Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0344307 (analgesia)
 28,200 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The present study explored whether immersive virtual reality can serve as an effective non-pharmacologic analgesic for dental pain. Two patients (aged 51 and 56 years old) with adult periodontitis, a chronic, progressive inflammatory disease that affects gums, ligaments, and bones around the teeth, were studied in the treatment room of a periodontist. Each patient received periodontal scaling and root planing (scraping off/removing plaque deposits below the gum line, hereafter referred to as scaling) under three treatment conditions: (1) virtual reality distraction, (2) movie distraction, and (3) a no-distraction control condition. Condition order was randomized and counterbalanced. For each of the three treatment conditions, five visual analog pain scores for each treatment condition served as the dependent variables. On 0-10 labeled scales, both patients provided sensory and affective pain ratings, and subjective estimates of time spent thinking about his pain during the procedure. For patient 1, mean pain ratings were in the severe range while watching a movie (7.2), or no distraction (7.2) but in the mild pain range (1.2) during the VR condition. Patient 2 reported mild to moderate pain with no distraction (mean = 4.4), mild pain while watching the movie (3.3), and essentially no pain while in VR (0.6) during his periodontal scaling. Although the small sample size limits generalizability, we contend that virtual reality is a uniquely attention-grabbing medium capable of maximizing the amount of attention drawn away from the "real world," allowing patients to tolerate painful dental procedures. These preliminary results suggest that immersive VR merits more attention as a potentially viable adjunctive nonpharmacologic analgesia for procedural dental/periodontal pain. Virtual reality may also have analgesic potential for other painful procedures or pain populations. Practical implications are discussed.
 ...
PMID:The effectiveness of virtual reality for dental pain control: a case study. 1170 32

The purpose of this project was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of misoprostol when combined with ibuprofen or diclofenac Na. Animal experiments using the inflamed rat paw formalin model suggested that misoprostol potentiates the analgesic effect of some NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) including diclofenac Na but not propionic acid derivatives or opiates. The dental pain model was used to evaluate the clinical relevance of this interaction. Patients received a single oral dose of study medication following surgical removal of impacted teeth. Patients were medicated for moderate to severe postsurgical pain and then filled in an analgesic diary for a 6-h observation period. Several blood samples were taken over the observation period. In addition, microdialysis samples were taken directly from the extraction socket and were analyzed for immunoreactive prostaglandin E(2) levels. The studies were single-dose, parallel group and double-blind assays. In the first study, 70 patients received an oral dose of either placebo (n = 13), misoprostol 200 &mgr;g (n = 18), ibuprofen 200 mg (n = 19), or the combination of misoprostol + ibuprofen (n = 20). Misoprostol alone demonstrated a small analgesic effect compared to placebo. Both the ibuprofen and combination groups were substantially more effective than placebo but not different from each other. The combination group had higher ibuprofen blood levels during the first 45 min but had a lower C(max) and longer time to T(max). The second study evaluated oral doses of placebo (n = 11), misoprostol 200 &mgr;g (n = 21), diclofenac Na 50 mg (n = 18), and the combination of misoprostol + diclofenac Na (n = 20). Relative to placebo, misoprostol performance was similar to the first study. When the results of the two studies were combined, there was a small, but statistically significant, analgesic effect for misoprostol. Diclofenac Na was superior to both placebo and to misoprostol alone. The combination was the most effective treatment, and for hours 4--6 it was significantly better than diclofenac Na alone. Analysis of the blood samples showed an earlier and higher peak effect for the diclofenac Na group compared to the combination, and the combination again had a lower C(max). The microdialysis probe assays demonstrated that misoprostol depressed PGE(2) levels at the peripheral site of trauma over the first 2 h after surgery. These pilot studies used small samples, and the results only suggest trend effects. Both studies demonstrated that misoprostol 200 &mgr;g, a prostaglandin analog, does have an analgesic effect. When combined with ibuprofen, there was no potentiation of analgesia. In contrast, the combination of misoprostol + diclofenac Na demonstrated an enhanced peak effect, total effect for pain intensity difference and pain relief (sum pain intensity difference [SPID] and total pain relief [TOTPAR]), and
 ...
PMID:The Analgesic Interaction of Misoprostol with Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs. 1186 59

The analgesic efficacy of an arginine salt of ibuprofen was compared to one of the commercially available forms of conventional ibuprofen in a 500-patient clinical trial in postoperative dental pain. Patients were administered a single dose of ibuprofen arginate (200 mg or 400 mg), conventional ibuprofen (200 mg or 400 mg), orplacebo in this double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trial. Results demonstrated that ibuprofen arginate was a safe and effective analgesia that was superior to conventional ibuprofen in both the amount of pain relief achieved and the time to onset of pain relief. Onset of analgesia, assessed as the median amount of time to achieve meaningful pain relief, was reached after 32 and 31 minutes with ibuprofen arginate 200 and 400 mg, respectively, and 64 and 58 minutes with conventional ibuprofen 200 and 400 mg, respectively (p < 0.05). Patients treated with ibuprofen arginate rated its overall effectiveness higher than those patients treated with conventional ibuprofen. Adverse event profiles were similar across all treatment groups.
 ...
PMID:A controlled comparative study of ibuprofen arginate versus conventional ibuprofen in the treatment of postoperative dental pain. 1216 73

Ibuprofen is a safe and effective analgesic, but some formulations have a slow onset of action. Ibuprofen arginate is a rapidly absorbed salt designed to promote more rapid onset of analgesia. A clinical trial was conducted in 226 patients with postoperative dental pain to assess the analgesic efficacy and speed of onset of the arginine salt of ibuprofen compared with one of the commercially available forms of ibuprofen. Patients were administered a single dose of either ibuprofen arginate (200 mg or 400 mg), ibuprofen (200 mg or 400 mg), or placebo in this double-blind, randomized trial. To determine the onset of action of the study medication patients were required to note time to "any" pain relief and then time to "meaningful" pain relief, using the two-stopwatch method. Pain intensity and relief were assessed using traditional categorical scales over a 6-h period. Meaningful pain relief was achieved in 42 min and 24 min for ibuprofen arginate 200 mg and 400 mg, respectively, compared with 50 min and 48 min for ibuprofen 200 mg and 400 mg, respectively ( P<0.05). The results for the measurements of analgesic effectiveness [sum of pain intensity difference, total pain relief (TOTPAR), peak pain relief and overall evaluation of treatment] all showed that both doses of ibuprofen arginate and both doses of ibuprofen were significantly better than placebo and both 200-mg and 400-mg ibuprofen arginate doses were significantly better than ibuprofen 200 mg for peak pain relief. Mean plasma ibuprofen concentrations at 30 min and 60 min, respectively, were: ibuprofen arginine 200 mg, 13.9 micro g/ml and 15.7 micro g/ml; ibuprofen arginine 400 mg, 29.5 micro g/ml and 29.3 micro g/ml; ibuprofen 200 mg 2.5 micro g/ml and 5 micro g/ml; ibuprofen 400 mg, 2.3 micro g/ml and 7.4 micro g/ml. ( P<0.05). Adverse event profiles were similar across treatment groups. These results overall suggest that ibuprofen arginate when taken at doses equivalent to commercially available ibuprofen formulations produces analgesia that is faster in onset.
 ...
PMID:Ibuprofen arginate provides effective relief from postoperative dental pain with a more rapid onset of action than ibuprofen. 1224 97

Although there have been many advances in our understanding of the neurophysiology of pain, the management of acute pain continues to be a challenge. When the need arises to provide adequate and effective pain management for the recovering alcoholic, the problem becomes much more complex. The clinician must provide the patient with adequate analgesia without causing a relapse. In the US, 6% to 10% of the population has attended Alcoholics Anonymous at some point, increasing the likelihood of the clinician being faced with the need to manage acute pain in a recovering alcoholic. The purpose of this article is to suggest guidelines for the management of acute dental pain in the recovering alcoholic based on current principles of acute pain management and for the treatment of pain in addicted patients.
 ...
PMID:The management of acute dental pain in the recovering alcoholic. 1268 26

There is a clear relationship between single doses of ibuprofen over the range 50-400 mg and the peak analgesic effect and the duration of analgesia. The smallest clinically useful dose of ibuprofen is 200 mg. Ibuprofen 400 mg has been shown to be as effective as aspirin 600 or 900 mg/day in models of moderate pain but superior to aspirin or paracetamol in more sensitive models such as dental pain. The duration of action of ibuprofen 400 mg is at least 6 hours compared with 4-6 hours for ibuprofen 200 mg or paracetamol. In patients undergoing oral surgery, ibuprofen 200 mg was broadly comparable with naproxen 220 mg and ibuprofen 400 mg comparable with ketoprofen 25 mg. The combination of ibuprofen and hydrocodone is more effective than either drug alone in patients undergoing abdominal and gynaecological surgery. The absorption of ibuprofen acid is influenced by formulation, and certain salts of ibuprofen (lysine, arginine, potassium) and solubilised formulations have an enhanced onset of activity. These differences are clinically important, offering a shorter time to onset of relief of tension headache compared with paracetamol.
 ...
PMID:Review of the analgesic efficacy of ibuprofen. 1272 41

The orally administered fixed combination tablet of tramadol (centrally-acting opiate) plus paracetamol (acetaminophen; nonopiate, nonsalicylate analgesic) [37.5/325 mg] provides effective analgesia in patients with moderate to severe acute pain and those with chronic painful conditions characterised by intermittent exacerbations of pain. Two tramadol/paracetamol 37.5/325 mg tablets provided greater relief of dental pain over an 8-hour period than either agent alone, with a faster onset of action than tramadol alone and a longer duration of action than either agent as monotherapy. In patients with postoperative dental pain, two tramadol/paracetamol tablets (37.5/325 mg) provided similar analgesia to hydrocodone/paracetamol 10/650 mg over an 8-hour period. The addition of one or two tramadol/paracetamol 37.5/32 5mg tablets (up to four times daily) for 5 days to existing NSAID or cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor analgesic therapy provided effective pain relief in patients with osteoarthritis flare pain. Tramadol/paracetamol 37.5/325 mg provided similar efficacy to that of codeine/paracetamol 30/300 mg in patients with chronic back pain in a 4-week, randomised, double-blind trial (a maximum of 10 tablets or capsules per day of the active drug).
 ...
PMID:Tramadol/paracetamol. 1274 38

Rofecoxib was the first specific inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) approved for the treatment of acute pain. It has been shown to provide analgesia that is significantly better than placebo and has an onset of action and efficacy similar to that of traditional nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as naproxen and ibuprofen. In addition, the analgesic efficacy of rofecoxib has been demonstrated to be superior to that of the opioid combination of codeine 60 mg/acetaminophen 600 mg in an acute dental pain model. For the treatment of acute pain, the efficacy of rofecoxib was further demonstrated in a study of patients who had undergone orthopedic surgery. Rofecoxib has been found to be as effective as naproxen sodium and more effective than placebo in studies evaluating its use for the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea. In patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip, rofecoxib is superior to placebo and similar to diclofenac and ibuprofen in relieving OA pain and improving physical function. Rofecoxib has also been shown to be superior to acetaminophen and celecoxib after 6 weeks of treatment for OA. The efficacy of rofecoxib has also been demonstrated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and low back pain. The advantages of using COX-2-specific NSAIDs include convenient once-daily dosing schedule and improved safety compared with traditional NSAIDs. Two large outcomes studies, VIGOR and CLASS, have shown that gastric mucosal ulceration occurs significantly less often in patients taking COX-2-specific inhibitors than in those treated with ibuprofen, diclofenac, or naproxen and occurs with a similar incidence to that of placebo. Absence of any effect on platelet aggregation and bleeding time further distinguishes these agents from traditional NSAIDs. Because COX-2-specific inhibitors do not have an antiplatelet effect, they cannot be used as a substitute for low-dose aspirin for cardiovascular prophylaxis. Rofecoxib is a safe and highly effective alternative to previously available NSAIDs and should be considered for the treatment of acute pain conditions in adult patients, especially those at risk for developing gastrointestinal complications. It is preferred in the perioperative setting because of its analgesic efficacy and lack of platelet effects. Because of its more favorable gastrointestinal toxicity profile compared with nonselective NSAIDs, rofecoxib is safer in patients, especially older patients, for whom chronic anti-inflammatory or analgesic therapy is indicated.
 ...
PMID:The role of rofecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitor, for the treatment of non-cancer pain: a review. 1462 51

BACKGROUND: Individual patient meta-analysis to determine the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of single-dose rofecoxib in acute postoperative pain. METHODS: Individual patient information was available from 14 trials; 13 in dental and one in postsurgical pain. For each patient the percentage of maximum possible pain relief (%maxTOTPAR) was determined at different time points. The proportion of patients with at least 50% maxTOTPAR, and number-needed-to-treat (NNT) for at least 50% maxTOTPAR, were then calculated, with time when 50% of patients had remedicated (TTR50) and number-needed-to-harm (NNH) for adverse effects. RESULTS: In dental pain, for rofecoxib 50 mg (1330 patients) compared with placebo (570 patients) the NNT was 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.8 to 2.1) for six hours, 2.0 (1.8 to 2.1) at eight, 2.4 (2.2 to 2.6) at 12, and 2.8 (2.5 to 3.1) at 24 hours. The TTR50 was 15.5 hours. Adverse effects were uncommon, though post-extraction alveolitis (dry socket) occurred more often with rofecoxib 50 mg than with placebo, NNH 24 (14 to 80). For postsurgical pain in one trial (163 patients), the NNT for rofecoxib 50 mg for six hours was 3.9 (2.6 to 7.8), the TTR50 was 5.8 hours, and multiple-dose adverse effects over five days occurred at similar rates with rofecoxib 50 mg and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Single-dose rofecoxib 50 mg is an effective treatment with long-lasting analgesia and few adverse effects in dental pain. More information is required to confirm efficacy in postsurgical pain.
 ...
PMID:Individual patient meta-analysis of single-dose rofecoxib in postoperative pain. 1501 38

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and tolerability of lumiracoxib (a novel COX-2 selective inhibitor) with rofecoxib, celecoxib and placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe post-operative dental pain. Following third molar extraction, patients received single oral doses of lumiracoxib 400 mg, rofecoxib 50 mg, celecoxib 200 mg or placebo (n = 355). Additional patients from a similar study, assigned to lumiracoxib, rofecoxib or placebo (n = 155), were included for analysis of the primary variable, Summed Pain Intensity Difference over the first 8 h post dose (SPID-8). For SPID-8, lumiracoxib was superior to rofecoxib (p < 0.05), celecoxib (p < 0.001) and placebo (p < 0.001). Lumiracoxib demonstrated the fastest onset of analgesia and the longest time to rescue medication use. Patient global evaluation of lumiracoxib was comparable to rofecoxib and superior to celecoxib and placebo. All treatments were well tolerated. Lumiracoxib 400 mg provides rapid, effective and sustained relief of post-operative dental pain, comparable or superior to rofecoxib.
 ...
PMID:Analgesic efficacy of a single dose of lumiracoxib compared with rofecoxib, celecoxib and placebo in the treatment of post-operative dental pain. 1511 90


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next >>