Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0338671 (Steroids)
9,479 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Studies were conducted to assess progesterone antagonists (PAs) and progesterone receptor modulators (PRMs) with respect to PR agonistic and antagonistic activities in vivo. These properties are not always adequately reflected in transactivation in vitro models. Studies were performed in pregnant rats, estrogen-primed rabbits (McPhail -Test), and cycling and pregnant guinea pigs. Tested compounds included mifepristone (RU486), onapristone, J867, J956, J1042, and ZK137316. J-compounds induced sub-maximum endometrial transformation and, paradoxically, inhibited effects of progesterone in rabbits. Mifepristone, onapristone, and ZK137316 behaved as 'pure' antagonists in this species. Inhibition of uterine PGF(2alpha) secretion and inhibition of luteolysis in cycling guinea pigs were more sensitive parameters of PR-agonistic and antagonistic properties. 'Pure' PAs inhibited uterine PGF(2alpha) secretion and luteal regression completely. The PR agonist R5020 reversed both effects which demonstrates a PR mediation. Agonistic PRMs (J-substances and mifepristone) showed no or blunted antiluteolytic effects compared to the 'pure' PR antagonist onapristone. When tested in pregnant guinea pigs for their labor-inducing potential, PR agonistic PRMs had much reduced or abolished abortifacient activity compared to mifepristone (mifepristone > J956 > J867/J912 > J1042). However, in cycling animals, superior antiovulatory and antiproliferative properties of the J-substances were seen. Antiovulatory effects of 'pure' and agonistic PRMs are probably due to different mechanisms. The relevance of rodent studies for antiovulatory and uterine antiproliferative effects for the human is still uncertain. The non-abortifacient PRM J1042 induced stromal compaction and inhibition of endometrial proliferation in monkeys, but this effect was not stronger than that of the 'purer' PAs. 'Pure' PAs are important pharmacological tools analogous to PRKO models to study the role of PR in the menstrual cycle and in pregnancy.
Steroids
PMID:Endocrine pharmacological characterization of progesterone antagonists and progesterone receptor modulators with respect to PR-agonistic and antagonistic activity. 1110 82

Org 31710 and Org 33628 are two highly selective progesterone receptor modulators (PRMs) with respect to their anti-progestational and anti-glucocorticoid activity. The compounds have been studied both in vitro and in vivo. Org 33628 has approximately four times stronger anti-progestational activity in vitro than does Org 31710, and in rats it is about 15 times more potent in the pregnancy interruption test. Two main indications for the use of PRMs are breast cancer and fertility regulation. The effects of both Org 31710 and Org 33628 were tested in relevant models for these indications. The effects of the two compounds on breast tumor development were assessed and in rats using the DMBA model. Their potency in menses induction was tested in monkeys on a 4-day regimen in the luteal phase, and after a single dose at day 21 of the normal cycle, and under a continuous progestin treatment using desogestrel. The compounds were also tested alone in a continuous low-dose regimen. The effects on follicular development and ovulation were determined by measuring estradiol and progesterone levels. Cycle control was monitored by daily vaginal swabs. In the DMBA model, Org 31710 at oral doses of 0.8, 2.0, and 5.0 mg/kg showed a clear dose-related reduction in tumor load. With the two highest doses, an even lower tumor load was seen after a 3-week treatment period compared to the tumor load at the start of treatment. Org 33628 showed a similar efficacy as Org 31710 at a dose of 2.0 mg/kg. RU 486 after oral treatment was two times less potent in this model than Org 31710 and Org 33628. The efficacy of menses induction using the 4-day regimen is dependent on the time of administration relative to the progesterone peak in the luteal phase. The highest efficacy is achieved in the descending part of the peak, at which a 100% success rate is found with a dose of 1 mg/kg of either Org 31710 or Org 33628. In Cynomolgus monkeys, at a single dose of 15 mg/kg of Org 31710 or Org 33628 in the luteal phase, menses induction was achieved only in 60% of the treatment cycles. Surprisingly menses induction can be achieved with a single dose that is about a ten-times lower when the monkeys are treated continuously with desogestrel. Cycle control is better at low than at high doses of antiprogestin in combination with daily dosing of 4 microg/kg desogestrel. Despite the difference in receptor affinity, no difference between Org 31710 and Org 33628 was found in menses induction. In the continuous low-dose (1 mg/kg) regimen with the PRMs, follicular development occurs normally while ovulation is inhibited. Ovulation is resumed shortly after stopping treatment, and a normal menses occurs after the first progesterone peak. Both compounds may be interesting options for the prevention and treatment of breast cancer and for fertility control.
Steroids
PMID:Preclinical experience with two selective progesterone receptor modulators on breast and endometrium. 1110 84

Progesterone antagonists (PAs, antiprogestins) can modulate estrogenic effects in various estrogen-dependent tissues. These modulatory effects are complex and depend on species, tissue, type of compound, dose, and duration of treatment. In non-human primates, PAs, including mifepristone, ZK 137 316 and ZK 230 211, inhibit endometrial proliferation and induce amenorrhea. When administered chronically at relatively low doses, these compounds block the mitotic activity of endometrial epithelium and induce stromal compaction in a dose-dependent manner in both spayed and intact monkeys at high estradiol concentrations. These effects were accompanied by an atrophy of spiral arteries. The antiproliferative effects were endometrium-specific, since the estrogenic effects in the oviduct and vagina were not inhibited by PAs. Similar endometrial antiproliferative effects were also found after treatment with the progesterone receptor modulator (PRM), mesoprogestin J1042. The endometrial antiproliferative effects of PAs, particularly within the endometrial glands, were also observed in spayed rabbits. In spayed rats, however, the PAs did not inhibit, but rather enhanced, various estrogen responses, including endometrial proliferation, pointing to species-specific differences. In conclusion, our studies indicate that both pure PAs and PRMs selectively inhibit estrogen-dependent endometrial proliferation in the primate endometrium without affecting estrogenic response in other estrogen-dependent tissues or inducing unscheduled bleeding. Our studies indicate that the spiral arteries, which are unique to the primate endometrium, are the primary targets that are damaged or inhibited by PAs and PRMs. The damage to these unique vessels may underlay the paradoxical, endometrium-specific, antiproliferative effects of these compounds. Hence, the properties of PAs and PRMs (mesoprogestins) open up new applications in gynecological therapy and hormone replacement therapy.
Steroids
PMID:Antiproliferative effects of progesterone antagonists and progesterone receptor modulators on the endometrium. 1110 85

Progesterone secretion during the luteal phase influences oviductal and endometrial functions which are essential for embryo viability and implantation in a number of species including primates. Luteal phase estrogen is not essential for progesterone-dependent endometrial receptivity towards implantation and pregnancy in the rhesus monkey and in the human. However, synchronous development of embryo and endometrium is an essential prerequisite for evolutive implantation. Progesterone helps to maintain synchronous development of preimplantation embryo through its action on maternal uterus. The anti-nidatory action of mifepristone, a potent progesterone receptor modulator (PRM) with pronounced antiprogestagenic activity, is known to be associated with desynchronization of endometrium along with repression of glandular secretory differentiation and vascular maturation. Thus, it is likely that early luteal phase administration of mifepristone affects paracrine action of the secretory stage endometrium on the preimplantation stage embryo, and thereby inhibits embryonic development and viability. We shall examine this hypothesis using the rhesus monkey as a primate model.
Steroids
PMID:Role of progesterone on peri-implantation stage endometrium-embryo interaction in the primate. 1110 86

The influences of the synthetic progestin, medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), the progesterone receptor modulator J867, and the antagonist ZK137316 were studied in vitro on isolated endometrial epithelial cells, as well as endometrial fibroblasts. We evaluated the expression of estrogen receptor alpha (ER) and the progesterone receptor (PR) by RT-PCR. ER and PR were strongly expressed in the fibroblasts and epithelial cells under treatment with 10(-8) M 17beta-estradiol (E(2)). Treatment with 10(-6) M J867 or ZK137316 upregulated the PR expression as did E(2), in contrast to treatment with 10(-6) M MPA, which caused a downregulation of PR in epithelial cells, but not in fibroblasts. In addition, the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) release into the cell culture medium was analyzed by a VEGF-ELISA. VEGF which plays an important role in angiogenesis, is regulated by steroid hormones as well as hypoxia. E(2) stimulates VEGF release into the medium in both cell types. MPA reduces VEGF release significantly in the fibroblast cell culture, but increases it in the epithelial cell culture. ZK137316, in the presence or absence of E(2), reduces VEGF release in fibroblast cell culture. J867 increases the VEGF production in fibroblasts only in the presence of E(2). Both compounds show no significant effects, compared to E(2), in epithelial cell culture. The different results for the epithelial cells and fibroblasts indicate that the pharmacological effects of PR modulators (PRMs) and progesterone antagonists (PAs) may be cell specific and depend on the presence or absence of partial progestagenic agonistic activities. This observation opens up new perspectives for various clinical applications.
Steroids
PMID:Progestins, progesterone receptor modulators, and progesterone antagonists change VEGF release of endometrial cells in culture. 1110 87

Modulation of endometrial receptivity is a promising approach for fertility regulation since it allows a contraceptive to act specifically at the endometrium. This was corroborated by our previous observations that treatment with low doses of a pure progesterone antagonist (PA, antiprogestin), onapristone (ZK 98299), in bonnet monkeys inhibited fertility by selectively retarding endometrial development, without affecting the hypophyseal-hypothalamic function. In the present study, further investigations, undertaken to analyze the molecular repertoire of a nonreceptive primate endometrium, determined expression of: steroid hormone receptors, i.e. progesterone receptor (PR) and estrogen receptor (ER); cytokines, i.e. leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF): transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta) and its receptor (TGFbetaR); and cell adhesion molecules, i.e. integrins (alpha(v)beta(3), alpha(1)beta(1)). These studies were conducted during the different phases of the normal menstrual cycle and following treatment with different doses of onapristone (2.5 mg, 5 mg, or 10 mg every third day for one cycle) in bonnet monkeys. The molecules were analysed collectively to explore the possibility of a correlation between expression of these markers and endometrial receptivity and to investigate whether there exists a regulatory link between expression of these molecules under in vivo conditions. Three types of expression patterns of endometrial factors were observed during the peri-implantation period following onapristone treatment: 1) LIF, alpha(v)beta(3), and alpha(1)beta(1) showed significant (P < 0.02) down regulation in glandular epithelium of endometria in animals treated with all three doses of onapristone as compared to the control group. This was indicative of their critical role in the progesterone-driven cascade leading to implantation. 2) PR, TGFbeta, and TGFbetaR remained unaffected in the endometria from 2.5 mg treated animals and showed down regulation in animals treated with 5 and 10 mg onapristone as compared to the control group, thereby suggesting that the expression of these markers may not truely reflect endometrial receptivity per se. However, their facilitatory role in preparing the endometrium for implantation can not be ruled out since continued perturbation in the expression of these molecules may affect endometrial growth, remodelling, and differentiation, which in turn may render the endometrium nonreceptive; 3) ER remained unaltered in endometria of animals rendered infertile with 2.5, 5, and 10 mg onapristone. This observation indirectly suggests that onapristone-induced endometrial changes are mediated via some specific mechanisms. The present study clearly demonstrates that endometrial non-receptivity induced at low doses of onapristone is associated with changes in the expression pattern of specific molecular markers. However, no direct correlation was observed between in vivo expression of TGFbeta, LIF, and integrins, thereby lending support to the concept that there exists redundancy or multiple pathways which regulate implantation events.
Steroids
PMID:Endometrial contraception: modulation of molecular determinants of uterine receptivity. 1110 89

Both progesterone receptor modulators (PRMs) as well as pure progesterone antagonists (PAs) have numerous proven and potential therapeutic applications in female health care. Mifepristone, a PRM with only marginal agonistic activity, together with a prostaglandin can terminate pregnancies of less than 9 weeks duration; mifepristone is also used in the preparation of women at later gestational stages whose pregnancies are terminated with prostaglandins or surgery. Mifepristone causes expulsion of the uterine contents following intrauterine fetal death and promotes dilation of the non-pregnant primigravid uterus. It is also effective in the treatment of missed abortion. Together with methotrexate, mifepristone can be used in the medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Both PAs and PRMs display antiproliferative effects on the endometrium. Because of this, they have application in the treatment of endometriosis, an estrogen-dependent condition. They may also be utilized to reduce myoma size, acting as both a PA and antiproliferative agent. Unlike GnRH agonists, long-term use in endometriosis and myoma is not associated with loss of bone and hypoestrogenism. PRMs may also be useful in IVF programs to prevent a premature LH surge and to delay the emergence of the implantation window. Some PRMs have potential use as hormone replacement therapy in women during menopause or in those with dysfunctional uterine bleeding.
Steroids
PMID:Progesterone receptor modulators and progesterone antagonists in women's health. 1110 92

Progesterone antagonists (PAs) (antiprogestins) or progesterone receptor modulators (PRMs) form an interesting category of new hormonal agents in the treatment of breast cancer. In vitro, antiproliferative effects of different PAs are mainly observed in estrogen-stimulated growth of PR-positive tumor cell lines. Both progestin agonist/antagonist actions on mammary tumor cells are dependent on the type of cell line, culture medium and concentrations of the PAs used, and type of biologic response measured. In various experimental animal tumor models, different PAs showed a greater antitumor activity than tamoxifen or high-dose progestins. Most interestingly, combination treatment of different PAs (mifepristone, ORG 31710, onapristone) or PRMs with different antiestrogens (tamoxifen, droloxifen, ICI 164384) or with an aromatase inhibitor (atemestane) showed greater antitumor efficacy than treatment with each single type of drug alone. These additive antiproliferative effects were demonstrated in various experimental in vitro and in vivo models. In some studies, these effects were accompanied by additive effects on several cell biologic parameters. In pretreated postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer, objective responses have been observed in 10-12%, and stable disease in 42-46% of the patients; in previously untreated patients objective response rates of 11 and 56% have been reported. The clinical development of onapristone was stopped because of liver toxicity. At the present time, apart from development of new pure potent PAs, clinical investigation of combined therapy of PAs with antiestrogens are urgently needed.
Steroids
PMID:Progesterone antagonists and progesterone receptor modulators in the treatment of breast cancer. 1110 94

Long-term administration of progesterone antagonists (PAs) and progesterone receptor modulators (PRMs) has been proposed as a novel hormonal therapy for various hormone dependent maladies. We studied the long-term endocrine effects of mifepristone on the kinetics of estradiol (E(2)) and its precursors, and on gonadotropin levels in five postmenopausal women treated for unresectable meningioma with mifepristone [200 mg/day] for at least 15 months. Serum samples were analyzed for LH, FSH and SHBG with fluoroimmunoassay; androstenedione (A), testosterone (T), estrone (E(1)) and E(2) were measured with radioimmunoassay (RIA). Serum levels of mifepristone were measured using both RIA and high performance-liquid chromatography (HPLC). Serum levels (mean +/- SD) of LH and FSH were suppressed from pretreatment values of 32 +/- 16 and 65 +/- 30 IU/l to 13 +/- 7 and 33 +/- 16 IU/l at 6 months (P < 0.05), respectively. Serum (mean +/- SD) A, T, E(1), and E(2) were increased from initial values of 6.9 +/- 0.9 nmol/l, 1.2 +/- 0.3 nmol/l, 77 +/- 25 pmol/l, and 29 +/- 14 pmol/l to 6 month values of 13.1 +/- 5.6 nmol/l, 1.8 +/- 0.6 nmol/l, 178 +/- 60 pmol/l, and 45 +/- 22 pmol/l (n.s.). The correlation coefficients between the levels of A, T, E(1), and E(2) were statistically significant, whereas the ratios of T/A, E(1)/A, E(2)/E(1), and E(2)/T remained unchanged. The levels of SHBG remained stable, and ranged from 48 +/- 10 to 65 +/- 9 nmol/l (mean +/- SD). Thus, prolonged mifepristone treatment marginally increased the serum levels of A, T, E(1) and E(2). These effects of mifepristone are likely due to its antiglucocorticoid effect and thus increased secretion of adrenal A. Serum levels of LH and FSH declined. The serum levels of gonadotropins and those of T, E(1) and E(2) were inversely, yet significantly, correlated. Therefore the decrease in LH and FSH might reflect the slightly increased levels of T, E(1) and E(2). However, the lack of change in SHBG and the low E(2) levels suggest that enhanced systemic estrogen effects are unlikely during long-term mifepristone treatment.
Steroids
PMID:Alterations in sex steroids and gonadotropins in post-menopausal women subsequent to long-term mifepristone administration. 1110 95

Progesterone antagonists (PAs) and progesterone receptor modulators (PRMs) have contraceptive potential by suppressing follicular development, delaying the surge of luteinizing hormone (LH), retarding endometrial maturation, and promoting endometrial bleeding. Mifepristone, in daily doses of 2-10 mg, blocks the LH surge and ovulation. Many of the studies were conducted in women not at risk of pregnancy, and thus the contraceptive efficacy is not yet known. Nevertheless, there is evidence that daily doses of 2 or 5 mg of mifepristone have contraceptive potential. Because of anovulation, there may be an unopposed estrogen effect on the endometrium, although this risk may be mitigated by the noncompetitive anti-estrogenic activity exhibited by both PAs and PRMs. Low doses of PAs and PRMs, which do not affect ovulation, retard endometrial maturation, indicating that the endometrium is exquisitely sensitive to these compounds. This raises the prospect of endometrial contraception, i.e. prevention of endometrial maturation without disturbing ovulation or producing alterations in bleeding patterns. This approach works well in monkeys but was not found to be very promising when given to women not using contraception. On the other hand, 200 mg mifepristone administered 48 h after the LH surge, which has minimal or no effect on ovulation and bleeding patterns, is an effective contraceptive; yet, it is not a practical approach to contraception. Late luteal phase administration of mifepristone produces menstrual bleeding. However, when mifepristone was administered every month at the end of the cycle either alone or together with prostaglandins, it was not very effective in preventing pregnancy. In contrast, a mifepristone-prostaglandin combination has been shown to be a very effective treatment for occasional menstrual regulation, with vaginal bleeding induced in 98% of pregnant women, with menses delay of 11 days or less. Mifepristone is an excellent agent for emergency contraception when used within 120 h of unprotected intercourse. It is also possible that PAs and PRMs may be used to reduce the occurrence of bleeding irregularities induced by progestin-only contraceptive methods. Both classes of progesterone receptor ligands may also have contraceptive efficacy by having a pharmacological effect on the embryo or altering tubal transport or other aspects of tubal physiology.
Steroids
PMID:The use of progesterone antagonists and progesterone receptor modulators in contraception. 1110 93


<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next >>