Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Pivot Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Target Concepts:
Gene/Protein
Disease
Symptom
Drug
Enzyme
Compound
Query: UMLS:C0278488 (
metastatic breast cancer
)
7,812
document(s) hit in 31,850,051 MEDLINE articles (0.00 seconds)
The objective of this review is to determine clinical practical guidelines for the use of serum tumor markers in the care of breast cancer patients outside of clinical trials. Mucin antigens (CA 15-3, MCA, CA 549) and CEA are established markers in breast cancer. Owing to their low sensitivity, none of these markers can be recommended for screening, diagnosis or staging. During follow-up, increasing marker levels may indicate recurrence 3-6 months earlier than clinical and radiological examinations in about 40-50% of patients. However, the clinical benefit of this lead-time is not established. Tumor markers are able to monitor response to treatment in 70-80% of patients with
metastatic breast cancer
. However, paradoxical changes of the markers especially in the beginning of treatment, the insufficient concordance with tumor activity in 20-30% of the women, and the lack of curative therapy regimens limit the prospective clinical use of the markers in the individual patient. Therefore, marker changes require confirmation by radiological methods in most cases. The present data are insufficient to recommend routine use of tumor markers alone for monitoring breast cancer patients after primary treatment or during palliative therapy. However, in the absence of readily
measurable disease
(e. g. bone metastases) continuously increasing marker levels may be used to indicate treatment failure. If high-dose chemotherapy in
metastatic breast cancer
renders to be effective, the clinical impact of tumor markers will increase considerably. Until that time, the analytical performance and the sensitivity of the established marker assays should be improved, and the clinical role of newer marker tests (TPS, CA 27.29) should be evaluated.
...
PMID:[Considerations in rational use of tumor markers in breast carcinoma]. 962 26
Results from our previous phase II study demonstrating high efficacy and low toxicity for a weekly schedule of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin in intensively pretreated patients with
metastatic breast cancer
prompted addition of paclitaxel and cisplatin to this regimen for a phase II study of outpatient first-line treatment of
metastatic breast cancer
. (MBC). Twenty-eight patients with
metastatic breast cancer
have been evaluated. Pretreatment comprised adjuvant CTX in 24 out of 28 patients, but no prior CTX for MBC. Patients were treated with 5-FU 2 g/m2 (24 h infusion) plus leucovorin 500 mg/m2 (2 h infusion prior to 5-FU) weekly for 6 weeks (days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36); in addition, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3 h infusion) was administered on days 0 and 21, and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 (1 h infusion) on days 1 and 22 prior to 5-FU/leucovorin, repeated every 50 days. All patients were treated as outpatients using Port-a-Cath systems and portable pumps. Aside from common total alopecia, neutropenia was common but only of short duration. No episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred. Non-hematologic toxicities (NCl CTC grade, percent of patients) consisted of mild to moderate diarrhea (2+3, 47%), mucositis (2, 14%), and nausea and vomiting (2+3, 60%). Out of 28 patients with bidimensionally
measurable disease
25% (seven out of 28) achieved a CR, 57% (16 out of 28) achieved a PR, 11% (three out of 28) had a SD and 7% (two out of 28) had a PD. Overall RR was 82% (95% confidence interval 66-100%). Median remission duration was 8 months, median time to progression 9 months and median survival time 28 months with a median follow-up of 21 months. We conclude that the combination of paclitaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU/leucovorin is an effective non-anthracycline-containing regimen for the first-line treatment of MBC.
...
PMID:Phase II study with cisplatin and paclitaxel in combination with weekly high-dose 24 h infusional 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. 962 30
A single high-dose cycle of chemotherapy with stem cell support can produce disease-free survival of 15-20% for at least 3 years in women with responding
stage IV breast cancer
. North American Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant Registry data suggest that a complete response (CR) is the single most important prognostic factor associated with prolonged disease-free survival. Therefore, if sequential high-dose chemotherapy can increase the CR rate, then perhaps an increased proportion of patients will remain disease free. Women with at least a partial response (PR) to induction chemotherapy received three separate high-dose cycles of chemotherapy with peripheral blood progenitor support and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The first intensification was a dose escalation of paclitaxel (400-825 mg/ m2), the second intensification was melphalan (180 mg/m2), and the third intensification consisted of 6000 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide (1500 mg/m2/day), 500 mg/m2 thiotepa (125 mg/m2/day), and 800 mg/m2 carboplatin (200 mg/m2/day; CTCb). Thirty-six women were enrolled and 31 completed all three cycles. After the paclitaxel infusion most patients developed reversible predominantly sensory neuropathy. Of the 19 patients with
measurable disease
, 6 converted to CR, 7 converted to a PR* (the complete resolution of all soft tissue or visceral disease with sclerosis of prior lytic bone lesions), and 2 had a further PR for an overall response rate of 79%. Two patients had no further response and disease in two patients progressed, and thus they were taken off the study before CTCb. Seventy-eight percent are progression-free at a median follow-up of 14 months (range, 3-24+). Three sequential cycles of high-dose chemotherapy are feasible and were administered in this study with no mortality. Single agent paclitaxel at doses up to 825 mg/m2 were well tolerated with moderate reversible toxicity.
...
PMID:Phase I trial of sequential high-dose chemotherapy with escalating dose paclitaxel, melphalan, and cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin with peripheral blood progenitor support in women with responding metastatic breast cancer. 967 43
Our purpose was to determine the feasibility of a regimen of multiple, rapidly cycled courses of high-dose alkylating agents, including paired courses of escalating doses of thiotepa, supported by peripheral blood progenitor cells and filgrastim, in patients with responding
stage IV breast cancer
. The regimen consisted of two courses of cyclophosphamide (3.0 g/m2/course) followed by two courses of thiotepa (500-700 mg/m2/course). All courses were supported by filgrastim. Leukaphereses were performed after each cyclophosphamide course to harvest peripheral blood progenitors (PBPs) for use as rescue following thiotepa administration. The planned interval for all courses was 14 days. Forty-two patients were enrolled. Thirty-eight received all four courses, and four did not receive the second thiotepa cycle due to poor PBP mobilization. The maximum dose of thiotepa that was administered was 700 mg/m2 x 2. At this dose, one patient developed encephalopathy, which resolved over several weeks. The median number of days to an absolute neutrophil count of 0.5 x 10(9)/liter after PBP reinfusion for cycles 1 and 2 of thiotepa were 9 (range, 7-16) and 9 (range, 8-13) days, respectively. The corresponding values for platelet recovery to >20 x 10(9)/liter were 11 (range, 8-39) and 12 (range, 10-28) days, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. Hospitalization was required following 28 of 84 cyclophosphamide courses and 76 of 80 thiotepa courses. Four patients developed grade III-IV mucositis. The median interval between courses of treatment was 15 (range, 13-29) days. Of 19 patients who entered the protocol with
measurable disease
in partial response from prior therapy, 8 (42%) achieved complete response following the high-dose therapy. Nine (21%) of 42 remain progression free at a median follow-up of 28 (range, 20-32) months. Therefore, we concluded that the administration of multiple, rapidly cycled courses of high-dose alkylating agents is feasible.
...
PMID:Rapidly cycled courses of high-dose alkylating agents supported by filgrastim and peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer. 981 21
We assessed the value of positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) and 16alpha-[18F]fluoro-17beta-estradiol (FES) in women with breast cancer for predicting response to systemic therapy. Results of FES-PET were correlated with estrogen receptor (ER) status. Forty-three women with locally advanced or
metastatic breast cancer
underwent FDG-PET and FES-PET prior to institution of systemic therapy. All patients had
measurable disease
and had tumors submitted for ER determination. Cancers were considered functionally hormone sensitive if the standardized uptake value of the lesion on FES-PET was >/=1.0 (FES+) and hormone resistant if the standardized uptake value was <1.0 (FES-). Information obtained by FES-PET was compared with the results of ER assays. The tumor response to chemotherapy and hormonal therapy was correlated with intensity of uptake by both FDG-PET and FES-PET. The ER status of the breast cancers was negative (ER-) in 20 patients, positive (ER+) in 21 patients, and unknown in 2 patients. All 20 of the ER- tumors were also FES-. However, of the 21 ER+ tumors, 16 were FES+ and 5 were FES-. Thirty patients were treated initially with chemotherapy, and 21 (70%) demonstrated objective responses. We were unable to correlate the response to chemotherapy with information obtained by FDG-PET or FES-PET. Thirteen patients were treated with hormone therapy, and 8 (61%) responded to that therapy. Only 1 of the 5 patients whose tumors were ER+ but FES- received hormone therapy, and this treatment resulted in disease stabilization only. Multiple sites of disease were assessed by FES-PET in 17 patients with
metastatic breast cancer
. Functional hormone sensitivity, defined by FES-PET, was concordant with multiple lesions in 13 (76%). Ten patients with locally advanced breast cancer developed recurrent disease. The initial site of recurrence was the breast in 5 patients. Of the 5 patients with systemic recurrence, 4 had disease detected at the site of recurrence on the pretreatment FDG-PET study but not detected on pretreatment computed tomography. In our experience, FDG-PET imaging is more sensitive than conventional imaging methods, including computed tomography, in staging women with breast cancer. When compared with the in vitro assay of ER status, FES-PET has an apparent sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 100%. Our finding of a subset of patients who have tumors that are ER+ and FES- suggests that the functional assessment of hormone sensitivity by PET imaging can identify patients with ER+ disease whose tumors are likely to be hormone refractory.
...
PMID:Positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and 16alpha-[18F]fluoro-17beta-estradiol in breast cancer: correlation with estrogen receptor status and response to systemic therapy. 981 53
Metastatic breast cancer
is commonly thought to be incurable. Treatment advances have resulted in increased response rates, although such responses are often more palliative than curative. A regimen of continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5FU) or continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil with paclitaxel was studied in patients with
metastatic breast cancer
and
measurable disease
. The induction therapy preceded high-dose ifosfamide, carboplatin, and melphalan in a phase I-II trial. Eighty-seven patients were enrolled in the trial. Forty-five received continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil as induction and 42 received 5-fluorouracil and paclitaxel. The single-agent, continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil cohort had one complete response (2%) and eight partial responses (18%). The combination continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil and 3-hour paclitaxel regimen produced four complete responses (10%) and 17 partial responses (40%). The combination regimen of continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil with bolus paclitaxel was well tolerated and with a 50% response rate, is an active regimen for women with
metastatic breast cancer
.
...
PMID:The addition of paclitaxel to continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil is an active regimen for metastatic breast cancer. 985 52
Considering the recommended dose of the docetaxel/doxorubicin combination (75 mg/m2 and 50 mg/m2, respectively), we decided to proceed with a pilot program in untreated
metastatic breast cancer
aimed at defining a multidrug regimen that could be later randomly compared with a standard doxorubicin-containing polychemotherapy regimen with equidoses of doxorubicin such as the FAC protocol (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) in first-line metastatic and adjuvant treatment of breast cancer patients. We proceeded with a pilot phase II study of the TAC combination, which consists of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 as a 1-hour infusion preceded by doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, both given as an intravenous bolus. Three hundred seventy courses were delivered in 54 anthracycline-naive patients, among whom 62% had visceral metastases. Median relative dose intensity was above 98% for all drugs. Grade 4 neutropenia was the main toxicity (70% of cycles) and the incidence of febrile neutropenia and infection was acceptable (6% and 0.8% of cycles, respectively). Acute and chronic extrahematologic toxicities were mild, mostly grade 2, and the docetaxel-specific toxicities (fluid retention, nail changes, etc) were not major clinical problems; no patient was discontinued due to fluid retention. The major response rate was 73% overall and 79% in
measurable disease
. Time to progression and survival are still under evaluation. The TAC combination is an active and well-tolerated regimen that is the basis of two currently open, pivotal, randomized phase III trials comparing TAC with FAC in the metastatic and adjuvant treatment of breast cancer.
...
PMID:Taxane-based three-drug combination in metastatic and adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. 986 9
Motivated by the observation of preclinical synergy, a Phase I dose escalation study of edatrexate in combination with a 3-h paclitaxel infusion was performed in patients with advanced breast cancer to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of edatrexate and the toxicities associated with this combination and to report preliminary observations of efficacy with this novel combination. Thirty-six patients were enrolled in this Phase I trial. Thirty-five eligible patients were treated every 21 days in cohorts of at least three patients and were assessable for toxicity. One patient was ineligible due to hyperbilirubinemia. Stepwise dose escalations of edatrexate were administered until grade >3 nonhematological dose-limiting toxicities were reported. The initial dose level of edatrexate was 180 mg/m2; subsequent cohorts were treated with escalating doses of edatrexate (210, 240, 270, 300, 350, and 400 mg/m2). Edatrexate was administered by i.v. infusion over 1 h. Paclitaxel was administered 24 h later at a fixed dose of 175 mg/m2 as a 3-h infusion with standard dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine premedication. The MTD of edatrexate was reached at the 350 mg/m2 level in this study. Grade 3 diarrhea was seen in one patient at the 300 and 400 mg/m2 dose levels, requiring dose reductions. Two patients experienced grade 4 stomatitis at the 400 mg/m2 dose level and also required dose reduction, establishing the MTD as 350 mg/m2. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting were noted in two of three patients at the highest dose level. Of 35 patients, 4 patients reported grade 3 myalgias and 1 patient reported grade 3 neurosensory complaints, which were seen mostly at the 350 and 400 mg/m2 dose levels; however, 1 patient reported grade 3 myalgias at 180 mg/m2. No cumulative neurotoxicity was observed, and no patient experienced an allergic reaction to paclitaxel. In 23 patients with bidimensionally
measurable disease
, there were four complete (17%) and seven partial responses, with an overall response rate of 48% (95% confidence interval, 27-69%). All of the responses were seen in patients who had not received prior chemotherapy for stage IV disease. The median duration of response was not assessable because many responding patients went on to receive high-dose chemotherapy treatment with stem cell support. The combination of edatrexate and paclitaxel for treatment of
metastatic breast cancer
is a feasible and safe regimen. The MTD of edatrexate was 350 mg/m2 when combined with a 3-h infusion of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) given 24 h later. Activity was noted even among patients who had relapsed shortly after receiving methotrexate- and/or doxorubicin-containing adjuvant regimens. Additional studies evaluating the sequences and dosing schema for this combination are warranted to improve the response proportion and define the duration of the response.
...
PMID:Phase I study of escalating doses of edatrexate in combination with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. 1003 75
The purpose of this trial was to determine the effects of paclitaxel in patients with newly diagnosed
metastatic breast cancer
scheduled to receive high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support. Eighty-four patients received anthracycline-based induction and two doses of paclitaxel at 170 mg/m2 (n = 52) or 250 mg/m2 (n = 32). Eighty-two (98%) received cyclophosphamide and etoposide (n = 50) or paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide (n = 32) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells, and 79 (94%) received cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin with peripheral blood stem cell support. One patient (1%) died of infection and 56 (67%) died of progressive disease. For patients with
measurable disease
, the complete response rate was 21% after induction and 29% after paclitaxel (p = 0.54). Results were compared with those of 125 patients who received the same sequence of therapy without paclitaxel. The complete response rate after high-dose chemotherapy was 54% for patients receiving paclitaxel and 62% for those not receiving paclitaxel (p = 0.60). The probabilities of overall survival and event-free survival at 3 years for patients receiving paclitaxel were 46% and 24%, respectively, compared with 54% and 22%, respectively, for patients not receiving paclitaxel (p = 0.62). Further trials evaluating this dose and schedule of paclitaxel in patients with
metastatic breast cancer
receiving high-dose chemotherapy are not warranted.
...
PMID:Single-agent paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell support. 1019 51
Many patients with
metastatic breast cancer
receive several types of chemotherapy, although it is recognized that there is a declining probability of response. A major problem confronts oncologists in deciding when to recommend to patients that no further chemotherapy should be given. To address this problem we have assessed prospectively, health-related quality of life (HRQL) and costs of health care for 35 patients with
metastatic breast cancer
receiving third line chemotherapy in a representative clinical situation. HRQL and utilities were measured longitudinally using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and the time trade-off method. Patients received a median of 2 cycles of chemotherapy and lived a median of 4.3 months. Twelve patients (34%) had substantial (> 10 points) improvement in the Global QL subscale and more than 30% of patients had similar changes in emotional and social function. The median baseline utility score was 0.9 and utilities correlated poorly with HRQL subscale. Eighteen patients had
measurable disease
and one patients experienced a partial response. Grade 3/4 toxicity occurred in 30% of patients. The average cost of management from study entry to death was CDN$ 17,260 (approximately US$ 12,000). Sixteen percent of this cost was associated directly with chemotherapy while hospital admissions and outpatient visits accounted for 50% and 14% of the total cost respectively. We conclude that: (a) many patients receiving third line chemotherapy maintain or improve indices of HRQL despite short survival and a low response rate: this might be due to chemotherapy, placebo effect, or a shift in frame of reference for HRQL; (b) patients were unwilling to trade quantity for quality of life; and (c) response rates and survival may be overestimated in patients selected for clinical trials.
...
PMID:Third line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: an evaluation of quality of life and cost. 1044 20
<< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Next >>