in their potencies on the two responses. Pirenzepine, intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.), inhibited yawning (ED50 value 5.7 micrograms/rat) but not analgesia (3-100 micrograms/rat). The results are discussed in terms of a possible functional differentiation of central muscarinic receptors.
...
PMID:Effects of acetylcholine agonists and antagonists on yawning and analgesia in the rat. 365 42

Spinal neostigmine produces analgesia in chronically prepared rats, but not in sheep. However, since pain itself activates bulbospinal inhibitory pathways, neostigmine may be more effective in the postoperative period. We examined in sheep the antinociceptive effect of intrathecal neostigmine in the acute postoperative period and determined the muscarinic receptor subtype activated by neostigmine. A cervical intrathecal catheter was inserted via a laminotomy in 14 sheep that then received, in random order 1 mg of spinal neostigmine or saline on postoperative Day 1 and the other injection on postoperative Day 2. Three additional sheep received, on separate days, intrathecal neostigmine alone or with the muscarinic receptor subtype-specific antagonists pirenzepine (M1) 2 mg or AFDX-116 (M2) 2 mg. Antinociception was tested using a mechanical stimulus after each injection. Baseline withdrawal threshold did not change postoperatively. Intrathecal neostigmine, but not saline caused antinociception on both of the first two postoperative days. In contrast, intrathecal neostigmine caused no antinociception in another similar study performed at least 5 days after surgery. Pirenzepine, but not AFDX-116, abolished antinociception from neostigmine, suggesting an action on M1 subtype muscarinic receptors. Intrathecal neostigmine is antinociceptive in sheep during the acute postoperative period, and these data suggest that spinal cholinergic tone, and hence intrathecal neostigmine's analgesic effect, may be enhanced during the acute postoperative period.
...
PMID:Postoperative analgesia from intrathecal neostigmine in sheep. 776 41