Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0338671 (Steroids)
 9,479 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Warm-type idiopathic autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a relatively common hematologic disorder resulting from autoantibody production against red blood cells. Steroids represent the first-line therapeutic option, and immunosuppressive agents as well as splenectomy are used for refractory cases. Recently, the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has been shown to control autoimmune hemolysis in patients with refractory chronic disease. We report results from a retrospective analysis of 11 adult patients receiving rituximab for steroid-refractory AIHA of the warm type at a mean age of 55 yr (range 23-81 yr). All patients were given methyl-prednisolone as first-line treatment and some of them also received azathioprine and intravenous high-dose immunoglobulins. One patient underwent splenectomy. All patients were considered refractory to steroids and/or immunosuppressive drugs and all were then given weekly rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) for four consecutive weeks. An increase in hemoglobin (Hgb) levels in response to rituximab, with a mean increment of 3.3 g/dL (95% CI 2.1-4.4), was observed in all cases. Four patients required packed red cell transfusions before starting rituximab and all became transfusion-free. At a mean follow-up of 604 d (range 30-2884 d) since the treatment of AIHA with rituximab, all patients are alive, eight (73%) of them in complete remission (CR) and three (27%) in partial remission (PR). A moderate hemolysis still persisted in six (54%) patients. In conclusion, our experience clearly demonstrates that anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab is an effective and safe alternative treatment option for idiopathic AIHA, in particular, for steroid-refractory disease.
 ...
PMID:Rituximab for warm-type idiopathic autoimmune hemolytic anemia: a retrospective study of 11 adult patients. 1753 66

We report four patients (mean age 65 yr; range 40-77 yr) affected by acquired pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) complicating chronic lymphoid disorders and treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab. Three out of four patients were given packed red cell transfusion. Steroids and recombinant erythropoietin (r-Epo) were also administered as first-line therapy without response. After a mean time of 57 d (range 23-62 d) from PRCA diagnosis, all patients received rituximab at a dosage of 375 mg/m(2)/wk for four consecutive weeks. First injection side effects of rituximab were minimal. All patients showed an increase in hemoglobin levels in response to rituximab, in one patient just after the first dose, in another patient after the second and in two other patients after the third dose. Three patients (75%) were considered in complete remission (CR) and one patient (25%) in partial remission 4 wk after the last rituximab infusion, despite a CR was obtained later (16 wk following the beginning of the therapy). Finally, at the last follow-up (mean 18.5 months, range 2-60 months), all patients were alive and in continue CR. Despite very limited in number, these results suggest that rituximab is very effective in the treatment of PRCA complicating B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders.
 ...
PMID:Rituximab to treat chronic lymphoproliferative disorder-associated pure red cell aplasia. 1906 38

The ideal treatment of patients with primary membranous nephropathy (MN) and persistent nephrotic syndrome (NS) is still a matter of debate. This is a major issue since these patients may progress to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in 5-10 years. Steroids, alkylating agents, and calcineurin inhibitors have been suggested to achieve NS remission and prevent ESKD in this population. Treatment benefits, however, are uncertain and are often offset by serious adverse events (SAEs). Evidence that B cells play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of the disease, both as precursors of autoantibody-producing cells and as antigen-presenting cells, provided the background for explorative studies testing the role of B cell-depletion therapy with the monoclonal antibody rituximab. This approach aimed at selectively inhibiting disease mechanisms without the devastating consequences of unspecific immunosuppression. Finding that rituximab safely ameliorated NS in 8 patients with primary MN fueled a series of observational studies that uniformly confirmed the safety/efficacy profile of rituximab in this context. Although head-to-head comparisons in randomized clinical trials are missing, comparative analyses between series of homogeneous patient cohorts clearly show at least similar efficacy of rituximab as compared to steroid plus alkylating agents. Moreover, data confirm the dramatically superior safety profile of rituximab that actually appears to be associated with a rate of SAEs even lower than that observed with conservative therapy. Rituximab is also effective in patients resistant to other treatments and its cost-effectiveness is further increased when treatment is titrated to circulating B cells. Recently identified pathogenic antibodies against the M type phospholipase A2 receptor will likely provide a novel tool to monitor disease activity and drive rituximab therapy, at least in a subset of patients. Newly developed anti-CD20 antibodies could represent a valuable option for those who fail rituximab therapy. Steroids, alkylating agents, and calcineurin inhibitors should likely be abandoned.
 ...
PMID:Rituximab in primary membranous nephropathy: first-line therapy, why not? 2542 22