Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0341503 (bacterial peritonitis)
 1,303 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

A phase II study of ip 5-FU was performed in 14 patients with ovarian cancer who were refractory to systemic chemotherapy including prior iv 5-FU in 12 of the patients. 5-FU was administered via a semipermanent Tenckhoff peritoneal dialysis catheter. The starting concentration of 5-FU in the dialysate was 4 mM. The patients received eight consecutive 2-L exchanges, each of 4-hour duration, for a total of 36 hours including time for instillation and drainage. Treatment courses were repeated every 2 weeks for six cycles or until disease progression occurred. A total of 69 cycles of ip 5-FU were administered to 14 patients. There was one complete response to therapy documented by second-look laparotomy. While the response rate was only 7%, in seven of eight (88%) patients with small volume disease (tumor masses less than 2.0 cm in diameter), there was no evidence for disease progression while receiving ip 5-FU therapy. In this phase II trial, the major toxic effect of ip 5-FU was abdominal pain. While there were no cases of documented bacterial peritonitis, all of the patients experienced some degree of abdominal discomfort while receiving therapy. Fifty percent of the patients had severe abdominal pain with at least one cycle of therapy. Other toxic effects included myelosuppression, mucositis, nausea and vomiting, and skin rash. The results of this study indicate that ip 5-FU should be further evaluated in patients with ovarian cancer who have a small volume of disease and who have not had prior therapy with 5-FU.
 ...
PMID:Phase II trial of 5-FU administered Ip to patients with refractory ovarian cancer. 652 96

The use of high-volume i.p. chemotherapy with methotrexate (7.5 to 50 microM methotrexate administered via peritoneal dialysis technique) was studied in four patients with ovarian cancer and one patient with malignant melanoma. All had tumor localized to the peritoneal cavity or liver. Methotrexate concentration in the peritoneum could be maintained 18- to 36-fold higher than corresponding plasma concentrations using this method, plasma levels remaining in the range of 0.2 to 3 microM. While local toxicity was generally limited and manageable, mild aseptic peritoneal irritation was commonly seen, and one episode of bacterial peritonitis did occur. Because of the concentration difference between peritoneum and the systemic circulation, systemic toxicity was moderate with only six of 29 treatment cycles resulting in myelosuppression. No definite therapeutic benefit was seen, but the tumors of four of five patients had demonstrated resistance to a methotrexate-containing chemotherapeutic regimen prior to this study. Further investigation of this novel treatment modality is warranted. In addition, this study provides the first measurement of peritoneal methotrexate clearance and the ratio of peritoneal in total body clearance.
 ...
PMID:High-volume intraperitoneal chemotherapy with methotrexate in patients with cancer. 744 76