Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0344232 (blurred vision)
 2,072 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are a tribute to the ingenuity of pharmacologists and designers of molecules. Not only do these drugs have remarkable selectivity for the reuptake of serotonin compared with other monoamines, but also they have a commendable lack of affinity for receptors including the serotonin receptor. In contrast, the classical tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are less specific in their pharmacological action. In addition to inhibiting the reuptake of serotonin, TCAs inhibit the uptake of noradrenaline, dopamine and tyramine, and antagonize cholinergic (muscarinic), adrenergic and histaminergic receptors. Moreover, TCAs have quinidine-like anti-arrhythmic activity and lower the seizure threshold. Clinical investigations have shown that the SSRIs have equivalent therapeutic efficacy compared with the TCAs in the treatment of depression. However, the pharmacological specificity of the SSRIs is a clinical advantage since they lack the propensity to cause dry mouth, blurred vision, urinary hesitancy, constipation, hypotension and arrhythmia. Furthermore, the SSRIs are relatively safe in overdosage. The similarities between the SSRIs are more obvious than their differences: all are highly potent and selective inhibitors of serotonin reuptake with efficacy in the treatment of depression. Nevertheless, each has a distinctive pharmacological profile. In this review the characteristics desired in an "ideal" antidepressant are examined, and the ways in which the TCAs and SSRIs fit this ideal are compared.
 ...
PMID:Clinical implications of the pharmacology of serotonin reuptake inhibitors. 148 74

Disabling orthostatic hypotension, due to insufficiency of the autonomic nervous system, is a common complication of type I familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy (FAP). We investigated whether oral treatment with L-threo-3,4-dihydroxyphenylserine (L-threo-Dops), a noradrenaline precursor, might be of therapeutical benefit. In twenty untreated FAP patients, aged 33 to 44 years, who, because of severe orthostatic hypotension, were bedridden or constrained to a sitting life, supine and erect blood pressure (BP), plasma noradrenaline and tilting time, defined as the interval (s) between the beginning of a 60 degrees head-up tilt and the occurrence of orthostatic symptoms (dizziness, blurred vision or near syncope) were determined before and at repeated intervals during oral treatment with L-threo-Dops, 100 mg bid, for 6 months. Before treatment supine mean BP was 80 (76-85) mmHg (mean and 95% CI), supine plasma noradrenaline was low, 59 (41-77) pg/ml and tilting time ranged from 38 to 118 s. In response to tilt, mean BP immediately fell by 36 (31-41) mmHg, whereas plasma noradrenaline increased by only 11 (0-21) pg/ml (p = 0.05). After 3 to 5 days of treatment with L-threo-Dops all patients experienced marked improvement of their orthostatic tolerance as reflected by their ability to walk freely around. This effect sustained throughout the six months of treatment. Plasma noradrenaline increased moderately by 37 (11-63) pg/ml (p = 0.02) and supine mean BP increased by 8.6 (5.8-12.4) mmHg (p < 0.001) during chronic treatment. Supine or nocturnal hypertension did not develop, the fall in mean BP in response to tilt diminished by 12.5 (6.5-17.3) mmHg (p < 0.001) and tilting time became longer than 600 s in all patients. Because of its efficacy, its sustained duration of action and the lack of side effects, L-threo-Dops is advocated to improve orthostatic tolerance in patients with autonomic insufficiency due to FAP.
 ...
PMID:Improved orthostatic tolerance in familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy with unnatural noradrenaline precursor L-threo-3,4-dihydroxyphenylserine. 902 51

The efficacy and tolerability of reboxetine, a unique selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, were compared with those of placebo in a 6-week, randomized, double-blind study of hospitalized patients with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Fifty-two patients (25 in the placebo group, 27 in the reboxetine group) were included in the efficacy analysis. Sixteen (64%) of those in the placebo group and four (15%) in the reboxetine group were withdrawn during the study because of lack of efficacy. Improvement in the mean Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) total score at last assessment was significantly greater in the reboxetine group than in the placebo group (p < 0.001). Similarly, the response rate to treatment, defined as > or =50% reduction in HAM-D total score, was 74% for patients who received reboxetine compared with 20% for those who received placebo (p < 0.001). A significantly greater response with reboxetine than with placebo was seen as early as day 10 of treatment (p = 0.006). The therapeutic efficacy of reboxetine was substantiated by improvement in mean scores on the Zung Self-Rating Scale and on the Clinical Global Impression Severity of Illness and Global Improvement scales. Reboxetine was well tolerated, and only one patient in each group withdrew because of adverse events. Dry mouth, insomnia, blurred vision, sweating, and constipation were recorded more frequently in the reboxetine group than in the placebo group. There was a tendency toward orthostatic changes in the systolic blood pressure, but this was not clinically significant. This study demonstrated that reboxetine is significantly more effective than placebo in the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe major depressive disorder and is well tolerated.
 ...
PMID:Double-blind, placebo-controlled study with reboxetine in inpatients with severe major depressive disorder. 1065 5