Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0344307 (analgesia)
 28,200 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The analgesic profile of epidural nalbuphine for postoperative pain relief and the impact of local anaesthetic choice upon this profile was investigated in 58 patients undergoing elective Caesarean delivery under epidural anaesthesia. Patients were randomized to receive either lidocaine 2% with 1:200,000 epinephrine or 2-chloroprocaine 3% for perioperative anaesthesia, followed by either 10, 20, or 30 mg of epidural nalbuphine administered at the first complaint of postoperative discomfort. Postoperative analgesia was quantitated on a visual analogue (VAS) scale, and by the time from the epidural opioid injection until the first request for supplemental pain medication. The duration of analgesia after lidocaine anaesthesia followed by 10, 20 or 30 mg nalbuphine was 77 (53-127) min, 205 (110-269) min, and 185 (116-241), respectively (median, 95% confidence interval, P less than 0.01, 20 and 30 mg vs 10 mg). Following 2-chloroprocaine anaesthesia, VAS remained consistently elevated: the median duration of analgesia was only 30-40 min and did not differ among the three doses of nalbuphine. Side-effects consisted only of somnolence, and were noted only following lidocaine anaesthesia. Somnolence was observed in 0, 20% and 50% of those receiving 10 mg, 20 mg and 30 mg of nalbuphine respectively (NS). No evidence of respiratory depression was noted in any patient. It is concluded that 20 or 30 mg of epidural nalbuphine provides analgesia for only two to four hours following Caesarean delivery with lidocaine anaesthesia, but anaesthesia with 2-chloroprocaine resulted in minimal or no analgesia from this opioid. Nalbuphine appears to be a disappointing agent for epidural use after Caesarean delivery.
 ...
PMID:Epidural nalbuphine for analgesia following caesarean delivery: dose-response and effect of local anaesthetic choice. 191 55

Epidural sufentanil was administered to 57 women after Caesarean section, under epidural anaesthesia, to provide postoperative analgesia. Each patient received a 30 micrograms dose at the first complaint of pain and this dose was repeated when pain recurred. Epinephrine (1:200,000) was added to the local anaesthetic, sufentanil, both, or neither. The time of onset of analgesia, efficacy, duration of analgesia and the incidence of side-effects were recorded. This dose of epidural sufentanil provided satisfactory postoperative analgesia and no serious side-effects were observed. The onset of analgesia was rapid (4-6 min), but the duration of action was brief (4-5 hr). The addition of 1:200,000 epinephrine had no statistically significant influence on any of the measured variables. Pruritus occurred commonly but never required treatment. Drowsiness was experienced frequently and was felt by some patients to inhibit their interaction with their neonates. Respiratory depression, as defined by a respiratory rate less than 10 bpm, was not observed. A number of patients noted a transient period of euphoria 5-8 min after administration of the epidural sufentanil. The authors feel that epidural sufentanil provides satisfactory analgesia after Caesarean section, but the brief duration of action and the high incidence of drowsiness limit its acceptability for routine use in obstetric patients.
 ...
PMID:Epidural sufentanil for post-caesarean section analgesia: lack of benefit of epinephrine. 197 Nov 98

Alpha-agonists are frequently added to local anaesthetic agents to prolong the duration of spinal or extradural anaesthesia. Adrenaline and phenylephrine have been employed most commonly for this purpose. Recent controlled studies indicated that the alpha-adrenoceptor agonist clonidine, when administered spinally, has a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect. Clonidine seems to be as effective as adrenaline to prolong the duration of local anaesthetic blocks and is useful to decrease the incidence of tourniquet pain under spinal anaesthesia. As they improve the intensity and duration of opioid analgesia, intraspinal alpha-agonists have also a synergic analgesic effect with spinal opioids. Alpha-agonist effects are due: 1) to an activation of the post and/or presynaptic alpha 2-adrenoceptors in the substantia gelatinosa of the spinal cord, 2) to a local vasoconstriction by stimulating vascular smooth muscle alpha-receptors which decrease the rate of absorption of local anaesthetics from the subarachnoid or extradural space, 3) to a co-activation of the spinal opioid and alpha-adrenergic receptors at the spinal cord level. However, spinally administered alpha-agonists have side effects, which include vasoconstriction in the spinal cord, hypotension, bradycardia or tachycardia, somnolence and respiratory depression. To minimize such complications, great care may be needed, which is described in this review, assessing the minimal required amount of alpha-agonists and effective clinical monitoring. The development of this technique in the management of subarachnoid and extradural anaesthesia and of chronic pain is discussed.
 ...
PMID:[Intrathecal and epidural administration of alpha adrenergic receptor agonists]. 197 1

This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of transnasal butorphanol (TNB) compared to intravenous butorphanol (IVB) in 186 patients experiencing moderate to severe post-cesarean section pain. Patients were randomly assigned to five groups in a double-blind fashion: Group I (n = 37) received 2 mg IVB, Group II (n = 38) 2 mg TNB, Group III (n = 36) 1 mg TNB followed by a repeat dose of 1 mg TNB at 60 min, Group IV (n = 38) 0.5 mg TNB followed by a repeat dose of 0.5 mg at 60 min, and Group V (n = 37) received placebo. All administrations were double dummy. Pain intensity and relief were noted and the incidence of side effects was recorded. Remedication with the same study drug was allowed up to 72 h. Onset of analgesia was more rapid in the 2 mg IV group compared to the three TN groups: 5 min vs 15 min, respectively. However, the 2 mg and the 1-1 mg TN groups had a longer duration of analgesia, approximately 4.5 h, compared to 3.0 h for the 2 mg IV group (P less than 0.05). Somnolence was dose related and was the most frequent side effect, and was less frequent when the TN dose was divided into 2 doses administered 1 h apart. Multiple doses of TNB and IVB were safe and clinically acceptable up to 3 days at all doses studied. There were no incidences of nasal mucosa irritation, or cardiovascular or respiratory depression. It is concluded that transnasal butorphanol represents a safe and effective alternative to injectable butorphanol for post-cesarean section pain and offers a better and longer duration of analgesia compared to IV butorphanol. The optimum dose seems to be 2 mg TN butorphanol and it is tolerated better when divided into 1 mg increments, given 1 h apart.
 ...
PMID:Transnasal butorphanol: a new method for pain relief in post-cesarean section pain. 200 93

The analgesic efficacy of subcutaneous wound infiltration with 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine after elective lower segment section Caesarean section was studied in 28 patients in a double-blind randomised controlled manner using a patient-controlled analgesia system. The mean 24-hour morphine consumption of the placebo group and the bupivacaine group was similar (76 mg and 68 mg respectively). Analysis of the cumulative hourly morphine consumption failed to show any statistically significant differences between the groups. However, on a weight-adjusted basis statistically significant differences in morphine consumption were demonstrated, although these may not be clinically important. Subjective experiences of pain, nausea and drowsiness assessed by linear analogue scoring were similar in both groups.
 ...
PMID:Wound infiltration of local anaesthetic after lower segment caesarean section. 175 Jun 26

The amount of pain experienced by the postoperative newborn remains one of the most challenging problems in neonatology. In this study, ethological methods were used to examine behaviours for 12 hours, commencing 24 hours postoperatively in three male full-term infants following chest surgery. The infants' facial expressions, body postures and movements were coded each minute from videotapes. The infants' heart rates and respiratory rates were also continuously recorded. Behavioural data were analysed using descriptive statistics and factor analysis. The six-factor solution accounted for 61.6% of the variance and identified indices of acute distress, subacute pain, quiet alertness, drowsiness and sleeping. Changes were evident when comparing behavioural or physiological variables before and after the administration of analgesia, treatments, nursing care or environmental noise. The authors conclude that ethological methods are appropriate to examine this problem, and recommend that the study be replicated.
 ...
PMID:The pain response of the postoperative newborn. 206

This randomized, double-blind study compared the analgesic and respiratory effects of lumbar epidural morphine 5 mg, nalbuphine 10 mg, and nalbuphine 20 mg in repeated doses in patients after thoracotomy; the first dose was administered intraoperatively. Pre-and postoperative monitoring included continuous pulse oximetry, respiratory inductance plethysmography, and repeated arterial blood gas analysis. Postoperatively, visual analogue pain scores, somnolence scores, respiratory rate, and arterial blood gases were determined for 16 h. Preoperatively, episodes of apnea were common during sleep but were not associated with low hemoglobin oxygen saturation or increased arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2). During sleep, some otherwise normal patients had increased PaCO2, and 2 of 15 patients had episodes of hemoglobin oxygen saturation of less than 90%. Postoperatively, 1 and 2 h after arrival in the recovery room, patients who received morphine had lower pain scores than did those who received nalbuphine 10 or 20 mg (P less than 0.05). All 6 patients who received morphine had satisfactory analgesia. Two of 4 patients who received nalbuphine 10 mg and all 5 who received nalbuphine 20 mg were withdrawn from the study because of inadequate analgesia (morphine vs. nalbuphine 10 mg, not significant; morphine vs. nalbuphine 20 mg, P less than 0.01). Two patients who received morphine had persistently increased PaCO2 postoperatively. Two patients who received morphine had episodes of apnea and slow respiratory rate, which were most frequent 6 h after arrival in the recovery room. We conclude that lumbar epidural nalbuphine does not provide adequate analgesia after thoracotomy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
 ...
PMID:A comparison of the analgesic and respiratory effects of epidural nalbuphine or morphine in postthoracotomy patients. 206 65

The analgesic effects of epidurally administered morphine 5 mg (group M, n = 15), fentanyl 100 micrograms (group F, n = 15), 2% lidocaine 60 mg (group L, n = 15) and normal saline (group S, n = 10) were investigated in 55 patients scheduled for abdominal surgery. Each drug was prepared in 3 ml solution and was injected though an epidural catheter introduced 3 cm cephalad into the epidural space at T10-11. Analgesic effects were assessed by changes in the dull pain sensation induced by electrical stimulation at 3 Hz through a pair of stainless needles which were placed subcutaneously at T7 and T10 dermatomes. In group M, analgesic effects at T10 were demonstrated in 12 of 15 subjects and the onset of analgesia was more rapid at T10 than at T7. The mean onset time of analgesia was 7.8 +/- 3.6 (mean +/- SD) min. There were 5 subjects in group F and 6 in group L who showed more rapid onset of analgesic effects at T10 than at T7, respectively. There were 2 subjects in group F and 5 in group L, with more rapid onset of analgesia at T7 than at T10. There were several subjects in group F and L with simultaneous onset of analgesia at T7 and T10. In group L, the mean distribution of analgesic area, confirmed with pinprick, was 5.2 +/- 1.9 (mean +/- SD) dermatomal segments. Hypercapnea, associated with somnolence, was frequently seen in group F. None of the subjects in group M, L or S showed such incidents. These results suggest that the main site of action of epidural morphine is located in the spinal cord while that of epidural fentanyl in the brain.
 ...
PMID:[Analgesic effects of epidural morphine, fentanyl and lidocaine]. 207 14

Intravenous ketorolac tromethamine was compared with morphine sulfate for the relief of moderate to severe postoperative pain and for side effects in 125 women undergoing major abdominal gynecologic surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive an initial intravenous dose of ketorolac 10 mg, ketorolac 30 mg, morphine 2 mg, or morphine 4 mg, administered in a double-blind fashion. No other narcotics were administered in the 3 hours preceding the first dose of study drug. A second dose was administered on request, but no sooner than 15 minutes after the initial dose. Patients who required additional analgesia within the 6-hour observation period were remedicated with a backup analgesic and withdrawn from the study. Pain scores and side effect evaluations were performed at baseline, 30 minutes, 1 hour, and then hourly for up to 6 hours or until the subject terminated the study. No significant differences among the treatments were noted in terms of area under the time-effect curves for pain intensity differences or pain relief. In each treatment group, 70-80% of patients withdrew within 1 hour and approximately 90% within 3 hours of the initial drug dose because of inadequate analgesia. With the dosage regimens used, neither drug adequately controlled moderate to severe pain in the immediate postoperative period. Patients receiving ketorolac experienced significantly less drowsiness than those given morphine, and some subjects in each experienced nausea. No serious adverse effects were reported.
 ...
PMID:Intravenous ketorolac tromethamine versus morphine sulfate in the treatment of immediate postoperative pain. 208 6

The analgesic and adverse effects of intrathecal methadone 5 mg, 10 mg and 20 mg were assessed and compared with intrathecal morphine 0.5 mg. The study was conducted on 38 patients who underwent total knee or hip replacement surgery. The intrathecal opioid was administered at the end of surgery and assessments began 1 h thereafter and continued for 24 h. Pain measurements, supplementary analgesia requirements, and adverse effects were recorded. Intrathecal morphine 0.5 mg provided effective and prolonged analgesia. Intrathecal methadone 5 mg, 10 mg, and 20 mg produced good analgesia of 4 h duration. Thereafter the median pain scores with intrathecal methadone were consistently higher (worse) than those with intrathecal morphine (P less than 0.05). The time to the onset of discomfort severe enough to require supplemental morphine was longer after intrathecal morphine than following methadone (15 h with morphine 0.5 mg; 6.25 h, 6.5 h and 6 h with methadone 5 mg, 10 mg, and 20 mg respectively: P less than 0.05). Central nervous system depression manifesting as respiratory depression, hypotension, and excessive drowsiness occurred in 3 of 8 patients injected with methadone 20 mg intrathecally. Generalized pruritus, nausea, vomiting, and urinary retention were common and equally distributed among the treatment groups. We conclude that both intrathecal morphine 0.5 mg and methadone 5, 10, and 20 mg provide excellent analgesia but that morphine has a more prolonged effect. Methadone 20 mg produced unacceptable side effects. Clinical evidence for rostral spread of methadone within the CSF, as indicated by facial itching and excessive drowsiness, was less apparent with 5 mg than with 10 and 20 mg. Various explanations for the observed differences between the drugs are discussed.
 ...
PMID:Intrathecal methadone: a dose-response study and comparison with intrathecal morphine 0.5 mg. 208 26


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>