Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0344232 (blurred vision)
2,072 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A wealth of clinical evidence supports the view that muscarinic receptor antagonists are effective in the treatment of overactive bladder. However, treatment-limiting adverse effects such as dry mouth, constipation, and blurred vision have restricted the usefulness of previously available agents, such as oxybutynin. A real need therefore existed for effective and well-tolerated agents for the long-term management of the troublesome symptoms of overactive bladder. This review outlines the various approaches that have been used in attempts to overcome the tolerability problems of oxybutynin. It also describes how advances in our understanding of muscarinic receptors and bladder function has led to the potential development of either tissue- or subtype-selective antimuscarinic agents with improved tolerability. Drugs that have been developed in this way include tolterodine and darifenacin, each of which shows some bladder selectivity in animal models. Unlike darifenacin, however, the bladder selectivity of tolterodine has been confirmed by numerous clinical studies. Tolterodine's improved tolerability compared with oxybutynin, along with its equivalent therapeutic efficacy at recommended dosages, permits patients to experience the beneficial effects of long-term treatment. Tolterodine therefore represents a real alternative for the long-term management of overactive bladder. The results of ongoing clinical studies with darifenacin are awaited before it can be concluded that selective antagonism of M(3) receptors leads to improved tolerability over existing agents in the treatment of overactive bladder. Similarly, the potential improvements in tolerability associated with different dosage formulations of oxybutynin, and the clinical utility of S-oxybutynin, are yet to be conclusively demonstrated.
...
PMID:Muscarinic receptor antagonists in the treatment of overactive bladder. 1076 51

This analysis reviews clinical trials of the efficacy and safety of tolterodine for use in overactive bladder. It also compares the safety and efficacy of tolterodine and previously available pharmacotherapy. The MEDLINE database (1966 to present) was searched for all English language randomized controlled trials with keyword tolterodine. The search retrieved 10 randomized controlled trials involving tolterodine. Studies ranged from 2 to 12 weeks in duration. Nine trials studied tolterodine vs. placebo, 6 compared tolterodine vs. oxybutynin, 6 compared different doses of tolterodine, and 1 compared immediate-release and extended-release tolterodine. Doses of tolterodine were 0.5-4 mg bid or 4 mg extended-release daily, and doses of oxybutynin were 5 mg bid or tid. All studies found a benefit of tolterodine over placebo in decreasing symptoms of overactive bladder. Parameters significantly improved by tolterodine include number of voids per day, urine volume per void, number of incontinent episodes per day, pad use, maximal cystometric capacity, residual volume, volume at first detrusor contraction, and volume at normal desire to void. Tolterodine 2 mg bid was consistently of equal efficacy as oxybutynin 5 mg tid. Adverse events with both medications were mostly dose-related autonomic nervous system events. The most common adverse event was dry mouth, which was both more frequent and more severe with oxybutynin 5 mg tid than with tolterodine 2 mg bid. Dry mouth did not generally result in discontinuation of medication with either drug. Most drug withdrawal was because of blurred vision or headache. Tolterodine 2 mg bid caused less dose reduction, patient withdrawal, and adverse events, especially dry mouth, compared with oxybutynin 5 mg tid. A single trial found tolterodine extended-release 4 mg/day to have improved efficacy for decreasing urge incontinence episodes along with lower frequency of dry mouth vs. immediate-release tolterodine 2 mg bid. At 4 mg bid, tolterodine caused urinary retention. Neither drug significantly altered any laboratory tests, nor was there clear evidence of electrocardiographic abnormalities induced by either drug. In all randomized controlled trials to date, tolterodine 2 mg bid is an equally effective alternative to oxybutynin 5 mg tid, while causing less intense and less frequent dry mouth or need for treatment withdrawal.
...
PMID:Tolterodine: a clinical review. 1170 85