Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0282612 (PIN)
2,291 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

PSA is a kallikrein-like, serine protease that is produced exclusively by the epithelial cells of all types of prostatic tissue, benign and malignant. Physiologically, it is present in the seminal fluid at high concentration and functions to cleave the high molecular weight protein responsible for the seminal coagulum into smaller polypeptides. This action results in liquefaction of the coagulum. PSA is also present in the serum and can be measured reliably by either a monoclonal immunoradiometric assay or a polyclonal radioimmunoassay. The calculated half-life of serum PSA ranges from 2.2 to 3.2 days and the metabolic clearance rate of this tumor marker follows first-order kinetics. Digital rectal examination, cystoscopic examination and prostate biopsy all can cause spurious elevations of the serum PSA concentration. Conditions such as bacterial prostatitis and acute urinary retention also can falsely elevate the serum PSA level. Because approximately 25% of the patients with BPH only will have an elevated serum PSA concentration and BPH tissue contributes to this PSA value in a variable manner from patient to patient, it is unlikely that PSA by itself will become an effective screening tool for the early diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, if combined with digital rectal examination and/or transrectal ultrasound it may become a vital part of any early detection program. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia also may be associated with moderately elevated serum PSA levels. Although there is a direct correlation between the serum PSA concentration and clinical stage, PSA is not sufficiently reliable to determine the clinical stage on an individual basis. This finding also applies to pathological stage. As a result, the preoperative serum PSA concentration cannot be used to decide whether to recommend radical prostatectomy for potential cure. Low preoperative serum PSA concentrations in patients with previously untreated prostate cancers are predictive of a negative bone scan. Thus, in these select patients a staging bone scintigram may not be necessary. With respect to monitoring patients after definitive therapy, PSA is an exquisitely sensitive tumor marker. Irrespective of the treatment modality (radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy or antiandrogen treatment), PSA reflects accurately the tumor status of the patient and is prognostic of eventual outcome; this tumor marker is capable of predicting tumor recurrence months before its detection by any other method. PSA is also a most useful immunocytochemical marker. Its sensitivity and specificity to identify tissue of prostatic origin approach 100%. When compared to PAP, PSA is a more precise and meaningful marker in all clinical situations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
...
PMID:Prostate specific antigen: a critical assessment of the most useful tumor marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. 170 89

1. PIN can present as a hypoechoic lesion on ultrasound. 2. Biopsy results prove a close relationship between PIN and cancer. 3. Measurements of age, lesion size, and PSA for diagnoses of PIN were intermediate values between non-cancer and cancer. 4. Sequential, precise transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies of hypoechoic lesions are now possible, and close follow-up of patients with diagnoses of PIN is therefore possible.
...
PMID:Use of transrectal ultrasound and prostate-specific antigen in diagnosis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. 248 62

PSA represents a major advance in our tumor marker armamentarium. PIN fulfills the majority of requirements for a premalignant change. If we could determine a subset of individuals with PIN, an enriched population on which to base screening studies would emerge. In this regard the observation that PIN may be associated with elevation of the serum PSA is particularly intriguing. Considerable interest exists for early detection of prostate cancer. The high morbidity and mortality associated with this tumor coupled with the late stage at presentation by conventional means underscore the justification for such enthusiasm. However, the wisdom of screening for a cancer for which the mortality is far less than the histologic incidence remains to be proven. In the final analysis, the question is not whether we can detect more carcinoma, but rather whether we can significantly decrease patient morbidity and mortality. Until prospective randomized clinical trials demonstrate the effectiveness of early detection programs for carcinoma of the prostate, it is difficult to recommend such screening to the general public.
...
PMID:Prostate-specific antigen and premalignant change: implications for early detection. 248 17

Prostate specific antigen has become an important adjunct to the digital rectal examination in screening for prostate cancer. The clinician should be familiar with interpretation of this test. Many men with BPH have elevated serum PSA concentrations; however, the majority of these men will have other pathologic processes such as occult cancer, PIN, or acute inflammation that may account for the elevations in serum PSA. Certainly, serial increases in serum PSA should increase concern that occult carcinoma is present. Patients with PIN may also have elevated PSA concentrations. When PIN is associated with elevated PSA, a high incidence of invasive carcinoma is noted on subsequent biopsy. Further investigation into the associations will further refine the clinical utility of this powerful tumor marker.
...
PMID:PSA in benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. 750 69

"Incidental" cancer refers to predominantly well differentiated cancer that arises in the transition zone and is found by chance in TURP chips. These tumours are frequently small and may be completely resected by TURP, although a significant number have an additional tumour that is unreachable with a resectoscope. These tumours often co-exist with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Putative precursors of incidental carcinoma include high grade PIN and AAH, and these lesions are frequently found in the transition zone in prostatectomies for cancer. The single most significant question in treating incidental adenocarcinoma is how to separate tumours that will progress from those that will not progress during the expected lifetime of the patient. The 1992 revision of the TNM staging system separated non-aggressive (T1a) and aggressive (T1b) incidental cancer according to the number of foci of cancer, using more than three foci as the cutpoint to identify more aggressive cancer. However, 8-37% of patients with T1 a cancer will develop cancer progression within 10 years if untreated, with the risk of progression increasing with additional years of follow-up. Important prognostic factors include the patient's age, tumour location (peripheral zone v. transition zone), tumour grade, tumour volume, serum PSA concentrations and morphometric factors such as nuclear roundness. Studies directed at early detection allow discovery of increasingly smaller cancers.
...
PMID:The pathology of incidental carcinoma. 762 75

Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia (PIN) is widely considered to be a precursor lesion for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. No information is available, however, on the sensitivity of PIN to irradiation or the distribution of residual PIN after radiotherapy. We studied a series of forty-six totally embedded, whole mounted, serially sectioned prostates removed by salvage radical retropubic prostatectomy following irradiation failure in which no hormonal therapy/ablation had been undertaken. The mean age of patients was 65 (56-74) years, the mean dose of radiotherapy was 7,266 (6,000-9,000) cGy (15 external beam, 27 external beam plus iridium or gold seed, 3 iodine, and 1 unknown) and the mean interval for irradiation therapy to prostatectomy was 60 (16-145) months. Thirty-two (70%) of the patients had high grade PIN within the prostatectomy specimen. The pattern of PIN was recorded as described by Bostwick and co workers. The frequency of the different patterns per positive case paralleled in rank those in Bostwick's series of non-irradiated prostates, with the most common to least common per patient being: tufting (78.1%), micropapillary (59.3%), cribriform (34.4%) and flat (15.6%). However, the mean number of foci of PIN per prostate was less than in Bostwick's series (7.1 foci vs. 17 foci). There was no statistically significant difference between groups with or without high grade PIN with regard to various clinical factors (last preoperative serum PSA, age, dose of radiotherapy, interval from irradiation therapy to prostatectomy, Kaplan-Meier survival), or pathologic factors (presence of confined tumor, extracapsular extension, positive surgical margins, seminal vesicle invasion, or positive lymph nodes on permanent sections). We conclude that high grade PIN is common in the prostates of patients who have failed irradiation therapy and that, theoretically, not all recurrent tumors derive from regrowth of the initial, incompletely eradicated tumor. However, because there was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to the clinical and pathologic parameters listed, we consider it likely that most recurrent tumors derive from the initial incompletely eradicated tumor.
...
PMID:High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in prostates removed following irradiation failure in the treatment of prostatic adenocarcinoma. 860 67

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) fulfils the majority of requirements for a premalignant change in the human prostate. Forty-eight patients were diagnosed to have high grade PIN on prostatic needle biopsy. During a follow-up period, 23 (47.9%) were found to have adenocarcinoma on subsequent biopsies. We compared the patients age, the digital examination, the transrectal ultrasound appearance (TRUS) and the serum PSA level between those in whom cancer was detected subsequently and those with PIN alone. There was a statistically significant difference in the transrectal ultrasound appearance (TRUS) and the serum PSA level between the two groups (p < 0.001, p < 0.016 respectively). In conclusion, patients with high grade PIN, elevated serum PSA with hypoechoic zone on TRUS should be rebiopsied 3 months after the initial diagnosis. If the results are negative, close follow-up is mandatory.
...
PMID:[High-grade intraepithelial prostatic neoplasms: diagnosis and association with prostate cancer]. 865 30

To determine if patients with bladder cancer have a higher incidence of unsuspected prostate cancer, 40 cases were studied. All except one case had no evidence of prostate cancer on preoperative clinical assessment. Detailed pathological evaluation of cystoprostatectomy specimens with sections at 2- to 3-mm intervals was done. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate was identified in 18 of 40 patients (45%). Multifocal prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) was present in 19 cases (47.5%); 4 (10%) without an associated prostate cancer and 15 (37.5%) in conjunction with adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Twelve cases of unsuspected prostate cancer were stage pT1a, 4 were pT1b, and 2 were pT3. No patients exhibited nodal or distance metastases by the prostate cancer. At a mean follow-up of 15.2 months (range 3-34 months), 37 of the 40 patients are alive. Among prostate cancer patients, no clinical or biochemical evidence of disease recurrence or prostate cancer related mortality has been observed. Our findings support the previously reported high incidence rate of prostate cancer in patients undergoing cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer. This, though, may not be higher than the observed incidence in an age-matched general population. We recommend DRE and PSA as part of the bladder cancer workup in males, and complete removal of the prostate at cystoprostatectomy to prevent the dilemma of residual prostate cancer.
...
PMID:Incidental prostatic adenocarcinoma in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy for bladder cancer. 893 64

PSA-based screening substantially increases the prostate cancer detection rate and the percentage of organ-confined tumors. It appears that there is some benefit from screening for prostate cancer because of the increased amount of potentially curable disease discovered and the fact that 96% of the pathologically staged tumors detected have histologic features associated with aggressive cancer. Additional evidence that nearly all tumors detected on the basis of initial PSA screening are apt to be clinically significant may be derived from the information that PSA-based screening decreases the incidence of incidental A1 grade III and A2 tumors but does not increase the detection of clinically insignificant A1 grade I and II tumors. At this time, PSA represents the most effective and valuable tool to detect early prostate cancer; therefore, PSA should be used to improve early diagnosis of prostate cancer. Some advances have been made with the introduction of age-specific reference ranges and the ability to measure free to total PSA ratios. The data presented support the clinical usefulness of age-specific reference ranges for serum PSA. Calculation of the free to total PSA ratio is valuable in deciding which screening volunteers require further evaluation, increases the specificity of PSA screening, and as demonstrated may be useful in deciding which patients with isolated PIN should undergo repeat biopsies. Based on these facts, PSA truly can be described as the most important and useful marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Based on these encouraging results and the obligingness of the social insurances, we will be able to continue PSA screening for early detection of prostate cancer for all concerned Tyrolean men in the future.
...
PMID:Prostate-specific antigen as a screening test. The Austrian experience. 912 29

In a total of 59 prostate cancer (PCa) patients, 9 patients with PIN. 29 subjects with BPH and 26 healthy men serum TPS and PSA values were measured together with NK cell activity, number and proportion of CD16+ cells, and reactivity of lymphocytes to mitogens (Con A. PHA and PWM). NK activity data indicate highly significant differences between both of patients with local tumor and those with disseminated disease (P < 0.01) and b) responders and nonresponding patients to hormonal therapy (P < 0.01). The number and proportion of CD16+ cells is lowest in BPH patients in comparison with controls and PCa patients. Since benign enlargement is attributed mainly to stromal cell proliferation in the absence of cell death in this compartment, gene expressions which control these events may participate in the surprisingly low CD16+ cell proportion. The reactivity of lymphocytes to mitogens (PHA. Con A and PWM) showed lower numerical values in all categories of PCa and BPH patients when compared with healthy men. The reactivity of T and B lymphocytes reported herein as immunological responses to mitogens (PHA. Con A and PWM) was performed 4-6 months after the beginning of therapy. Our data fit in well with those previously reported. Numerically lowest respective reactivity parameters to all mitogens were assessed in PIN subjects. Reported results show the specific significance of the changes in NK cell activity in regard with both metastatic extention of PCa and tumor response to therapy. These alterations match in their reliability changes with tumor marker values related to prostate cancer activity (TPS) and tumor differentiation (PSA). Lymphocyte reactivity to mitogens (Con A. PHA. PWM) may help in a subclinical discrimination between BPH and PIN patients that is still an important goal of clinical urology.
...
PMID:Analysis of NK cell activity, lymphocyte reactivity to mitogens and serotest PSA and TPS values in patients with primary and disseminated prostate cancer, PIN and BPH. 917 16


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next >>