Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0344307 (analgesia)
 28,200 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid with short-acting analgesic activity after intravenous or subcutaneous administration. The low molecular weight, high potency and lipid solubility of fentanyl make it suitable for delivery via the transdermal therapeutic system (TTS). These systems are designed to release the drug into the skin at a constant rate ranging from 25 to 100 micrograms/h, multiple systems can be applied to achieve higher delivery rates. Initially, much of the clinical experience with fentanyl TTS was obtained in patients with acute postoperative pain. However, because of the increased risk of respiratory complications, fentanyl TTS is contraindicated in this setting. Fentanyl TTS is recommended for use in chronic cancer pain. Moreover, in 11 countries worldwide including the US, its use is not restricted to chronic cancer pain; the drug is also available for treatment of general chronic pain, including that of nonmalignant origin. At the start of fentanyl TTS treatment, depot accumulation of the drug within skin tissue results in a significant delay (17 to 48 hours) before maximum plasma concentration is achieved. Approximately half of the cancer patients converted to transdermal fentanyl from other opioid agents required increased dosages after initial application of the patch. However, concomitant use of short-acting morphine maintained pain relief during the titration period, and the use of such supplementary medication decreased with the duration of fentanyl TTS treatment. In patients with chronic cancer pain, changes in visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores ranged from a 10% increase (worse pain) to > 50% decrease (less pain) during transdermal fentanyl therapy compared with previous opioid treatment. In addition, patient preference for fentanyl TTS was indicated by the number of patient requests (up to 95%) for continued use of the drug at the end of the study. Although fentanyl TTS is contraindicated in patients postoperatively, the efficacy of fentanyl via the transdermal route was investigated in this patient group. Supplementary patient controlled analgesia was significantly reduced in patients who received fentanyl TTS 75 micrograms/h compared with placebo, although this was not apparent until > or = 12 hours after application. Data evaluating pain relief, which was assessed by VAS pain scores, were inconclusive. Preliminary data, although from relatively small numbers of patients, indicate that transdermal fentanyl may be useful in the management of chronic non-malignant pain. Indeed, some patients whose pain was previously uncontrolled became completely pain free. The most frequently occurring adverse events during fentanyl TTS therapy (as with other opioid agents) included vomiting, nausea and constipation, although vomiting and nausea were not clearly associated with the drug. The most serious adverse event was hypoventilation, which occurred more frequently in postoperative (4%) than in cancer patients (2%). In surgical patients, fentanyl-associated respiratory events (reduced respiratory rate and apnoea) generally occurred within 24 hours of patch application; however, there were isolated reports of late onset (> or = 36 hours postsurgery) fentanyl-associated respiratory depression. In cancer patients, the incidence of constipation was reduced by up to two-thirds after switching from oral morphine to transdermal fentanyl. Transient skin irritation associated with the plastic patch or the adhesive, rather than the drug, was reported in a maximum 3% of patients. In summary, transdermal fentanyl is a useful alternative to other opioid agents, which are also recommended on the third step of the WHO analgesic ladder, in the management of chronic malignant pain. Preliminary data indicate that it may be useful in the management of chronic nonmalignant pain. The advantages offered by fentanyl TTS over traditional methods of chronic pain control include its ease of administration, less constipation and the 3-
 ...
PMID:Transdermal fentanyl. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in pain control. 901 Jun 52

Male circumcision consists of the surgical removal of some, or all, of the foreskin (or prepuce) from the penis. It is one of the most common procedures in the world. In the United States, the procedure is commonly performed during the newborn period. In 2007, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) convened a multidisciplinary workgroup of AAP members and other stakeholders to evaluate the evidence regarding male circumcision and update the AAP's 1999 recommendations in this area. The Task Force included AAP representatives from specialty areas as well as members of the AAP Board of Directors and liaisons representing the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Task Force members identified selected topics relevant to male circumcision and conducted a critical review of peer-reviewed literature by using the American Heart Association's template for evidence evaluation. Evaluation of current evidence indicates that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks; furthermore, the benefits of newborn male circumcision justify access to this procedure for families who choose it. Specific benefits from male circumcision were identified for the prevention of urinary tract infections, acquisition of HIV, transmission of some sexually transmitted infections, and penile cancer. Male circumcision does not appear to adversely affect penile sexual function/sensitivity or sexual satisfaction. It is imperative that those providing circumcision are adequately trained and that both sterile techniques and effective pain management are used. Significant acute complications are rare. In general, untrained providers who perform circumcisions have more complications than well-trained providers who perform the procedure, regardless of whether the former are physicians, nurses, or traditional religious providers. Parents are entitled to factually correct, nonbiased information about circumcision and should receive this information from clinicians before conception or early in pregnancy, which is when parents typically make circumcision decisions. Parents should determine what is in the best interest of their child. Physicians who counsel families about this decision should provide assistance by explaining the potential benefits and risks and ensuring that parents understand that circumcision is an elective procedure. The Task Force strongly recommends the creation, revision, and enhancement of educational materials to assist parents of male infants with the care of circumcised and uncircumcised penises. The Task Force also strongly recommends the development of educational materials for providers to enhance practitioners' competency in discussing circumcision's benefits and risks with parents. The Task Force made the following recommendations:Evaluation of current evidence indicates that the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks, and the benefits of newborn male circumcision justify access to this procedure for those families who choose it. Parents are entitled to factually correct, nonbiased information about circumcision that should be provided before conception and early in pregnancy, when parents are most likely to be weighing the option of circumcision of a male child. Physicians counseling families about elective male circumcision should assist parents by explaining, in a nonbiased manner, the potential benefits and risks and by ensuring that they understand the elective nature of the procedure. Parents should weigh the health benefits and risks in light of their own religious, cultural, and personal preferences, as the medical benefits alone may not outweigh these other considerations for individual families. Parents of newborn boys should be instructed in the care of the penis, regardless of whether the newborn has been circumcised or not. Elective circumcision should be performed only if the infant's condition is stable and healthy. Male circumcision should be performed by trained and competent practitioners, by using sterile techniques and effective pain management. Analgesia is safe and effective in reducing the procedural pain associated with newborn circumcision; thus, adequate analgesia should be provided whenever newborn circumcision is performed.Nonpharmacologic techniques (eg, positioning, sucrose pacifiers) alone are insufficient to prevent procedural and postprocedural pain and are not recommended as the sole method of analgesia. They should be used only as analgesic adjuncts to improve infant comfort during circumcision. If used, topical creams may cause a higher incidence of skin irritation in low birth weight infants, compared with infants of normal weight; penile nerve block techniques should therefore be chosen for this group of newborns. Key professional organizations (AAP, the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Society of Anesthesiologists, the American College of Nurse Midwives, and other midlevel clinicians such as nurse practitioners) should work collaboratively to:Develop standards of trainee proficiency in the performance of anesthetic and procedure techniques, including suturing; Teach the procedure and analgesic techniques during postgraduate training programs; Develop educational materials for clinicians to enhance their own competency in discussing the benefits and risks of circumcision with parents; Offer educational materials to assist parents of male infants with the care of both circumcised and uncircumcised penises. The preventive and public health benefits associated with newborn male circumcision warrant third-party reimbursement of the procedure. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has endorsed this technical report.
 ...
PMID:Male circumcision. 2350 70

The objective of this study was to identify an adjuvant for anesthetics coated on microneedles to provide rapid onset and prolonged analgesic action with minimal skin tissue reaction. Aqueous lidocaine or prilocaine formulations with or without clonidine or the related analogs, guanfacine and apraclonidine, were dip-coated onto polymeric microneedles. The amount of lidocaine or prilocaine coated onto the microneedles was assessed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Delivery efficiency and dermal pharmacokinetics associated with lidocaine or prilocaine delivered via the microneedles were characterized in vivo using domestic swine. Skin punch biopsies were collected and analyzed to determine the anesthetic concentrations in the skin using HPLC-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Addition of clonidine to the formulations decreased the systemic absorption rate of the anesthetics from the patch application site without impacting the coating performance or the rapid onset of anesthesia. Formulations with 0.3 wt.% clonidine, identified as the optimal dose for lidocaine-delivery via microneedles, maintained the lidocaine skin concentration above the estimated therapeutic level (100 ng/mg) for 1 h without causing any skin irritation or color change. The other two clonidine analogs, guanfacine and apraclonidine, also led to delayed systemic absorption of lidocaine from the skin, indicating utility in providing prolonged analgesia.
 ...
PMID:Adjuvants to prolong the local anesthetic effects of coated microneedle products. 2302 95

Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are found to have an analgesic action for relieving cutaneous pain associated with neuropathies. The aim of this study was to assess cutaneous absorption and analgesia of topically applied TCAs. Percutaneous delivery was investigated using nude mouse and pig skin models at both infinite and saturated doses. We evaluated the cutaneous analgesia in nude mice using the pinprick scores. Among five antidepressants tested in the in vitro experiment, mesoridazine, promazine and doxepin showed a superior total absorption percentage. The drug with the lowest total absorption percentage was found to be fluphenazine (<7%) either at an infinite dose or at saturated solubility. The follicular pathway was important for mesoridazine and promazine delivery. Mesoridazine showed stronger skin analgesia than the other TCAs although the in vivo skin absorption of mesoridazine (0.34nmol/mg) was less than that of promazine (0.80nmol/mg) and doxepin (0.74nmol/mg). Mesoridazine had a prolonged duration of pain relief (165min) compared to promazine (83min) and doxepin (17min). The skin irritation test demonstrated an evident barrier function deterioration and cutaneous erythema by promazine and doxepin treatment, whereas mesoridazine caused no obvious adverse effect by topical application for up to 7days.
...
PMID:Topically applied mesoridazine exhibits the strongest cutaneous analgesia and minimized skin disruption among tricyclic antidepressants: The skin absorption assessment. 2726 Feb 1

Neuropathic pain caused by nerve injury is debilitating and difficult to treat. Current systemic pharmacological therapeutics for neuropathic pain produce limited pain relief and have undesirable side effects, while current local anesthetics tend to nonspecifically block both sensory and motor functions. Calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP), a neuropeptide released from sensory nerve endings, appears to play a significant role in chronic neuropathic pain. In this study, an analgesic microneedle (AMN) patch was developed using dissolvable microneedles to transdermally deliver selective CGRP antagonist peptide in a painless manner for the treatment of localized neuropathic pain. Local analgesic effects were evaluated in rats by testing behavioral pain sensitivity in response to thermal and mechanical stimuli using neuropathic pain models such as spared-nerve injury and diabetic neuropathy pain, as well as neurogenic inflammatory pain model induced by ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation. Unlike several conventional therapies, the AMN patches produced effective analgesia on neuropathic pain without disturbing the normal nociception and motor function of the rat, resulting from the high specificity of the delivered peptide against CGRP receptors. The AMN patches did not cause skin irritation or systemic side effects. These results demonstrate that dissolvable microneedle patches delivering CGRP antagonist peptide provide an effective, safe, and simple approach to mitigate neuropathic pain with significant advantages over current treatments.
 ...
PMID:Analgesic Microneedle Patch for Neuropathic Pain Therapy. 2800 46