Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0344307 (
analgesia
)
28,200
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The present study was designed to compare the hemodynamic changes of epidural bupivacaine (EB) with epidural sufentanil (ES), supplemented by general anesthesia, in patients scheduled for abdominal aorto-iliac surgery. Twenty-eight
ASA
Grade 2 patients randomly received bupivacaine 0.5%, 1-1.5 mg kg-1 (n = 14) or sufentanil 150 micrograms (n = 14) epidurally at T12-L1, combined with light general anesthesia. Hemodynamics were measured before (T1) and after (T2) injection of EB or ES, after induction of general anesthesia (T3), and during the aortic dissection period (T4). EB or ES injection both produced a significant decrease in systolic, mean and diastolic blood pressure, left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) and coronary perfusion pressure (CPP). The induction of general anesthesia caused a significant fall in heart rate (HR) and cardiac index (CI) in the ES group. Abdominal dissection restored systemic pressure and cardiac index in the ES group. It was concluded that both ES and EB provided adequate
analgesia
and hemodynamics during tracheal intubation and abdominal dissection for aorto-iliac surgery.
...
PMID:Epidural bupivacaine versus epidural sufentanil anesthesia: hemodynamic differences during induction of anesthesia and abdominal dissection in aortic surgery. 130 Aug 56
So as to determine the effects of some factors on the duration of bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia, a prospective controlled study was carried out on 152
ASA
I or II patients. They were randomly allocated to six groups. The patients of group I were given 4 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine at 27 degrees C. The patients of group II were given 4 ml of a mixture including 3 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, 1 ml fentanyl in 1 ml of 10% dextrose solution. The group III was given 4 ml of a mixture including 3 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, 0.20 mg adrenaline. The group IV was given 4 ml of a mixture including 3 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, 0.15 mg clonidine. The patients of group V were given 4 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine at 20 degrees C and those of group VI were given 4 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine at 5 degrees C. There is significant difference between regression times of sensory
analgesia
of group II and group I, group IV and group III, group VI and group V. The choice of product to lengthen
analgesia
in spinal anaesthesia depends on the use of each anaesthesist, the characteristic of patients and the duration of surgery.
...
PMID:[Factors changing the length of analgesia in spinal anesthesia]. 134 Nov 33
The analgesic efficacy and safety of a single caudal injection of a bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture was investigated in this prospective, controlled, triple-blinded study of 34 children, aged 1-11 yr and of
ASA
physical status I-II undergoing urological surgery. After induction of anaesthesia and before surgery, the children were randomly assigned to receive a caudal injection of 1.0 ml.kg-1 bupivacaine 0.125% with epinephrine 1:400,000 and either fentanyl 1.0 microgram.kg-1 in 1.0 ml of normal saline or 1.0 ml of normal saline. After completion of surgery, patients were assessed in the recovery room for six hours from the time of the caudal injection and for a further 18 hr on the ward. While in the recovery room arterial oxygen saturation and respiratory rate were monitored continuously and recorded hourly together with end-tidal carbon dioxide, pain and sedation scores. Other complications were also recorded. While on the ward, pain and sedation scores, respiratory rate and side effects were recorded every two hours. Postoperative
analgesia
was provided by intravenous morphine. Analgesic requirements were recorded for the 24-hr study period. Pain and sedation scores did not differ between groups. Respiratory depression or hypoxia did not occur. The incidences of other side effects did not differ. There were no differences in the numbers of patients requiring morphine within eight hours, the time to first morphine administration or the total morphine requirements. We conclude that a single caudal injection of a bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture with epinephrine administered prior to surgery, while safe, offers no advantage over an injection of bupivacaine 0.125% with epinephrine for paediatric urological surgery.
...
PMID:Analgesic efficacy and safety of a caudal bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture in children. 139 53
A randomized, double-blind true experimental design with a post-test only was chosen to determine if the addition of sodium bicarbonate to 2-chloroprocaine would result in a longer duration of epidural
analgesia
, as well as increase the quality of pain relief in stage I parturients receiving a continuous bupivacaine epidural infusion. The experimental group (number (N) = 16) received sodium bicarbonate and 2-chloroprocaine followed by a continuous bupivacaine epidural infusion. The control group (N = 15) received normal saline and 2-chloroprocaine followed by a continuous bupivacaine epidural infusion. Only
ASA
I or II patients in stage I labor were included in this study. Measures of pain perception were made using a self-report, visual analog scale. Measures also were made of the quality and duration of block over time, the intensity of motor block over time, and the blood pressure over time. The cephalad dermatome level of
analgesia
was determined by pinprick. A record of the need for a supplemental bolus of local anesthetic to maintain a sensory level of T-10 was also recorded. The mean self-perceived level of pain was significantly different for the two groups (P = .024). Moreover, the pattern of self-perceived level of pain over time differs for the two groups in a significant way (P = .023). Additional bolus injections occurred nine times in the control group and six times in the experimental group. The differences were not found to be significant (P > .106). The differences in time and amount of local anesthetic delivered were also found to be trivial (P > .80).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:The effect of pH-adjusted 2-chloroprocaine on the duration and quality of pain relief with a subsequent continuous epidural bupivacaine infusion. 141 79
A prospective study was carried out to compare the qualities of spinal block with those of combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia (CSEA). It included 63 patients, ranked
ASA
1 or 2, aged between 35 and 75 years, scheduled for gynaecological surgery due to last more than 2 hours, and randomly allocated to two groups. In the first group (n = 34), spinal anaesthesia was carried out with the patients sitting, in the L3-4 interspace, using 15 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine with 0.4 mg of adrenaline. In the second group (n = 29), a catheter was inserted in the epidural space through the L2-3 interspace, and spinal anaesthesia carried out as in the first group, using bupivacaine without adrenaline. Once the highest level of
analgesia
had been reached, aliquots of 0.5% plain bupivacaine were injected through the epidural catheter, until anaesthesia of T5 was obtained. In the spinal group, general anaesthesia was required in 3 cases, as anaesthesia only reached the T12 level in 2 cases, and as surgery lasted longer than the spinal in the third one. In the CSEA group, excellent
analgesia
was obtained in all patients. Sensory blockade lasted 308 +/- 48 min at the T12 level, versus 162 +/- 51 min in the spinal group (p < 0.025), and 361 +/- 51 min at the L2 level, versus 210 < 44 min in the other group (p < 0.025). "Topping up" was possible with the epidural catheter only, thus raising the level of sensory blockade, making it deeper, and increasing its duration. It avoids the use of general anaesthesia in case of failed spinal blockade.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:[Comparative study of conventional spinal anesthesia and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in gynecological surgery]. 141 71
80 patients (
ASA
I-III, mean age 40-50 years, mean weight 59-68 kg) recovering from major gynaecological surgery (170-200 min) under balanced anaesthesia were randomly assigned to four groups to self-administer intravenous fentanyl during the early postoperative period. PCA devices were ODAC and Prominject with fentanyl demand doses of 34.5 or 34 micrograms, respectively, and lockout times of 1 or 5 min. Concurrent fentanyl infusion was none (group Prom), fixed-rate with 4 micrograms/h (group ODACf), tail-dose, i.e., a fixed-rate infusion with 17 mg/h for a maximum of 60 minutes following a valid demand (group Prom(t)), or adaptive, starting with 4 micrograms/h and being adapted to individual needs depending on total fentanyl consumption in the latest 60-minute period (group ODACa). Data were collected for fentanyl consumption, venous fentanyl serum concentrations in fixed intervals, actual and retrospective verbal rating pain scores (0-5), haemodynamic variables, respiratory rate, side effects and patients' acceptance. Mean duration of patient-controlled
analgesia
(PCA) was 15-17 hrs. During this period, an average of 12-18 demands were administered per patient, resulting in an average fentanyl consumption of 36-52 micrograms/h (0.57-0.94 micrograms/kg/h). Analgesic efficacy was good in all groups, mean pain scores ranging from 0.4 to 1.1 (actual) and 1.7 to 2.2 (retrospective). Mean duration of a single fentanyl bolus dose was highly variable, ranging from 58 to 90 min if calculated for the total observation period. Statistically significant differences were found for none of the above mentioned PCA parameters. As a trend, the adaptive-rate infusion strategy was favoured (lowest demand rate, best retrospective pain scores).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:[Clinical comparison of various infusion regimens within the scope of postoperative on demand analgesia with fentanyl]. 145 Mar 9
At the beginning, the way intrathecal morphine was used for postoperative pain relief was quite unfortunate, because the doses derived from experience with morphine-tolerant cancer patients were considerably too high and respiratory depression occurred frequently. Subsequent dose-finding studies showed that the doses of morphine used initially could be reduced by a factor of ten without loss of the analgesic effect and with a marked reduction in side-effects. No respiratory depression has been reported when doses below 0.1 mg morphine are used. METHOD. In this prospective study the effect of 0.06 to 0.08 mg intrathecal morphine, mixed with the local anaesthetic for spinal anesthesia, was investigated in surgical patients aged 21 to 81 years,
ASA
grade I or II, scheduled for orthopaedic operations or herniorraphies. Thirty unpremedicated patients were enrolled in the study and were, after informed consent, randomly allocated to a control group without morphine or to a morphine group. The analgesic effect was assessed by the time interval between the administration of the spinal anaesthesia and the first demand for an analgesic medication. The mood state was evaluated with the adjective checklist of Janke and Debus 6 h after the spinal anaesthesia. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. In the control group half of the patients asked for an analgesic medication within 275 min (median) after the spinal anaesthesia, and all patients within 420 min, whereas in the morphine group half of the patients asked for an analgesic within 1170 min (median). Seven patients had not required an analgesic at the termination of the observation period 20 h after the spinal anaesthesia. The mood status showed no difference between the two groups, in particular, no dizziness or drowsiness after morphine. There was no difference in the incidence of side-effects such as nausea or urinary retention between the two groups. Pruritus was not reported spontaneously but was found upon questioning in five patients. It was in no case disturbing. CONCLUSIONS. Morphine (0.06 to 0.08 mg) mixed with the local anaesthetic for spinal anaesthesia provided for an
analgesia
of more than 20 h duration in half of the patients. This technique is safe, simple, reliable and virtually free of side-effects. No particular supervision due to the administration of intrathecal morphine is necessary in this dose range if systemic opiates are avoided. If the
analgesia
is unsatisfactory, a non-opioid analgesic is recommended.
...
PMID:[Intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain]. 146 57
A double-blind study was undertaken to investigate the effect of prewarmed local anaesthetic solution on the latency of onset of caudal blocks. Forty-four (
ASA
I-II) patients were allocated into two equal groups. In Group A, the local anaesthetic solutions were injected at room temperature (25 degrees C), while in Group B, they were injected at 37 degrees C. All the caudal blocks were performed using 20 ml of lignocaine 1.5% with adrenaline 1:200,000. The speed of onset of perianal
analgesia
was found to be significantly faster (39%) with the prewarmed local anaesthetic solution (P < 0.05). No adverse effects were observed.
...
PMID:Use of warm local anaesthetic solution for caudal blocks. 146 71
This double blind study aimed to assess the effects of a continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion of morphine added to an intermittent bolus patient controlled
analgesia
on morphine demand and related side-effects. Patients scheduled for abdominal and thoracic surgery (
ASA
2 or 3) were randomly allocated postoperatively to three groups (n = 10 each): group 1 were given i.v. boluses of 2 mg of morphine (lockout interval = 15 min); the other two groups were given the same boluses as well as a continuous i.v. infusion of either 1 mg.kg-1 of morphine (group 2) or 2 mg.kg-1 (group 3). Pain was assessed with a visual analog scale before starting
analgesia
, and after 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 16, 24 and 36 h. Total and bolus morphine doses were recorded at the same time. Breathing rate and the level of sedation were measured every hour and blood gases every time 40 mg of morphine had been consumed. Morphine administration was stopped if breathing rate decreased to less than 10 c.min-1, the patient became too sedated, or PaCO2 rose to more than 45 mmHg. Pain scores were similar in the three groups. Total amounts of morphine were higher in groups 2 (56.8 +/- 23.8 mg) and 3 (116.2 +/- 41.8 mg) compared with group 1 (38.2 +/- 17.8 mg) (p < 0.05). Morphine administration was stopped in 5 patients in group 3 and in 1 in group 2 because PaCO2 had risen to more than 45 mmHg. Therefore, a continuous i.v. infusion is not required in patients receiving PCA, all the more so as this has deleterious respiratory effects.
...
PMID:[Patient-controlled analgesia: effect of adding continuous infusion of morphine]. 147 77
A study of the duration of
analgesia
and of the respiratory response to hypercapnia was carried out in 14 children who had had a caudal block with either bupivacaine alone (group B) or combined with fentanyl (Group B+F). Fourteen
ASA
I or II 5 to 10-year-old children undergoing genital and urinary surgery were included. They were not premedicated. At first, general anaesthesia was induced with halothane and nitrous oxide in oxygen. Thereafter, caudal anaesthesia was then carried out with 1 ml.kg-1 of 0.25% bupivacaine with adrenaline 1 in 200,000. Group B+F patients were also given 1 microgram.kg-1 of fentanyl in 1 ml of normal saline, and those in Group B 1 ml of normal saline. The level of sensory loss on leaving the operating theatre as well as the duration of motor paralysis were monitored. Postoperative pain was scored with Hannalah and Broadman's score (0 to 10) 2, 4, 8 and 24 h after the caudal block. Respiratory rate (fR), tidal volume (VT) and minute ventilation (VE) were assessed 10 min before induction of general anaesthesia, and 30, 60 and 120 min after the caudal anaesthesia. Petco2 was also measured before induction of general anaesthesia, and 60 and 120 min after caudal anaesthesia; at the same times, the ventilatory response to hypercapnia was assessed using Read's method with a Douglas bag containing 7% CO2 and 93% O2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
...
PMID:[Caudal block in children: analgesia and respiratory effect of the combination bupivacaine-fentanyl]. 150 85
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next >>