Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0282612 (PIN)
 2,291 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Estrogens have been implicated in prostatic cancerogenesis and tumor progression. The mechanisms underlying estrogen signaling in human prostate tissue, however, remain poorly understood. Using immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization (ISH) techniques, the present study demonstrates the classical estrogen receptor (ERalpha) in premalignant lesions and prostatic adenocarcinoma through the various stages of the disease. Conversely, the novel characterized ERbeta subtype was undetectable in human prostate tissue. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia revealed ERalpha mRNA and protein expression in 28% and 11% of cases evaluated. Focal ER immunoreactivity was detected in a minority of low- to intermediate-grade adenocarcinoma. High-grade (primary Gleason grade 4 and 5) tumors revealed ER protein expression in 43% (62% respectively) of cases. The most significant ERalpha gene expression on mRNA and protein levels was observed in hormone refractory tumors and metastatic lesions, including lymph node and bone metastases. Results of the current study suggest that estrogens can affect prostatic cancerogenesis and neoplastic progression through an ER-mediated process in human prostate tissue.
 ...
PMID:Estrogen receptor expression in prostate cancer and premalignant prostatic lesions. 1043 57

An antibody, GC-17, thoroughly characterized for its specificity for estrogen receptor-beta (ER-beta), was used to immunolocalize the receptor in histologically normal prostate, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, primary carcinomas, and in metastases to lymph nodes and bone. Comparisons were made between ER-beta, estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-alpha), and androgen receptor (AR) immunostaining in these tissues. Concurrently, transcript expression of the three steroid hormone receptors was studied by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analysis on laser capture-microdissected samples of normal prostatic acini, dysplasias, and carcinomas. In Western blot analyses, GC-17 selectively identified a 63-kd protein expressed in normal and malignant prostatic epithelial cells as well as in normal testicular and prostatic tissues. This protein likely represents a posttranslationally modified form of the long-form ER-beta, which has a predicted size of 59 kd based on polypeptide length. In normal prostate, ER-beta immunostaining was predominately localized in the nuclei of basal cells and to a lesser extent stromal cells. ER-alpha staining was only present in stromal cell nuclei. AR immunostaining was variable in basal cells but strongly expressed in nuclei of secretory and stromal cells. Overall, prostatic carcinogenesis was characterized by a loss of ER-beta expression at the protein and transcript levels in high-grade dysplasias, its reappearance in grade 3 cancers, and its diminution/absence in grade 4/5 neoplasms. In contrast, AR was strongly expressed in all grades of dysplasia and carcinoma. Because ER-beta is thought to function as an inhibitor of prostatic growth, androgen action, presumably mediated by functional AR and unopposed by the beta receptor, may have provided a strong stimulus for aberrant cell growth. With the exception of a small subset of dysplasias in the central zone and a few carcinomas, ER-alpha-stained cells were not found in these lesions. The majority of bone and lymph node metastases contained cells that were immunostained for ER-beta. Expression of ER-beta in metastases may have been influenced by the local microenvironment in these tissues. In contrast, ER-alpha-stained cells were absent in bone metastases and rare in lymph nodes metastases. Irrespective of the site, AR-positive cells were found in all metastases. Based on our recent finding of anti-estrogen/ER-beta-mediated growth inhibition of prostate cancer cells in vitro, the presence of ER-beta in metastatic cells may have important implications for the treatment of late-stage disease.
 ...
PMID:Comparative studies of the estrogen receptors beta and alpha and the androgen receptor in normal human prostate glands, dysplasia, and in primary and metastatic carcinoma. 1143 47

Neonatal exposure of rodents to high doses of estrogen permanently imprints the growth and function of the prostate and predisposes this gland to hyperplasia and severe dysplasia analogous to prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia with aging. Because the rodent prostate gland expresses estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha within a subpopulation of stromal cells and ERbeta within epithelial cells, the present study was undertaken to determine the specific ER(s) involved in mediating prostatic developmental estrogenization. Wild-type (WT) mice, homozygous mutant ER (ERKO) alpha -/- mice, and betaERKO -/- mice were injected with 2 microg of diethylstilbestrol (DES) or oil (controls) on days 1, 3, and 5 of life. Reproductive tracts were excised on days 5 or 10 (prepubertal), day 30 (pubertal), day 90 (young adult), or with aging at 6, 12, and 18 months of age. Prostate complexes were microdissected and examined histologically for prostatic lesions and markers of estrogenization. Immunocytochemistry was used to examine expression of androgen receptor, ERalpha, ERbeta, cytokeratin 14 (basal cells), cytokeratin 18 (luminal cells), and dorsolateral protein over time in the treated mice. In WT-DES mice, developmental estrogenization of the prostate was observed at all of the time points as compared with WT-oil mice. These prostatic imprints included transient up-regulation of ERalpha, down-regulation of androgen receptor, decreased ERbeta levels in adult prostate epithelium, lack of DLP secretory protein, and a continuous layer of basal cells lining the ducts. With aging, epithelial dysplasia and inflammatory cell infiltrate were observed in the ventral and dorsolateral prostate lobes. In contrast, the prostates of alphaERKO mice exhibited no response to neonatal DES either immediately after exposure or throughout life up to 18 months of age. Furthermore, neonatal DES treatment of betaERKO mice resulted in a prostatic response similar to that observed in WT animals. The present findings indicate that ERalpha is the dominant ER form mediating the developmental estrogenization of the prostate gland. If epithelial ERbeta is involved in some component of estrogen imprinting, its role would be considered minor and would require the presence of ERalpha expression in the prostatic stromal cells.
 ...
PMID:Estrogen imprinting of the developing prostate gland is mediated through stromal estrogen receptor alpha: studies with alphaERKO and betaERKO mice. 1150 58

The chemopreventive efficacy of toremifene, an antiestrogen, was evaluated in the transgenic adenocarcinoma of mouse prostate (TRAMP) model. TRAMP mice were segregated into three groups: (a) the low-dose toremifene group (6.6 mg/kg/day); (b) the high-dose toremifene group (33 mg/kg/day); and (c) the control placebo group. Efficacy of treatment was measured by the absence of palpable tumor. To extend these studies using more sensitive techniques, TRAMP mice were then treated with placebo, flutamide (an antiandrogen; 33 mg/kg/day), or toremifene (10 mg/kg/day). Animals from each treatment group were sacrificed at 7, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 weeks of age, and prostate tissues and seminal vesicles were harvested. Tissues from animals (n = 5) in each group were evaluated by wholemount dissections of genitourinary tracts, histology, immunohistochemistry, and Western blot analyses. Blood was pooled per group to measure estradiol and testosterone hormonal levels. Tumors formed at week 17 in the placebo group (n = 10), at week 21 in the high-dose toremifene group (n = 12), and at week 29 in the low-dose toremifene group (n = 12). This represents an increased tumor latency of up to 12 weeks. By 33 weeks, all animals in the placebo group had tumors compared with only 35% of the animals treated with toremifene. Although both flutamide and toremifene decreased tumor incidence compared with the placebo, toremifene was more effective than flutamide. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia was observed in animals in the placebo group, but not in animals treated with toremifene. Moreover, toremifene-treated animals had prolonged survival compared with placebo-treated animals. By 33 weeks of age, 100% of the placebo-treated animals had developed palpable tumors and died, whereas 60% of the toremifene-treated animals were tumor free. T antigen levels in the prostate of toremifene-treated animals were similar to those of placebo-treated, age-matched animals. Whereas serum estradiol levels remained unchanged, the total and free testosterone levels were elevated in the toremifene-treated group. Toremifene treatment did not affect androgen receptor levels. Because toremifene prevented prostate cancer in a milieu of elevated blood free testosterone levels with no change in prostate androgen receptor expression, the mechanism of toremifene's chemopreventive activity may be through nonandrogenic pathways, such as estrogen receptor signaling.
 ...
PMID:Toremifene prevents prostate cancer in the transgenic adenocarcinoma of mouse prostate model. 1188 7

Prostate cancer chemoprevention can be described as the administration of natural products and pharmaceutical agents that inhibit one or more steps in the natural history of prostatic carcinogenesis. The principle components of the chemoprevention strategy are closely connected to this natural history and include: (a) agents and their molecular targets; (b) strategic intermediate endpoint biomarkers (IEBs) and their critical pathways; (c) cohorts identified by genetic and acquired risk factors and (d) efficient designs that combine these elements into a cohesive clinical trial. The primary goal is to find effective noncytotoxic agents that modulate the promotion and progression from normal epithelium to dysplasia to high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) to locally invasive cancer and metastatic disease. Another important target for chemoprevention is to modulate progression to clinically aggressive disease and to maintain an androgen-sensitive clinical state and delay the emergence of androgen resistance. There is a rationale for use of antiandrogens as the lead class, e.g., 5 alpha receptor inhibitors (5ARI), for chemoprevention of prostate cancer. Nevertheless, the desire to improve the therapeutic index, achieve synergy (5ARI may have only modest anticancer effects) and prevent the emergence of drug (androgen) resistance provide incentives for developing other effective agents and combinations. The availability of more than a dozen classes of noncytotoxic pharmaceutical and natural products already in clinical development create many opportunities for rational combination therapy. Several agent classes have a pharmacodynamic basis for combination with antiandrogens including antiproliferatives, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), proapoptotic antioxidant micronutrients and selective cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors. Many other rational pharmacodynamic combinations without antiandrogens are feasible. It is anticipated that in the future, a selective COX-2 inhibitor may be combined with other agent classes such as proapoptotic antioxidant micronutrients, receptor tyrosine kinase modulators, antiangiogenic modulators, antiproliferative/differentiating agents, NFkappaB modulators, IGF-1 modulators and other novel proapototic nonsteroidal drugs. A novel target for rational combinations is the hypermethylation of GST-PI leading to functional silencing of this key anticarcinogen defense enzyme in precursors (HGPIN) and prostate cancer. Factorial designs are well suited for evaluating the individual and combined effects of each agent in a single trial design. There are a number of moderate to high-risk cohorts and clinical models of primary and secondary prevention that can be employed in both short-term developmental (translational) trials for proof of biologic activity and in intermediate sized longer-term chemoprevention trials for proof of efficacy against prostate cancer. Strategic IEBs are needed to more efficiently monitor short-term biologic activity and validate efficacy. The emergence of new powerful tools such as gene chip cDNA microarrays for multiplex gene expression profiling and proteomic analysis of tissue based and secreted proteins will accelerate the identification of new molecular targets, strategic endpoints, cohorts at risk and the design of rational combination trials.
 ...
PMID:Chemoprevention of prostate cancer: current status and future directions. 1254 68

The development of chemoprevention strategies against prostate cancer would have the greatest overall impact both medically and economically against prostate cancer. Estrogens are required for prostate carcinogenesis. Estrogenic stimulation through estrogen receptor alpha in a milieu of decreasing androgens contributes significantly to the genesis of benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostate dysplasia, and prostate cancer. The ability of antiestrogens and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) to delay and to suppress prostate carcinogenesis is supported by preclinical, clinical, and epidemiological studies. SERMs have many features that make them attractive candidates for prostate cancer chemoprevention including their favorable safety profile and efficacy in preclinical prostate cancer models. The true clinical benefits of SERMs for chemoprevention to prevent prostate cancer, however, should continue to be investigated through human clinical trials. A phase IIb/III human clinical trial is currently evaluating safety and efficacy of toremifene, a SERM, in men who have high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.
 ...
PMID:Antiestrogens and selective estrogen receptor modulators reduce prostate cancer risk. 1275 92

Men with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) evident on prostate biopsy are at high risk for the eventual development of prostate cancer. The ability to reverse high-grade PIN may reduce the incidence or delay the development of prostate cancer. Toremifene (GTx-006, Acapodene trade mark ) is a selective estrogen receptor modulator that has been shown in the transgenic mouse model of prostate cancer to eliminate high-grade PIN and reduce the incidence of prostate cancer. This study was aimed at the evaluation of the safety and efficacy of toremifene in men diagnosed with high-grade PIN. This was an open-label, phase IIA clinical trial that enrolled 21 men (mean age, 64.7 years) with evidence of high-grade PIN on biopsy within 6 months of entry into the study. Eighteen of these men (86%) completed toremifene treatment (60 mg/day orally for 4 months) and then underwent follow-up prostate biopsy (8 cores) to determine high-grade PIN status. The effect of the drug on serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), percentage of free PSA, testosterone, estradiol, and quality of life was also measured. After toremifene treatment, 72% of these 18 men (vs. 17.9% of historical controls) had no high-grade PIN on subsequent prostate biopsies. Mean PSA trended higher, and percentage of free PSA was increased. Quality of life was not significantly affected by treatment. There were 3 mild adverse events, and no serious adverse events. Toremifene appeared to reduce high-grade PIN in this small, exploratory trial. The drug was well tolerated. A double-blind, dose-finding, randomized, placebo-controlled phase IIB/III study is currently open to further study toremifene's activity against high-grade PIN and prostate cancer incidence.
 ...
PMID:Phase IIA clinical trial to test the efficacy and safety of Toremifene in men with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. 1504 81

Exposure to estrogen in the neonatal period affects prostatic growth and leads to an increased incidence of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in later life. The effects of neonatal estrogen are clearly dependent on estrogen receptor (ER) alpha because they do not occur in ERalpha-knockout mice. Because ERalpha is expressed in the stroma, but not in the epithelium, of the adult ventral prostate, the concept of indirect estrogen effects through stromal signaling has been proposed. Here, we show that during the first 4 weeks of life, there are profound and rapid changes in the ER profile in the mouse ventral prostate. ERalpha is abundant in the stroma during week 1, but by week 2 it is exclusively epithelial, and then by week 4, ERalpha is lost and ERbeta is dominant in the prostatic epithelium. The presence of ERalpha is associated with a high proliferation index, and ERbeta is associated with quiescence. Branching morphogenesis was altered in ERalpha-/-, but not in ERbeta-/-, mice. We conclude that imprinting and branching morphogenesis of the ventral prostate are mediated by estrogen acting directly on epithelial and stromal ERalpha during the first 2 weeks of life.
 ...
PMID:Estrogen receptor alpha and imprinting of the neonatal mouse ventral prostate by estrogen. 1567 20

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the most established precursor of prostatic carcinoma. The presence of prominent nucleoli within an existing duct structure is an easy way to identify the disorder. Four main patterns of high-grade PIN (HGPIN) have been described: tufting, micropapillary, cribriform, and flat. In addition to exhibiting similar cytologic features, both HGPIN and prostatic carcinoma are associated with increased incidence and severity with age, and with high rates of occurrence in the peripheral zone of the prostate. HGPIN and prostate cancer share genetic and molecular markers as well, with PIN representing an intermediate stage between benign epithelium and invasive malignant carcinoma. The clinical significance of HGPIN is that it identifies patients at risk for malignancy. With the increased use of extended biopsy protocols, clinicians are more likely to identify HGPIN and less likely to miss concurrent carcinoma. Androgen deprivation therapy decreases the prevalence and extent of PIN, and may play a role in chemoprevention. Preliminary studies suggest that selective estrogen receptor modulators may also prevent the progression of HGPIN to prostate cancer.
 ...
PMID:Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: an overview. 1698 75

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is a precursor to invasive prostate cancer observed as an isolated entity in a growing subset of men undergoing prostate biopsy. The presence of HGPIN predicts an increased risk of 1) coexisting occult prostate cancer at baseline and 2) delayed progression to prostate cancer. As such, men with HGPIN represent a population at high risk for the development of prostate cancer. Because the current recommended therapy is observation and delayed-interval biopsies until cancer develops, a well-tolerated therapeutic agent capable of interrupting the progression of HGPIN to cancer is highly desirable. Given the known cancer-stimulatory effects of estrogens in the prostate, the use of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) to provide an antiestrogen effect represents a novel strategy for prostate cancer prevention. Recent phase II data from trials using toremifene in the treatment of men with HGPIN validate the use of SERMs as a rational and provocative strategy for the prevention of prostate cancer.
 ...
PMID:Drug therapies for eradicating high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in the prevention of prostate cancer. 1698 76


1 2 Next >>