Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0279530 (bone cancer)
1,036 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

Patients with bone cancer report severe pain and receive mu-opioids. We developed a family of peptidomimetic delta-agonists, one of which H2N-Tyr-dVal-Gly-Phe-Ala-OH ([dVal(L)2,Ala(L)5]E) binds with a 1700x affinity at the delta versus mu receptor. To examine the systemic analgesic efficacy of this delta-agonist versus morphine in osteosarcoma pain, osteosarcoma cells are injected into one femur of the anesthetized mouse. After 10-18 days, a decalcification of the injected femur occurs along with a pronounced tactile allodynia. IP morphine and [dVal(L)2,Ala(L)5]E produced a dose-dependent reversal of allodynia with the respective ED50 values being 5.3+/-1.9 mg/kg for morphine and 1.3+/-0.3 mg/kg for [dVal(L)2,Ala(L)5]E. Plotting peak effect versus area under the analgesic curve for doses of morphine and [dVal(L)2,Ala(L)5]E revealed overlapping curves suggesting that for a given effect, [dVal(L)2,Ala(L)5]E produced a similar duration of action as morphine. These effects were reversed by IP naloxone (3 mg/kg). IP naltrindole (1 mg/kg) preferentially reversed [dVal(L)2,Ala(L)5]E. The upper dose effects of morphine but not [dVal(L)2,Ala(L)5]E were limited by pronounced hyperactivity. No other effects were noted. These results show that IP [dVal(L)2,Ala(L)5]E through a delta receptor produces analgesia equal in efficacy to that of morphine but with a 4.5-fold greater potency. Over the doses examined, morphine actions were side effect limited. The delta side effects were not so limited, suggesting a favorable therapeutic ratio for delta-agonists in this pain model. These studies suggest that a systemically delivered delta-opioid agonist has pronounced analgesic properties on a preclinical cancer pain model.
...
PMID:Cancer-related bone pain is attenuated by a systemically available delta-opioid receptor agonist. 1654 11

Our preliminary experiment indicated the activation of with-nolysine kinases 1 (WNK1) in bone cancer pain (BCP) rats. This study aimed to investigate the underlying mechanisms via which WNK1 contributed to BCP. A rat model of BCP was induced by Walker-256 tumor cell implantation. WNK1 expression and distribution in the lumbar spinal cord dorsal horn and dorsal root ganglion were examined. SPS1-related proline/alanine-rich kinase (SPAK), oxidative stress-responsive kinase 1 (OSR1), sodium-potassium-chloride cotransporter 1 (NKCC1), and potassium-chloride cotransporter 2 (KCC2) expression were assessed. Pain behaviors including mechanical allodynia and movement-evoked pain were measured. BCP rats exhibited significant mechanical allodynia, with increased WNK1 expression in the dorsal horn and dorsal root ganglion neurons, elevated SPAK/OSR1 and NKCC1 expression in the dorsal root ganglion, and decreased KCC2 expression in the dorsal horn. WNK1 knock-down by small interfering alleviated mechanical allodynia and movement-evoked pain, inhibited WNK1-SPAK/OSR1-NKCC1 activities, and restored KCC2 expression. In addition, closantel (a WNK1-SPAK/OSR1 inhibitor) improved pain behaviors, downregulated SPAK/OSR1 and NKCC1 expression, and upregulated KCC2 expression in BCP rats. Activation of WNK1-SPAK/OSR1 signaling contributed to BCP in rats by modulating NKCC1 and KCC2 expression. Therefore, suppression of WNK1-SPAK/OSR1 may serve as a potential target for BCP therapy. PERSPECTIVE: Our findings demonstrated that the WNK1-SPAK/OSR1 signaling contributed to BCP in rats via regulating NKCC1 and KCC2. Suppressing this pathway reduced pain behaviors. Based on these findings, the WNK1-SPAK/OSR1 signaling may be a potential target for BCP therapy.
...
PMID:Suppression of WNK1-SPAK/OSR1 Attenuates Bone Cancer Pain by Regulating NKCC1 and KCC2. 3108 34

Ewing sarcoma is a pediatric bone cancer that expresses the chimeric protein EWSR1/FLI1. We previously demonstrated that EWSR1/FLI1 impairs the localization of Aurora B kinase to the midzone (the midline structure located between segregating chromosomes) during anaphase. While localization of Aurora B is essential for faithful cell division, it is unknown whether interference with midzone organization by EWSR1/FLI1 induces aneuploidy. To address this, we generated stable Tet-on inducible cell lines with EWSR1/FLI1, using CRISPR/Cas9 technology to integrate the transgene at the safe-harbor AAVS1 locus in DLD-1 cells. Induced cells expressing EWSR1/FLI1 displayed an increased incidence of aberrant localization of Aurora B, and greater levels of aneuploidy, compared to non-induced cells. Furthermore, the expression of EWSR1/FLI1-T79A, containing a threonine (Thr) to alanine (Ala) substitution at amino acid 79, failed to induce these phenotypes, indicating that Thr 79 is critical for EWSR1/FLI1 interference with mitosis. In contrast, the phosphomimetic mutant EWSR1/FLI1-T79D (Thr to aspartic acid (Asp)) retained the high activity as wildtype EWSR1/FLI1. Together, these findings suggest that phosphorylation of EWSR1/FLI1 at Thr 79 promotes the co-localization of EWSR1/FLI1 and Aurora B on the chromosomes during prophase and metaphase, and in addition, impairs the localization of Aurora B during anaphase, leading to induction of aneuploidy. This is the first demonstration of the mechanism for EWSR1/FLI1-dependent induction of aneuploidy associated with mitotic dysfunction, and the identification of the phosphorylation of the Thr 79 of EWSR1/FLI1 as a critical residue required for this induction.
...
PMID:Chromosomal localization of Ewing sarcoma EWSR1/FLI1 protein promotes the induction of aneuploidy. 3329 70