Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0344232 (blurred vision)
 2,072 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Proprietary sleep aids and sedatives can cause delirium, coma and occasionally death in children and adults. The constituents in sleep aids that significantly effect central nervous system activity are bromides, methapyrilene, pyrilamine and scopolamine (hyoscine). Constituent proportions and mixtures vary greatly at different times since manufacturers make frequent adjustments. The effects of toxicity resulting from the misuse of ethylenediamines include nausea, vomiting, blurred vision, incoordination, tremors, dry mouth, constipation and an acute poisoning syndrome. Management of adverse reactions produced by either methapyrilene or pyrilamine consists of dosage reduction or discontinuation. The acute poisoning syndrome requires implementation of general symptomatic and supportive principles.
 ...
PMID:Sleep aids and sedatives. 33 Sep 11

Forty psychiatric out-patients with primary anxiety entered a double-blind trial comparing 2 weeks of treatment with mianserin 30--60 mg daily or diazepam 15--30 mg daily, followed by 2 weeks of single-blind placebo administration. Both drugs were effective anti-anxiety agents, but mianserin was significantly superior in efficacy as measured by the Physician's Global Rating of Severity of Illness. No differences between treatments were apparent using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety. There was no significant differences in terms of side-effects and both drugs increased anticholinergic effects such as dry mouth, blurred vision and constipation over baseline values. With one exception in the mianserin group, all patients who entered placebo treatment became worse.
 ...
PMID:A controlled comparative trial of mianserin and diazepam in the treatment of anxiety states in psychiatric out-patients. 38 99

Simple bedside measurements of blood pressure and systolic pressure response to the Valsalva maneuver will confirm a clinical impression of orthostatic hypotension. Careful questioning of the patient usually elicits other symptoms of autonomic nervous system dysfunction, such as impotence, urinary and fecal incontinence, constipation or diarrhea, blurred vision, or sweating changes. Drugs are the most common cause of autonomic dysfunction, and their benefits should be weighed against the severity of the dysfunction. In addition, diabetes mellitus, uremia, amyloidosis, acute intermittent porphyria, myeloma, tabes dorsalis, and alcohol-nutritional problems may produce symptoms of autonomic dysfunction. Thus, patients who present with autonomic features but no history of dysfunction-producing drugs should undergo complete laboratory evaluation. A regimen of tyramine or L-dopa or a diet rich in cheese, processed meats, and wine (a monoamine), coupled with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor have beneficial effects in patients with orthostatic hypotension due to preganglionic autonomic dysfunction. Patients who do not respond to catecholamine precursors have stable, isolated orthostatic hypotension or a polyneuropathy such as that caused by diabetes.
 ...
PMID:Evaluating dysfunction of the autonomic nervous system. 63 67

Patients were treated with protriptyline or nortriptyline (double-blind). They were assessed on the Zung Depression Scale and on the Hostility and Direction of Hostility Questionnaire (HDHQ). A good response was heralded by low ratings on criticism of self and others,and on projected (paranoid) hostility. The outcome was better with initial low scores on depressive symptoms, particularly unworthiness, restlessness and constipation. As to reported side effects, initial loss of interest augured badly for drowsiness, lack of clear mind for blurred vision, loss of libido for constipation and ideas of suicide for dry mouth.
 ...
PMID:Hostility, somatic symptoms and recovery with antidepressants. 115 28

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are a tribute to the ingenuity of pharmacologists and designers of molecules. Not only do these drugs have remarkable selectivity for the reuptake of serotonin compared with other monoamines, but also they have a commendable lack of affinity for receptors including the serotonin receptor. In contrast, the classical tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) are less specific in their pharmacological action. In addition to inhibiting the reuptake of serotonin, TCAs inhibit the uptake of noradrenaline, dopamine and tyramine, and antagonize cholinergic (muscarinic), adrenergic and histaminergic receptors. Moreover, TCAs have quinidine-like anti-arrhythmic activity and lower the seizure threshold. Clinical investigations have shown that the SSRIs have equivalent therapeutic efficacy compared with the TCAs in the treatment of depression. However, the pharmacological specificity of the SSRIs is a clinical advantage since they lack the propensity to cause dry mouth, blurred vision, urinary hesitancy, constipation, hypotension and arrhythmia. Furthermore, the SSRIs are relatively safe in overdosage. The similarities between the SSRIs are more obvious than their differences: all are highly potent and selective inhibitors of serotonin reuptake with efficacy in the treatment of depression. Nevertheless, each has a distinctive pharmacological profile. In this review the characteristics desired in an "ideal" antidepressant are examined, and the ways in which the TCAs and SSRIs fit this ideal are compared.
 ...
PMID:Clinical implications of the pharmacology of serotonin reuptake inhibitors. 148 74

Data from the early stages of the thrombosis prevention trial (TPT) have been used to establish and quantify the risk of extracranial bleeding due to low dose aspirin (75 mg) and low intensity oral anticoagulation with warfarin (international normalised ratio, INR, 1.5) singly or in combination, in men aged between 45 and 69 who are at high risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD). The design of the trial is factorial, the four treatments being combined low dose aspirin and low intensity anticoagulation (WA), low intensity anticoagulation alone (W), low dose aspirin alone (A) and double placebo treatment (P). The trial is being carried out through the Medical Research Council's General Practice Research Framework, with participating practices throughout the United Kingdom. Results are based on the first 3,667 men entered. The risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding due to active treatment is probably about 1 in 500 man-years of treatment, there currently being no difference between the three active regimes (WA, W, A). Intermediate and minor bleeding episodes occur more frequently with WA than with W or A on their own, the excess being mainly due to minor nose bleeds and bruises. In turn, both W and A on their own cause more such minor episodes than placebo treatment, P. There is no evidence that any of the three active regimens increases the risk of peptic ulceration, nor do they increase reports of indigestion. Aspirin increases reports of constipation and reduces reports of blurred vision. Minor bleeding occurs less frequently in smokers than in non-smokers but is not influenced by age. The antithrombotic regimes used are feasible and acceptable.
 ...
PMID:Extra-cranial bleeding and other symptoms due to low dose aspirin and low intensity oral anticoagulation. 151 66

The efficacy and safety of remoxipride in the treatment of schizophrenia were compared with those of haloperidol in a multicentre double-blind 6-week study which was randomized with a parallel group design and was preceded by a washout period. Eighty-nine consecutively admitted men and women meeting the Research Diagnostic Criteria for schizophrenia in an acute phase of the illness were treated with remoxipride 75-300 mg twice daily or haloperidol 5-20 mg twice daily. The efficacy assessments were the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Krawiecka Rating Scale, and Clinical Global Impression. Both antipsychotic drugs produced clinical improvement with no significant differences between the efficacy of the two drugs. There were relatively few side effects. There were significantly fewer extrapyramidal symptoms and instances of blurred vision with remoxipride and less constipation with haloperidol. The results indicate that remoxipride is as effective an antipsychotic as haloperidol. Remoxipride has an advantage over haloperidol in respect to extrapyramidal side effects.
 ...
PMID:Remoxipride and haloperidol in the acute phase of schizophrenia: a double-blind comparison. 197 70

The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of paroxetine with imipramine and placebo in depressed outpatients. Following a 4- to 14-day placebo washout, patients were randomized into treatment groups and received study compound for up to 42 days. At Day 42, paroxetine was significantly more effective than placebo (p less than .05) in several observer- and patient-rated scales: the Retardation and Anxiety/Somatization factors of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Raskin Depression Scale, the Covi Anxiety Scale, the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Improvement Scale, the Symptom Checklist-56 (SCL-56) Total, and the Patient's Global Evaluation (PGE). There were no significant differences between paroxetine and imipramine. Significantly more imipramine (75%) than paroxetine (35%) or placebo (23%) patients reported anticholinergic side effects, including blurred vision (5%, 0%, and 0%, respectively), constipation (35%, 8%, and 15%, respectively), and dry mouth (63%, 25%, and 15%, respectively). The data from this study indicated that paroxetine is a safe, well-tolerated, effective treatment for major depressive disorder.
 ...
PMID:A placebo- and imipramine-controlled study of paroxetine. 214 97

The increasing proportion of elderly to the general population and the relatively high prevalence rate of depression in this age group justifies concern for specific clinical indications for antidepressant selection. Of the numerous agents that possess antidepressant activity, some have a more narrow therapeutic window for the old (lithium), while others may be more efficacious for the old than traditional tricyclics (stimulants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors). Stimulants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors require close monitoring to obviate complications, and this limits their use in this population. Prescription of the more common reuptake inhibitors in this age group can be based on consideration of efficacy and especially predictable incidence of side effects. Efficacy of all the reuptake inhibitors is essentially equivalent over 4 weeks, if the patient can tolerate treatment. Antidepressants with many side effects are, thus, less efficacious if we consider only whether the patient will be better 4 weeks after we start treatment since drop outs must be considered treatment failures for that particular treatment. Side effects are more clearly different among the antidepressants with demonstrably fewer cardiac effects (i.e. ECG changes, orthostatic hypotension) for buproprion, mianserin, nomifensine, and trazodone in the geriatric group compared to older agents such as amitriptyline and imipramine. Further, anticholinergic effects in the periphery (dry mouth, constipation, blurred vision, and urinary hesitancy) and centrally (confusion, sedation, decreased memory recall) are substantially less with several of the newer antidepressants: buproprion, maprotiline, nomifensine and trazodone.
 ...
PMID:Present status of drug therapy of depression in late life. 286 75

1 Preliminary results of a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of mianserin and maprotiline carried out in 58 outpatients with primary depressive illness are reported. 2 Patients received six weeks' treatment with 30 to 90 mg mianserin, 75 to 225 mg maprotiline or one to three capsules of placebo, all medication being taken at night. 3 There were statistically significant improvements in each treatment group and a better response to mianserin than to placebo or maprotiline on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, after one week's treatment. 4 Neither mianserin nor maprotiline was superior to placebo after two or four weeks' treatment and relatively few patients completed six weeks' treatment because of a generally unsatisfactory response. 5 Unwanted effects were not particularly troublesome, though mianserin and maprotiline caused more drowsiness and blurred vision than did placebo, while maptrotiline produced more constipation than either of the other two treatments. 6 The importance of placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants is emphasized and the precautions that should be taken when they are carried out in outpatients are described.
 ...
PMID:Placebo-controlled trial of mianserin and maprotiline in primary depressive illness: a preliminary report. 633 11


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>