Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0344307 (analgesia)
 28,200 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

We observed 73 cancer patients receiving transdermal fentanyl for 1-29 (mean 5.5) months immediately after participation in a randomized clinical trial. Of these, 32 received fentanyl until death, 18 were lost to follow-up, 11 required alternative analgesia, and 12 withdrew for other reasons. The median first recorded dose (not necessarily the patient's first fentanyl dose) was 75 microg/h. The median final dose was 100 microg/h. All but 3 patients required <300 microg fentanyl/h. In the 16 who received fentanyl for > or =3 months until death, the median dose was unchanged (100 microg/h) 3 months before death and at death; 8/16 required no dosage change. The incidence of constipation, skin reactions, nausea, and vomiting was low. No significant respiratory depression was associated with fentanyl. Most patients (85%) and investigators (86%) rated the treatment as good or excellent. We conclude that long-term treatment with transdermal fentanyl is safe and acceptable to many cancer patients.
 ...
PMID:Long-term observations of patients receiving transdermal fentanyl after a randomized trial. 1136 59

Methylnaltrexone, the first peripheral opioid receptor antagonist, has the potential to prevent or reverse opioid-induced peripherally mediated side effects without affecting analgesia. In previous human trials, we demonstrated that intravenous methylnaltrexone prevented morphine-induced delay in gastrointestinal transit time. We also observed that the compound decreased some of the morphine-induced troublesome subjective effects. However, the effects of subcutaneous methylnaltrexone, a more convenient route of administration, have not been evaluated. In this controlled trial, we evaluated the efficacy of subcutanous methylnaltrexone in antagonizing morphine-induced delay in oral-cecal transit time. In addition, opioid-induced unpleasant subjective effects and pharmacokinetics were studied. We observed that in the first group (n = 6) morphine (0.05 mg/kg intravenously) increased the transit time from a baseline level of 85 +/- 20.5 min to 155 +/- 27.9 min (mean +/- S.D., P < 0.01). After 0.1 mg/kg subcutaneous methylnaltrexone plus morphine, the transit time reduced to 110 +/- 41.0 min. In the second group (n = 6), morphine increased the transit time from a baseline level of 98 +/- 49.1 min to 140 +/- 58.2 min (P < 0.01). After 0.3 mg/kg subcutaneous methylnaltrexone plus morphine, the transit time reduced to 108 +/- 59.6 min (P < 0.05 compared with placebo plus morphine). In addition, subcutaneous methylnaltrexone significantly decreased morphine-induced subjective rating changes. Pharmacokinetic data after subcutaneous drug injection were compared to the data obtained from previous intravenous and oral administrations. Our results suggest that subcutaneous methylnaltrexone may have clinical utility in treating opioid-induced constipation and reducing opioid-induced unpleasant subjective symptoms.
 ...
PMID:Effects of subcutaneous methylnaltrexone on morphine-induced peripherally mediated side effects: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. 1175 6

Opioid bowel dysfunction (OBD) is a common adverse effect associated with opioid therapy. OBD is commonly described as constipation; however, it is a constellation of adverse gastrointestinal (GI) effects, which also includes abdominal cramping, bloating, and gastroesophageal reflux. The mechanism for these effects is mediated primarily by stimulation of opioid receptors in the GI tract. In patients with pain, uncontrolled symptoms of OBD can add to their discomfort and may serve as a barrier to effective pain management, limiting therapy, or prompting discontinuation. Patients with cancer may have disease-related constipation, which is usually worsened by opioid therapy. However, OBD is not limited to cancer patients. A recent survey of patients taking opioid therapy for pain of noncancer origin found that approximately 40% of patients experienced constipation related to opioid therapy (<3 complete bowel movements per week) compared with 7.6% in a control group. Of subjects who required laxative therapy, only 46% of opioid-treated patients (control subjects, 84%) reported achieving the desired treatment results >50% of the time. Laxatives prescribed prophylactically and throughout opioid therapy may improve bowel movements in many patients. Nevertheless, a substantial number of patients will not obtain adequate relief of OBD because of its refractory nature. Naloxone and other tertiary opioid receptor antagonists effectively reduce the symptoms of constipation in opioid-treated patients. However, because they also act centrally, they may provoke opioid withdrawal symptoms or reverse analgesia in some patients. There are 2 peripherally selective opioid receptor antagonists, methylnaltrexone and ADL 8-2698 (Adolor Corporation, Exton, PA, USA), that are currently under investigation for their use in treating OBD. Early studies confirm that they are effective at normalizing bowel function in opioid-treated patients without entering the central nervous system and affecting analgesia. With a better understanding of the prevalence of OBD and its pathophysiology, a more aggressive approach to preventing and treating OBD is possible and will likely improve the quality of life of patients with pain.
 ...
PMID:Incidence, prevalence, and management of opioid bowel dysfunction. 1175 92

The most common side effect of opioid therapy is constipation. It is often difficult to treat and is believed to be primarily a peripheral effect. Single large doses of oral naloxone have been shown to be efficacious in reversing opioid-induced constipation. However, they often cause the unwanted side effect of analgesia reversal. This study evaluated the effects on constipation and analgesia of low doses of oral naloxone given three times daily. Patients taking stable doses of opioids with complaints of constipation were recruited for this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Patients were given 4 mg or 2 mg of oral naloxone, or placebo, three times daily. Stool frequency and symptoms related to constipation were recorded daily. Patients also recorded the daily amount of analgesics required to maintain pain control. Nine patients were recruited for the study. All the patients who received oral naloxone had some improvement in their bowel frequency. Three of the patients also experienced reversal of analgesia, including one who had complete reversal of analgesia. This study demonstrates that reversal of analgesia still occurred despite dividing the oral naloxone into very low doses relative to the total dose of opioid used. Patients using high doses of opioids appear to be the most vulnerable to the analgesic effect of oral naloxone.
 ...
PMID:Low-dose oral naloxone reverses opioid-induced constipation and analgesia. 1245

Management of pain in the trauma patient is a complex issue requiring the ability to selectively match different injuries and patient situations with the most optimal pain management methods. Having an understanding of the various stages of trauma care helps clinicians to best support the goals of patient care while decreasing the detrimental effects of the stress response through good pain control interventions. When nurses have a good understanding of the various pain management interventions they are better able to assess the effectiveness, potential side effects, and goals of therapy. The following is a list of clinical pearls to help guide nurses to better manage the pain of traumatic injuries: Encourage your trauma team to standardize pain medications (particularly opioids). A protocol that uses a couple of opioids with varving routes of administration, onset, duration, mechanism of action, and side effects helps the team to become extremely familiar with them and better able to assess effectiveness and side effects. Frequent motor and sensory assessments are necessary in the injured-patient (especially with extremity and head injuries), and drug therapy choices must allow for a thorough baseline assessment and periodic checks to follow. Patients with multiple rib fractures or flail segments (particularly elderly patients) and no contraindications deserve serious consideration for treatment with an epidural. When using various pain management techniques, the nurse needs to be prepared to treat complications if they should arise. Airway equipment, drugs (i.e., oxygen, opioid antagonists, pressors), and resuscitation means must be immediately available. Nurses need to be extremely careful when receiving pain medication and other central nervous system depressant orders from various doctors involved in patients' care. If a pain management specialist is involved, all pain medication therapies should be supervised and ordered by that individual, particularly when spinal analgesia is employed. Nurses must be knowledgeable regarding the effects of spinal medications (local anesthetics and opioids) at varying spinal levels so as to assess therapeutic as well as untoward effects. Institute a diligent bowel protocol when using opioids. Opioid administration combined with the immobility and altered nutrition often associated with trauma can easily result in constipation, abdominal distention, and bowel obstruction. It is not uncommon for epidural blocks to need supplementation with other drug therapy, and this should not be considered a failure of the epidural. Any addition needs to be ordered and closely supervised by one primary team of doctors. Use of nonopioid drugs, if not contraindicated should be considered in all trauma patients. This is especially true for patients sustaining trauma and being discharged to home within 24 hours. They need to be educated about the pain they can expect the next day and how to judge if it is normal and expected or possibly the sign of a missed injury or developing complication (i.e., compartment svndrome infection).
 ...
PMID:Managing the pain of traumatic injury. 1186 6

The role of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in cancer pain has been well established in the treatment of mild pain and in association with opioids in the treatment of moderate to severe pain. The aim of this study was to verify the effects of NSAIDs on morphine escalation in advanced cancer patients with pain followed-up at home and to assess the pharmacoeconomic implications. A prospective randomised controlled study was carried out in 156 consecutive advanced cancer patients with pain followed-up at home in the period December 1999-December 2000. In this group of patients, 47 were selected with pain progression after 1 week of opioid stabilisation. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group 'O' patients were treated with continuing opioid escalation according to their clinical needs; group 'OK' received ketorolac 60 mg/daily orally (p.o.) in three doses and then continued opioid escalation according to their clinical situation. Performance status, doses of morphine before and after starting treatment, mean weekly pain intensity (assessed by means of a numerical scale from 0 to 10), mean weekly symptoms intensity, adverse effects and pain mechanisms were recorded. Moreover, drug costs per day in both groups were calculated. Patients who received ketorolac in addition to morphine showed a better analgesia after a week in comparison to the group treated with morphine only (P=0.005). Thereafter, morphine escalation was slower and the maximum morphine dose was lower in the group treated with ketorolac. The incidence and the severity of gastric discomfort was more evident in patients treated with ketorolac, while constipation was significantly increased in patients who received morphine only. Drug costs per day were similar in both groups; statistical differences were observed in patients who started on lower morphine doses (<100 mg/daily) in the two groups (4.3 in the ketorolac-morphine group versus 3.4 in the morphine group; P=0.012). The use of NSAIDs reduces the need for an opioid dose escalation or allows the use of lower doses. Their use is associated with a more intense gastric discomfort, but results in less opioid-related constipation. The eventual additive cost for NSAIDs therapy is negligible, especially in patients taking high doses of morphine.
 ...
PMID:A randomised controlled study on the use of anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with cancer pain on morphine therapy: effects on dose-escalation and a pharmacoeconomic analysis. 1209 Oct 67

Opioid antagonists have well-established indications in the reversal of life-threatening opioid toxicity, but also hold considerable promise for other applications in palliative care practice, particularly management of opioid-related constipation. We briefly review current understanding of opioid receptors, focusing on their complex role in gastrointestinal physiology. We summarize the pharmacology, conventional indications, and clinical usage of three major groups of opioid antagonists, including a promising new peripherally acting agent, methylnaltrexone, which is not commercially available. We suggest an approach to administering opioid antagonists for reduction of life-threatening opioid toxicity in patients with pain. The literature on opioid-induced constipation and its treatment with opioid-antagonists is reviewed in detail. Finally, other potential uses of opioid antagonists in palliative care are described, especially strategies for reducing such opioid side effects as nausea and pruritus and for improving analgesia or reducing tolerance by concomitantly administrating both an opioid agonist and low dosages of an antagonist.
 ...
PMID:Opioid antagonists: a review of their role in palliative care, focusing on use in opioid-related constipation. 1218 97

Administration of opioids to alleviate moderate to severe acute pain and chronic cancer pain is an established management process. However, advancements in clinical pharmacologic research have shown that opioids are also effective in chronic noncancerous pain. Many patients properly treated for prolonged periods with opioids develop tolerance and subsequently, physical dependence. This process is not necessarily harmful to the patient and will not cause the patient to develop an addiction (properly defined as psychologic dependence). For many patients who have been on opioid therapy for months or years, analgesic effectiveness tragically becomes less. In addition, opioid-induced constipation can be severe and cause pain; patients do not develop tolerance to this adverse reaction. Therefore, such issues become a management problem and require additional intervention. Currently, many different classes of drugs can serve as effective adjuncts to opioids for treatment of pain. Adding adjunctive medication to opioid therapy improves pain management primarily by nonopioid mechanisms of action. Clinical outcomes of such combinations include greater analgesia and attenuation of opioid-induced adverse reactions such as nausea and vomiting, constipation, sedation, and respiratory depression. Adjuncts include acetaminophen, antiarrhythmics, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, antipsychotics, baclofen, benzodiazepines, capsaicin, calcium channel blockers, clonidine hydrochloride, central nervous system stimulants, corticosteroids, local anesthetics, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, pentoxifylline, and scopolamine. Some adjuncts (eg, acetaminophen) are routinely used today, whereas others (eg, nifedipine [calcium channel blocker]) are used on a limited basis but have great potential for more widespread application. All professionals (eg, nurses, pharmacists, physicians, physicians' assistants, social workers, members of the clergy) involved in treating patients with unresolved pain recognize this to be an extraordinary and delicate time. It is when patients are likely to request physicians to provide some method to accelerate their death. Thus, inadequate analgesia can become a suicidogen, ie, any factor that causes a patient to want to commit suicide. Incorporation of adjuncts to opioid therapy can serve to lessen pain and improve quality of life for a suffering patient.
 ...
PMID:Adjuncts to opioid therapy. 1235 36

Dihydroetorphine (DHE) is one of the strongest analgesic opioid alkaloids known; it is 1000 to 12000 times more potent than morphine. Several in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that DHE is a selective mu-opioid receptor (OP(3)) agonist that also binds and activates all human recombinant mu-, delta-, and kappa-opioid receptors (OP(3), OP(1), and OP(2)). The onset of the analgesic effect of DHE in rodents is rapid, 5 to 15 min after parenteral administration; the duration of action is short, the analgesic effect disappears within 120 min after administration. By oral administration much higher doses of DHE are required to produce analgesic effects. These characteristics are accounted for by the pharmacokinetic properties of DHE in the rat, namely, by rapid distribution of DHE from the injection site to the brain and rapid metabolism by glucuronidation in the gut and liver followed by elimination into the bile. Continuous infusion and repeated administration of DHE lead to the development of tolerance to analgesia, physical dependence, and a rewarding effect in normal rats but not in animals with formalin-induced inflammation. Although formalin-induced inflammation is only one type of pain stimulus, these findings suggest that DHE addiction would be observed only in the case of pain-free conditions. Clinical reports in China show that sublingual doses of DHE, 20 to 180 microg, produce a potent analgesic effect with only mild side effects, including dizziness, somnolence, nausea, vomiting, constipation, and shortness of breath. To improve the short-lasting effect following sublingual administration, transdermal delivery of DHE via a patch has been investigated. The patch formulation of DHE produces continuous analgesic effect with minimal physical dependence and rewarding effect in rats suffering from chronic pain. This patch formulation, which is very suitable for DHE, may be viable for the treatment of severe pain and is likely to improve patients' quality of life.
 ...
PMID:Dihydroetorphine: a potent analgesic: pharmacology, toxicology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical effects. 1248 Nov 94

The management of patients with chronic pain is a common clinical challenge. Indeed, chronic pain is often inadequately controlled in patients with cancer and in those with non-cancer chronic pain. Because of the complex nature of chronic pain, successful long-term treatment is more difficult than for acute pain. Most often acute pain is nociceptive, whereas chronic pain can be nociceptive (i.e., in response to noxious stimuli), neuropathic (i.e., initiated by a primary lesion or dysfunction in the nervous system) or mixed in origin. Opioids are the current standard of care for the treatment of moderate or severe nociceptive pain. Opioids mediate their actions by binding and activating receptors both in the peripheral nervous system and those that are found in inhibitory pain circuits that descend from the midbrain to the spinal cord dorsal horn. Opioid agonists exert a number of physiological responses including analgesia, which increases with increasing doses. The use of opioids to manage pain in patients with cancer is well accepted. The WHO step-wise algorithm for analgesic therapy based on pain severity reserves the use of opioid therapy for moderate and severe pain. The WHO algorithm has proven to be highly effective for the management of cancer pain. However, the use of opioids to treat patients with chronic non-cancer pain is controversial because of concerns about efficacy and safety, and the possibility of addiction or abuse. The results of clinical surveys and retrospective case series involving patients with non-cancer chronic pain have been inconsistent in regard to resolving these controversial issues. The oral route of drug administration is most appropriate for patients receiving opioids; although rectal, transdermal and parenteral routes of administration are used in specific situations. For continuous chronic pain, opioids should be administered around-the-clock and several long-acting formulations are available that require administration only once or twice daily. Opioid doses should be titrated according to agent-specific schedules to maximise pain relief and maintain tolerability. Adverse effects include constipation, nausea and vomiting, sedation, cognitive impairment and respiratory depression. Tolerance to the analgesic and adverse effects as well as physical dependence, which causes withdrawal symptoms upon discontinuance, may occur with opioid use. Estimates of addiction rates among patients with chronic non-cancer pain range from 3.2 to 18.9%. Successful pain treatment and symptom management is an attainable goal for the majority of patients with chronic pain. Further controlled clinical trials are needed to define the role of opioid therapy in chronic non-cancer pain, and to establish criteria for patient selection and specific treatment algorithms.
 ...
PMID:Responsible prescribing of opioids for the management of chronic pain. 1248 20


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>