Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0344307 (analgesia)
 28,200 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

This study examined the efficacy and toxicity associated with chronic epidural opioid-bupivacaine infusions. In a series of 68 patients with cancer pain refractory to epidural opioids alone, analgesia was effectively regained by infusing a opioid-bupivacaine combination. Sixty-one patients (90%) were considered treatment successes, according to conventional criteria. Median length of therapy was 60-120 days, with the longest infusion lasting 277 days. Chronic bupivacaine infusion concentrations ranged from 0.1 to 0.5% with infusion rates varying from 4 to 18 ml/h. The majority of patients experienced pain relief with little or no sympathetic or sensorimotor impairment after the first 24 h at bupivacaine concentrations of 0.125-0.25% and were managed in home or chronic care settings without the need for re-hospitalization. In patients receiving higher bupivacaine concentrations, sympathetic, sensory and motor blockade were well tolerated during chronic infusion. Sensory loss was consistently observed only at bupivacaine concentrations exceeding 0.25%, and motor impairment occurred only at concentrations exceeding 0.35%. Postural hypotension was observed in 6 patients (9%) for the first 24 h only, which supports the requirement for monitoring and fluid therapy during initiation of the bupivacaine infusion. No patient experienced CNS or systemic toxicity, despite plasma total bupivacaine concentrations as high as 10.8 micrograms/ml. Serial plasma bupivacaine levels were measured in 15 patients during chronic infusion. There was considerable inter- and intra-individual variability in plasma bupivacaine concentrations and bupivacaine clearance. We conclude that epidural opioid-bupivacaine infusion is an effective and safe technique for long-term administration of analgesics in the refractory cancer patient.
 ...
PMID:Chronic epidural bupivacaine-opioid infusion in intractable cancer pain. 148 24

Spinal analgesia, a new method for relieving refractory cancer pain, was tested in 19 patients. A catheter was installed in the subarachnoid (17 cases) or peridural (2 cases) space and connected to a subcutaneous site of injection. The success rate at 10 days was 68%. In 11 patients pain was relieved throughout the course of the malignant disease, with doses that did not exceed 6 mg in 7 patients and 10 mg in the remaining 4 patients. The most severe complications were leakage of the cerebrospinal fluid in 1 case, meningitis after 18 months of injection in 1 case and displacement of the catheter in 3 cases.
 ...
PMID:[Refractory cancer pain. Subarachnoid or epidural administration of morphine]. 295 74

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, adverse effects, and dosage and administration of tramadol are reviewed. Tramadol is a synthetic analogue of codeine that binds to mu opiate receptors and inhibits norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake. It is rapidly and extensively absorbed after oral doses and is metabolized in the liver. Analgesia begins within one hour and starts to peak in two hours. In patients with moderate postoperative pain, i.v. or i.m. tramadol is roughly equal in efficacy to meperidine or morphine; for severe acute pain, tramadol is less effective than morphine. Oral tramadol can also be effective after certain types of surgery. Tramadol and meperidine are equally effective in postoperative patient-controlled analgesia. In epidural administration for pain after abdominal surgery, tramadol is more effective than bupivacaine but less effective than morphine. In patients with ureteral calculi, both dipyrone and butylscopolamine are more effective than tramadol. For labor pain, i.m. tramadol works as well as meperidine and is less likely to cause neonatal respiratory depression. Oral tramadol is as effective as codeine for acute dental pain. In several types of severe or refractory cancer pain, tramadol is effective, but less so than morphine; for other types of chronic pain, such as low-back pain, oral tramadol works as well as acetaminophen-codeine. Common adverse effects of tramadol include dizziness, nausea, dry mouth, and sedation. The abuse potential seems low. The recommended oral dosage is 50-100 mg every four to six hours. Tramadol is an effective, if expensive, alternative to other analgesics in some clinical situations.
 ...
PMID:Tramadol: a new centrally acting analgesic. 907 93

Certain types of cancer pain fail to respond well either to systemic drug therapy or to spinal opioids because of the occurrence of intolerable adverse effects. In addition to spinal opioids other drugs may produce an antinociceptive effect when administered by the spinal route, such as local anesthetics, NSAID, alpha 2-agonists, calcium-channel blockers, NMDA antagonists, cholinergic drugs, peptides such as somatostatin, octreotide or calcitonin, adenosine agonists, benzodiazepines, neurokinin and cholecystokinin antagonists, nitric oxide synthase inhibitors, corticosteroids, and enkephalinase inhibitors. All these drugs may be administered in combination between them, realising the so called balanced spinal analgesia. The aim of this study is to analyse: the available methods for the evaluation of pharmacological interactions, the types of interaction between different spinal antinociceptive drugs and the role of balanced spinal analgesia in the treatment of cancer pain. Analysis of the presented data shows that the spinal synergism between opioids-local anesthetics and opioids-alpha 2-agonists can be useful in the treatment of opioid refractory cancer pain. Furthermore, the use of cholinergic drugs combined with opioids and alpha 2-agonists may be promising. Finally, even if the synergism between NSAID or NMDA antagonists with opioids or alpha 2-agonists have been proved, at the moment their use in man by the spinal route is not advisable because of the absence of adequate studies on their neurotoxicity and adverse effects.
 ...
PMID:[Balanced spinal analgesia in the treatment of oncologic pain. Review of the literature]. 910 86

Ever since the application in 1980 of morphine for spinal analgesia in patients with refractory cancer pain, spinal infusion therapy has become one of the cornerstones for the management of chronic, medically intractable pain. Initially, spinal infusion therapy was indicated only for patients with cancer pain that could not be adequately controlled with systemic narcotics. However, over the past decade, there has been a significant increase in the number of pumps implanted for the treatment of nonmalignant pain. Indeed, "benign" pain syndromes, particularly failed back surgery syndrome, are the most common indication for intrathecal opiates. As we have gained more experience with this therapy, it has become apparent that even intrathecal opiates, when administered in the long term, can be associated with problems such as tolerance, hyperalgesia, and other side effects. Consequently, long-term efficacy has not been as significant as had been hoped. Because of the difficulties associated with long-term intrathecal opiate therapy, much of the research, both basic and clinical, has focused on developing alternative nonopioid agents to be used either alone or in combination with opiates. Clinical trials have been and continue to be conducted to evaluate drugs such as clonidine, SNX-111, local anesthetics, baclofen, and many other less common agents to determine their efficacy and potential toxicity for intrathecal therapy. This article reviews the agents developed as alternatives to intrathecal opiates.
 ...
PMID:Neuraxial infusion in patients with chronic intractable cancer and noncancer pain. 1130 12

The use of opioids presents practitioners with many challenges, such as the variation in responses and side effects seen with traditional methods of administration. This has prompted an increase in the consideration of the intrathecal route for the management of patients with refractory cancer pain. Although this has increased the therapeutic options available to patients, it has also led to more complicated pain management strategies. In Perth, Western Australia, it was identified that clinical variations, especially in the programming of the pump maintenance of the filters and associated dressings, occurred between service providers, causing confusion and anxiety for patients, families and practitioners. This article discusses a review of nursing management of patients receiving intrathecal analgesia and the collaboration of all services in the development of evidence-based policy.
 ...
PMID:Intrathecal catheters: developing consistency in filter use and dressings in Perth, Australia. 1292 Apr 51

The present study evaluated the safety and efficacy of patient-activated delivery of intrathecal morphine sulfate boluses delivered by way of a novel internalized intrathecal delivery system. Patients with refractory cancer pain or uncontrollable side effects were enrolled at 17 US and international sites in this prospective, open-label study. Pain relief, reduction in systemic opioid use, and reduction in opioid-related complications were analyzed both individually and together as a measure of overall success. One hundred forty-nine patients were enrolled and 119 were implanted. Average numeric analog scale pain decreased from 6.1 to 4.2 at 1 month and was maintained through month 7 (P <.01) and through month 13 (P <.05). Systemic opioid use was significantly decreased throughout the study (P <.01). Significant reduction in the opioid complication severity index was demonstrated at all 4 follow-up visits (P <.01). Overall success (>/=50% reduction in numeric analog scale pain, use of systemic opioids, or opioid complication severity index) was reported in 83%, 90%, 85%, and 91% of patients at months 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. This study demonstrated that patients with refractory cancer pain or intolerable side effects achieved better analgesia when managed with patient-activated intrathecal delivery of morphine sulfate via an implanted delivery system.
 ...
PMID:Long-term intrathecal opioid therapy with a patient-activated, implanted delivery system for the treatment of refractory cancer pain. 1504 22

The use of neuraxial (intrathecal and epidural) analgesia has been suggested in treatment guidelines put forth for the treatment of refractory cancer pain. We review the literature and present our algorithm for using neuraxial analgesia. We also present our outcomes using this algorithm over a 28-month period. We used neuraxial analgesia in 87 of 4,107 patients, approximately 2% of those seen for pain consultation. Evaluation of those patients at an 8-week follow-up revealed improved pain control. After institution of neuraxial analgesia, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of patients with severe pain (defined as a "pain worst" score in the severe range of 7-10), from 86% to 17%, noted to be highly statistically significant. At follow-up, numerical pain scores decreased significantly from 7.9 +/- 1.6 to 4.1 +/- 2.3. No difference was noted between the intrathecal and epidural groups. Oral opioid intake after instituting neuraxial analgesia revealed a significant decrease from 588 mg/day oral morphine equivalents to 294 mg/day. At follow-up, self-reported drowsiness and mental clouding (0-10) also significantly decreased from 6.2 +/- 3.0 and 5.4 +/- 3.4 to 3.2 +/- 3.0 and 3.1 +/- 3.0, respectively. This retrospective review shows promising efficacy of neuraxial analgesia in the context of failing medical management.
 ...
PMID:Epidural and intrathecal analgesia is effective in treating refractory cancer pain. 1536 98

Most patients with cancer pain achieve good analgesia using traditional analgesics and adjuvant medications; however, an important minority of patients (2% to 5%) suffers from severe and refractory cancer pain. For these individuals, spinal analgesics (intrathecal or epidural) provide significant hope for pain relief over months or years of treatment to help improve quality of life. Spinal analgesics have been suggested as the fourth step in the World Health Organization guidelines in the management of cancer pain, and thus the pain physician should be familiar with principles of use. Most patients achieve pain relief using spinal analgesics, with a minimum of complications that are easily managed at home. A variety of opioids, local anesthetics, clonidine, ketamine, and other analgesics are available for the spinal route of administration and should be titrated to clinical effect or intolerable side effect. This article discusses the appropriate selection of patients for spinal analgesics, reviews current recommended infusion systems and current spinal analgesics, discusses possible complications, and includes practical suggestions for patient management.
 ...
PMID:Neuraxial pain relief for intractable cancer pain. 1768 92

For more than 20 years morphine for spinal analgesia in patients with refractory cancer pain has been one of the cornerstones for the management of chronic, medically intractable pain. In general, most types of cancer pain are treatable following the guideline of Cancer Pain Relief well established by the WHO. However, some patient are unable to tolerate pain only following the guideline and often suffer with side-effects from high doses of opioid and from prescribed multiple adjuvant drugs. Due to the proximity to the receptor sites, the therapeutic efficacy of intrathecal opioid application lasts longer and also reduces systemic side effects. Intrathecal drug application is cost effective and can significantly improve the quality of life in selected patients with limited life expectancy. However, an intensive training of physicians, careful patient selection, awareness of specific complications, and arrangement of social back-up medical system are essential to commence intrathecal morphine application using implantable access port. This article introduces the basic idea of intrathecal morphine therapy with implantable access port (not pumps) as cost effective, alternative therapy for cancer patient suffering from intractable pain.
 ...
PMID:[Intrathecal morphine treatment in advanced cancer pain patients]. 1992 5


1 2 Next >>