Gene/Protein Disease Symptom Drug Enzyme Compound
Pivot Concepts:   Target Concepts:
Query: UMLS:C0278488 (metastatic breast cancer)
 7,812 document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)

CA 15-3, MCA, and CA-549 levels were determined in the serum of 56 patients with metastatic breast cancer, all of whom had visceral and/or bone metastases. CA 15-3 was positive in the serum of 37 patients, MCA in the serum of 38 patients, and CA-549 in the serum of 39 patients. All 3 markers were positive in 36 patients, and all 3 were negative in 16 patients. In the serum of 4 patients only 1 or 2 markers were slightly elevated. Thus, the results were identical in 52 of the 56 patients. It is concluded that CA 15-3, MCA, and CA-549 are sensitive markers for advanced breast cancer, and that no advantage can be expected by combining them.
 ...
PMID:A comparison of CA-549 with CA 15-3 and MCA in patients with metastatic breast cancer. 139 Mar 7

MCA, CA 15-3, CEA and CA 125 were determined in the serum of 49 patients with metastatic breast cancer and 38 patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of other primary sites. By using the 99th percentile of the normal value distribution as the cut-off point, the positive predictive value (PV+) was found to be 85% (95% CI 76-94) for MCA, and 71% (95% CI 61-81) for CA 15-3. When receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed, the PV+ for CA 15-3 was increased to 82% (95% CI 72-92), using 60 U ml-1 as the cut-off point. With the exception of two patients who had a slightly elevated MCA, MCA and CA 15-3 identified the same patients with breast cancer. By combining a positive MCA or CA 15-3 with a negative CEA and CA 125, further improvement of the PV+ could be achieved; 100% (95% CI 91-100). We conclude that MCA and CA 15-3 may play a useful role in discrimination between patients with metastatic breast cancer and those with adenocarcinoma of other primary sites.
 ...
PMID:The value of MCA, CA 15-3, CEA and CA-125 for discrimination between metastatic breast cancer and adenocarcinoma of other primary sites. 204 Aug 73

The monoclonal antibodies that define the tumor markers CA15.3, MCA, CAM26 and CAM29 were found to react with coexisting epitopes present on mucin-like glycoproteins. Despite their immunologic relationship, the markers showed distinct concentration levels in various body fluids. Particularly, MCA and CAM26 were high in urine and amniotic fluid. Sera collected from pregnant or lactating women and especially human milk samples contained considerable amounts of CAM29 and MCA, but comparably small quantities of CAM26 and CA15.3. The concentrations of CA15.3, MCA, CAM26 and CAM29 were correlated in serum samples from patients with metastatic breast cancer. The discrepancy between immunologic relationship and dissimilar biologic behavior could be explained by a limited coexistence of epitopes on subsets of heterogeneous polymorphic mucins. All mucin markers which were investigated showed improved sensitivity for metastatic breast cancer compared with the established marker CEA.
 ...
PMID:CA15.3, MCA, CAM26, CAM29 are members of a polymorphic family of mucin-like glycoproteins. 206 12

The objective of this review is to determine clinical practical guidelines for the use of serum tumor markers in the care of breast cancer patients outside of clinical trials. Mucin antigens (CA 15-3, MCA, CA 549) and CEA are established markers in breast cancer. Owing to their low sensitivity, none of these markers can be recommended for screening, diagnosis or staging. During follow-up, increasing marker levels may indicate recurrence 3-6 months earlier than clinical and radiological examinations in about 40-50% of patients. However, the clinical benefit of this lead-time is not established. Tumor markers are able to monitor response to treatment in 70-80% of patients with metastatic breast cancer. However, paradoxical changes of the markers especially in the beginning of treatment, the insufficient concordance with tumor activity in 20-30% of the women, and the lack of curative therapy regimens limit the prospective clinical use of the markers in the individual patient. Therefore, marker changes require confirmation by radiological methods in most cases. The present data are insufficient to recommend routine use of tumor markers alone for monitoring breast cancer patients after primary treatment or during palliative therapy. However, in the absence of readily measurable disease (e. g. bone metastases) continuously increasing marker levels may be used to indicate treatment failure. If high-dose chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer renders to be effective, the clinical impact of tumor markers will increase considerably. Until that time, the analytical performance and the sensitivity of the established marker assays should be improved, and the clinical role of newer marker tests (TPS, CA 27.29) should be evaluated.
 ...
PMID:[Considerations in rational use of tumor markers in breast carcinoma]. 962 26