Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0344307 (analgesia)
 28,200 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

From October 1990 to October 1992 the first 23 laparoscopically operated patients were recorded. 11 patients retrospectively including a supplementary questioning to missing data, 12 patients prospectively with a follow-up 6-8 weeks later. They were compared with 35 from April 1991 to April 1992 conventionally operated and prospectively observed patients. Laparoscopy was performed on patients with subacute clinical signs. The median age was comparable. Acute appendicitis was histologically confirmed in 18% of the laparoscopically and in 80% of the conventionally operated patients. Operating time was in mean 110 minutes for laparoscopic and 65 minutes for open appendectomy. The postoperative complications for laparoscopy included 4 Douglas abscesses (2 x open and 2 x pararectal revisions), one peritonitis due to a defect Roeder-loop and an haematoma of the abdominal wall. One case of wound infection (3%), one pericoecal abscess which needed an ileoascendostomy and a postoperative fatigue syndrome were recorded for open appendectomy. The postoperative return to normal diet was faster for laparoscopy. Return to normal bowel habits, the need of analgesia and the nominal analogue scales concerning pain, quality of sleep, well-being and appetite showed no obvious differences between the two operation methods. The postoperative stay was on average 6.7 days for laparoscopy and 5.6 days for the open operation. The results show the severe complications which may happen when introducing this new operation method. The laparoscopic appendectomy should only be performed electively in subacute appendicitis or when diagnostic exploration shows an inflamed appendix. Careful rinsing of the operation site and perioperative antibiotic treatment are mandatory. We made good experiences when using a stapler for the removal of the appendix.
 ...
PMID:[Does laparoscopic appendectomy have advantages? Laparoscopic appendectomy in comparison with conventional appendectomy--an observational study during introduction of laparoscopy]. 814 46

This investigation evaluated patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for subjective well-being and mood in the postoperative period in comparison with the intramuscular (im) administration of morphine given on demand. Patients scheduled for elective upper abdominal surgery were assigned at random to either PCA (n = 17) or im morphine (n = 14). The PCA group experienced significantly more pain relief and consumed more morphine than those who received im morphine. The PCA patients suffered from more fatigue and showed less vigour than the im group. Neither preoperative trait anxiety nor locus of control was associated with postoperative pain in either of the groups.
 ...
PMID:Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) leads to more postoperative pain relief, but also to more fatigue and less vigour. 824 54

Forty-one ovarian cancer patients with less than 2 cm residual disease after systemic cisplatin-based chemotherapy received 4 courses of an ip regimen including cisplatin (75 mg/m2), mitoxantrone (20 mg/m2), and interferon-alpha 2b (30 mil IU/m2). The most important side effects were abdominal pain and fatigue. Overall 15/41 patients (37%) required narcotic analgesia for severe abdominal pain. In 1 case laparotomy was necessary due to bowel obstruction. Grade 3-4 myelotoxicity was observed in 18/41 patients (28 courses). No treatment-related death occurred. Pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 23/37 (62%) evaluable patients. Four-year disease-free survival was 50%, and no relapse occurred after 32 months. The estimated 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 35 and 60%, respectively. Patients who achieved pCR showed significantly better survival than the others (P < 0.000). At multivariate Cox's analysis pCR achievement was the most important predictor of PFS (P < 0.005) and survival (P < 0.02). Age (< or = 60 vs > 60) and CA-125 serum levels at entry (normal vs increased) also showed independent predictive value. On the basis of multivariate analysis results we created a risk model for survival and PFS based on age and CA-125 at entry. We identified three subgroups of patients with significantly different outcomes. With this new ip combination long-term disease-free survival is achieved in a significant part of ovarian cancer patients with small tumor burden. A longer follow-up is needed to see whether it can cure some of these patients, and further comparisons with other ip or systemic regimens are needed to draw definitive conclusions about its role in these patients.
 ...
PMID:Intraperitoneal (ip) cisplatin-mitoxantrone-interferon-alpha 2b in ovarian cancer patients with minimal residual disease. 834 66

The purpose of this paper is to report an eight-hour operation in which anaesthesia was provided by a combination of continuous epidural analgesia and light general anaesthesia administered via a laryngeal mask. During the perioperative period, the respiratory system was monitored with arterial blood gas and thoraco-abdominal movement analyses. There was no deterioration in respiratory function nor evidence of respiratory fatigue. We suggest that this is a suitable technique in fasting healthy patients undergoing prolonged surgery to the extremities.
 ...
PMID:The laryngeal mask airway and prolonged balanced regional anaesthesia. 848 96

The purpose of this comparative study was to examine differences in pain intensity, sleep disturbance, sleep effectiveness, fatigue, and vigor between patients undergoing cholecystectomy who received either patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) or intramuscular (IM) injections of narcotics for postoperative pain. The PCA group consisted of 16 women, aged 22-58; the IM group consisted of 10 women, aged 22-60. Data were collected on patients' postoperative days 1 and 2. Findings indicated that patients receiving PCA reported less pain on postoperative day 1 and less fatigue on postoperative day 2 than patients receiving IM injections of narcotics.
 ...
PMID:Efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia in women cholecystectomy patients. 855 Mar 4

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was administered in the domiciliary environment in 143 pre-terminally and terminally ill tumour patients suffering either from excruciating chronic pain or severe chronic/acute complex pain that could not be relieved adequately by oral analgesia. Morphine solutions were infused subcutaneously in concentrations between 1% and 3%. The intravenous route was preferred in patients with indwelling catheters or those susceptible to inflammatory skin reactions at the infusion site. After initial dose adjustment, lasting 2-3 days, the morphine amounts infused by PCA reached a median of 93 mg day(-1) (range 12-464 mg day(-1)). The median was 28% lower than the median dose administered orally. A total of 84% of patients utilized the option of bolus self-administration. The median percentage administered via the bolus mode amounted to 5.3% of the total requirements. During the course of treatment, morphine requirements increased by a median of 2.3 mg day(-1) (range -29 +52 mg day(-1)). Most patients were treated continuously in the home care setting until death, the median duration being 27 days (range 1-437 days). The terminal morphine demands reached a median of 188 mg day(-1) (range 15-1008 mg day(-1)). PCA turned out to be safe and effective, attaining excellent results in 95 (66%) patients and satisfactory pain relief in 43 (30%). PCA proved to be insufficient in five (4%) cases. Side-effects were mild: constipation, fatigue, nausea and local inflammatory skin reactions occurred in 9%. Thus, with support from an experienced mobile nursing team, PCA can be safely administered in the terminal domiciliary care of tumour patients. PCA is superior to oral analgesia, especially in the treatment of severe oscillating pain. PCA provides adequate pain control in about 96% of patients who are poorly responsive to oral opioids.
 ...
PMID:Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in the domiciliary care of tumour patients. 862 40

We examined if patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with i.v. morphine provided comparable postoperative analgesia after hysterectomy as extradural morphine, without increasing the incidence of side effects. The study (n = 40) was randomized and double-blind. An extradural catheter was inserted before surgery and anaesthesia was standardized. The extradural group received extradural morphine 0.06 mg kg-1 by the end of surgery and a second dose 6 h later. The i.v. group received an i.v. infusion of morphine 0.2 mg kg-1 after surgery. PCA with morphine 0.04 mg kg-1 i.v. was used in both groups. Pain relief (VAS), side effects and cognitive functions were evaluated for 18 h. Plasma samples were obtained for analysis of morphine concentrations. Mean consumption of PCA morphine was 2.4 mg h-1 for the i.v. group and 1 mg h-1 for the extradural group. Despite unlimited access to morphine, the i.v. group had higher VAS scores as the extradural group (P < 0.001). Plasma concentrations of morphine varied 8-10-fold in both groups. In the i.v. group itching, tiredness, blurred vision and vertigo correlated with cumulative consumption of i.v. morphine whereas in the extradural group this correlation existed only for tiredness. Both groups showed reduced ability to perform tests of cognitive function, indicating a central effect of both i.v. and extradural morphine, despite markedly lower plasma morphine concentrations in the extradural group.
 ...
PMID:Extradural morphine gives better pain relief than patient-controlled i.v. morphine after hysterectomy. 905 97

This article presents a summary of drug safety data concerning the use of tramadol hydrochloride and an outline of the specific aspects of this analgesic in particular with regard to respiratory depression and dependence potential. Information from phase II to IV clinical studies, postmarketing surveillance studies (covering safety data from a total of more than 21,000 patients) and the spontaneous reporting system have been taken into consideration. The data from the spontaneous reporting system covers the period between 1977 and 1993, during which more than one billion single dose units were distributed throughout the world. The phase II to IV studies compare acute intravenous, acute intramuscular, acute oral and multiple dose oral administration Postmarketing surveillance studies provide a picture of everyday use of tramadol in general medical practice. Further analyses were performed to provide information about the gender-, age- and dose-related distribution of adverse reactions The prevalence of side effects was calculated by comparing the number of symptoms with the number of patients. The pooled data from the clinical studies and the postmarketing surveillance studies reveal that the most commonly observed side effects were nausea, dizziness, drowsiness, tiredness, sweating, vomiting and dry mouth, with an overall incidence of between 1 and 6%. In the postmarketing surveillance studies on long term and acute administration, the profile of adverse events was qualitatively almost identical to that in the phase II to IV studies. However, there were distinct quantitative differences it favour of the long term studies. In the postmarketing surveillance study on acute parenteral administration, the incidences of nausea and vomiting were only 4.2 and 0.5% respectively, which is significantly lower than the 20.7 and 11.4% in the patient-controlled analgesia studies. Nevertheless, it is important to take into consideration the different conditions in these studies. All the postmarketing surveillance studies were outpatient studies, whereas almost all of the phase II to IV studies were carried out in hospitals. The studies with intravenous and intramuscular administration were mainly postoperative, which explains the relatively high incidence of nausea and vomiting, 17.8 and 7.0%, respectively, with intramuscular administration. The different conditions in the phase II to IV studies and the postmarketing surveillance studies are also reflected in the occurrence of dizziness and postural hypotension: The incidence of dizziness in the postmarketing surveillance studies is slightly higher than that observed in the phase II to IV studies. Particularly in the studies with intravenous and intramuscular administration, the patients were confined to bed and were therefore much less sensitive to dizziness than those in the long term oral and postmarketing surveillance studies, who were all outpatients. On the other hand, postural hypotension played almost no role in the multiple dose studies, in which the oral formulation were used most frequently. It is interesting to note that diarrhoea, pruritus and gastrointestinal disorder (except nausea and vomiting) are mainly reported in the multiple dose studies in the groups receiving oral tramadol, and also in the postmarketing surveillance studies. Once again, the study conditions may well be the explanation. The adverse effects reported in both clinical and postmarketing surveillance studies are similar to those in the spontaneous reports. The most frequently documented adverse effects in clinical and postmarketing surveillance studies, i.e. nausea/vomiting, dizziness, drowsiness, tiredness, sweating and dry mouth, are noted very infrequently in spontaneous reports, since in medical practice these side effects are usually known and are described in the product information. Almost all reports referring to abuse/dependence are connected with pain therapy; they give no reason to suspect any pro
 ...
PMID:[Tolerance and safety of tramadol use. Results of international studies and data from drug surveillance]. 919 Mar 25

Pethidine (meperidine) is a compound with both local anaesthetic and opioid agonist properties. We have in a recent study demonstrated that pethidine could be an interesting alternative to prilocaine in arthroscopy with local anaesthetic technique. Therefore, we investigated, in a controlled randomized double-blind study, the effect of three doses of pethidine compared with a standard local anaesthetic, in patients subjected to arthroscopic knee joint surgery. Ten patients in each group received 50 mg (P50), 100 mg (P100), 200 mg (P200) of pethidine or prilocaine (5 mg/ml) + adrenaline (4 mg/ml) (PC), injected intra-articularly (i.a.) before surgery. We measured pain intensity and discomfort during arthroscopy and pain intensity at rest and at movement, nausea and tiredness for 3 days post-operatively at regular intervals using the VAS-technique. We also measured the concentration of pethidine and its demethylated metabolite, norpethidine, in plasma by collecting blood samples at 20, 40, 60, 80, 140 and 200 min following injection, and in synovial fluid which was collected through the arthroscope at the start and the end of the surgery. It was found that significantly more patients in the P50 group (n = 6) needed general anaesthesia due to intense pain than those in the P100 group (n = 1), P200 group (n = 0) or the PC group (n = 1). The PC group required significantly more analgesics and had a significantly higher calculated total sum of pain scores at movement post-operatively, than the other three groups. The P200 group more often reported tiredness post-operatively than the other three groups. We conclude that 100 or 200 mg pethidine i.a. produces satisfactory anaesthesia for surgery. There was a rapid transfer of pethidine from synovial fluid to plasma, resulting in plasma levels earlier reported to produce centrally mediated effects, such as analgesia and tiredness. We found much higher concentrations of norpethidine in the synovial fluid than in plasma, suggesting a local demethylation in the knee joint tissues. This site of drug oxidation has not earlier been demonstrated neither in vitro nor in vivo. The results suggest that pethidine given i.a. in the dose range of 50 to 200 mg results in analgesia due to both peripheral and central mechanisms. The significant systemic uptake of pethidine can cause unwanted side-effects.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of 50, 100 and 200 mg of intra-articular pethidine during knee joint surgery, a controlled study with evidence for local demethylation to norpethidine. 1020 35

Once it is decided that the patient in distress requires tracheal intubation, the primary goal is to secure the airway as quickly and safely as possible to assure adequate oxygenation and ventilation. The clinician should quickly review the patient's history, physical examination findings, and laboratory data to determine the presence of cardiovascular disease, assess intravascular volume status, and formulate a plan for induction of anesthesia. The stresses of hypoxia, hypercarbia, acidosis, and extreme fatigue result in near-maximal sympathetic outflow that is manifest as tachycardia, labile blood pressure, and increased myocardial contractility. The astute clinician should anticipate that the tachycardia and hypertension associated with laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation is followed by a period of hypotension. This postintubation hypotension results from the acute marked attenuation of the sympathetic tone associated with resolution of hypoxia and hypercarbia, direct drug-induced negative inotropic effect, and vasodilation. The decrease in sympathetic vascular tone may result in hypotension by exacerbating the decrease in cardiac preload and afterload from hypovolemia. In addition, the use of positive pressure ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in these hypovolemic patients will further decrease ventricular preload by impeding venous return, leading to profound hypotension. Several pharmacologic agents are required to treat effectively the hemodynamic perturbations associated with induction, laryngoscopy, and tracheal intubation. Most sedative hypnotic agents that are administered for induction provide minimal to no analgesia. Patients are most often given a combination of drugs to provide adequate sedation, analgesia to blunt the noxious stimuli, and muscle relaxation to facilitate the laryngoscopy. The major challenge is to choose a combination of drugs that at the appropriate doses, effectively blunt the responses to intubation without contributing to postlaryngoscopy hypotension. One can use several strategies to accomplish these goals; administration of a narcotic analgesic before induction decreases the dose of induction agent and can attenuate the sympathetic response to intubation. Because of the prevalence of cardiovascular disease and hypovolemia in this population of patients, all chosen drugs should have minimal negative effect on cardiac function and patients with hypovolemia should be hydrated. Most clinical studies have been performed in hemodynamically stable patients, so the routine dosages of sedative hypnotics should be reduced substantially and titrated to effect. An additional strategy is to treat significant hemodynamic perturbations with vasopressors, vasodilators, short-acting selective beta-1 blockers, and inotropic agents. The choice of vasoactive agent depends on the magnitude of the hemodynamic response and the presence of specific underlying cardiovascular pathology.
 ...
PMID:Emergent management of the airway. New pharmacology and the control of comorbidities in cardiac disease, ischemia, and valvular heart disease. 1094 81


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next >>